Distinguished Undergraduate Research Honors Process & Requirements
D
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
i
s
h
e
d
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
a
d
u
a
t
e
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
H
o
n
o
r
s
Explanation of the Process and Requirements
Drs. Todd J. Pritchard and Eric von Wettberg
2023 CALS Academic Awards Committee Co-Chairperson
D
U
R
H
o
n
o
r
s
R
e
c
o
g
n
i
t
i
o
n
•
Open to all seniors in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
•
Applicants for consideration in the DUR Honors process must submit a proposal on or
before the deadlines outlined in the DUR Guidelines (
) for review by the CALS Academic
Awards Committee.distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur-programhttps://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals-
•
If selected to continue, applicants must complete original research which may result in
furthering the knowledge in the applicant's field of study.
•
Once completed the applicant must present their findings in a seminar setting which is
attended by their DUR review committee.
•
Following submittal of all required materials, the CALS Academic Awards Committee will
evaluate the research and determine if DUR Honors are to be awarded
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
•
Attend Meeting
•
Identify Mentor
•
Identify Project
•
Identify Review Committee
•
Develop well written proposal with aid of
mentor and review committee
•
Submit Proposal to CALS Academic Awards
Committee
•
Proposal reviewed by CALS Academic
Awards Committee
•
Proposal Defense (if required)
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
•
Complete work identified in the proposal
•
Submit progress report as required
•
Write up your project
•
Submit write up to your review committee
•
Presentation of research to review committee
and others
•
Make changes suggested by review committee
•
Obtain signed review committee form endorsing
your work for DUR Honors
•
Submit revised manuscript, review committee
form and from your mentor.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
M
e
n
t
o
r
•
Applicant must identify a mentor with
whom they will complete the proposed
project.
•
Mentor may be:
•
University of Vermont faculty member
•
University of Vermont Larner College of
Medicine faculty and/or research
associate
•
Community member but only if they are
the person under which you will conduct
the research for the project
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
•
Proposals may be classic wet bench lab research
•
Proposals may include the mining of Big Data
•
Proposals may include surveys of a scientific
nature
•
Proposals which are literature reviews do not
meet the requirements of the DUR Honors
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
W
e
l
l
W
r
i
t
t
e
n
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
•
Proposal must be rigorous in nature,
•
Proposal must, if appropriate, use proper scientific
nomenclature,
•
Proposal must use proper grammar and contain no
spelling mistakes,
•
Proposal must include a clearly articulated
hypothesis/question of inquiry and the process by
which that hypothesis will be evaluated
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
W
e
l
l
W
r
i
t
t
e
n
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
•
Proposal must contain, if appropriate, identification of specific
statistical analysis which will be applied to data,
•
Proposal must identify the journal in which the results could be
presented,
•
Proposal must have been reviewed by all review committee
members,
•
Failure to meet any of the above is reason for the project to be
rejected outright by the CALS Academic Awards Committee.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
W
e
l
l
W
r
i
t
t
e
n
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
•
Proposal must contain a review of related studies and other
relevant literature.
•
This review should include 8-10 references, and not more
than 15
•
The review should not be taken directly from a faculty-
written grant proposal or literature review, but be student
work.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
Y
o
u
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
•
Applicant must identify a total of three (3) individuals to be on their
review committee
•
Two (2) or more members of the review committee must be
UVM Faculty,
•
One (1) or more members of the review committee must be
CALS Faculty,
•
One (1) member of the review committee may be a community
member who has been identified to be involved with the
research, or may be a faculty member at a different
University/College who has a demonstratable knowledge of the
area of research undertaken by the applicant
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
R
e
v
i
e
w
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
•
Review committee is charged with reviewing and
suggesting editorial reviews of the proposal before
it is submitted for DUR Honors Committee review.
•
Applicants should NOT present a proposal to the
CALS Academic Awards Committee which has not
been evaluated by all of the review committee
members.
