Advancements in Lepton Colliders Technology

 
 Lepton Colliders with Higher Gradient at
 Lower Capital and Operational Costs
 
 
Emanuela Barzi, 
Fermilab & Ohio State University
 
 
 
Co-authors
 
 
 
 
 
California Institute of Technology
: Barry Barish
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
: Robert A. Rimmer, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
: Bill Barletta
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
: Marc Ross, Paul B. Welander, Emilio Nanni, Sami Tantawi, Mamdouh Nasr,
Mitch Schneider
Los Alamos National Laboratory
: 
Evgenya Simakov, Igor Usov
Energy to Power Solutions (e2P): Chris Rey
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
: Lambert Alff, Nail Karabas, Márton Major, Jasnamol P. Palakkal, Stefan
Petzold, Norbert Pietralla, Nils Schäfer
National Institute for Materials Science, Japan
: Akihiro Kikuchi
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan
: Hitoshi Hayano, Hayato Ito, Kensei Umemori, T. Kubo,
Hideaki Monjushiro
Tohoku University, Japan
: Shigeru Kashiwagi, H. Hama
Kyushu University
, Japan: Fuminori Honda
Akita Kagaku Co., Ltd
., Japan: K. Takahashi, R. Takahashi
Akita Industrial Technology Center
, Japan: Y. Kondo, K. Yamakawa
Iwate Industry Promotion Center
, Japan: K. Kon
 
 
Premise – Progress since Snowmass 2013
 
 
 
 
 
After the 2003 ITRP recommendation to focus on Superconducting RF, in the last decade
the technology in Normal-Conducting RF has made considerable progress. C
3
 , which
uses parallel-feed RF structures, enable both higher accelerating gradients and higher
efficiencies and achieves linac gradients exceeding 100 MV/m with cryo-cooled Cu.
 
Superconducting Nb
3
Sn coated RF cavities are expected to achieve 100 MV/m too, plus
a Q
0
 30 times that of Nb. Nb
3
Sn coated cavities can be operated at 4.5 K rather than in
superfluid helium.
Heavily processed bulk Nb cavities are a main cost driver, whereas Cu or bronze are less
expensive and much more thermally efficient metals
.
 
There are small R&D efforts in the U.S. and abroad, including at CERN, in producing
Nb
3
Sn films on either Cu or bronze. Parallel-feed RF structures are applicable to both Cu
and Nb
3
Sn coated Cu cells.
 
 
Baseline Design/Layout and Parameters
 
 
 
 
 
Based on the assessment of current efforts in the U.S. on the novel concept of parallel-
feed RF accelerator structures, and in the U.S. and abroad in producing Nb
3
Sn films on
either Cu or bronze, 
we recommend that the Particle Physics community foster R&D in
Superconducting Nb
3
Sn coated Cu RF Cavities instead of costly bulk Nb, while pursuing in
parallel the novel U.S. concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures made of Cu or Cu
alloys
.
 
A technology that synergistically uses both of these advanced tools would make an ILC or
equivalent machines more affordable and more likely to be built. A devoted global effort
in developing Cu cavity structures coated with Nb
3
Sn would readily apply to other HEP
accelerators, for instance a Muon Collider, and to accelerators beyond HEP.
 
A machine whose RF structures are made of bulk Cu or bronze that operate with the
properties of Nb
3
Sn would deliver higher gradient and higher temperature of operation
and reduce the overall capital and operational costs of any future lepton collider below
and above 1 TeV cm.
 
Key Technologies (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Coating Cu/bronze inner surface with thin layer of Nb
3
Sn
White paper at https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2203/2203.09718.pdf
 
Electroplating
 – FNAL, KEK, Akita Kagaku Co. Ltd.,
Tohoku University, Akita Industrial Technology Center.
Magnetron sputtering in co-sputtering mode 
from two
targets 
with direct deposition on substrate of
stoichiometric Nb
3
Sn - Technische Universität
Darmstadt.
Magnetron sputtering from a single stoichiometric
target 
– CERN, 
Old Dominion University
M
ultilayer sequential magnetron sputtering 
- Old
Dominion University, LANL
The Bronze Route
, which builds upon Nb
3
Sn
superconducting wire technology and also exploits the
heat treatment temperature reduction effect of the Cu as
ternary element of the Nb-Sn-Cu phase diagram –
NIMS.
 
Schematic of magnetron sputtering setup
with two targets at Technische Universität
Darmstadt.
 
Key Technologies (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Parallel-feed RF accelerator structures
 
C
3
 is NCRF accelerator technology to operate at high
gradient with high RF-to-beam efficiency.
Use highly-optimized reentrant cells with distributed
coupling to power the linac without cell-to-cell RF
coupling and operate at 77 K
Structure is machined in two halves by low-cost
numerically-controlled milling machines. This
machining process produces ultra-high vacuum quality
surfaces that need no further machining before a
standard Cu surface etch.
This manufacturing technique provides an ideal Cu
surface to be coated with superconducting films, as it
allows complete access to the inner cavity surface for
the coating process
.
The system is then assembled simply by joining the two
blocks.
 
