Open Heavy-Flavour Production in pp Collisions at the LHC - Physics Seminar Overview

 
Francesco Prino
INFN – Sezione di Torino
 
for the ALICE Collaboration
 
O
p
e
n
 
h
e
a
v
y
-
f
l
a
v
o
u
r
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
a
s
a
 
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
i
n
 
p
p
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
a
t
 
t
h
e
 
L
H
C
C
E
R
N
 
S
E
M
I
N
A
R
,
 
M
A
Y
 
5
t
h
 
2
0
1
5
 
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
 
Physics motivation
Heavy-flavour production mechanisms in pp collisions
Interplay between hard and soft processes of particle production
Multi-Parton Interactions (MPI)
Data analysis
Multiplicity estimation
D-meson reconstruction
J/
 from B-hadron decays
Results
Multiplicity dependence of o
pen heavy-flavour production in pp collisions
Comparison between open charm, open beauty and charmonia
Comparison to model calculations
PYTHIA, EPOS event generators
Calculations with the percolation model
Comparison to results in p-Pb collisions
Conclusions
 
2
 
P
h
y
s
i
c
s
 
m
o
t
i
v
a
t
i
o
n
 
3
 
H
e
a
v
y
 
f
l
a
v
o
u
r
s
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
4
 
Heavy quarks (charm and beauty) produced in partonic
scattering processes with large Q
2
Production cross section can be calculated with perturbative
QCD calculations based on the factorization approach
 
M
a
n
g
a
n
o
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
N
u
c
l
.
 
P
h
y
s
.
 
B
3
7
3
 
(
1
9
9
2
)
 
2
9
5
C
a
c
c
i
a
r
i
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
5
 
(
1
9
9
8
)
 
0
0
7
 
K
n
i
e
h
l
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
R
D
 
7
1
 
(
2
0
0
5
)
 
0
1
4
0
1
8
J
u
n
g
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
1
0
1
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
0
8
5
 
O
p
e
n
 
c
h
a
r
m
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
5
 
Measurements at the LHC described by
pQCD calculations within uncertainties
F
O
N
L
L
G
M
-
V
F
N
S
L
O
 
k
T
-
f
a
c
t
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
 
C
a
c
c
i
a
r
i
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
1
0
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
3
7
 
K
n
i
e
h
l
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
E
P
J
 
C
7
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
2
0
8
2
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
0
1
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
2
8
A
L
I
C
E
,
P
L
B
 
7
1
8
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
2
7
9
L
H
C
b
,
N
u
c
l
.
P
h
y
s
.
 
B
8
7
1
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
1
 
M
a
c
i
u
l
a
,
 
S
z
c
z
u
r
e
k
,
 
P
R
D
 
8
7
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
0
9
4
0
2
2
 
D
+
 
D
s
+
 
D
0
 
C
a
c
c
i
a
r
i
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
1
0
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
3
7
C
M
S
,
 
P
R
L
 
1
0
6
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
1
1
2
0
0
1
C
M
S
,
 
P
R
L
 
1
0
6
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
2
5
2
0
0
1
 
O
p
e
n
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
6
 
Measurements at the LHC described by
pQCD calculations within uncertainties
F
O
N
L
L
G
M
-
V
F
N
S
L
O
 
k
T
-
f
a
c
t
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
 
C
a
c
c
i
a
r
i
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
1
0
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
3
7
 
K
n
i
e
h
l
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
E
P
J
 
C
7
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
2
0
8
2
 
M
a
c
i
u
l
a
,
 
S
z
c
z
u
r
e
k
,
 
P
R
D
 
8
7
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
0
9
4
0
2
2
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
1
1
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
0
6
5
C
M
S
,
 
E
P
J
 
C
7
1
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
1
5
7
5
L
H
C
b
,
 
E
P
J
 
C
7
1
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
1
6
4
5
 
J
/
B
 
B
0
,
 
B
+
 
H
e
a
v
y
-
f
l
a
v
o
u
r
 
c
r
o
s
s
 
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
7
 
Total charm and beauty production cross section described
by pQCD calculations within uncertainties
Charm on the upper edge of the theoretical uncertainty band at all
collision energies
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
0
7
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
9
1
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
P
L
B
 
7
3
8
 
(
2
0
1
4
)
 
9
7
 
H
a
r
d
 
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
 
a
n
d
u
n
d
e
r
l
y
i
n
g
 
e
v
e
n
t
 
8
 
Two component approach:
Hard scattering process
L
a
r
g
e
 
Q
2
,
 
p
e
r
t
u
r
b
a
t
i
v
e
 
Q
C
D
D
i
j
e
t
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
/
F
i
n
a
l
 
s
t
a
t
e
 
r
a
d
i
a
t
i
o
n
Underlying event (UE) = final
state particles not associated to
the hard scattering
(
p
e
r
t
u
r
b
a
t
i
v
e
)
 
(
m
i
n
i
)
j
e
t
s
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
 
i
n
 
s
o
f
t
e
r
 
m
u
l
t
i
-
p
a
r
t
o
n
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
(
M
P
I
)
S
o
f
t
 
h
a
d
r
o
n
i
c
 
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
F
r
a
g
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
b
e
a
m
r
e
m
n
a
n
t
s
 
M
o
r
e
 
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
i
a
l
 
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
 
9
 
F
O
C
U
S
 
O
F
 
T
O
D
A
Y
S
S
E
M
I
N
A
R
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
C
h
a
r
m
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
10
10
 
NA27 and LEBC-EHS
Collaboration
pp collisions at SPS
p
BEAM
 = 400 GeV
Different multiplicity
distributions for events
with and without charm
production
“… It is natural to interpret
these differences by the
more 
central
 nature of
collisions leading to charm
production.”
 
A
g
u
i
l
a
r
-
B
e
n
i
t
e
z
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
Z
.
 
P
h
y
s
 
C
4
1
 
(
1
9
8
8
)
 
1
9
1
 
J
/
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
11
11
 
Per-event J/
 yield increases approximately linearly with
multiplicity
Hadronic activity accompanying J/
 production?
Multi-Parton interactions?
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
Self-normalized
quantities
Some uncertainties
cancel out
Compare different
experiments /
systems / energies
 
L
H
C
b
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
0
7
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
5
2
L
H
C
b
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
4
1
 
J
/
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
12
12
 
Per-event J/
 yield increases approximately linearly with
multiplicity
Hadronic activity accompanying J/
 production?
Multi-Parton interactions?
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
Charged particle
multiplicity
Dominated by
soft processes ?
Coincides with
KNO scaling
variable
 
Hard process
yield
 
K
o
b
a
,
 
N
i
e
l
s
e
n
,
 
O
l
e
s
e
n
,
N
u
c
l
.
P
h
y
s
.
 
