Comparative Study of Apprenticeship Systems in England, Finland, and France

 
The rhetoric and the reality of
apprenticeship in England:
A comparative study of the English, Finnish
and French apprenticeship systems for 16-18
year olds
Dr Anna Mazenod
Anna.Mazenod@gmail.com
 
Why research apprenticeships?
 
Apprenticeship in policy rhetoric –presented as
alternative to school-based learning – practical
vs academic learning
Research motivation from policy practitioner
experience
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Study design
 
Three country cases: England, Finland, France
Focus on 
16-18 year 
olds undertaking a formal
apprenticeship at any qualification level
Systematic literature reviews (research
published 1996-2012) and expert interview in
each country
 
Defining apprenticeship
 
Apprenticeship = systematic, long-term training
alternating periods 
at the workplace and in a
n
educational institution or training centre
 
Apprentice is 
contractually linked to the
employer
 and receives remuneration
 
Employer assumes responsibility for providing
training leading to a specific occupation
CEDEFOP
, 
2009 
Terminology of European education and training policy
 
Potential roles for employers within
apprenticeship programmes
 
Providers apprenticeship places
Part-funders: e.g. apprenticeship tax in France
Trainers: in-house training for apprentices
Qualification co-developers
Advocates: promoting apprenticeships
Industry role models: setting standards
 
Policy rhetoric of apprenticeship in
England
 
Employers in the
driving seat’
 
Study findings
 
Multiplicity of policy aims for apprenticeship
More ‘groundrules’ for employers in Finland
and France, voluntarism in England
Employer leadership rhetoric only in England
 
 
Meanings of apprenticeship
 
Work-placement type activity for disaffected
young people alongside competitive vocational
education programmes; 
training 
rather than
education (England)
Traditional pathway for occupations and
trades.  Also a more recent pathway into
higher education (France)
One part of a re-integration package for
disaffected young people (Finland)
 
 
 
 
 Multiplicity of policy aims
 
Economic and social challenges to which
apprenticeship is presented as a solution:
1)
improving intermediate vocational skills
2)
integrating the worlds of work and education
3)
re-engaging disaffected young people
 
The marginality of apprenticeship
 
Less than 10% of 16-18 year olds are
apprentices in England and France, less than
1% in Finland (almost 2/3rds in Germany,
Steedman, 2011)
Recent growth in England has been
concentrated in older age groups, now only
30% of apprenticeship starts are aged 16-18
 
Can employers be in the driving seat in
England?
 
Labyrinthine funding & management systems
Prescription is the norm in funding rules
Multiplicity of policy aims = apprenticeship as
an instrument of government education and
training policy (Fuller and Unwin, 2009)
Employers are not a homogenous group; the
relevance of apprenticeship depends on the
occupational sector
 
Recommendations
 
Develop a consensus around a country-specific
coherent meaning of apprenticeship in policy
Bridge policy rhetoric with reality of
contemporary apprenticeships in England
Accept marginality of apprenticeship?
Take account of the significance of differences
in country contexts in developing policy
 
 
References
 
 
Steedman, H. (2011
). The State of Apprenticeship in 2010 - 
International
Comparisons: Australia, Austria, England, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden and
Switzerland
.  Report to the Apprenticeship Ambassadors Network.
 
Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. (2009).  ‘Change and Continuity in
Apprenticeship: The Resilience of a Model of Learning’. 
Journal of Education
and Work
, 22(5), 405-416.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This comparative study explores the rhetoric and reality of apprenticeship systems in England, Finland, and France for 16-18 year-olds. It delves into the policy motivations behind researching apprenticeships and examines the roles of employers within these programs. The study also defines apprenticeship, highlights potential employer roles, discusses the policy rhetoric of apprenticeships in England, and presents findings on the multiplicity of policy aims across the three countries. Additionally, it explores the different meanings and pathways of apprenticeship programs in the respective contexts.

  • Comparative Study
  • Apprenticeship Systems
  • Policy Motivations
  • Employer Roles
  • Policy Rhetoric

Uploaded on Aug 17, 2024 | 3 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The rhetoric and the reality of apprenticeship in England: A comparative study of the English, Finnish and French apprenticeship systems for 16-18 year olds Dr Anna Mazenod Anna.Mazenod@gmail.com

  2. Why research apprenticeships? Apprenticeship in policy rhetoric presented as alternative to school-based learning practical vs academic learning Research motivation from policy practitioner experience

  3. Study design Three country cases: England, Finland, France Focus on 16-18 year olds undertaking a formal apprenticeship at any qualification level Systematic literature reviews (research published 1996-2012) and expert interview in each country

  4. Defining apprenticeship Apprenticeship = systematic, long-term training alternating periods at the workplace and in an educational institution or training centre Apprentice is contractually linked to the employer and receives remuneration Employer assumes responsibility for providing training leading to a specific occupation CEDEFOP, 2009 Terminology of European education and training policy

  5. Potential roles for employers within apprenticeship programmes Providers apprenticeship places Part-funders: e.g. apprenticeship tax in France Trainers: in-house training for apprentices Qualification co-developers Advocates: promoting apprenticeships Industry role models: setting standards

  6. Policy rhetoric of apprenticeship in England Employers in the driving seat

  7. Study findings Multiplicity of policy aims for apprenticeship More groundrules for employers in Finland and France, voluntarism in England Employer leadership rhetoric only in England

  8. Meanings of apprenticeship Work-placement type activity for disaffected young people alongside competitive vocational education programmes; training rather than education (England) Traditional pathway for occupations and trades. Also a more recent pathway into higher education (France) One part of a re-integration package for disaffected young people (Finland)

  9. Multiplicity of policy aims Economic and social challenges to which apprenticeship is presented as a solution: 1) improving intermediate vocational skills 2) integrating the worlds of work and education 3) re-engaging disaffected young people

  10. The marginality of apprenticeship Less than 10% of 16-18 year olds are apprentices in England and France, less than 1% in Finland (almost 2/3rds in Germany, Steedman, 2011) Recent growth in England has been concentrated in older age groups, now only 30% of apprenticeship starts are aged 16-18

  11. Can employers be in the driving seat in England? Labyrinthine funding & management systems Prescription is the norm in funding rules Multiplicity of policy aims = apprenticeship as an instrument of government education and training policy (Fuller and Unwin, 2009) Employers are not a homogenous group; the relevance of apprenticeship depends on the occupational sector

  12. Recommendations Develop a consensus around a country-specific coherent meaning of apprenticeship in policy Bridge policy rhetoric with reality of contemporary apprenticeships in England Accept marginality of apprenticeship? Take account of the significance of differences in country contexts in developing policy

  13. References Steedman, H. (2011). The State of Apprenticeship in 2010 - International Comparisons: Australia, Austria, England, France, Germany, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland. Report to the Apprenticeship Ambassadors Network. Fuller, A. and Unwin, L. (2009). Change and Continuity in Apprenticeship: The Resilience of a Model of Learning . Journal of Education and Work, 22(5), 405-416.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#