Electron Lenses in Particle Accelerators: Advancements and Applications

undefined
Electron Lenses for: 
a) 
Space-charge compensation
b) Landau damping
c) Halo collimation
d) Beam-beam compensation
V.Shiltsev
with input from G.Stancari, E.Stern, A.Burov, A.Valishev and
Yu.Alexahin
GARD ABP Roadmap Workshop #1
LBNL, December
 8-9
, 2019
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
2
Electron Lens Space Charge – Physics Motivation
Electron Lens Space Charge – Physics Motivation
 
B
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
3
Electron Lenses – Since 1997
Electron Lenses – Since 1997
~4 mm dia 2 m long
  
in 3T solenoid 
 beam of ~10kV
~1A electrons 
(~10
12
)
  
can turn on/off in 0.5 usec
generates strong radial electric field 
E 
E 
~ 0.3MV/m
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
4
Two Electron Lenses Installed in Tevatron
Two Electron Lenses Installed in Tevatron
V.Shiltsev, et al, PRST-AB (1997)
V.Shiltsev, et al, PRST-AB (1997)
TEL-1 in 2001
TEL-1 in 2001
TEL-2 in 2004
TEL-2 in 2004
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
5
What Electron Lenses Are Good For (1)
What Electron Lenses Are Good For (1)
I
I
n
n
 
 
t
t
h
h
e
e
 
 
F
F
e
e
r
r
m
m
i
i
l
l
a
a
b
b
 
 
T
T
e
e
v
v
a
a
t
t
r
r
o
o
n
n
 
 
C
C
o
o
l
l
l
l
i
i
d
d
e
e
r
r
:
:
l
o
n
g
-
r
a
n
g
e
 
b
e
a
m
-
b
e
a
m
 
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
 
(
v
a
r
i
e
d
 
t
u
n
e
 
s
h
i
f
t
 
o
f
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
 
1
 
T
e
V
 
b
u
n
c
h
e
s
 
b
y
 
0
.
0
0
3
-
0
.
0
1
)
;
S
h
i
l
t
s
e
v
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
h
y
s
.
 
R
e
v
.
 
L
e
t
t
.
 
9
9
,
 
2
4
4
8
0
1
 
(
2
0
0
7
)
a
b
o
r
t
 
g
a
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
m
a
t
i
o
n
 
(
f
o
r
 
y
e
a
r
s
 
i
n
 
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
 
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
;
Z
h
a
n
g
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
h
y
s
.
 
R
e
v
.
 
S
T
 
A
c
c
e
l
.
 
B
e
a
m
s
 
1
1
,
 
0
5
1
0
0
2
 
(
2
0
0
8
)
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
 
o
f
 
h
e
a
d
-
o
n
 
b
e
a
m
-
b
e
a
m
 
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
;
Shiltsev et al, NJP (2008); Stancari et al., PRL 107, 084802 (2011)
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
h
a
l
o
 
s
c
r
a
p
i
n
g
 
w
i
t
h
 
h
o
l
l
o
w
 
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
b
e
a
m
s
;
Shiltsev (2006); Stancari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 084802 (2011)
P
A
S
T
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
6
What Electron Lenses Are Good For (2)
What Electron Lenses Are Good For (2)
P
P
r
r
e
e
s
s
e
e
n
n
t
t
l
l
y
y
 
 
u
u
s
s
e
e
d
d
 
 
i
i
n
n
 
 
R
R
H
H
I
I
C
C
 
 
a
a
t
t
 
 
B
B
N
N
L
L
 
 
f
o
r
 
h
e
a
d
-
o
n
 
b
e
a
m
-
b
e
a
m
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
 
w
i
t
h
 
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
 
l
l
u
u
m
m
i
i
n
n
o
o
s
s
i
i
t
t
y
y
 
 
g
g
a
a
i
i
n
n
 
 
~
~
x
x
2
2
Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 264801 (2015)
C
C
u
u
r
r
r
r
e
e
n
n
t
t
 
 
a
a
r
r
e
e
a
a
s
s
 
 
o
o
f
f
 
 
r
r
e
e
s
s
e
e
a
a
r
r
c
c
h
h
:
:
t
o
 
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
e
 
s
p
a
c
e
-
c
h
a
r
g
e
 
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
 
i
n
 
m
o
d
e
r
n
 
R
C
S
s
 
Burov, Foster, Shiltsev (2000), Stern et al, IPAC’18
h
o
l
l
o
w
 
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
 
b
e
a
m
 
c
o
l
l
i
m
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
p
r
o
t
o
n
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
H
L
-
L
H
C
;
Conceptional Design Report, CERN-ACC-2014-0248 (2014)
l
o
n
g
-
r
a
n
g
e
 
b
e
a
m
-
b
e
a
m
 
c
o
m
p
e
n
s
a
t
i
o
n
 
a
s
 
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
-
b
e
a
r
i
n
g
 
w
i
r
e
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
H
L
-
L
H
C
V
a
l
i
s
h
e
v
,
S
t
a
n
c
a
r
i
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
3
1
2
.
5
0
0
6
;
 