B
4
0
 
(
1
9
7
2
)
 
3
1
7
 
L
H
C
b
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
0
7
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
5
2
L
H
C
b
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
4
1
 
M
u
l
t
i
 
P
a
r
t
o
n
 
I
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
13
13
 
Naïve picture
Several interactions at the partonic level occur in
parallel
A
t
 
L
H
C
 
e
n
e
r
g
i
e
s
:
 
c
r
o
s
s
 
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
f
o
r
 
2
-
2
 
p
a
r
t
o
n
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
s
 
w
i
t
h
 
Q
2
 
~
 
f
e
w
 
G
e
V
/
c
 
e
x
c
e
e
d
 
t
h
e
t
o
t
a
l
 
h
a
d
r
o
n
i
c
 
c
r
o
s
s
 
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Yield of particles from hard processes should
increase with multiplicity
 
More complex picture
Role of collision geometry (impact parameter + transverse structure
of proton)
 
Final state: color reconnections, saturation, string percolation
 
Collectivity in pp for sufficiently high multiplicities?
M
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
i
e
s
 
i
n
 
h
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
c
i
t
y
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
a
t
 
t
h
e
 
L
H
C
 
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
 
t
o
p
e
r
i
p
h
e
r
a
l
 
C
u
-
C
u
 
a
t
 
R
H
I
C
 
F
r
a
n
k
f
u
r
t
,
 
S
t
r
i
k
m
a
n
,
 
W
e
i
s
s
,
 
P
R
D
 
8
3
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
0
5
4
0
1
2
A
z
a
r
k
i
n
,
 
D
r
e
m
i
n
,
 
S
t
r
i
k
m
a
n
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
3
5
 
(
2
0
1
4
)
 
2
4
4
 
W
e
r
n
e
r
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
R
C
 
8
3
 
(
2
0
1
1
)
 
0
4
4
9
1
5
 
F
e
r
r
e
i
r
o
,
 
P
a
j
a
r
e
s
,
 
P
R
C
 
8
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
0
3
4
9
0
3
 
B
a
r
t
a
l
i
n
i
,
 
F
a
n
o
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
0
0
3
.
4
2
2
0
 
H
o
w
 
t
o
 
g
a
i
n
 
m
o
r
e
 
i
n
s
i
g
h
t
?
 
14
14
 
E
x
t
e
n
d
 
t
o
 
o
p
e
n
 
c
h
a
r
m
(
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
)
Compare open/hidden
charm production
S
t
u
d
y
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
o
f
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
i
n
 
p
T
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
E
x
t
e
n
d
 
t
o
 
o
p
e
n
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
Via non-prompt J/
E
x
t
e
n
d
 
t
o
 
h
i
g
h
e
r
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
i
e
s
Clearer picture of the
trend. Linear? Stronger
than linear?
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
(
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
)
 
o
t
h
e
r
 
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
a
s
 
a
 
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
i
n
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
a
t
 
t
h
e
 
L
H
C
 
15
15
 
B
o
t
t
o
m
o
n
i
a
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
16
16
 
(nS) production ratios depend on
multiplicity
Ground state 
(1S) systematically
produced with more particles?
Excited states more easily
dissociated by interactions with
other particles?
 
Yield of 

 
increases with
multiplicity
Similar in pp, p-Pb and Pb-Pb
In Pb-Pb (and p-Pb) number of
nucleon-nucleon collisions
increases with multiplicity
 
 
C
M
S
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
4
0
4
 
(
2
0
1
4
)
 
1
0
3
 
J
e
t
s
 
a
n
d
 
U
E
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
17
17
 
 
C
M
S
,
 
E
P
J
 
C
7
3
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
2
6
7
4
 
High-multiplicity events:
Larger number of (semi) hard
parton interactions, (mini)jets
Softer distribution of hadrons inside
jets
Multi-Parton Interaction (MPI)
mechanism critical to reproduce
the features of the data
 
M
i
n
i
 
j
e
t
s
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
18
18
 
M
i
n
i
 
j
e
t
s
:
 
b
u
n
d
l
e
s
 
o
f
 
p
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s
 
f
r
o
m
s
e
m
i
-
h
a
r
d
 
p
a
r
t
o
n
i
c
 
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
s
H
o
w
:
 
f
r
o
m
 
2
-
p
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
 
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
 
y
i
e
l
d
s
 
i
n
 
n
e
a
r
 
a
n
d
 
a
w
a
y
s
i
d
e
s
 
N
e
a
r
 
s
i
d
e
associated yield
 
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
9
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
0
4
9
 
A
w
a
y
 
s
i
d
e
associated yield
 
M
i
n
i
-
j
e
t
s
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
19
19
 
M
i
n
i
-
j
e
t
s
:
 
b
u
n
d
l
e
s
 
o
f
 
p
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s
 
f
r
o
m
s
e
m
i
-
h
a
r
d
 
p
a
r
t
o
n
i
c
 
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
s
H
o
w
:
 
f
r
o
m
 
2
-
p
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
 
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
 
y
i
e
l
d
s
 
i
n
 
n
e
a
r
 
a
n
d
 
a
w
a
y
s
i
d
e
s
 
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
9
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
0
4
9
 
Uncorrelated seeds = number
of independent sources of
particle production
 
 
In PYTHIA strongly correlated
with number of MPIs
Linearly increasing with
multiplicity at low multiplicity
Levels off at high multiplicities
 
A
n
g
u
l
a
r
 
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
:
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
,
 
h
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
20
20
 
Ridge in Pb-Pb collisions described by hydrodynamics
Initial state geometrical anisotropy + collective expansion
A
l
s
o
 
o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
 
i
n
 
h
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
p
-
P
b
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
a
t
 
t
h
e
 
L
H
C
 
Jet peak
 
Recoil jet on the away side
 
H
i
g
h
-
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
p
p
 
e
v
e
n
t
s
8x average
multiplicity
-
>
 
n
e
a
r
 
s
i
d
e
 
r
i
d
g
e
a
l
o
n
g
 
Δ
η
:
 
o
r
i
g
i
n
?
 
