Clearing Up Investor Confusion Over Fees and Regulations

 
    
September 20,
 2021
Knut A. Rostad, President
, 
Institute for the Fiduciary Standard
 
www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org
Improve Investors ‘Fee IQ’,
End Investor Confusion  
Investor confusion over the fees they pay is no surprise; the
solution is no mystery
   
2
Since 1934 the SEC has disclosed financial information for
Main Street investors
Since 2008 (or earlier)  “investor confusion” – I.E: “investor
fault” – has driven discussions of regulations of retail investors
Research – and SEC research – suggests this paradigm is wrong
and should be replaced by “information confusion / omission”
 
End Investor Confusion?
3
The 2008 RAND Report, The “Bible of retail investor perceptions
of BDs and IAs”, defines the current ‘confusion’ paradigm
Not surprised (many investors) did not understand key
distinctions … The roles are confusing” RAND Report
RAND “tested” an ad for an IA and an ad for a BD:
Firm A “
stressed the importance of building a relationship …
based on trust (and) … described the expertise of its (advisors)
 
Firm B 
“stressed careful planning and (specifically mentioned)
“the firm’s expertise and experience (and) … philanthropy,
asset management and wealth transfer strategies”
Investor and Industry Perceptions on Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers, 2008
    
 
RAND Report 2008*
4
RAND also “tested” “fact sheets” for IAs and BDs
Even after being presented with fact sheets, participants
      were confused by the different titles … common job titles are
      so similar that people can easily get confused over the type of
      professional with which they are working”
      
“Some did not understand … whether fiduciary was a higher
       standard than suitability”   
 
RAND Report 2008
5
A RAND Report in 2018 tested 31 investors on the CRS form
on IAs and BDs
“Some participants  …. demonstrated significant
misunderstandings”
“Some did not appear to have synthesized the information and
be able to apply it.”
“ … the differences between account types … never fully
grasping”
Investor Testing of Form CRS Relationship Summary, 2018
    
 
RAND Report 2018*
6
CRS fails on fees due to vague ideas and unclear language
Some investors said the IAs/BDs were described the same
On fees 
Or ... said the fee section is “overwhelming” and
lacked, “More specific details on fees”
On fees 
“If you are price comparing … you are going to be
looking at the specific price you are paying”    
 
RAND Report 2018
7
Kleimann researchers tested new CRS language and found how
certain words increase investor understanding
“Commission” is better than “transaction-based”
“Sales” is better than “brokerage”
Fiduciary “Highest legal standing” and “in relationships of
trust” have meaning; “best interest”, “conflict consent” and
“mitigation” do not have meaning
 
Kleimann Communication Group, December 5, 2018, Report on Testing Model CR
    
 
Kleimann Report, December 2018
8
Review: CRS forms of 29 large dual registered firms
Roles and purposes of IAs and BDs are obscured or omitted
Point one 
Investors are not clearly informed BDs’ primary role
to distribute securities for 3
rd
 parties directly conflicts with
IAs’ role to advise clients as fiduciaries
Point two 
Investors are not clearly and uniformly informed
what they pay for advice, investments and other services
SEC CRS Disclosure Need Fixing: Here’s Why / How, September 22, 2021, 
www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org
 
    
 
Institute for the Fiduciary Standard
New Paper on Form CRS*
9
SEC rejects requiring BDs disclose actual fees, cites “significant
operational burdens”. The SEC explains*:
“Individualized fee disclosure may be helpful to some retail
customers, but can be costly, prone to errors and cause delays
in trade execution … We believe that … standardized
disclosure furthers our goal of informing investors.”
 
SEC Reg BI Final Rule, June 5, 2019, page 170
. 
 
 
SEC on Requiring Fee Disclosure:
“Costly, prone to errors”
10
Improving investor ‘Fee IQ’ means adopting a new paradigm
Today’s paradigm
: “investor confusion” explains why  effective
regulation and disclosure is so hard to achieve
The new paradigm
: “information confusion, omission” explains
how effective disclosure can immediately improve regulation
 
The bottom line: 
The SEC can fix disclosure quickly and end
much confusion
    
 
Improve Investors ‘Fee IQ’,
End Investor Confusion
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Investor confusion regarding the fees they pay and regulatory distinctions persists, as evidenced by studies and reports dating back to 2008. The complexity of differentiating between investment advisers (IAs) and broker-dealers (BDs) has led to misunderstandings among investors, highlighting the need for more transparent communication and education in the financial industry.