•
Following the completion of a students work, the
review committee is responsible for reading the
final manuscript and giving feedback for changes
which need to be made
•
Attend the public presentation of the students work
•
Sign form indicating they believe the completed
work meets the standards of research in the field
and is deserving of DUR Honors recognition.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
S
u
b
m
i
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
t
o
C
A
L
S
A
c
a
d
e
m
i
c
A
w
a
r
d
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
•
Complete application materials should be
submitted to the CALS Dean’s Office at the
email indicated in the DUR Guidelines
(
https://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals-distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur-
program
)
•
Cover sheet of proposal
•
Letter of support from your project mentor
•
List of members of your review committee
•
Failure to supply ALL materials by the date
and time indicated in the DUR Guidelines
will result in automatic removal from
consideration for DUR Honors recognition
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
b
y
t
h
e
C
A
L
S
A
c
a
d
e
m
i
c
A
w
a
r
d
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
•
All complete proposals received on time will
be reviewed by two or more of the CALS
Academic Awards Committee
•
Committee members will submit comments
and recommendations
•
Accept without reservations. No proposal
defense needed
•
Accept with reservation. Proposal defense and
written responses needed
•
Reject. Students will be allowed a defense if
requested
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
D
e
f
e
n
s
e
o
f
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
•
In the event that members of the CALS Academic Awards Committee have
questions or concerns about the proposal, students will be asked to set up a
“defense”.
•
The “defense” is typically a short 15-20 minute meeting with one or more CALS
Academic Awards Committee
•
Briefly describe proposal and goals
•
Address any questions with regards to the written proposal.
•
Following the “defense” the student will receive notice from the chairperson
•
Continue without reservations. No need to supply written responses to
questions
•
Continue with reservations, please address the following concerns.
Student must supply written responses to questions identified in the
notice from the chairperson following the “defense”.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
S
u
b
m
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
•
Students must write up a 1-2 page summary of
work to date and submit on or before date outlined
in DUR Guidelines (
https://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals-
distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur-
program
•
Students should indicate any potential issues with
completing the work in the proposal
•
Students must supply the confirmed list of their
review committee and indicate which review
committee member is a faculty member in the
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
W
r
i
t
e
U
p
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
•
Students should write up their research following the
guidelines of the journal to which it could be
submitted.
•
Students should complete the write up and submit a
copy of the manuscript to their review committee
one week prior to their public presentation
•
Review committee should review the manuscript and
submit suggested changes to the manuscript at the
time of the public presentation.
•
Students should use the review committee members
comments to revise their manuscript to the final
version that will be submitted to the CALS Academic
Awards Committee for final consideration.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
•
Students are required to prepare and present a 10-20
minute presentation of their research and findings
•
The presentation should be in the home department
in which the mentor is located.
•
Presentations may be in the form of a department
seminar or a specially called meeting.
•
ALL three (3) members of the student’s review
committee must be present at the presentation.
•
Following the presentation students should obtain
the signature of their review committee members
indicating they believe the research is meritorious
and deserving of DUR Honors recognition.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
F
i
n
a
l
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
o
f
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
•
Students must present ALL required materials on or
before the time identified in the DUR Guidelines.
•
Required materials include:
•
Final version of manuscript (docx),
•
Student reflection (minimum of one page) on
what they learned through the process of
completing their research (docx),
•
Original review committee signature page
•
Mentor evaluation and final letter of support
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
M
e
n
t
o
r
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
L
e
t
t
e
r
o
f
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
•
1-2 pages in length
•
Should demonstrate at least the following:
•
Student’s involvement
•
Student’s degree of independence in the
project,
•
Positive comments they have to say about the
student’s work,
•
Statement of support for the student receiving
DUR Honors recognition.
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
:
T
h
e
C
A
L
S
A
c
a
d
e
m
i
c
A
w
a
r
d
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
•
Will meet and review all materials received to assure that all
requirements have been met. They will also use this time to evaluate the
submitted manuscript.
•
Submit names to the CALS Dean’s Office for those projects which have
been identified to receive DUR Honors recognition.
•
CALS Academic Awards Chairperson will contact those who have been
selected to receive DUR Honors recognition.