F
a
r
t
o
u
k
h
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
R
S
T
A
B
 
1
8
,
 
1
2
1
0
0
1
 
(
2
0
1
5
)
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
a
r
 
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
b
l
e
 
l
a
t
t
i
c
e
s
,
 
 
e
g
 
i
n
 
I
O
T
A
Shiltsev et al, PRSTAB(1997), Nagaitsev, et al., IPAC’12; Stancari et al., IPAC’15
t
o
 
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
 
t
u
n
e
 
s
p
r
e
a
d
 
f
o
r
 
L
a
n
d
a
u
 
d
a
m
p
i
n
g
 
o
f
 
i
n
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
 
b
e
f
o
r
e
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
L
H
C
,
 
F
C
C
-
h
h
 
(
(
>
>
1
1
0
0
,
,
0
0
0
0
0
0
 
 
o
o
c
c
t
t
u
u
p
p
o
o
l
l
e
e
s
s
)
,
 
F
N
A
L
 
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
r
 
Shiltsev (2006), Shiltsev, Alexahin, Burov, Valishev PRL (2018)
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
F
U
T
U
R
E
   versatile applications depending on e-beam profile + pulsing
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
7
ABP eLens Topic #1:
ABP eLens Topic #1:
 
Compensation of space-charge
effects by electron lenses
   PIC simulations below - by E.Stern, et al (FNAL)
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
8
Tune Footprint dQ
Tune Footprint dQ
SC
SC
=-0.9
=-0.9
 
dQ
SC
= - 0.9
 
dQ
SC+EL
= - 0.2
  Stern et al, THPAF075, IPAC18, Beams Document 6790-v1 FNAL (2019)
 
no e-lenses
no e-lenses
 
~
~
7
7
5
5
%
%
 
 
e
e
-
-
l
l
e
e
n
n
s
s
 
 
c
c
o
o
m
m
p
p
e
e
n
n
s
s
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
9
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
SC
SC
=-0.9
=-0.9
Case #1
Case #1
Ideal ring 
Ideal ring 
Case #
Case #
2
2
1% error in 
1% error in 
one quad 
one quad 
Case #3
Case #3
1% error in 
1% error in 
one quad +
one quad +
12 e-Lenses
12 e-Lenses
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
10
Emittance Growth – Case #1
Emittance Growth – Case #1
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
11
Emittance Growth – Case #2
Emittance Growth – Case #2
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
12
Emittance Growth – Case #3
Emittance Growth – Case #3
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
13
Particle Losses at 4
Particle Losses at 4
σ
σ
 – Case #2 and #3
 – Case #2 and #3
e-lenses 
e-lenses 
reduce 
reduce 
losses 
losses 
~6 fold ! 
~6 fold ! 
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
14
Optimal Compensation ~75% (emitt. growth)
Optimal Compensation ~75% (emitt. growth)
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
15
Optimal Compensation ~70% (beam losses)
Optimal Compensation ~70% (beam losses)
Electron Lens in IOTA
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
16
Two Add’l Important Variations
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
17
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
 
C
o
l
u
m
n
M
c
M
i
l
l
a
n
 
e
L
e
n
s
I
n
 
s
t
r
o
n
g
 
f
i
e
l
d
,
 
i
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
 
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
s
 
m
i
r
r
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
v
e
r
s
e
 
p
r
o
f
i
l
e
 
o
f
 
p
r
o
t
o
n
s
H
o
w
 
d
o
e
s
 
t
h
e
 
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
 
c
o
l
u
m
n
 
e
v
o
l
v
e
?
Use the electromagnetic field generated by
the electron distribution to
provide the desired nonlinear field.
ABP 
eLens
 Topic #2 : Coherent Stability
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
В.Шильцев
           
18
For the parameters of the
 
Future
Circular Collider, a single conventional
electron lens a few meters long would
provide stabilization
 
superior to 
tens of
thousands of superconducting octupole
magnets.”
A.Burov, Y. Alexahin, V.Shiltsev, A.Valishev
A.Burov, Y. Alexahin, V.Shiltsev, A.Valishev
ABP 
eLens
 Topic #3 : Halo Collimation
HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tev
HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tev
atron to LHC
atron to LHC
12/08/2019
19
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Hollow e-Lens
 Collimator for HL-LHC
HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tev
HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tev
atron to LHC
atron to LHC
12/08/2019
20
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Topic #4 : Beam-beam compensation
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Gaussian e-beam
Gaussian e-beam
s for head-on compensation
s for head-on compensation
Broader/smooth edge e-beams for long-range
Broader/smooth edge e-beams for long-range
beam-beam compensation
beam-beam compensation
Found very effective in the Tevatron (LR-BBC)
Found very effective in the Tevatron (LR-BBC)
and RHIC (HO-BBC)
and RHIC (HO-BBC)
Can be very helpful in HL-LHC for LR-BBC:
A.Valishev, S.Fartoukh, et al
Relatively complex (wrt to Wire LR-BBC
R
H
I
C
 