 
C
M
S
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
0
0
9
 
(
2
0
1
0
)
 
0
9
1
 
C
M
S
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
8
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
7
9
5
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
9
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
2
9
 
H
e
a
v
y
-
f
l
a
v
o
u
r
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
:
D
a
t
a
 
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
 
21
21
 
22
22
Central Barrel
Tracking, PID

 < 0.9
Muon Arm
-4 < 
 < -2.5
 
A
A
L
L
I
I
C
C
E
E
 
 
a
a
t
t
 
 
t
t
h
h
e
e
 
 
L
L
H
H
C
C
 
D
a
t
a
 
s
a
m
p
l
e
 
23
23
 
Minimum-bias trigger
Signal in V0A or V0C
or SPD
N. events = 314∙10
6
L
d
t
 = 5 nb
-1
S
P
D
|

<1.4
 
High-multiplicity trigger
Threshold on number of
fired chips in SPD
N. events = 6∙10
6
L
d
t
 = 
14
 nb
-1
 
p
p
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
a
t
 
s
 
=
 
7
 
T
e
V
 
M
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
i
o
n
 
24
24
 
Number of tracklets in the two innermost ITS layers
S
i
l
i
c
o
n
 
P
i
x
e
l
 
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
s
,
 
p
s
e
u
d
o
-
r
a
p
i
d
i
t
y
 
r
a
n
g
e
:
 
|
|
<
1
.
0
N
tracklets
 
 d
N
ch
/d
Sum of amplitudes in the V0 scintillator arrays
N
V
0
,
 
p
s
e
u
d
o
-
r
a
p
i
d
i
t
y
 
r
a
n
g
e
 
-
3
.
7
<
<
-
1
.
7
 
a
n
d
 
2
.
8
<
<
5
.
1
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
N
t
r
a
c
k
l
e
t
s
 
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
 
25
25
 
Number of tracklets in the two innermost ITS layers
S
i
l
i
c
o
n
 
P
i
x
e
l
 
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
s
,
 
p
s
e
u
d
o
-
r
a
p
i
d
i
t
y
 
r
a
n
g
e
:
 
|
|
<
1
.
0
N
tracklets
 
 d
N
ch
/d
 
M
B
t
r
i
g
g
e
r
 
H
i
g
h
 
M
u
l
t
t
r
i
g
g
e
r
 
O
p
e
n
 
c
h
a
r
m
 
26
26
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
27
27
Full reconstruction of D-meson
hadronic decays
 
D
0
 
 K
-
 
+
D
+
 
 K
-
 
+
 
+
D*
+
 
 
D
0
 
+
D
s
+
 
 K
-
 
K
+
 
+
 
K
 
 
Analysis strategy
Invariant mass analysis of fully reconstructed decay
topologies displaced from the primary vertex
Background reduction via:
G
e
o
m
e
t
r
i
c
a
l
 
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
o
n
 
t
h
e
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
v
e
r
t
e
x
P
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
 
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
Feed down from B (10-15 % after cuts) subtracted
using pQCD (FONLL) predictions
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
28
28
Full reconstruction of D-meson
hadronic decays
 
D
0
 
 K
-
 
+
D
+
 
 K
-
 
+
 
+
D*
+
 
 
D
0
 
+
D
s
+
 
 K
-
 
K
+
 
+
 
K
 
 
Geometrical selections
Track impact parameter
(resolution ≈ 75 
m at 
p
T
= 1 GeV/
c
)
Decay length
Pointing of the D-meson
momentum to the primary
vertex
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
1
2
0
1
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
2
8
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
29
29
Full reconstruction of D-meson
hadronic decays
 
D
0
 
 K
-
 
+
D
+
 
 K
-
 
+
 
+
D*
+
 
 
D
0
 
+
D
s
+
 
 K
-
 
K
+
 
+
 
K
 
 
PID selection: 3
 cuts on
 d
E
/d
x
 in TPC
Time-of-flight from
interaction point to TOF
detector
 
D
0
,
 
D
+
,
 
D
*
+
 
i
n
v
a
r
i
a
n
t
 
m
a
s
s
 
30
30
 
L
o
w
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
M
i
d
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
H
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
D
0
L
o
w
 
p
T
 
D
+
M
i
d
 
p
T
 
D
*
+
H
i
g
h
 
p
T
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
 
31
31
 
D-meson yield / event
in multiplicity intervals
corrected for
reconstruction efficiency
 
D-meson yield / event
multiplicity integrated
,
corrected for reconstruction
and trigger efficiencies
 
Sources of systematics
R
a
w
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
l
i
n
e
 
s
h
a
p
e
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
f
i
t
 
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
3
-
1
5
%
 
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
 
o
n
 
p
T
,
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
,
 
s
p
e
c
i
e
s
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
 
v
e
r
t
e
x
 
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
i
t
h
/
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
t
r
a
c
k
s
N
e
g
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
 
e
f
f
e
c
t
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
P
I
D
 
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
S
a
m
e
 
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
 
u
s
e
d
 
i
n
 
a
l
l
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
s
N
e
g
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
 
r
e
s
i
d
u
a
l
 
e
f
f
e
c
t
 
d
u
e
 
t
o
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e
 
o
f
 
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
F
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
p
r
o
m
p
t
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
r
a
w
 
y
i
e
l
d
A
s
s
u
m
e
d
 
t
o
 
b
e
 
t
h
e
 
s
a
m
e
 
i
n
 
a
l
l
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
b
i
n
s
 
(
c
a
n
c
e
l
s
 
o
u
t
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
r
a
t
i
o
)
U
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y
 
b
y
 
v
a
r
y
i
n
g
 
t
h
e
 
D
B
 
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
 
b
y
 
a
 
f
a
c
t
o
r
 
1
/
2
 
(
2
)
 
a
t
l
o
w
(
h
i
g
h
)
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
 
32
32
 
Contribution of 
D from B decays
:
 assumed independent of
multiplicity
uncertainty by varying the
D←B contribution by a factor
1/2 (2) at low(high) multiplicity
 
D-meson yield / event
in multiplicity intervals
corrected for
reconstruction efficiency
 
D-meson yield / event
multiplicity integrated
,
corrected for reconstruction
and trigger efficiencies
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
D
0
,
 
D
+
,
 
D
*
+
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
33
33
 
D-meson per-event yields increase with charged-particle
multiplicity
Similar trend in different 
p
T
 intervals
Faster than linear increase
D
0
, D
+
 and D*
+
 results compatible within uncertainties
Compute the average of the three meson species
 
2
<
p
T
<
4
 
G
e
V
/
c
 
4
<
p
T
<
8
 
G
e
V
/
c
 
8
<
p
T
<
1
2
 
G
e
V
/
c
 
D
0
 
D
+
 
D
*
+
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
p
T
 
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
c
e
?
 
