Different Types of Specifications in Estimation and Costing

 
Subject: Estimation and Costing
Topic: Types of specification
Presented by:Prof. Balraj Marjara
 
Types
 
of
 Specifications
 
There are 
four 
methods of specifying. There
is
 
no
 
defined 
rule
 
for
 
using
 
one 
method
 
over
another
 
or about
 combining
 
methods,
 
but
care should 
be 
taken 
to 
avoid 
redundancy 
or
contradictions.
The
 
four
 
methods
 
are:
Descriptive
Performance
Reference
 
Standard
Proprietary
 
Descriptive
 
Specifications
Under 
this method of 
specifying 
the 
exact
properties 
of the materials and methods of
installation are 
described in 
detail 
without
using proprietary
 
or 
manufacturer's
 
names.
Descriptive
 specifications
 
are 
commonly
used
 
for
 
products
 
for
 which no
 
standards
exist, on 
projects 
where 
using proprietary
names is 
restricted, and in situations where
the 
Architect/Engineer 
want 
to 
exercise tight
control 
over
 the
 
specified
 
work.
 
There are 
five 
steps 
for 
preparing
descriptive
 
specifications:
1.
Research
 
available
 
products
2.
Research 
the 
important features 
required for
the
 
product
.
3.
Determine which features to describe 
in the
specification 
and which features to 
show 
in
the
 
drawings
.
4.
Describe
 
the
 
important
 
features.
5.
Specify quality assurance measures (i.e.
submittals, certifications, testing or
inspection
 
activities)
 
Advantages 
to using descriptive
specifications
Descriptive
 
specifications
 
specify
 
exactly what
the 
design intends.
They
 
are
 
applicable
 
to all
 
conditions,
 methods
 
or
situations of 
a 
project.
They are 
applicable to 
all sizes and 
types 
of
projects.
They 
permit 
free competition 
because they 
do 
not
restrict the use 
of specific 
products 
or
manufacturers.
Disadvantages
 
of
 
descriptive
 specifications:
 
They 
require the specifier 
to take special care 
in
describing 
the 
design 
intent in 
order 
to achieve
the 
desired
 
results.
 
Descriptive
 
specifications tend
 
to
 
take
 
up
more space because they 
require 
more
verbiage
 
than
 
other
 
methods.
They
 
may
 
be more
 
time
 consuming
 
than
 
other
methods
 
to
 
create
 
and
 
write.
They are being used 
less 
often as more
complete reference standards are being
developed 
and implemented.
 
Performance
 
Specifications
Under
 
this method 
the
 
required
 
end 
results
are 
specified 
along with the criteria 
by 
which
the
 
performance
 
will
 be
 
judged
 
and
 
the
method
 
by
 
which it
 
can 
be
 
verified
.
The contractor 
is 
free 
to choose 
the materials
and methods that 
comply 
with 
the
performance
 
specification.
 
They
 
are
 
generally
 
used 
to
 
encourage
 
the
 
use
of new and 
innovative 
techniques that may
lead to
 
more
 
economical
 
construction.
They
 
are
 
also
 
used to
 
supplement
 
other
specification
 
methods.
 
Advantages 
to 
using performance
specifications:
 
Only the 
end result or design intent 
is
specified,
 
this
 
gives
 
the Contractor flexibility
in selecting
 
and applying
 
products.
They
 
permit
 
free competition.
They
 
can
 
be applicable
 
in all
 
types
 
and 
sizes
of
 
projects.
 
Performance 
specifications delegate 
the
technical 
responsibilities
 
to
 
the
 construction
industry,
 
where
 
the
 
Contractor 
instead
 
of
 
the
Architecture/Engineering firm is responsible
for
 the 
results.
 
Disadvantages to using performance
specifications:
They
 
can be
 
time
 consuming to
 produce
 
and
may result
 
in
 
long, detailed
 
specifications.
They are more difficult to enforce than other
methods
 
of
 
specifying.
They may be too elaborate for simple or
minor
 
projects.
Performance 
specifications delegate 
the
technical
 
responsibilities
 
to the construction
industry,
 
where
 
the
 
Contractor
 
instead
 
of
 
the
Architecture/Engineering firm is responsible
for 
the 
results. 
(This 
is 
both 
an 
advantage 
and
disadvantage)
Slide Note
Embed
Share

In the field of estimation and costing, four main methods of specifying are used: Descriptive, Performance, Reference Standard, and Proprietary. Descriptive specifications provide detailed descriptions without using proprietary names, allowing for tight control over specified work. Performance specifications focus on end results and verification criteria. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, impacting factors such as competition, space usage, and time consumption.

  • Estimation
  • Costing
  • Specifications
  • Descriptive
  • Performance

Uploaded on Jul 05, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Subject: Estimation and Costing Topic: Types of specification Presented by:Prof. Balraj Marjara

  2. Types of Specifications There are four methods of specifying. There is no defined rule for using one method over another or about combining methods, but care should be taken to avoid redundancy or contradictions. The four methods are: Descriptive Performance Reference Standard Proprietary

  3. Descriptive Specifications Under this method of specifying the exact properties of the materials and methods of installation are described in detail without using proprietary or manufacturer's names. Descriptive specifications are commonly used for products for which no standards exist, on projects where using proprietary names is restricted, and in situations where the Architect/Engineer want to exercise tight control over the specified work.

  4. There are five steps for preparing descriptive specifications: 1. Research available products 2. Research the important features required for the product. 3. Determine which features to describe in the specification and which features to show in the drawings. 4. Describe the important features. 5. Specify quality assurance measures (i.e. submittals, certifications, testing or inspection activities)

  5. Advantages to using descriptive specifications Descriptive specifications specify exactly what the design intends. They are applicable to all conditions, methods or situations of a project. They are applicable to all sizes and types of projects. They permit free competition because they do not restrict the use of specific products or manufacturers. Disadvantages of descriptive specifications: They require the specifier to take special care in describing the design intent in order to achieve the desired results.

  6. Descriptive specifications tend to take up more space because they require more verbiage than other methods. They may be more time consuming than other methods to create and write. They are being used less often as more complete reference standards are being developed and implemented.

  7. Performance Specifications Under this method the required end results are specified along with the criteria by which the performance will be judged and the method by which it can be verified. The contractor is free to choose the materials and methods that comply with the performance specification. They are generally used to encourage the use of new and innovative techniques that may lead to more economical construction. They are also used to supplement other specification methods.

  8. Advantages to using performance specifications: Only the end result or design intent is specified, this gives the Contractor flexibility in selecting and applying products. They permit free competition. They can be applicable in all types and sizes of projects. Performance specifications delegate the technical responsibilities to the construction industry, where the Contractor instead of the Architecture/Engineering firm is responsible for the results.

  9. Disadvantages to using performance specifications: They can be time consuming to produce and may result in long, detailed specifications. They are more difficult to enforce than other methods of specifying. They may be too elaborate for simple or minor projects. Performance specifications delegate the technical responsibilities to the construction industry, where the Contractor instead of the Architecture/Engineering firm is responsible for the results. (This is both an advantage and disadvantage)

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#