•
CALS Dean’s Office will prepare certificates for those receiving DUR
Honors recognition.
•
CALS Dean and Academic Awards Committee Chair will sign certificates.
•
CALS Dean’s Office will contact recipients that certificates are available
at the Dean’s Office.
The process for Distinguished Undergraduate Research (DUR) Honors recognizes outstanding seniors in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at the University of Vermont. Applicants submit proposals, conduct original research, present findings, and seek approval from the CALS Academic Awards Committee for this prestigious recognition.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Distinguished Distinguished Undergraduate Undergraduate Research Research Honors Honors Explanation of the Process and Requirements Drs. Todd J. Pritchard and Eric von Wettberg 2023 CALS Academic Awards Committee Co-Chairperson
DUR Honors Recognition DUR Honors Recognition Open to all seniors in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Applicants for consideration in the DUR Honors process must submit a proposal on or before the deadlines outlined in the DUR Guidelines (https://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals- distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur-program) for review by the CALS Academic Awards Committee. If selected to continue, applicants must complete original research which may result in furthering the knowledge in the applicant's field of study. Once completed the applicant must present their findings in a seminar setting which is attended by their DUR review committee. Following submittal of all required materials, the CALS Academic Awards Committee will evaluate the research and determine if DUR Honors are to be awarded
Attend Meeting Identify Mentor Identify Project Identify Review Committee Develop well written proposal with aid of mentor and review committee Submit Proposal to CALS Academic Awards Committee Proposal reviewed by CALS Academic Awards Committee Proposal Defense (if required) Outline of Process Outline of Process
Complete work identified in the proposal Submit progress report as required Write up your project Submit write up to your review committee Presentation of research to review committee and others Make changes suggested by review committee Obtain signed review committee form endorsing your work for DUR Honors Submit revised manuscript, review committee form and from your mentor. Outline of Process Outline of Process
Applicant must identify a mentor with whom they will complete the proposed project. Application Process: Application Process: Identify Mentor Identify Mentor Mentor may be: University of Vermont faculty member University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine faculty and/or research associate Community member but only if they are the person under which you will conduct the research for the project
Application Process: Identify a Project Application Process: Identify a Project Proposals may be classic wet bench lab research Proposals may include the mining of Big Data Proposals may include surveys of a scientific nature Proposals which are literature reviews do not meet the requirements of the DUR Honors
Application Process: Develop a Well Application Process: Develop a Well Written Proposal Written Proposal Proposal must be rigorous in nature, Proposal must, if appropriate, use proper scientific nomenclature, Proposal must use proper grammar and contain no spelling mistakes, Proposal must include a clearly articulated hypothesis/question of inquiry and the process by which that hypothesis will be evaluated
Application Process: Develop a Well Application Process: Develop a Well Written Proposal Written Proposal Proposal must contain, if appropriate, identification of specific statistical analysis which will be applied to data, Proposal must identify the journal in which the results could be presented, Proposal must have been reviewed by all review committee members, Failure to meet any of the above is reason for the project to be rejected outright by the CALS Academic Awards Committee.
Application Process: Develop a Well Application Process: Develop a Well Written Proposal Written Proposal Proposal must contain a review of related studies and other relevant literature. This review should include 8-10 references, and not more than 15 The review should not be taken directly from a faculty- written grant proposal or literature review, but be student work.