34
34
 
T
r
e
n
d
 
o
f
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
v
s
.
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
i
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
 
o
f
 
p
T
 
w
i
t
h
i
n
 
u
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
i
e
s
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
I
n
t
r
o
d
u
c
i
n
g
 
a
n
 
 
g
a
p
 
35
35
 
Charged-particle multiplicity
measured in the same 
range as D mesons
Multiplicity estimation
includes:
D-meson decay particles
Particles produced in the
charm-quark fragmentation
Test effect of possible auto-
correlations using the
multiplicity measured in the
V0 detector
Qualitatively similar
increasing trend when an 
gap is introduced between the
regions in which D mesons
and  multiplicity are measured
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
J
/
 
f
r
o
m
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
-
h
a
d
r
o
n
d
e
c
a
y
s
 
36
36
 
J
/
 
f
r
o
m
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
-
h
a
d
r
o
n
 
d
e
c
a
y
s
 
37
37
 
e
+
 
Analysis strategy
Electron identification based on
energy loss in TPC
3
 
 
c
u
t
 
a
r
o
u
n
d
 
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
 
e
±
d
E
/
d
x
3
.
5
(
3
)
 
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
 
b
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
 
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
 
(
p
)
 
d
E
/
d
x
Displaced J/
 (from beauty-
hadron decays)
 
e
-
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
R
D
 
8
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
1
2
0
0
7
 
J
/
 
f
r
o
m
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
-
h
a
d
r
o
n
 
d
e
c
a
y
s
 
38
38
 
e
+
 
Analysis strategy
Electron identification based on
energy loss in TPC
Reduction of background from 
conversions and 
0
 Dalitz
decays
E
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
 
e
±
 
t
h
a
t
 
f
o
r
m
 
e
+
e
-
p
a
i
r
s
 
w
i
t
h
 
i
n
v
a
r
i
a
n
t
 
m
a
s
s
 
<
 
1
0
0
M
e
V
/
c
2
Displaced J/
 (from beauty-
hadron decays)
 
e
-
 
J
/
 
f
r
o
m
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
-
h
a
d
r
o
n
 
d
e
c
a
y
s
 
39
39
 
e
+
 
Analysis strategy
Electron identification based on
energy loss in TPC
Reduction of background from 
conversions and 
0
 Dalitz
decays
J/
 production vertex
reconstruction
Simultaneous fit to invariant
mass and pseudo-proper decay
length (
x
) distributions
 
e
-
Displaced J/
 (from beauty-
hadron decays)
 
N
o
n
-
p
r
o
m
p
t
 
J
/
:
 
f
i
t
s
 
40
40
 
Fraction of
non-prompt
J/
 from 2D
un-binned log-
likelihood fit to:
Invariant mass
M
(e
+
e
-
)
Pseudo-
proper decay
length 
x
 
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
 
41
41
 
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
 
42
42
 
Sources of systematic uncertainty
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
 
v
e
r
t
e
x
 
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
i
t
h
/
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
 
r
e
m
o
v
i
n
g
 
J
/
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
t
r
a
c
k
s
 
(
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
b
i
a
s
)
E
f
f
e
c
t
:
 
1
9
%
 
a
t
 
l
o
w
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
 
3
%
 
a
t
 
h
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
p
s
e
u
d
o
-
p
r
o
p
e
r
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
l
e
n
g
t
h
 
(
x
)
D
u
e
 
t
o
 
i
m
p
e
r
f
e
c
t
 
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
x
 
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
s
i
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
E
f
f
e
c
t
:
 
8
%
 
a
t
 
l
o
w
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
 
2
0
%
 
a
t
 
h
i
g
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
 
J
/
 
p
T
 
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
 
i
n
 
M
C
E
f
f
e
c
t
 
o
n
 
 
A
 
x
 
 
 
(
~
 
1
%
)
E
f
f
e
c
t
 
o
n
 
x
 
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
 
(
w
i
t
h
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
 
u
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y
)
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
 
o
f
 
J
/
 
f
r
o
m
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
 
p
s
e
u
d
o
-
p
r
o
p
e
r
 
d
e
c
a
y
-
l
e
n
g
t
h
 
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
B
e
a
u
t
y
-
h
a
d
r
o
n
 
d
e
c
a
y
 
k
i
n
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
 
a
n
d
 
p
T
 
s
p
e
c
t
r
a
E
f
f
e
c
t
:
 
3
%
,
 
i
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
 
o
f
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
 
i
n
 
t
h
e
 
f
i
t
U
s
e
 
s
i
d
e
-
b
a
n
d
s
 
f
o
r
 
x
 
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
U
s
e
 
L
S
 
t
o
 
c
h
e
c
k
 
t
h
e
 
i
n
v
a
r
i
a
n
t
 
m
a
s
s
 
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
e
c
t
:
 
~
7
%
 
,
 
i
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
 
o
f
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
E
x
t
r
a
p
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
 
t
o
 
p
T
=
0
E
f
f
e
c
t
:
 
3
%
 
 
F
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
n
o
n
-
p
r
o
m
p
t
 
J
/
 
43
43
 
Fraction of non-prompt
J/
Approximately flat as a
function of multiplicity
Non-prompt J/
 yield
relative to the multiplicity
integrated one
computed as:
 
I
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
 
J
/
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
 
f
r
o
m
:
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
M
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
 
v
a
l
u
e
 
<
f
B
>
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
O
p
e
n
 
c
h
a
r
m
,
 
c
h
a
r
m
o
n
i
a
 
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
 
44
44
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
 
v
s
.
 
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
 
J
/
 
45
45
 
Similar increase with
multiplicity of per-event
yield of open and
hidden charm
Inclusive J/
 measured
at mid (e
+
e
-
) and
forward (
+
-
) rapidity
Forward rapidity J/
and charged multiplicity
measured in different 
regions
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
I
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
 
J
/
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
 
f
r
o
m
:
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
,
 
m
i
d
 
y
 
 
J
,
 
m
i
d
 
y
 
J
,
 
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
 
y
 
O
p
e
n
 
c
h
a
r
m
 
v
s
.
 
o
p
e
n
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
 
46
46
 
Similar increase with
multiplicity of per-event
yield of open charm and
beauty production
 
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
,
 
m
i
d
 
y
 
 
J
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
,
 
m
i
d
 
y
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
 
t
o
 
m
o
d
e
l
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
47
47
 
M
o
d
e
l
 
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
48
48
 
Percolation model
Elementary sources of
particle production:
colour ropes/strings
formed in parton-parton
collisions
C
l
o
s
e
 
t
o
 
M
P
I
 
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
Colour strings have
finite spatial extension
and interact
A
t
 
h
i
g
h
 
d
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
:
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
 
a
m
o
n
g
 
t
h
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
 
-
>
 
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
 
t
h
e
i
r
 
n
u
m
b
e
r
A
f
f
e
c
t
s
 
m
o
r
e
 
s
o
f
t
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
 
(
l
a
r
g
e
r
t
r
a
n
s
v
e
r
s
e
 
s
i
z
e
)
 
a
n
d
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
More than linear
increase of D-meson
yield with multiplicity
 