Accelerator design and challenges
Civil Engineering and site
Sustainability and Carbon footprint studies
Proposals for upgrades and extensions
Stageability to future experiments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depend on Lepton
machine considered
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Parameters
 
State of Proposal and R&D needs (5-10 years)
 
 
 
 
 
Under reasonable funding in the U.S. with respect to
now, perform R&D in Superconducting Nb
3
Sn coated
Cu RF Cavities instead of on costly bulk Nb.
Use the next decade for R&D on producing Nb
3
Sn on
inexpensive and thermally efficient metals such as Cu
or bronze, while pursuing in parallel the novel U.S.
concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures.
Increased effort on these two techniques would
synergize expenditures towards 10-year progress,
which will naturally converge to a clear decision by the
community on which path to take for the RF of an ILC.
Use SLAC existing and future test setups for single
cavity tests first, and meter scale next.
That would lead to a decision to proceed with
cryomodule design. Cryomodules to be tested at SLAC
Demo or at FAST.
Use SLAC Demo setup to test components from
industry as they scale up in 2030-2034.
2028 CDR
2030-2034 Industrialization
 
 
Conclusions
 
A devoted global effort in developing Cu cavity structures coated with Nb
3
Sn would make the ILC or
Higgs/EW factories more affordable and more likely to be built.
 
Using the next decade for R&D on producing Nb
3
Sn on inexpensive and thermally efficient metals such as
Cu or bronze, while pursuing in parallel the novel U.S. concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures,
would compound the best of both worlds. Not only do parallel-feed RF structures enable both higher
accelerating gradients and higher efficiencies, but they would be applicable to both Cu and Nb
3
Sn coated
Cu cells.
 
Increased effort on these two techniques would synergize expenditures towards 10-year progress, which
will naturally converge to a clear decision by the community on which path to take for the RF of an ILC
or other leptonic future accelerator.  If for any reason, the C
3
 structures were not ready in ten years, the
current methods of Nb
3
Sn coatings on Cu or bronze are geared towards standard cavity cells. Were one of
these methods to succeed, it could still be implemented on conventional Cu RFs.
 
In conclusion, the use of distributed coupling structure topology within improved performance
parameters together with Nb
3
Sn coating technology can lead to a paradigm shift for superconducting
linacs, with higher gradient, higher temperature of operation, and reduced overall costs for any future
collider.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Emanuela Barzi and co-authors have made significant progress in developing lepton colliders with higher gradients at lower capital and operational costs. Their research focuses on using Superconducting Nb3Sn coated Cu RF cavities, parallel-feed RF structures, and innovative technologies to achieve higher efficiencies and gradients in accelerator systems. By fostering R&D in these advanced tools, the Particle Physics community aims to make future lepton colliders more affordable and feasible for construction, potentially revolutionizing the field of High Energy Physics.

  • Lepton colliders
  • Technology advancements
  • Superconducting RF cavities
  • Particle Physics
  • Accelerator systems

Uploaded on Sep 24, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lepton Colliders with Higher Gradient at Lower Capital and Operational Costs Emanuela Barzi, Fermilab & Ohio State University

  2. Co-authors California Institute of Technology: Barry Barish Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility: Robert A. Rimmer, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Bill Barletta SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory: Marc Ross, Paul B. Welander, Emilio Nanni, Sami Tantawi, Mamdouh Nasr, Mitch Schneider Los Alamos National Laboratory: Evgenya Simakov, Igor Usov Energy to Power Solutions (e2P): Chris Rey Technische Universit t Darmstadt, Germany: Lambert Alff, Nail Karabas, M rton Major, Jasnamol P. Palakkal, Stefan Petzold, Norbert Pietralla, Nils Sch fer National Institute for Materials Science, Japan: Akihiro Kikuchi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan: Hitoshi Hayano, Hayato Ito, Kensei Umemori, T. Kubo, Hideaki Monjushiro Tohoku University, Japan: Shigeru Kashiwagi, H. Hama Kyushu University, Japan: Fuminori Honda Akita Kagaku Co., Ltd., Japan: K. Takahashi, R. Takahashi Akita Industrial Technology Center, Japan: Y. Kondo, K. Yamakawa Iwate Industry Promotion Center, Japan: K. Kon

  3. Premise Progress since Snowmass 2013 After the 2003 ITRP recommendation to focus on Superconducting RF, in the last decade the technology in Normal-Conducting RF has made considerable progress. C3, which uses parallel-feed RF structures, enable both higher accelerating gradients and higher efficiencies and achieves linac gradients exceeding 100 MV/m with cryo-cooled Cu. Superconducting Nb3Sn coated RF cavities are expected to achieve 100 MV/m too, plus a Q030 times that of Nb. Nb3Sn coated cavities can be operated at 4.5 K rather than in superfluid helium. Heavily processed bulk Nb cavities are a main cost driver, whereas Cu or bronze are less expensive and much more thermally efficient metals. There are small R&D efforts in the U.S. and abroad, including at CERN, in producing Nb3Sn films on either Cu or bronze. Parallel-feed RF structures are applicable to both Cu and Nb3Sn coated Cu cells.

