ATF2 Collimator Mechanics at LAL - Current Design and Status
Detailed overview of the mechanical designs of ATF2 collimator at LAL, including the first design in stainless steel and an alternative design in aluminum alloy. The pros and cons of each design are explored, along with discussions on the chassis for the collimator system.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ATF2 Collimator - Mechanics at LAL Current Design and Short Status I-LINK meeting 2015 1 LAL-IN2P3-CNRS and Paris-Sud Orsay University - Sandry WALLON 01 July 2015
Outline 1. First mechanical design (SS) : short brief 2. Alternative design in aluminum alloy : purpose ; pros and cons 3. Chassis for collimator 4. Manufacture, Checkings (vacuum, dimensions), mounting, Installation
1. First mechanical design (SS) : short brief Vacuum chamber (SS) Indium wire seal (copper gasket possible [SS chamber]) DN40CF Flange (copper gasket) 848 mm Transition foil (elastic part) Transition pipe Front wall Linear slide Jaw (mask) Backing plate
Rail (slide) Transition foil (elastic part) Front wall Rear wall Bellow Stem holder Carriage driven by ball-screw Rated linear slides disp. repeatability : +- 10 m Stem with brazed flange
2. Alternative design in aluminum alloy : purpose ; pros and cons Vacuum chamber (Al alloy) Transition pipe (inside vacuum zone ; screwed to chamber) DN40CF Flange (SS) (screw to chamber ; indium wire crushed for tightness) Purpose of Al alloy Low production time to match LAL s workshop work load Indium wire seal Smaller design (height) required by rail length issue
Pros : Production on time at LAL Lighter design (Chamber with its flanges : 15 7 kg) No welds Higher thermal conductivity Cons : Indium creeping (not worse than SS design) especially if beam hits entrance flange (but heat loss at very low level see CST Nuria s calculations [beam hitting the jaws])
Tansition part shift (SS/Al) : 30.7-5.3 mm
3. Chassis for collimator : open discussion Use of standard beam (Bosch system, ) : building block style Footprint to groung required, and way to fix the chassis (drawing from KEK)
4. Manufacture, Checkings (vacuum, dimensions), Mounting, Installation 1. Main components already ordered (linear slides, bellows) 2. Production at LAL s workshop expected to start on Aug. 3. Chassis to design and beams to order 4. Checkings foreseen (and to be planned) at LAL Vacuum leak - outgasing ; 3D (dimensions, geometrical specs) 5. Mounting ; checking jaws position / beam axis 6. Installation goal : Nov. or Dec. 2015