F
e
r
r
e
i
r
o
,
 
P
a
j
a
r
e
s
,
 
P
R
C
 
8
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
0
3
4
9
0
3
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
M
o
d
e
l
 
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
49
49
 
EPOS 3.099
Initial conditions
G
r
i
b
o
v
-
R
e
g
g
e
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
-
s
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
f
o
r
m
a
l
i
s
m
S
a
t
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
 
s
c
a
l
e
 
t
o
m
o
d
e
l
 
n
o
n
-
l
i
n
e
a
r
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
H
a
d
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
 
v
i
a
s
t
r
i
n
g
 
f
r
a
g
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
N
u
m
b
e
r
 
o
f
 
M
P
I
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
 
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
 
t
o
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
Hydrodynamical
evolution
C
a
n
 
b
e
 
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
 
t
o
 
t
h
e
d
e
n
s
e
 
c
o
r
e
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
 
i
n
 
a
 
s
t
r
o
n
g
e
r
t
h
a
n
 
l
i
n
e
a
r
 
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
 
o
f
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
y
i
e
l
d
 
w
i
t
h
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
W
e
r
n
e
r
 
e
t
 
a
l
.
,
 
P
R
C
 
8
9
 
(
2
0
1
4
)
 
0
6
4
9
0
3
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
M
o
d
e
l
 
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
 
50
50
 
PYTHIA 8
Soft-QCD tune
Colour reconnections
Multi-parton
interactions
Initial and Final state
radiation (ISR/FSR)
Almost linear
increase of D-meson
yield with multiplicity
T
r
e
n
d
 
d
e
p
e
n
d
s
 
o
n
p
T
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
N
o
n
-
p
r
o
m
p
t
 
J
/
 
v
s
.
 
P
Y
T
H
I
A
8
 
51
51
 
PYTHIA 8
Soft-QCD tune
Colour reconnections
Multi-parton
interactions
Initial and Final state
radiation (ISR/FSR)
Almost linear
increase of beauty-
hadron yield with
multiplicity
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
G
o
i
n
g
 
d
e
e
p
e
r
 
i
n
t
o
 
P
Y
T
H
I
A
8
 
52
52
 
Split by process:
First hard 
= hardest
process
~
 
f
l
a
t
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
 
y
i
e
l
d
w
i
t
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
MPI 
= subsequent hard
processes
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
y
i
e
l
d
 
w
i
t
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
Splitting of a gluon from
a hard process
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
y
i
e
l
d
 
w
i
t
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
Initial and Final state
radiation (
ISR/FSR
)
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
y
i
e
l
d
 
w
i
t
h
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
 
F
i
r
s
t
 
h
a
r
d
,
 
p
T
 
b
i
n
s
 
A
l
l
 
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
,
p
T
 
b
i
n
s
 
B
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
 
B
a
c
k
 
t
o
 
P
Y
T
H
I
A
 
6
 
p
r
e
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
 
53
53
 
PYTHIA 6.4, Perugia
2011 tune
Direct J/
 production only
MPI without charm
production in subsequent
interactions
Fails to reproduce the
measured trend
Improvement of MPI
scenario in PYTHIA 8
Charm produced also in
subsequent MPIs
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
7
1
2
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
1
6
5
 
J
/
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
 
v
s
.
 
p
e
r
c
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
 
m
o
d
e
l
 
54
54
 
Percolation model
Elementary sources of
particle production: colour
ropes/strings formed in
parton-parton collisions
C
l
o
s
e
 
t
o
 
M
P
I
 
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
Colour strings have finite
spatial extension and interact
A
t
 
h
i
g
h
 
d
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
:
 
o
v
e
r
l
a
p
a
m
o
n
g
 
t
h
e
 
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
 
-
>
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
o
f
 
t
h
e
i
r
 
n
u
m
b
e
r
A
f
f
e
c
t
s
 
m
o
r
e
 
s
o
f
t
 
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
l
a
r
g
e
r
 
t
r
a
n
s
v
e
r
s
e
 
s
i
z
e
)
 
a
n
d
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
i
c
i
t
y
More than linear increase of
J/
 yield with multiplicity
 
F
e
r
r
e
i
r
o
,
 
P
a
j
a
r
e
s
,
 
P
R
C
 
8
6
 
(
2
0
1
2
)
 
0
3
4
9
0
3
 
2.5<y<4
 
|y|<0.9
 
ALICE data
|y|<0.9
2.5<y<4
 
C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
 
t
o
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
 
i
n
p
-
P
b
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
55
55
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
:
 
p
p
 
v
s
.
 
p
-
P
b
 
56
56
 
Similar trend in pp and p-Pb collisions
Caveat:
d
N
/
d
~
4
<
d
N
/
d
>
 
i
n
 
p
p
 
f
r
o
m
 
m
a
n
y
 
M
P
I
s
 
+
 
h
i
g
h
 
n
u
m
b
e
r
 
o
f
f
r
a
g
m
e
n
t
s
 
p
e
r
 
p
a
r
t
o
n
d
N
/
d
<
d
N
/
d
>
 
i
n
 
p
-
P
b
 
a
l
s
o
 
f
r
o
m
 
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
 
(
a
n
d
 
s
o
f
t
e
r
)
 
n
u
c
l
e
o
n
-
n
u
c
l
e
o
n
 
c
o
l
l
i
s
i
o
n
s
 
p
p
p
-
P
b
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
 
a
n
d
 
J
/
 
i
n
 
p
-
P
b
 
57
57
 
Similar increasing
trend of D and J/
yields with multiplicity
in p-Pb collisions at
low multiplicities
Deviation at high
multiplicities
NOTE:
Different 
p
T
 and 
y
ranges for D’s and J/
Different probed values
of Bjorken 
x
Different Cold Nuclear
Matter effects
 
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
,
 
m
i
d
 
y
 
 
J
,
 
b
a
c
k
w
a
r
d
 
y
 
J
,
 
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
 
y
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
:
 
p
p
 
v
s
.
 
p
-
P
b
 
v
s
.
 
P
b
-
P
b
 
58
58
 
Comparison to Pb-Pb
NOTE: in-medium parton energy loss + radial flow
modify the 
p
T
 distribution of D mesons in a
centrality/multiplicity dependent way in Pb-Pb
 
p
p
p
-
P
b
P
b
-
P
b
 
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
 
59
59
 
Heavy-flavour (charm and beauty) hadron yield in pp
collisions increases with the  multiplicity of charged
particles produced in the collision
Similar trend for open charm, charmonium and open beauty
S
m
a
l
l
 
e
f
f
e
c
t
 
d
u
e
 
t
o
 
h
a
d
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
?
 