e
-
L
e
n
s
e
s
Effectiveness for
future colliders
(EIC and FCChh)
Need to be studied
21
eLens c
hallenges:
12/08/2019
22
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Space-charge compensation risks : 
Physics of space-charge requires not only transverse matching as in beam-
beam compensation but also longitudinal matching of e- and p+ bunches
Specs for the SCC are not fully explored yet
Specs might be very challenging for practical cost effective eLenses
E-lenses for Landau damping risk :
Physics and technological risks are limited
Hollow eLens Collimation risk:
Physics risks is limited
Technological risks in generation of the proper beam profile, problem-free
bending sections, and   proper time modulation
eLens beam-beam compensation risks : 
Physics and technological risks are limited
Specs might be very challenging for practical cost effective eLenses (if high
A*m are needed for high current colliders)
How can it fail? What can go wrong with this idea?
Facilities: Fermilab and CERN test stands 
… Upgrades
CERN electron lens test stand
12/08/2019
23
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Fermilab elens test stand
Phase 1
Diagnostics Box 
Phase 2
Operational, up to 10 kV, 8
s x 1Hz pulses (or higher at lower
current). Used to test Tevatron and CERN guns, will be used for
testing guns for space-charge compensation at IOTA ring. Could
be used to test HF modulators.
Upgrades needed:  
for higher
intensity, faster modulators and new
profile diagnostics
Electron Lenses and the 
GARD ABP 
Grand challenges
12/08/2019
24
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Grand challenge #1 (beam intensity): 
 How do we increase beam
intensities by orders of magnitude?
eLens Space-Charge Compensation can lead to factor 2-3-5? in intensity
eLens Landau damping can keep narrow beams stable x10-100
Grand challenge #2 (beam quality): 
How do we increase beam
phase-space density by orders of magnitude, towards quantum
degeneracy limit?
eLens Landau damping can keep superbright beams stable x10-100
eLens Beam-beam/SC compensation can allow x2-5 in
 
ξ
 
and 
dQ
SC
Grand challenge #3 (beam control): 
How do we control the beam
distribution down to the level of individual particles?
eLens Halo collimation can control losses of superbright beams
eLens in McMillan form can control beam distribution and losses
Grand Challenge #4 (beam prediction): 
How do we develop
predictive “virtual particle accelerators”?
eLens SC and BBC require arguably the most predictive modeling tools
Describe an approximate timeline in relation to grand challenges
Describe an approximate timeline in relation to grand challenges
: #1 – 10-15 yrs; #2 – 10-20 yrs; #3 – 5-10 yrs; #4 – 5-10 yrs
(see slide 30)
Electron Lenses and the 
GARD ABP Missions
12/08/2019
25
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Advance physics of accelerators and beams to enable
future accelerators.
Substantially expand 
intensity/power reach of future multi-MW
RCSs via space-charge loss control and luminosity reach of future
EF hadron colliders via beam-beam, syability and halo control
Develop conventional and advanced accelerator
concepts and tools to disrupt existing costly technology
paradigms in coordination with other GARD thrusts.
eLens SC compensation can allow (less expensive) RCS options for
multi-mW beams; inexpensive luminosity increase tools
Guide and help to fully exploit science at the GARD
beam facilities and operational accelerators.
Vigorous eLens program in IOTA; HL-LHC e-beam collimation greatly helps
Educate and train future accelerator physicists.
eLenses offer unmatched variety for development of existing and new
concepts  for operational and future accelerators, rich collaborations
Electron Lenses and
 HEP-Specific Missions
12/08/2019
26
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Intensity frontier
Space-charge compensation can be a game-
changer for next generation cost efficient multi-MW
machines for neutrino physics 
(eg PIP-III)
Energy frontier: hadron colliders
Halo collimation, Landau damping and beam-
beam compensation can be a game-changer for
next generation hh-Colliders 
(HL-, HE-LHC, FCChh)
Energy frontier: lepton colliders
Space-charge compensation will advance proton
drivers for muon colliders 
(MC)
Accelerators for physics beyond colliders and
Standard Model
SC-compensation for cost efficient multi-MW beams
Electron Lenses : 
 Synergies and Connections
12/08/2019
27
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
To other GARD thrusts :
High Field Magnets 
High Field Magnets 
: SC solenoids for eLens
beamsize compression
Targetry and Sources : 
Targetry and Sources : 
AAC
AAC
  : PIC plasma simulations (Space-charge,
Beam-beam, Landau damping)
To other SC offices :
BES 
BES 
: space-charge compensation  in protons
beams for spallation neutron sources
Nuclear Physics : 
Nuclear Physics : 
 beam-beam and space-charge
compensation in EIC; synergy with e-cooling
FES
FES
 : high sield solenoids; PIC plasma simulations
(Space-charge, Beam-beam, Landau damping);
physics of electron columns/traps
Collaborations: 
Collaborations: 
Who is working on this now?
Who is working on this now?
Fermilab:
Exp/HW/Test stands: G.Stancari, V.Shiltsev, B.Cathey, et al
Modeling/Simulations: E.Stern, A.Valishev, A.Burov, et al
Collaborating Universities / Labs:
LBNL (C.Mitchell, et al), Korea (M.Chung, C.S.Park),
RadiaSoft (J.Edelen, C.Hall); Finland (Lapland U.)
BNL: 
W.
Fischer, X.Gu, et al
CERN:
Exp/HW/Test stands: S.Radealli, D.Perini, et al
Modeling/Simulations: A.Rossi, S. Sadovich, et al
Collaborating Universities/Labs
BINP (Novosibirsk): A.Levichev, D.Nikiforov, et al
Germany: J.Wagner (Frankfurt), et al
China: W.Shao, et al
12/08/2019
28
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
ABP 
eLens
 R&D: Milestones (draft)
Space-charge compensation :
IOTA eLens installed 
IOTA eLens installed 
 
