Analysis of Faculty Survey Results at 2016 Portland Biennial Conference

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Results from a survey conducted at the 2016 Portland Biennial Conference provide insights into faculty perceptions on various aspects such as institutional value, salaries, financial changes, voting rights, and faculty status changes. The survey covered responses on voting rights, salary changes, institutional value, and other financial matters.


Uploaded on Oct 11, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Professional Status Committee 2016 Survey Results Portland Biennial Conference July 12, 2016

  2. We got 261 responses to our survey ( 20% of LRW faculty) 6% 5-year, non- presumptively renewable K 3% adjunct or part-time 33% 405(c) or 405(c) track 26% some form of tenure or tenure track 2% visitors 29% 4-year, non- presumptively renewable K .08% unemployed

  3. To what extent do we feel our institutions value us and our work? (Q.1) 33% 6% 15% 10% 17% 17% 36%

  4. Current salaries (Q.3) 10% 10% 41% 16% 22%

  5. Salary changes last 18 months (Q.4) Decreased 3% Stayed the same 35% Increased 62%

  6. Other financial changes in last 18 months (Q. s 5-6) Travel funding Research grants YES 25% YES 15% NO 75% NO 85%

  7. What can we vote on? (Q. 8)

  8. Are our voting rights changing? (Q. 9) 42% some positive results (e.g., cmte just formed to consider for LRW and clinical faculty) 39% mixed results (e.g., discussions but no change) 11% negative (e.g., now decanal app ts w/o voting rights) 8% non-responsive Unknown 6% YES 20% NO 74%

  9. 32% report faculty status changes (Q. 10) Positive E.g., The faculty has endorsed a path to tenure. 25 47 28 Negative E.g., Four faculty members did not have their contracts renewed at the end of the last school year. Mixed E.g., Positions that used to have 3- year caps no longer have caps but the positions are subject to national searches every 5 years .

  10. 25% report changes in teaching load that did not affect other faculty (Q.11) Additional students or courses (usually without additional $) Miscellanous (neither + or -) Academic support Orientation or overload Bar review and moot court Decreased 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  11. 30% report they have taken on additional duties (Q.12)

  12. 44% report a reduction in the number of people teaching legal research or writing at their school (Q.14) YES 44% NO 56%

  13. Reasons for reduction (Q.15)

  14. How can we best help? (Q. 16) 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 % response 10 5 0

Related


More Related Content