T
r
e
n
d
 
d
i
c
t
a
t
e
d
 
b
y
 
c
h
a
r
m
a
n
d
 
b
e
a
u
t
y
 
q
u
a
r
k
 
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
 
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
s
m
Faster than linearly for high multiplicities
No dependence on 
p
T
 observed for D mesons within current
uncertainties
Models including MPI can reproduce the observed
trend
Future directions (Run II):
Higher multiplicities and higher √s
D mesons in finer 
p
T
 intervals
Angular correlations between heavy-flavour particles and
hadrons in high-multiplicity events
 
B
a
c
k
u
p
 
60
60
 
U
n
c
o
r
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
 
s
e
e
d
s
:
 
p
p
 
v
s
.
 
p
-
P
b
 
61
61
 
Number of uncorrelated seeds grows linearly with
multiplicity in p-Pb
Levelling off in pp
 
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
J
H
E
P
 
0
9
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
0
4
9
 
M
e
a
n
 
p
T
 
i
n
 
p
p
,
 
p
-
P
b
 
a
n
d
 
P
b
-
P
b
 
62
62
 
Three different √s for
pp, p-Pb and Pb-Pb
but √s dependence
expected to be weak
Much stronger
increase of <p
T
> in p-
Pb than in Pb-Pb
p-Pb follows pp up to
N
ch
~14-15
N
ch
>14 corresponds to
~10% of pp x-section:
p
p
 
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
 
h
i
g
h
l
y
b
i
a
s
e
d
50% of p-Pb x-section
o
n
l
y
 
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
i
t
y
 
b
i
a
s
 
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
P
L
B
 
7
2
7
 
(
2
0
1
3
)
 
3
7
1
 
P
Y
T
H
I
A
8
 
 
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
 
b
r
e
a
k
d
o
w
n
 
63
63
 
Relative amount of contributions to HF
production in PYTHIA8
 
D
-
m
e
s
o
n
s
,
 
o
t
h
e
r
 
p
T
 
b
i
n
s
 
64
64
 
A
L
I
C
E
,
 
a
r
X
i
v
:
1
5
0
5
.
0
0
6
6
4
 
J
/
 
a
n
d
 
D
 
m
e
s
o
n
s
,
 
p
-
P
b
 
v
s
.
 
p
p
 
65
65
 
No modification of D-meson
production in p-Pb compared to pp at
mid y at all multiplicities
R
pPb
 and Q
pPb
 ~ 1
Multiplicity/centrality dependent
modification of J/
 at forward and
backward y
Cold nuclear matter effects
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Physics seminar presentation by Francesco Prino on open heavy-flavour production as a function of multiplicity in pp collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The talk covers the motivation behind studying heavy-flavour production mechanisms, data analysis techniques, results on the multiplicity dependence, comparison with model calculations and event generators, and conclusions drawn from the analysis. Various topics discussed include heavy quark production, open charm and beauty measurements at the LHC, and cross-section calculations using perturbative QCD calculations.


Uploaded on Aug 17, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Open heavy-flavour production as a function of multiplicity in pp collisions at the LHC Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino for the ALICE Collaboration CERN SEMINAR, MAY 5th 2015

  2. Outline Physics motivation Heavy-flavour production mechanisms in pp collisions Interplay between hard and soft processes of particle production Multi-Parton Interactions (MPI) Data analysis Multiplicity estimation D-meson reconstruction J/ from B-hadron decays Results Multiplicity dependence of open heavy-flavour production in pp collisions Comparison between open charm, open beauty and charmonia Comparison to model calculations PYTHIA, EPOS event generators Calculations with the percolation model Comparison to results in p-Pb collisions Conclusions 2

  3. Physics motivation 3

  4. Heavy flavours in pp collisions Heavy quarks (charm and beauty) produced in partonic scattering processes with large Q2 Production cross section can be calculated with perturbative QCD calculations based on the factorization approach D c = 2 2 2 ( , ) ( , ) , PDF x Q PDF x Q D (z Q ) hh Hx a b ab q q q H q Kniehl et al., PRD 71 (2005) 014018 Jung et al., JHEP 1101 (2011) 085 Mangano et al., Nucl. Phys. B373 (1992) 295 Cacciari et al., JHEP 05 (1998) 007 4

  5. Open charm in pp collisions Measurements at the LHC described by pQCD calculations within uncertainties FONLL Cacciari et al., JHEP 1210 (2012) 137 D0 GM-VFNS Kniehl et al., EPJ C72 (2012) 2082 LO kT-factorization Maciula, Szczurek, PRD 87 (2013) 094022 Ds+ D+ ALICE, JHEP 1201 (2012) 128 ALICE, PLB 718 (2012) 279 LHCb, Nucl.Phys. B871 (2013) 1 5

  6. Open beauty in pp collisions Measurements at the LHC described by pQCD calculations within uncertainties FONLL Cacciari et al., JHEP 1210 (2012) 137 GM-VFNS Kniehl et al., EPJ C72 (2012) 2082 LO kT-factorization Maciula, Szczurek, PRD 87 (2013) 094022 B0, B+ Cacciari et al., JHEP 1210 (2012) 137 CMS, PRL 106 (2011) 112001 CMS, PRL 106 (2011) 252001 J/ B ALICE, JHEP 1211 (2012) 065 CMS, EPJ C71 (2011) 1575 LHCb, EPJ C71 (2011) 1645 6

  7. Heavy-flavour cross section b b b b at at midrapidity midrapidity c c c c at at midrapidity midrapidity ALICE, PLB 738 (2014) 97 ALICE, JHEP 1207 (2012) 191 Total charm and beauty production cross section described by pQCD calculations within uncertainties Charm on the upper edge of the theoretical uncertainty band at all collision energies 7

  8. Hard scattering and underlying event Two component approach: Hard scattering process Large Q2, perturbative QCD Dijet Initial/Final state radiation Underlying event (UE) = final state particles not associated to the hard scattering (perturbative) (mini)jets produced in softer multi-parton interactions (MPI) Soft hadronic processes Fragmentation of beam remnants 8

  9. More differential measurements More differential measurements deeper insight into charm production in pp collisions D-hadron angular correlations Charm quark fragmentation c c production mechanism Charm and beauty hadron production as a function of the multiplicity of charged particles produced in the collision Interplay between hard and soft processes Multi-Parton Interactions FOCUS OF TODAY S SEMINAR ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 9