 
   
2021-2022
SCC experimental studies
SCC experimental studies
   
2022-2028
Mod/Sim’s on eLens SCC
Mod/Sim’s on eLens SCC
   
2020-2028
Decision on PIP-III eLens SCC
Decision on PIP-III eLens SCC
  
2028
Pre-project & Constr’n SCC-PIP-III
Pre-project & Constr’n SCC-PIP-III
  
ca 2035
Electron Lenses for Colliders :
Landau Damping exp’s RHIC and IOTA 
Landau Damping exp’s RHIC and IOTA 
 
 
2020-2024
HL-LHC HEBC development 
HL-LHC HEBC development 
 
 
 
2020-2022
HL-LHC HEBC installed 
HL-LHC HEBC installed 
  
  
 
2024-2025
Design/Simulation work complete for FCC-hh Landau
Design/Simulation work complete for FCC-hh Landau
damping eL, HEBC and beam-beam 
damping eL, HEBC and beam-beam 
 
 
2032
FCC-hh electron lenses prototypes
FCC-hh electron lenses prototypes
 
 
2040
12/08/2019
29
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
dQ
SC
=-1 specs
Construction
RHIC head-on
compensation
RHIC
PoP exp
Construction
Build
    / Install
IOTA
ELECTRON LENS SPACE CHARGE COMPENSATION
2
nd
 Lens?
e-column?
TDR
Multi-MW RCS EL Design / Prototyping
R&D, TDR, prototyping, pre-construction
IOTA SCC Experiment
240 GeV                  Z        W
HL-LHC BBC studies ?
HL-LHC LR/HO  Modeling
 27 TeV
FCC e-coll. design/
prototyping
SppC
ELECTRON LENSES FOR ENERGY FRONTIER COLLIDERS
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
30
ELECTRON LENS TECHNOLOGY AND TEST STANDS
IOTA Analysis
Multi-MW RCS CDR
 McMillan   / Compensation
Double
 dQ
SC
 
?
HL-LHC
Multi-MW RCS & FCC EL Components
 
Prototyping 
 Test Stand
IOTA
HL-LHC e-Collimator
 build & install
HL-LHC e-Collimator
 commissioning & studies
FCC-hh BBC
design
IOTA studies
HL-LHC studies?
FCC-hh
design
HL-LHC Modeling
Electron Lenses R&D  : Possible Roadmap
In general, electron lens R&D is of direct relevance to the US HEP priorities for intensity and
In general, electron lens R&D is of direct relevance to the US HEP priorities for intensity and
energy frontier science outlined by 2014 P5 and those foreseen in the 2021 Snowmass  report.
energy frontier science outlined by 2014 P5 and those foreseen in the 2021 Snowmass  report.
Electron lenses combine practical feasibility and potential “blue-sky” high-impact.
Electron lenses combine practical feasibility and potential “blue-sky” high-impact.
Back up slides:
Beam Intensity
Grand Challenge
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
31
“x10 Beam Power“ Grand Challenge
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
32
“Brute force”
“Brute force”
:
:
increase the energy 
E – 
E – 
magnets, RF
magnets, RF
decrease the cycle time 
T – 
T – 
magnets, RF
magnets, RF
k
e
y
 
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
 
:
 
c
o
s
t
 
(
e
.
g
.
,
 
J
-
P
A
R
C
 
T
P
C
 
~
$
1
.
7
B
)
 
a
n
d
 
p
o
w
e
r
 
η
Increase PPP 
Increase PPP 
(protons per pulse) 
(protons per pulse) 
N
N
p
p
 :
 :
key challenges : 
many 
beam dynamics issues
beam dynamics issues
 
& cost
In both cases – 
In both cases – 
need reliable horns and targets :
need reliable horns and targets :
key challenge :
 
 
lifetime
lifetime
 
 
gets worse with power
Protons Per Pulse – no “Silver Bullet”
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
33
Increase the injection energy 
Increase the injection energy 
(PIP-II)
(PIP-II)
:
:
Gain about 
Gain about 
N
N
p
p
~ 
~ 
β
β
γ
γ
2
2
, 
, 
need (often - costly) linacs 
need (often - costly) linacs 
Flatten the beams 
Flatten the beams 
(using 2
(using 2
nd
nd
 harm, RF) :
 harm, RF) :
Makes SC force uniform, 
N
N
p
p
~ 
~ 
x1.5-2
“Painting” beams 
“Painting” beams 
at injection
at injection
:
:
Linearize SC force across beams 
N
N
p
p
~ 
~ 
x
1.5
Better collimation system beams:
Better collimation system beams:
From 
η
~80
% to ~95% 
N
N
p 
p 
~ 
~ 
x1.5
M
M
a
a
k
k
e
e
 
 
f
f
o
o
c
c
u
u
s
s
i
i
n
n
g
g
 
 
l
l
a
a
t
t
t
t
i
i
c
c
e
e
 
 
p
p
e
e
r
r
f
f
e
e
c
c
t
t
l
l
y
y
 
 
p
p
e
e
r
r
i
i
o
o
d
d
i
i
c
c
:
:
Eg 
Eg 
P
P
=24 in Fermilab Booster, 
=24 in Fermilab Booster, 
P
P
=3 in JPARC MR 
=3 in JPARC MR 
 
