Cultural Divide in "No Sugar" by Jack Davis
By Jack Davis
No Sugar (1988) – Playwright:Jack
Davis Stage Drama, based on
historical events Faction (uses real
life events for the bases of a fictional
dramatisation) Greater degree of
realism and emotional connection
with audiences because of the
reference to real life events (Billy’s
emotive account of the massacre)
Jack Davis manipulates his audience to see
past race relations, and into the lives of a
close Aboriginal family, displaced from their
homes and their traditional lives. By
creating an ironic dialect of humour and
suffering within his unquestionably dramatic
style, Davis enforces a personal sympathy and
understanding from the audience. The point on
which the entire play operates is the
difference in cultural understanding between
colonial audiences and Aboriginal characters.
Jack Davis manipulates this wide visual
distance to his advantage. He differentiates
between audience preconceptions of
Aboriginality and its reality. In fact, it is
as a result of this distance that much of the
play's humour is formed.
•
Born 11 March 1917
•
Moore River Settlement
•
Descendant of the
Nyoongarah people
•
Worked as labourer,
drover
•
Wrote down what he saw
•
First play 1972,
The Steel
and the Stone,
history of
the Moore River
Settlement
•
Set during the Great
Depression 1929-34
•
Moore River settlement a
place to which families are
forcibly
resettled
•
This comes after 40-80,000
years of history of
inhabitation of Australia
•
Country as religion –
‘Dreamtime’/ alcheringa –
land as life, so if you are
forcibly removed from your
land….?
•
Indigenous Australian ancient history
•
Early contact history
•
Invasion and wars
•
Genocide
•
Protectionism and Control Policy period
•
Assimilation Policy and the height of the
stolen generation period
•
Path to Reconciliation – Native Title, Land
Rights, Apology
•
http://www.australianstogether.org.au/stories
/detail/assimilation
2.
The richly varied modes of dialogue in
No Sugar
are
central to viewer’s experience and their understanding of
the characters in the play.’ Discuss.
Remember there are distinct
types of language used in the
play:
•
The aborigines often speak in their own dialect to show their own unique
relationship to culture, land and lifestyle.
•
Many aboriginal terms are used to authenticate the aborigines’ experiences (such
as inji sticks, the gugha, the jeering meear); these expressions capture their
unique relationship to land and reflect their diverse cultural systems (mummari
and boolyaduk) and lifestyle customs.
•
Their use also reinforces Davis’s point that many aboriginal words simply do not
have a corresponding word in the white man’s language, because of cultural and
lifestyle differences. They cannot be translated.
•
Furthermore, audiences are invited to identify with the alienating affect of a foreign
language which the aborigines have to deal with on a daily basis. This alienation
is also exacerbated by their lack of access to education.
•
Overly formal language.
•
Use of idiom
•
Serves to emphasise themes of power and oppression
•
Neville’s formal speech – language of the bureaucracy of the motherland.
•
Power and authority.
•
Detachment and disconnection = unable to empathise.
•
The use of ‘everyday spoken language’ by the indigenous characters and the
sympathetic white characters serves to increase the realism of their lives and
situation, and in doing this, their situation becomes more real to the
reader/audience.
•
It increases the affinity the audience has with the characters.
•
This ‘put down’ language serves to highlight how racist some of the chite
characters are and how lacking in sympathy they are.
•
It shows them to be racist and unpleasant.
•
It alienates the audience from the character.
Jack Davis manipulates his audience's perception of race relations and delves into the lives of an Aboriginal family, displaced from their traditional homes. By using humor and suffering through an ironic lens, Davis evokes sympathy and understanding from the audience. The play focuses on the cultural gap between colonial audiences and Aboriginal characters, challenging preconceptions and highlighting the reality of Aboriginal experiences during a historical period marked by forced resettlement and cultural clashes.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Jack Davis manipulates his audience to see past race relations, and into the lives of a close Aboriginal family, displaced from their homes and their traditional lives. By creating an ironic dialect of humour and suffering within his unquestionably dramatic style, Davis enforces a personal sympathy and understanding from the audience. The point on which the entire play operates is the difference in cultural understanding between colonial audiences and Aboriginal characters. Jack Davis manipulates this wide visual distance to his advantage. He differentiates between audience preconceptions of Aboriginality and its reality. In fact, it is as a result of this distance that much of the play's humour is formed. By Jack Davis
Born 11 March 1917 Moore River Settlement Descendant of the Nyoongarah people Worked as labourer, drover Wrote down what he saw First play 1972, The Steel and the Stone, history of the Moore River Settlement
Set during the Great Depression 1929-34 Moore River settlement a place to which families are forcibly resettled This comes after 40-80,000 years of history of inhabitation of Australia Country as religion Dreamtime / alcheringa land as life, so if you are forcibly removed from your land .?
Indigenous Australian ancient history Early contact history Invasion and wars Genocide Protectionism and Control Policy period Assimilation Policy and the height of the stolen generation period Path to Reconciliation Native Title, Land Rights, Apology http://www.australianstogether.org.au/stories /detail/assimilation
2. The richly varied modes of dialogue in No Sugar are central to viewer s experience and their understanding of the characters in the play. Discuss.
Remember there are distinct types of language used in the play:
The aborigines often speak in their own dialect to show their own unique relationship to culture, land and lifestyle. Many aboriginal terms are used to authenticate the aborigines experiences (such as inji sticks , the gugha , the jeering meear ); these expressions capture their unique relationship to land and reflect their diverse cultural systems ( mummari and boolyaduk ) and lifestyle customs. Their use also reinforces Davis s point that many aboriginal words simply do not have a corresponding word in the white man s language, because of cultural and lifestyle differences. They cannot be translated. Furthermore, audiences are invited to identify with the alienating affect of a foreign language which the aborigines have to deal with on a daily basis. This alienation is also exacerbated by their lack of access to education.
Overly formal language. Use of idiom Serves to emphasise themes of power and oppression Neville s formal speech language of the bureaucracy of the motherland. Power and authority. Detachment and disconnection = unable to empathise.
The use of everyday spoken language by the indigenous characters and the sympathetic white characters serves to increase the realism of their lives and situation, and in doing this, their situation becomes more real to the reader/audience. It increases the affinity the audience has with the characters.
This put down language serves to highlight how racist some of the chite characters are and how lacking in sympathy they are. It shows them to be racist and unpleasant. It alienates the audience from the character.
