Enhancing Medical Leadership Through Deliberative Dialogue
undefined
Exploring a 12-Month Call to Translate Medical
Leadership into Action
Explore new ways of
acting together to:
Grow
medical
leadership
in
member countries
Enhance the
capacity of medical
leaders
to
influence health
reform in our
respective
jurisdictions
Mining our knowledge...
Demonstrate the
power
of dialogue.
Introduce
Deliberative
Dialogue
process that
harnesses collective
knowledge for action.
Gain input into a
potential activity to
stimulate
collective
action
on issues of
health reform.
Conversations often are characterized by
advocacy
and
debate
whereby one person tries to impose his
or her ideas on others, or win the argument.
Dialogue is characterized by
open
and
honest
inquiry
—asking questions of clarification and
understanding, rather than advocating for one’s
own point of view.
There is a true desire to
co-create
understanding
and
meaning
, by building on each other’s
contributions.
Key skills of dialogue
Bertha Fries
McMaster University Health
forum’
Deliberative
Dialogue
Process
Dialogues consist of a
multi-stage process that
aim to ensure relevant
evidence on
pressing
health concerns
is used to
fuel action for improving
health outcomes through
collective problem solving.
Bulletin of the World
Health Organization:
Evidence briefs and
deliberative dialogues:
perceptions and
intentions to act on what
was learnt.
Kaelan A Moat
a
,
John N
Lavis
b
, Sarah J Clancy
c
,
Fadi El-Jardali
d
, Tomas
Pantoja (2013).
lavisj@mcmaster.ca
Evidence-informed
Systems
perspective
Structured, real
dialogue of
main
actors
who can
“make a difference”
Commitment to
action
8—12 m. process
Identification of topic
that needs collective
action.
Secretariat
Issue Brief
(Systematic
review of literature and
key informants)
Stakeholder group
dialogue (full day)
Summary report and KM
strategies
No-one has all the
expertise to solve
the issues we face
Wicked issues in
health care
Trans-disciplinary
problems (Max-
Neef)
Require knowledge
arbitrage and
collective action
Medicine
Business
Social
Sciences
Political
science
As well as difference professional
world views...
1.
Is
dialogue
—and the practices of dialogue as described in this
session—often employed in your organization? Why or why not?
2.
Consider the
challenges of health reform
in your country. What
kinds of
knowledge disciplines
do those challenges require to
understand, and resolve?
3.
Does the idea of a
Deliberative Dialogue
—or a version of the same
construct—have the potential of helping physicians in your country
shape health reform at a policy level? Is this a process you would
champion in your jurisdiction?
4.
If you were advising the
WFMM strategic planning group (
that is
meeting tomorrow), as to whether or not to consider building a DD
into their future strategies, what would you say? How might they
do it?
A
&
Q
Thank you
Graham Dickson,
gdickson@royalroads.ca
Explore a 12-month initiative to translate medical leadership into action through collaborative efforts, capacity building, and harnessing collective knowledge. Discover the power of Deliberative Dialogue in fostering understanding and co-creating meaning to drive collective action in health reform.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Exploring a 12-Month Call to Translate Medical Leadership into Action
Explore new ways of acting together to: Grow medical leadership member countries Enhance the capacity of medical leaders influence health reform in our respective jurisdictions medical leadership in capacity of medical leaders to Mining our knowledge...
Demonstrate the power Introduce Deliberative Dialogue harnesses collective knowledge for action. Gain input into a potential activity to stimulate collective action health reform. power of dialogue. Deliberative Dialogue process that collective action on issues of
Conversations often are characterized by advocacy and debate whereby one person tries to impose his or her ideas on others, or win the argument. Dialogue is characterized by open and honest inquiry asking questions of clarification and understanding, rather than advocating for one s own point of view. There is a true desire to co-create understanding and meaning, by building on each other s contributions.
Key skills of dialogue Bertha Fries
McMaster University Health forum Deliberative Dialogue Dialogues consist of a multi-stage process that aim to ensure relevant evidence on pressing health concerns fuel action for improving health outcomes through collective problem solving. Deliberative Bulletin of the World Health Organization: Bulletin of the World Health Organization: Dialogue Process Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. pressing health concerns is used to Kaelan A Moata, John N Lavis Fadi El-Jardalid, Tomas Pantoja (2013). John N Lavisb, Sarah J Clancyc, lavisj@mcmaster.ca
Evidence-informed Systems perspective Structured, real dialogue of main actors make a difference Commitment to action main actors who can
812 m. process Identification of topic that needs collective action. Secretariat Issue Brief review of literature and key informants) Stakeholder group dialogue (full day) Summary report and KM strategies Issue Brief (Systematic
No-one has all the expertise to solve the issues we face Wicked issues in health care Trans-disciplinary problems (Max- Neef) Require knowledge arbitrage and collective action Political science Business Social Sciences Medicine As well as difference professional world views...
Is dialogue session often employed in your organization? Why or why not? dialogue and the practices of dialogue as described in this 1. Consider the challenges of health reform kinds of knowledge disciplines understand, and resolve? challenges of health reform in your country. What knowledge disciplines do those challenges require to 2. Does the idea of a Deliberative Dialogue construct have the potential of helping physicians in your country shape health reform at a policy level? Is this a process you would champion in your jurisdiction? Deliberative Dialogue or a version of the same 3. If you were advising the WFMM strategic planning group ( meeting tomorrow), as to whether or not to consider building a DD into their future strategies, what would you say? How might they do it? WFMM strategic planning group (that is 4.
Thank you Graham Dickson, gdickson@royalroads.ca