 
N
N
p
p
~  
~  
x 1.5 - ?
I
I
n
n
t
t
r
r
o
o
d
d
u
u
c
c
e
e
 
 
N
N
o
o
n
n
-
-
l
l
i
i
n
n
e
e
a
a
r
r
 
 
I
I
n
n
t
t
e
e
g
g
r
r
a
a
b
b
l
l
e
e
 
 
O
O
p
p
t
t
i
i
c
c
s
s
 
 
:
:
Reduces the losses, allows 
N
N
p
p
~ 
~ 
x 1.5 – 3?
S
S
p
p
a
a
c
c
e
e
-
-
C
C
h
h
a
a
r
r
g
g
e
e
 
 
C
C
o
o
m
m
p
p
e
e
n
n
s
s
a
a
t
t
i
i
o
o
n
n
 
 
b
b
y
y
 
 
e
e
l
l
e
e
c
c
t
t
r
r
o
o
n
n
 
 
l
l
e
e
n
n
s
s
e
e
s
s
 
 
:
:
Electrons to focus protons,  
N
N
p
p
~ 
~ 
x 
1.5 – 3?
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
34
IOTA: 
Integrable Optics Test Accelerator
Speaker guidelines
Emphasize broad forward-looking research topics other
than your specific R&D program
Focus on your view of future challenges and methods
to address those challenges.
My abstracts:
“Electron Lenses for Landau damping”.
Developments of higher and higher brightness beams call for new methods of the beam stability
control. Traditional ways to ensure Landau damping by nonlinear elements, such as eg octupoles,
become less efficient for unprecedentedly narrow beams. Electron lenses are considered as an
extremely useful and versatile tool for stability control which seems to be free of traditional caveats
of reduced dynamic aperture. 
“Space-charge compensation”.
A 60-years old problem of space-charge limit affects all types of modern hadron accelerators.
There are several approaches including active space-charge compensation with electron lenses,
electron columns or other means of externally controlled neutralization. It needs to be explored
theoretically and experimentally whether indeed the space-charge parameters (figure of merit
such as tune shift or tune suppression) can be increased by substantial factors - thus paving the way
to new revolutionary accelerators.
12/08/2019
35
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Slides 1 – 4: Research idea/proposal
Please address the following:
Describe the science/R&D that you are proposing to
do.
Briefly describe present “state of the art” – you
presentation should include this!
What is the desirable outcome? What are the potential
impacts?
How does it fit into the GARD ABP missions (see
above)?
How can it fail? What can go wrong with this idea?
Is it testable? What facility?
12/08/2019
36
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Slide 5: Grand challenges
Which Grand Challenges (see above) is this
proposal/idea addressing?
Describe an approximate timeline in relation to grand
challenges
12/08/2019
37
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Slide 6: HEP missions
How is your proposed research related to the HEP-
specific missions?
Intensity frontier
Energy frontier: hadron
Energy frontier: lepton
Accelerators for physics beyond colliders and Standard
Model
“Blue-sky” with high-impact and relevance to HEP.
12/08/2019
38
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Slide 7-8: Synergies
Describe potential synergies and connections to other
GARD thrusts and other SC offices (BES, NP, QIS, FES,
etc)
12/08/2019
39
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Slides 9-10: Timeline (aka the Roadmap)
Describe the proposed timeline and associated
milestones
12/08/2019
40
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
Year
   2020
   2020
   
   
        2025
        2025
  
  
  
  
 
 
 2030
 2030
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
41
   2020
   2020
   
   
        2025
        2025
  
  
  
  
 
 
 2030
 2030
Electron Lenses R&D  : Approx. Timeline (10 yrs)
Year
   2030
   2030
   
   
        2035
        2035
  
  
  
  
 
 
 2040
 2040
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
42
   2030
   2030
   
   
        2035
        2035
  
  
  
  
 
 
 2040
 2040
E-Lenses R&D  : Approx. Timeline (next 10 yrs)
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
43
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
SC
SC
=-0.9
=-0.9
Case #1 
Case #1 
12/08/2019
Shiltsev | Electron Lenses
44
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
1000 Turns in a Ring with dQ
SC
SC
=-0.9
=-0.9
Case #2 
Case #2 
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the use of electron lenses in particle accelerators for space-charge compensation, Landau damping, halo collimation, and beam-beam compensation. Learn about their history, applications in Tevatron and RHIC colliders, and current research areas. Electron lenses have shown promise in enhancing beam quality, compensating for beam-beam effects, and improving collider performance.

