ERC Perfect Pitch Contest Overview
The ERC Perfect Pitch Contest challenges contestants to present a problem or opportunity aligned with their ERC's strategic vision in 90 seconds with a single PowerPoint slide. Judging criteria, prize levels, and results are outlined, emphasizing clear communication, problem-solving, and alignment with the ERC's mission. Creativity is encouraged, with key elements of problem, solution, and impact to be effectively conveyed. The visual anchor slide is crucial for aiding judges' recollection of pitches. Call-to-action and engagement are essential for a successful presentation.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ERC Perfect Pitch Contest Contestants in the ERC Perfect Pitch Contest will pitch a problem or opportunity connected with their ERC s strategic vision in a clear, compelling manner in 90 seconds. Contestants will use one PowerPoint slide to assist in their pitch. Purpose of Slide: Serve as a visual anchor to help judges remember the different pitches Visual complement to the pitch Format is Flexible: Students are encouraged to be creative Although pitch must address problem/opportunity, solution, and impact, slide content is not prescriptive see next slide for a template highlighting the only required elements Videos, animations, and props are prohibited
Short title of Perfect Pitch Project Presenter Name, Presenter s ERC
2017 Judging Criteria Presenter: First Last Name Pitch Title: Full ERC Name, ERC Acronym: ERC Home University, Location: Student Home University, Location: Degree Program: Advisor: Score Poor (0 points) Fair Good (3-5 points) Excellent (6-10 points) (1-2 points) Problem Statement Did not clearly explain the problem Problem explained, but no connection to applications Problem and connection to application explained Clearly and simply described the problem and application Exhibits clear expertise in how solution connects to problem Clear, compelling description of benefits Proposed solution Did not clearly explain the solution Solution explained but not well connected to problem Solution explained and connected to problem. Broader Impact Mission Fit (for local competitions only) Did not discuss benefits of the technology Minimal description of benefits Adequate description of benefits Does not fit within ERC mission Fit within ERC mission is tenuous or unclear Fit within ERC mission is appropriate Fit within ERC mission is clear and logical Call to action is clear and well articulated but only somewhat compelling Call to action leaves you wanting to get started or yearning to learn more Anchor is visually engaging, informative, and easily facilitates the intended message Call to action is unclear or not compelling Call to Action Call to action not included Anchor negatively detracts or distracts from the message of the pitch Anchor complements the pitch & helps the judges remember the pitch Anchor is a generic and not particularly memorable Visual Anchor Lacks confidence and enthusiasm Mildly uncomfortable with audience Makes eye contact and engages audience Poise/Style Enthusiasm is contagious Judge # ____ Comments Total Points: Strengths Suggestions
Prize Levels 1st Prize $5000 2nd Prize $2000 3rd Prize $1000
2017 Perfect Pitch Contest Results Judges Concurrence Statement: Contestant Name Judges Scores The assembled team of judges in the 2017 ERC- Wide Perfect Pitch Contest have discussed the merits of each presentation and concur with the average scores posted here and the final selection of the winners in this competition, as indicated in the table to the left. ERC #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ave. Rank ERC #1 Student #1 ERC #2 Student #2 ERC #3 Student #3 ERC #4 Student #4 Judges Name Concurrence Signature ERC #5 Student #5 Judge #1 ERC #6 Student #6 Judge #2 ERC #7 Student #7 Judge #3 ERC #8 Student #8 Judge #4 ERC #9 Student #9 Judge #5 ERC #10 Student #10 ERC #11 Student #11 Judge #6 ERC #12 Student #12 Judge #7 ERC #13 Student #13 ERC #14 Student #14 Judging Instructions 1. Score each contestant. 2. Enter average score in AVE column. 3. Rank the top 3 and sign with judges concurrence. 4. Place in envelope and seal. ERC #15 Student #15 ERC #16 Student #16 ERC #17 Student #17