Application Process: Application Process: Identify Your Review Committee Identify Your Review Committee Applicant must identify a total of three (3) individuals to be on their review committee Two (2) or more members of the review committee must be UVM Faculty, One (1) or more members of the review committee must be CALS Faculty, One (1) member of the review committee may be a community member who has been identified to be involved with the research, or may be a faculty member at a different University/College who has a demonstratable knowledge of the area of research undertaken by the applicant
Review committee is charged with reviewing and suggesting editorial reviews of the proposal before it is submitted for DUR Honors Committee review. Applicants should NOT present a proposal to the CALS Academic Awards Committee which has not been evaluated by all of the review committee members. Following the completion of a students work, the review committee is responsible for reading the final manuscript and giving feedback for changes which need to be made Attend the public presentation of the students work Sign form indicating they believe the completed work meets the standards of research in the field and is deserving of DUR Honors recognition. Application Application Process: Review Process: Review Committee Committee Responsibilities Responsibilities
Complete application materials should be submitted to the CALS Dean s Office at the email indicated in the DUR Guidelines (https://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals-distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur- program) Cover sheet of proposal Letter of support from your project mentor List of members of your review committee Application Application Process: Submit Process: Submit Proposal to Proposal to CALS Academic CALS Academic Awards Awards Committee Committee Failure to supply ALL materials by the date and time indicated in the DUR Guidelines will result in automatic removal from consideration for DUR Honors recognition
All complete proposals received on time will be reviewed by two or more of the CALS Academic Awards Committee Committee members will submit comments and recommendations Accept without reservations. No proposal defense needed Accept with reservation. Proposal defense and written responses needed Reject. Students will be allowed a defense if requested Application Application Process: Review Process: Review of the Proposal of the Proposal by the CALS by the CALS Academic Academic Awards Awards Committee Committee
Application Process: Defense of Proposal Application Process: Defense of Proposal In the event that members of the CALS Academic Awards Committee have questions or concerns about the proposal, students will be asked to set up a defense . The defense is typically a short 15-20 minute meeting with one or more CALS Academic Awards Committee Briefly describe proposal and goals Address any questions with regards to the written proposal. Following the defense the student will receive notice from the chairperson Continue without reservations. No need to supply written responses to questions Continue with reservations, please address the following concerns. Student must supply written responses to questions identified in the notice from the chairperson following the defense .
Application Process: Submit Application Process: Submit Project Update Project Update Students must write up a 1-2 page summary of work to date and submit on or before date outlined in DUR Guidelines (https://www.uvm.edu/cals/cals- distinguished-undergraduate-research-dur- program Students should indicate any potential issues with completing the work in the proposal Students must supply the confirmed list of their review committee and indicate which review committee member is a faculty member in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
Application Process: Application Process: Write Up Research Write Up Research Students should write up their research following the guidelines of the journal to which it could be submitted. Students should complete the write up and submit a copy of the manuscript to their review committee one week prior to their public presentation Review committee should review the manuscript and submit suggested changes to the manuscript at the time of the public presentation. Students should use the review committee members comments to revise their manuscript to the final version that will be submitted to the CALS Academic Awards Committee for final consideration.
Application Process: Application Process: Presentation of Research Presentation of Research Students are required to prepare and present a 10-20 minute presentation of their research and findings The presentation should be in the home department in which the mentor is located. Presentations may be in the form of a department seminar or a specially called meeting. ALL three (3) members of the student s review committee must be present at the presentation. Following the presentation students should obtain the signature of their review committee members indicating they believe the research is meritorious and deserving of DUR Honors recognition.
Application Process: Application Process: Final Submittal of Materials Final Submittal of Materials Students must present ALL required materials on or before the time identified in the DUR Guidelines. Required materials include: Final version of manuscript (docx), Student reflection (minimum of one page) on what they learned through the process of completing their research (docx), Original review committee signature page Mentor evaluation and final letter of support
Application Process: Mentor Application Process: Mentor Evaluation and Final Letter of Support Evaluation and Final Letter of Support 1-2 pages in length Should demonstrate at least the following: Student s involvement Student s degree of independence in the project, Positive comments they have to say about the student s work, Statement of support for the student receiving DUR Honors recognition.
Application Process: Application Process: The CALS Academic Awards The CALS Academic Awards Committee Committee Will meet and review all materials received to assure that all requirements have been met. They will also use this time to evaluate the submitted manuscript. Submit names to the CALS Dean s Office for those projects which have been identified to receive DUR Honors recognition. CALS Academic Awards Chairperson will contact those who have been selected to receive DUR Honors recognition. CALS Dean s Office will prepare certificates for those receiving DUR Honors recognition. CALS Dean and Academic Awards Committee Chair will sign certificates. CALS Dean s Office will contact recipients that certificates are available at the Dean s Office.