  • Particle accelerators
  • Electron lenses
  • Beam-beam compensation
  • Space-charge effects
  • Particle physics

Uploaded on Sep 22, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GARD ABP Roadmap Workshop #1 LBNL, December 8-9, 2019 Electron Lenses for: a) Space-charge compensation b) Landau damping c) Halo collimation d) Beam-beam compensation V.Shiltsev with input from G.Stancari, E.Stern, A.Burov, A.Valishev and Yu.Alexahin

  2. Electron Lens Space Charge Physics Motivation B 2 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  3. Electron Lenses Since 1997 ~4 mm dia 2 m long in 3T solenoid beam of ~10kV ~1A electrons (~1012) can turn on/off in 0.5 usec 3 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  4. Two Electron Lenses Installed in Tevatron TEL-1 in 2001 TEL-2 in 2004 V.Shiltsev, et al, PRST-AB (1997) 4 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  5. What Electron Lenses Are Good For (1) In the Fermilab Tevatron Collider: long-range beam-beam compensation (varied tune shift of individual 1 TeV bunches by 0.003-0.01); Shiltsev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 244801 (2007) abort gap collimation (for years in regular operation); Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 051002 (2008) studies of head-on beam-beam compensation; Shiltsev et al, NJP (2008); Stancari et al., PRL 107, 084802 (2011) demonstration of halo scraping with hollow electron beams; Shiltsev (2006); Stancari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 084802 (2011) 5 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  6. What Electron Lenses Are Good For (2) Presently used in RHIC at BNL for head-on beam-beam compensation with significant luminosity gain ~x2 Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 264801 (2015) Current areas of research: to compensate space-charge effects in modern RCSs Burov, Foster, Shiltsev (2000), Stern et al, IPAC 18 hollow electron beam collimation of protons in the HL-LHC; Conceptional Design Report, CERN-ACC-2014-0248 (2014) long-range beam-beam compensation as current-bearing wires in the HL-LHC Valishev,Stancari, arXiv:1312.5006; Fartoukh et al., PRSTAB 18, 121001 (2015) generation of nonlinear integrable lattices, eg in IOTA Shiltsev et al, PRSTAB(1997), Nagaitsev, et al., IPAC 12; Stancari et al., IPAC 15 to generate tune spread for Landau damping of instabilities before collisions in the LHC, FCC-hh (>10,000 octupoles), FNAL Recycler Shiltsev (2006), Shiltsev, Alexahin, Burov, Valishev PRL (2018) 12/08/2019 versatile applications depending on e-beam profile + pulsing 6 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  7. ABP eLens Topic #1: Compensation of space-charge effects by electron lenses 7 PIC simulations below - by E.Stern, et al (FNAL) 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  8. Tune Footprint dQSC=-0.9 dQSC= - 0.9 dQSC+EL= - 0.2 ~75% e-lens compensation no e-lenses 12/08/2019 Stern et al, THPAF075, IPAC18, Beams Document 6790-v1 FNAL (2019) 8 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  9. 1000 Turns in a Ring with dQSC=-0.9 Case #1 Ideal ring 1% error Electron lens Case #2 1% error in one quad Focusing Defocusing Case #3 1% error in one quad + 12 e-Lenses 9 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  10. Emittance Growth Case #1 10 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  11. Emittance Growth Case #2 11 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  12. Emittance Growth Case #3 12 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  13. Particle Losses at 4 Case #2 and #3 e-lenses reduce losses ~6 fold ! 13 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  14. Optimal Compensation ~75% (emitt. growth) 14 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  15. Optimal Compensation ~70% (beam losses) 15 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  16. Electron Lens in IOTA 16 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  17. Two Addl Important Variations McMillan eLens Electron Column Use the electromagnetic field generated by the electron distribution to provide the desired nonlinear field. In strong field, ionization electrons mirror transverse profile of protons How does the electron column evolve? 17 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  18. ABP eLens Topic #2 : Coherent Stability A.Burov, Y. Alexahin, V.Shiltsev, A.Valishev For the parameters of the Future Circular Collider, a single conventional electron lens a few meters long would provide stabilization superior to tens of Shiltsev | Electron Lenses thousands of superconducting octupole magnets. . 18 12/08/2019

  19. ABP eLens Topic #3 : Halo Collimation HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tevatron to LHC 19 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  20. Hollow e-Lens Collimator for HL-LHC HEBC: Hollow Electron Beam Collimation : Tevatron to LHC 20 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  21. Topic #4 : Beam-beam compensation Gaussian e-beams for head-on compensation Broader/smooth edge e-beams for long-range beam-beam compensation Found very effective in the Tevatron (LR-BBC) and RHIC (HO-BBC) Can be very helpful in HL-LHC for LR-BBC: A.Valishev, S.Fartoukh, et al Relatively complex (wrt to Wire LR-BBC Effectiveness for future colliders (EIC and FCChh) Need to be studied RHIC e-Lenses Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019 21

  22. eLens challenges: How can it fail? What can go wrong with this idea? Space-charge compensation risks : Physics of space-charge requires not only transverse matching as in beam- beam compensation but also longitudinal matching of e- and p+ bunches Specs for the SCC are not fully explored yet Specs might be very challenging for practical cost effective eLenses E-lenses for Landau damping risk : Physics and technological risks are limited Hollow eLens Collimation risk: Physics risks is limited Technological risks in generation of the proper beam profile, problem-free bending sections, and proper time modulation eLens beam-beam compensation risks : Physics and technological risks are limited Specs might be very challenging for practical cost effective eLenses (if high A*m are needed for high current colliders) 22 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  23. Facilities: Fermilab and CERN test stands Upgrades CERN electron lens test stand Fermilab elens test stand Phase 1 Phase 2 Operational, up to 10 kV, 8 s x 1Hz pulses (or higher at lower current). Used to test Tevatron and CERN guns, will be used for testing guns for space-charge compensation at IOTA ring. Could be used to test HF modulators. Upgrades needed: for higher intensity, faster modulators and new Diagnostics Box Shiltsev | Electron Lenses profile diagnostics 23 12/08/2019