  10. Charm production vs. multiplicity NA27 and LEBC-EHS Collaboration pp collisions at SPS pBEAM = 400 GeV Different multiplicity distributions for events with and without charm production It is natural to interpret these differences by the more central nature of collisions leading to charm production. Aguilar-Benitez et al., Z. Phys C41 (1988) 191 10

  11. J/ production vs. multiplicity ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 Self-normalized quantities Some uncertainties cancel out Compare different experiments / systems / energies Per-event J/ yield increases approximately linearly with multiplicity Hadronic activity accompanying J/ production? Multi-Parton interactions? LHCb, PLB 707 (2012) 52 LHCb, JHEP 06 (2012) 141 11

  12. J/ production vs. multiplicity ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 Hard process yield Charged particle multiplicity Dominated by soft processes ? Coincides with KNO scaling variable Koba, Nielsen, Olesen, Nucl.Phys. B40 (1972) 317 Per-event J/ yield increases approximately linearly with multiplicity Hadronic activity accompanying J/ production? Multi-Parton interactions? LHCb, PLB 707 (2012) 52 LHCb, JHEP 06 (2012) 141 12

  13. Multi Parton Interactions Na ve picture Several interactions at the partonic level occur in parallel At LHC energies: cross section for 2-2 parton scatterings with Q2 ~ few GeV/c exceed the total hadronic cross section Bartalini, Fano, arXiv:1003.4220 Yield of particles from hard processes should increase with multiplicity More complex picture Role of collision geometry (impact parameter + transverse structure of proton) Frankfurt, Strikman, Weiss, PRD 83 (2011) 054012 Azarkin, Dremin, Strikman, PLB 735 (2014) 244 Final state: color reconnections, saturation, string percolation Ferreiro, Pajares, PRC 86 (2012) 034903 Collectivity in pp for sufficiently high multiplicities? Multiplicities in high multiplcity pp collisions at the LHC similar to peripheral Cu-Cu at RHIC Werner et al., PRC 83 (2011) 044915 13

  14. How to gain more insight? Extend to open charm (D mesons) Compare open/hidden charm production Study yield of D mesons vs. multiplicity in pT intervals Extend to open beauty production Via non-prompt J/ Extend to higher multiplicities Clearer picture of the trend. Linear? Stronger than linear? ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 14

  15. (Selection of) other studies as a function of multiplicity in pp collisions at the LHC 15

  16. Bottomonia vs. multiplicity (nS) production ratios depend on multiplicity Ground state (1S) systematically produced with more particles? Excited states more easily dissociated by interactions with other particles? Yield of increases with multiplicity Similar in pp, p-Pb and Pb-Pb In Pb-Pb (and p-Pb) number of nucleon-nucleon collisions increases with multiplicity CMS, JHEP 1404 (2014) 103 16

  17. Jets and UE vs. multiplicity High-multiplicity events: Larger number of (semi) hard parton interactions, (mini)jets Softer distribution of hadrons inside jets Multi-Parton Interaction (MPI) mechanism critical to reproduce the features of the data 17 CMS, EPJ C73 (2013) 2674

  18. Mini jets in pp vs. multiplicity Mini jets: bundles of particles from semi-hard partonic scatterings How: from 2-particle correlations, associated yields in near and away sides ALICE, JHEP 09 (2013) 049 Near side associated yield Away side associated yield 18

  19. Mini-jets in pp vs. multiplicity Mini-jets: bundles of particles from semi-hard partonic scatterings How: from 2-particle correlations, associated yields in near and away sides ALICE, JHEP 09 (2013) 049 Uncorrelated seeds = number of independent sources of particle production N trigger = N uncorrelat ed seeds + 1 N +away assoc , near In PYTHIA strongly correlated with number of MPIs Linearly increasing with multiplicity at low multiplicity Levels off at high multiplicities 19

  20. Angular correlations: pp collisions, high multiplicity CMS, JHEP 1009 (2010) 091 High-multiplicity pp events 8x average multiplicity -> near side ridge along : origin? Jet peak Recoil jet on the away side Ridge in Pb-Pb collisions described by hydrodynamics Initial state geometrical anisotropy + collective expansion Also observed in high multiplicity p-Pb collisions at the LHC CMS, PLB 718 (2013) 795 ALICE, PLB 719 (2013) 29 20

  21. Heavy-flavour vs. multiplicity: Data analysis 21

  22. ALICE at the LHC Muon Arm -4 < < -2.5 Central Barrel Tracking, PID < 0.9 22

  23. Data sample pp collisions at s = 7 TeV Minimum-bias trigger Signal in V0A or V0C or SPD N. events = 314 106 Ldt = 5 nb-1 High-multiplicity trigger Threshold on number of fired chips in SPD N. events = 6 106 Ldt = 14 nb-1 SPD | <1.4 SPD | <1.4 V0C V0A -3.7< <-1.7 2.0< <5.1 23

  24. Multiplicity estimation Number of tracklets in the two innermost ITS layers Silicon Pixel Detectors, pseudo-rapidity range: | |<1.0 Ntracklets dNch/d Sum of amplitudes in the V0 scintillator arrays NV0, pseudo-rapidity range -3.7< <-1.7 and 2.8< <5.1 ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 24

  25. Ntracklets intervals Number of tracklets in the two innermost ITS layers Silicon Pixel Detectors, pseudo-rapidity range: | |<1.0 Ntracklets dNch/d MB trigger High Mult trigger 25

  26. Open charm 26

  27. D-meson reconstruction Full reconstruction of D-meson K hadronic decays D0 K- + D+ K- + + D*+ D0 + Ds+ K-K+ + Analysis strategy Invariant mass analysis of fully reconstructed decay topologies displaced from the primary vertex Background reduction via: Geometrical selections on the decay vertex Particle identification of the decay products Feed down from B (10-15 % after cuts) subtracted using pQCD (FONLL) predictions 27

  28. D-meson reconstruction Full reconstruction of D-meson K hadronic decays D0 K- + D+ K- + + D*+ D0 + Ds+ K-K+ + Geometrical selections Track impact parameter (resolution 75 m at pT = 1 GeV/c) Decay length Pointing of the D-meson momentum to the primary vertex ALICE, JHEP 1201 (2012) 128 28

  29. D-meson reconstruction Full reconstruction of D-meson K hadronic decays D0 K- + D+ K- + + D*+ D0 + Ds+ K-K+ + PID selection: 3 cuts on dE/dx in TPC Time-of-flight from interaction point to TOF detector 29

