Experimental Analysis of Capillary Diameter in Paper and Textile Fabric

Conducted by a team named RFMS, the experiment aimed to estimate the diameter of capillaries in paper and textile fabric through experimental methods. The theory analysis lacked clarity, but the experiment was well-structured, exploring the effects of temperature and density on capillary behavior. The opponent provided insightful questions and critiques, while the summary and conclusions highlighted the shortcomings in discussions and explanations. The marks given were 1 out of 10 for the reporter and 8 for the opponent.

• Capillary diameter
• Experimental analysis
• Paper
• Textile fabric
• RFMS

fennaw Follow

Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Presentation Transcript

1. Made by NAME, for Team RFMS Capillaries Estimate experimentally the diameter of capillaries in paper or textile fabric.

2. Theory Theory - + No demonstration No clear explanation of capillary inside the paper No qualitative explanation No answer to question what is capillary effect No hypothesis No explanation of theory No affection of weatability Little theory 1 2 3 4

3. Experiment Experiment - + We see clear setup Clear experiment Investigated affection of temperature and density Various materials No affection of wettability No controlling points of experiment No explanation of type of paper and how it affect No experiment to measure one capillary no explanation how amount of capillary will effect How the depth of the paper rolls into the height 1 2 3 4

4. Opponent Opponent - + Could ask more clarifying questions to ask More questions Haven't explained the phenomenon Good questions and most good question about formula Good point about explanation 1 2 3 4

5. Summaries and conclusions Summaries and conclusions Reporter(bad discussion ) Explaining experiment not Phenomenon Changes of diameter Dependence in formula Different absorbition How temperature of water Opponent Physical phenomenon Different sizes of material Why density influence Different density Our opinion Reporter do not provide good Discussion Opponent could explain the pheno Menon if reporter do not understa Nd 1 2 3 4

6. Marks Reporter 1 baursak out of 10 Opponent 8 baursak

7. Made by NAME, for Team RFMS Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.