  24. Electron Lenses and the GARD ABP Grand challenges Grand challenge #1 (beam intensity): How do we increase beam intensities by orders of magnitude? eLens Space-Charge Compensation can lead to factor 2-3-5? in intensity eLens Landau damping can keep narrow beams stable x10-100 Grand challenge #2 (beam quality): How do we increase beam phase-space density by orders of magnitude, towards quantum degeneracy limit? eLens Landau damping can keep superbright beams stable x10-100 eLens Beam-beam/SC compensation can allow x2-5 in and dQSC Grand challenge #3 (beam control): How do we control the beam distribution down to the level of individual particles? eLens Halo collimation can control losses of superbright beams eLens in McMillan form can control beam distribution and losses Grand Challenge #4 (beam prediction): How do we develop predictive virtual particle accelerators ? eLens SC and BBC require arguably the most predictive modeling tools Shiltsev | Electron Lenses Describe an approximate timeline in relation to grand challenges: #1 10-15 yrs; #2 10-20 yrs; #3 5-10 yrs; #4 5-10 yrs (see slide 30) 24 12/08/2019

  25. Electron Lenses and the GARD ABP Missions Advance physics of accelerators and beams to enable future accelerators. Substantially expand intensity/power reach of future multi-MW RCSs via space-charge loss control and luminosity reach of future EF hadron colliders via beam-beam, syability and halo control Develop conventional and advanced accelerator concepts and tools to disrupt existing costly technology paradigms in coordination with other GARD thrusts. eLens SC compensation can allow (less expensive) RCS options for multi-mW beams; inexpensive luminosity increase tools Guide and help to fully exploit science at the GARD beam facilities and operational accelerators. Vigorous eLens program in IOTA; HL-LHC e-beam collimation greatly helps Educate and train future accelerator physicists. eLenses offer unmatched variety for development of existing and new concepts for operational and future accelerators, rich collaborations 25 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  26. Electron Lenses and HEP-Specific Missions Intensity frontier Space-charge compensation can be a game- changer for next generation cost efficient multi-MW machines for neutrino physics (eg PIP-III) Energy frontier: hadron colliders Halo collimation, Landau damping and beam- beam compensation can be a game-changer for next generation hh-Colliders (HL-, HE-LHC, FCChh) Energy frontier: lepton colliders Space-charge compensation will advance proton drivers for muon colliders (MC) Accelerators for physics beyond colliders and Standard Model SC-compensation for cost efficient multi-MW beams 26 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  27. Electron Lenses : Synergies and Connections To other GARD thrusts : High Field Magnets : SC solenoids for eLens beamsize compression Targetry and Sources : AAC : PIC plasma simulations (Space-charge, Beam-beam, Landau damping) To other SC offices : BES : space-charge compensation in protons beams for spallation neutron sources Nuclear Physics : beam-beam and space-charge compensation in EIC; synergy with e-cooling FES : high sield solenoids; PIC plasma simulations (Space-charge, Beam-beam, Landau damping); physics of electron columns/traps 27 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  28. Collaborations: Who is working on this now? Fermilab: Exp/HW/Test stands: G.Stancari, V.Shiltsev, B.Cathey, et al Modeling/Simulations: E.Stern, A.Valishev, A.Burov, et al Collaborating Universities / Labs: LBNL (C.Mitchell, et al), Korea (M.Chung, C.S.Park), RadiaSoft (J.Edelen, C.Hall); Finland (Lapland U.) BNL: W.Fischer, X.Gu, et al CERN: Exp/HW/Test stands: S.Radealli, D.Perini, et al Modeling/Simulations: A.Rossi, S. Sadovich, et al Collaborating Universities/Labs BINP (Novosibirsk): A.Levichev, D.Nikiforov, et al Germany: J.Wagner (Frankfurt), et al China: W.Shao, et al 28 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  29. ABP eLens R&D: Milestones (draft) Space-charge compensation : IOTA eLens installed SCC experimental studies Mod/Sim s on eLens SCC Decision on PIP-III eLens SCC Pre-project & Constr n SCC-PIP-III Electron Lenses for Colliders : Landau Damping exp s RHIC and IOTA 2020-2024 HL-LHC HEBC development HL-LHC HEBC installed Design/Simulation work complete for FCC-hh Landau damping eL, HEBC and beam-beam FCC-hh electron lenses prototypes 2021-2022 2022-2028 2020-2028 2028 ca 2035 2020-2022 2024-2025 2032 2040 29 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  30. Electron Lenses R&D : Possible Roadmap 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 ELECTRON LENS SPACE CHARGE COMPENSATION dQSC=-1 specs IOTA SCC Experiment MODELING/SIMUL s IOTA Analysis Multi-MW RCS CDR Build / Install 2ndLens? e-column? IOTA EXPERIMENTS Double dQSC? McMillan / Compensation Multi-MW RCS EL Design / Prototyping DESIGN/PROTOTYPING IOTA TDR ELECTRON LENSES FOR ENERGY FRONTIER COLLIDERS SppC Construction 240 GeV Z W CEPC HL-LHC e-Collimator commissioning & studies HL-LHC e-Collimator build & install RHIC PoP exp FCC e-coll. design/ prototyping HALO COLLIMATION RHIC head-on compensation FCC-hh BBC design BEAM-BEAM COMPENS. HL-LHC BBC studies ? HL-LHC LR/HO Modeling FCC-hh design LANDAU DAMPING HL-LHC Modeling IOTA studies HL-LHC studies? Construction 27 TeV ELECTRON LENS TECHNOLOGY AND TEST STANDS HE-LHC R&D, TDR, prototyping, pre-construction FERMILAB TEST STAND Multi-MW RCS & FCC EL Components Prototyping Test Stand HL-LHC IOTA In general, electron lens R&D is of direct relevance to the US HEP priorities for intensity and energy frontier science outlined by 2014 P5 and those foreseen in the 2021 Snowmass report. Electron lenses combine practical feasibility and potential blue-sky high-impact. 30 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  31. Back up slides: Beam Intensity Grand Challenge 31 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  32. x10 Beam Power Grand Challenge Brute force : increase the energy E magnets, RF decrease the cycle time T magnets, RF key challenges : cost (e.g., J-PARC TPC ~$1.7B) and power Increase PPP (protons per pulse) Np: key challenges : many beam dynamics issues & cost In both cases need reliable horns and targets : key challenge : lifetime gets worse with power 32 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  33. Protons Per Pulse no Silver Bullet Increase the injection energy (PIP-II): Gain about Np~ 2, need (often - costly) linacs Flatten the beams (using 2ndharm, RF) : Makes SC force uniform, Np~ x1.5-2 Painting beams at injection: Linearize SC force across beams Np~ x1.5 Better collimation system beams: From ~80% to ~95% Np ~ x1.5 Make focusing lattice perfectly periodic: Eg P=24 in Fermilab Booster, P=3 in JPARC MR Np~ x 1.5 - ? Introduce Non-linear Integrable Optics : Reduces the losses, allows Np~ x 1.5 3? Space-Charge Compensation by electron lenses : Shiltsev | Electron Lenses Electrons to focus protons, Np~ x 1.5 3? 33 12/08/2019