  4. Baseline Design/Layout and Parameters Based on the assessment of current efforts in the U.S. on the novel concept of parallel- feed RF accelerator structures, and in the U.S. and abroad in producing Nb3Sn films on either Cu or bronze, we recommend that the Particle Physics community foster R&D in Superconducting Nb3Sn coated Cu RF Cavities instead of costly bulk Nb, while pursuing in parallel the novel U.S. concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures made of Cu or Cu alloys. A technology that synergistically uses both of these advanced tools would make an ILC or equivalent machines more affordable and more likely to be built. A devoted global effort in developing Cu cavity structures coated with Nb3Sn would readily apply to other HEP accelerators, for instance a Muon Collider, and to accelerators beyond HEP. A machine whose RF structures are made of bulk Cu or bronze that operate with the properties of Nb3Sn would deliver higher gradient and higher temperature of operation and reduce the overall capital and operational costs of any future lepton collider below and above 1 TeV cm.

  5. Key Technologies (1) Coating Cu/bronze inner surface with thin layer of Nb3Sn White paper at https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2203/2203.09718.pdf Electroplating FNAL, KEK, Akita Kagaku Co. Ltd., Tohoku University,Akita Industrial Technology Center. Magnetron sputtering in co-sputtering mode from two targets with direct deposition stoichiometric Nb3Sn Darmstadt. Magnetron sputtering from a single stoichiometric target CERN, Old Dominion University Multilayer sequential magnetron sputtering - Old Dominion University, LANL The Bronze Route, which superconducting wire technology and also exploits the heat treatment temperature reduction effect of the Cu as ternary element of the Nb-Sn-Cu phase diagram NIMS. on substrate Universit t of - Technische builds upon Nb3Sn Schematic of magnetron sputtering setup with two targets at Technische Universit t Darmstadt.

  6. Key Technologies (2) Parallel-feed RF accelerator structures C3is NCRF accelerator technology to operate at high gradient with high RF-to-beam efficiency. Use highly-optimized reentrant cells with distributed coupling to power the linac without cell-to-cell RF coupling and operate at 77 K Structure is machined in two halves by low-cost numerically-controlled milling machining process produces ultra-high vacuum quality surfaces that need no further machining before a standard Cu surface etch. This manufacturing technique provides an ideal Cu surface to be coated with superconducting films, as it allows complete access to the inner cavity surface for the coating process. The system is then assembled simply by joining the two blocks. machines. This

  7. Other Parameters Accelerator design and challenges Civil Engineering and site Sustainability and Carbon footprint studies Proposals for upgrades and extensions Stageability to future experiments Depend on Lepton machine considered

  8. State of Proposal and R&D needs (5-10 years) Under reasonable funding in the U.S. with respect to now, perform R&D in Superconducting Nb3Sn coated Cu RF Cavities instead of on costly bulk Nb. Use the next decade for R&D on producing Nb3Sn on inexpensive and thermally efficient metals such as Cu or bronze, while pursuing in parallel the novel U.S. concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures. Increased effort on these two techniques would synergize expenditures towards which will naturally converge to a clear decision by the community on which path to take for the RF of an ILC. Use SLAC existing and future test setups for single cavity tests first, and meter scale next. That would lead to a decision to proceed with cryomodule design. Cryomodules to be tested at SLAC Demo or at FAST. Use SLAC Demo setup to test components from industry as they scale up in 2030-2034. 2028 CDR 10-year progress, 2030-2034 Industrialization

  9. Conclusions A devoted global effort in developing Cu cavity structures coated with Nb3Sn would make the ILC or Higgs/EW factories more affordable and more likely to be built. Using the next decade for R&D on producing Nb3Sn on inexpensive and thermally efficient metals such as Cu or bronze, while pursuing in parallel the novel U.S. concept of parallel-feed RF accelerator structures, would compound the best of both worlds. Not only do parallel-feed RF structures enable both higher accelerating gradients and higher efficiencies, but they would be applicable to both Cu and Nb3Sn coated Cu cells. Increased effort on these two techniques would synergize expenditures towards 10-year progress, which will naturally converge to a clear decision by the community on which path to take for the RF of an ILC or other leptonic future accelerator. If for any reason, the C3structures were not ready in ten years, the current methods of Nb3Sn coatings on Cu or bronze are geared towards standard cavity cells. Were one of these methods to succeed, it could still be implemented on conventional Cu RFs. In conclusion, the use of distributed coupling structure topology within improved performance parameters together with Nb3Sn coating technology can lead to a paradigm shift for superconducting linacs, with higher gradient, higher temperature of operation, and reduced overall costs for any future collider.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#