  • Investor Education
  • Financial Regulations
  • Fee Transparency
  • Investment Advisers
  • Broker-Dealers

Uploaded on Sep 22, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improve Investors Fee IQ, End Investor Confusion Investor confusion over the fees they pay is no surprise; the solution is no mystery September 20, 2021 Knut A. Rostad, President, Institute for the Fiduciary Standard www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org

  2. End Investor Confusion? Since 1934 the SEC has disclosed financial information for Main Street investors Since 2008 (or earlier) investor confusion I.E: investor fault has driven discussions of regulations of retail investors Research and SEC research suggests this paradigm is wrong and should be replaced by information confusion / omission 2

  3. RAND Report 2008* The 2008 RAND Report, The Bible of retail investor perceptions of BDs and IAs , defines the current confusion paradigm Not surprised (many investors) did not understand key distinctions The roles are confusing RAND Report RAND tested an ad for an IA and an ad for a BD: Firm A Firm A stressed the importance of building a relationship based on trust (and) described the expertise of its (advisors) Firm B Firm B stressed careful planning and (specifically mentioned) the firm s expertise and experience (and) philanthropy, asset management and wealth transfer strategies Investor and Industry Perceptions on Investment Advisers and Broker Investor and Industry Perceptions on Investment Advisers and Broker- -Dealers, 2008 Dealers, 2008 3

  4. RAND Report 2008 RAND also tested fact sheets for IAs and BDs Even after being presented with fact sheets, participants were confused by the different titles common job titles are so similar that people can easily get confused over the type of professional with which they are working Some did not understand whether fiduciary was a higher standard than suitability 4

  5. RAND Report 2018* A RAND Report in 2018 tested 31 investors on the CRS form on IAs and BDs Some participants . demonstrated significant misunderstandings Some did not appear to have synthesized the information and be able to apply it. the differences between account types never fully grasping Investor Testing of Form CRS Relationship Summary, 2018 Investor Testing of Form CRS Relationship Summary, 2018 5

  6. RAND Report 2018 CRS fails on fees due to vague ideas and unclear language Some investors said the IAs/BDs were described the same On fees On fees Or ... said the fee section is overwhelming and lacked, More specific details on fees On fees On fees If you are price comparing you are going to be looking at the specific price you are paying 6

  7. Kleimann Report, December 2018 Kleimann researchers tested new CRS language and found how certain words increase investor understanding Commission is better than transaction-based Sales is better than brokerage Fiduciary Highest legal standing and in relationships of trust have meaning; best interest , conflict consent and mitigation do not have meaning Kleimann Kleimann Communication Group, December 5, 2018, Report on Testing Model CR Communication Group, December 5, 2018, Report on Testing Model CR 7

  8. Institute for the Fiduciary Standard New Paper on Form CRS* Review: CRS forms of 29 large dual registered firms Roles and purposes of IAs and BDs are obscured or omitted Point one Point one Investors are not clearly informed BDs primary role to distribute securities for 3rdparties directly conflicts with IAs role to advise clients as fiduciaries Point two Point two Investors are not clearly and uniformly informed what they pay for advice, investments and other services SEC CRS Disclosure Need Fixing: Here s Why / How, September 22, 2021, SEC CRS Disclosure Need Fixing: Here s Why / How, September 22, 2021, www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org www.thefiduciaryinstitute.org 8

  9. SEC on Requiring Fee Disclosure: Costly, prone to errors SEC rejects requiring BDs disclose actual fees, cites significant operational burdens . The SEC explains*: Individualized fee disclosure may be helpful to some retail customers, but can be costly, prone to errors and cause delays in trade execution We believe that standardized disclosure furthers our goal of informing investors. SEC Reg BI Final Rule, June 5, 2019, page 170 SEC Reg BI Final Rule, June 5, 2019, page 170. 9

  10. Improve Investors Fee IQ, End Investor Confusion Improving investor Fee IQ means adopting a new paradigm Today s paradigm Today s paradigm: investor confusion explains why effective regulation and disclosure is so hard to achieve The new paradigm The new paradigm: information confusion, omission explains how effective disclosure can immediately improve regulation The bottom line: The bottom line: The SEC can fix disclosure quickly and end much confusion 10

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#