  34. IOTA: Integrable Optics Test Accelerator 34 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  35. Speaker guidelines Emphasize broad forward-looking research topics other than your specific R&D program Focus on your view of future challenges and methods to address those challenges. My abstracts: Electron Lenses for Landau damping . Developments of higher and higher brightness beams call for new methods of the beam stability control. Traditional ways to ensure Landau damping by nonlinear elements, such as eg octupoles, become less efficient for unprecedentedly narrow beams. Electron lenses are considered as an extremely useful and versatile tool for stability control which seems to be free of traditional caveats of reduced dynamic aperture. Space-charge compensation . A 60-years old problem of space-charge limit affects all types of modern hadron accelerators. There are several approaches including active space-charge compensation with electron lenses, electron columns or other means of externally controlled neutralization. It needs to be explored theoretically and experimentally whether indeed the space-charge parameters (figure of merit such as tune shift or tune suppression) can be increased by substantial factors - thus paving the way to new revolutionary accelerators. Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019 35

  36. Slides 1 4: Research idea/proposal Please address the following: Describe the science/R&D that you are proposing to do. Briefly describe present state of the art you presentation should include this! What is the desirable outcome? What are the potential impacts? How does it fit into the GARD ABP missions (see above)? How can it fail? What can go wrong with this idea? Is it testable? What facility? 36 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  37. Slide 5: Grand challenges Which Grand Challenges (see above) is this proposal/idea addressing? Describe an approximate timeline in relation to grand challenges 37 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  38. Slide 6: HEP missions How is your proposed research related to the HEP- specific missions? Intensity frontier Energy frontier: hadron Energy frontier: lepton Accelerators for physics beyond colliders and Standard Model Blue-sky with high-impact and relevance to HEP. 38 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  39. Slide 7-8: Synergies Describe potential synergies and connections to other GARD thrusts and other SC offices (BES, NP, QIS, FES, etc) 39 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  40. Slides 9-10: Timeline (aka the Roadmap) Describe the proposed timeline and associated milestones 40 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 12/08/2019

  41. Electron Lenses R&D : Approx. Timeline (10 yrs) 2020 2025 2030 Year Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 2020 2025 2030 12/08/2019 41

  42. E-Lenses R&D : Approx. Timeline (next 10 yrs) 2030 2035 2040 Year Shiltsev | Electron Lenses 2030 2035 2040 12/08/2019 42

  43. 1000 Turns in a Ring with dQSC=-0.9 Case #1 Focusing Defocusing 43 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

  44. 1000 Turns in a Ring with dQSC=-0.9 Case #2 1% error Focusing Defocusing 44 12/08/2019 Shiltsev | Electron Lenses

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#