  30. D0, D+, D*+ invariant mass Low multiplicity Mid multiplicity High multiplicity D0 Low pT D+ Mid pT D*+ High pT 30 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  31. Corrections and systematics D-meson yield / event in multiplicity intervals corrected for reconstruction efficiency mult raw mult D N mult event /( ) N N 2 D / d N dydp D = T trigger tot raw tot D tot event 2 D /( / ) N / d N dydp D T D-meson yield / event multiplicity integrated, corrected for reconstruction and trigger efficiencies Sources of systematics Raw yield extraction D-meson line shape Background fit function 3-15% depending on pT, multiplicity, species Primary vertex determination With/without D-meson decay tracks Negligible effect Selection and PID efficiency Same selection used in all multiplicity intervals Negligible residual effect due to multiplicity dependence of efficiency Fraction of prompt D mesons in the raw yield Assumed to be the same in all multiplicity bins (cancels out in the ratio) Uncertainty by varying the D B contribution by a factor 1/2 (2) at low(high) multiplicity 31

  32. Corrections and systematics D-meson yield / event in multiplicity intervals corrected for reconstruction efficiency mult raw mult D N mult event /( ) N N 2 D / d N dydp D = T trigger tot raw tot D tot event 2 D /( / ) N / d N dydp D T D-meson yield / event multiplicity integrated, corrected for reconstruction and trigger efficiencies Contribution of D from B decays: assumed independent of multiplicity uncertainty by varying the D B contribution by a factor 1/2 (2) at low(high) multiplicity 32 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  33. D0, D+, D*+ yield vs. multiplicity 2<pT<4 GeV/c 4<pT<8 GeV/c 8<pT<12 GeV/c D0 D+ D*+ D-meson per-event yields increase with charged-particle multiplicity Similar trend in different pT intervals Faster than linear increase D0, D+ and D*+ results compatible within uncertainties Compute the average of the three meson species 33 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  34. D-meson yield vs. multiplicity pT dependence? Trend of D-meson yield vs. multiplicity independent of pT within uncertainties 34 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  35. Introducing an gap Charged-particle multiplicity measured in the same range as D mesons Multiplicity estimation includes: D-meson decay particles Particles produced in the charm-quark fragmentation Test effect of possible auto- correlations using the multiplicity measured in the V0 detector Qualitatively similar increasing trend when an gap is introduced between the regions in which D mesons and multiplicity are measured V0C V0A -3.7< <-1.7 2.0< <5.1 35 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  36. J/ from beauty-hadron decays 36

  37. J/ from beauty-hadron decays Displaced J/ (from beauty- hadron decays) J/ e- e+ e+ e- B ? ALICE, PRD 86 (2012) 112007 Analysis strategy Electron identification based on energy loss in TPC 3 cut around expected e dE/dx 3.5 (3 ) exclusion band around expected (p) dE/dx 37

  38. J/ from beauty-hadron decays Displaced J/ (from beauty- hadron decays) J/ e- e+ e+ e- B ? Analysis strategy Electron identification based on energy loss in TPC Reduction of background from conversions and 0 Dalitz decays Excluding e that form e+e- pairs with invariant mass < 100 MeV/c2 38

  39. J/ from beauty-hadron decays Displaced J/ (from beauty- hadron decays) J/ e- e+ e+ e- B ? M c Analysis strategy Electron identification based on energy loss in TPC Reduction of background from conversions and 0 Dalitz decays J/ production vertex reconstruction Simultaneous fit to invariant mass and pseudo-proper decay length (x) distributions J/ p = x L xy J/ T J/ p = L L T xy J/ p T 39

  40. Non-prompt J/ : fits Fraction of non-prompt J/ from 2D un-binned log- likelihood fit to: Invariant mass M(e+e-) Pseudo- proper decay length x Increasing multiplicity M c J/ p = x L xy J/ T 40 ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664

  41. Corrections and systematics Fraction of reconstructed non-prompt J/ Raw value f B extracted from 2D un-binned log-likelihood fits Corrected for acceptance x efficiency N f raw J/ + B N = B raw J/ raw J/ N prompt B 3% difference between Ax of prompt and non-prompt J/ Extrapolation from pT>1.3 GeV/c to pT>0 Extrapolation factor: extr = 0.99 +0.01 0.03 Based on FONLL (non-prompt) and phenomenological (prompt) pT shapes NOTE: pT>1.3 GeV/c selection needed because of the non- negligible amount of J/ emitted with large opening angle with respect to the beauty-hadron direction at low pT 41

  42. Corrections and systematics Sources of systematic uncertainty Primary vertex determination With/without removing J/ decay tracks (resolution and bias) Effect: 19% at low multiplicity 3% at high multiplicity Resolution of pseudo-proper decay length (x) Due to imperfect description of x variable in the simulations Effect: 8% at low multiplicity 20% at high multiplicity Generated J/ pT distributions in MC Effect on Ax (~ 1%) Effect on x resolution (within the estimated uncertainty) Modeling of J/ from beauty pseudo-proper decay-length distribution Beauty-hadron decay kinematics and pT spectra Effect: 3%, independent of multiplicity Background modeling in the fit Use side-bands for x distributions Use LS to check the invariant mass distribution Effect: ~7% , independent of multiplicity Extrapolation to pT=0 Effect: 3% 42

  43. Fraction of non-prompt J/ Fraction of non-prompt J/ Approximately flat as a function of multiplicity Non-prompt J/ yield relative to the multiplicity integrated one computed as: ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 Inclusive J/ result from: ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 Multiplicity integrated value <fB> 43

  44. Open charm, charmonia and open beauty 44

  45. D mesons vs. inclusive J/ Similar increase with multiplicity of per-event yield of open and hidden charm Inclusive J/ measured at mid (e+e-) and forward ( + -) rapidity Forward rapidity J/ and charged multiplicity measured in different regions D mesons, mid y J , mid y J , forward y ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 Inclusive J/ result from: ALICE, PLB 712 (2012) 165 45

  46. Open charm vs. open beauty Similar increase with multiplicity of per-event yield of open charm and beauty production D mesons, mid y J beauty, mid y ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 46

  47. Comparison to model calculations 47

  48. Model calculations ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 Percolation model Elementary sources of particle production: colour ropes/strings formed in parton-parton collisions Close to MPI scenario Colour strings have finite spatial extension and interact At high densities: overlap among the sources -> reduction of their number Affects more soft sources (larger transverse size) and charged multiplicity More than linear increase of D-meson yield with multiplicity 48 Ferreiro, Pajares, PRC 86 (2012) 034903

  49. Model calculations ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 EPOS 3.099 Initial conditions Gribov-Regge multiple-scattering formalism Saturation scale to model non-linear effects Hadronization via string fragmentation Number of MPI directly related to multiplicity Hydrodynamical evolution Can be applied to the dense core of the collision Results in a stronger than linear increase of D-meson yield with multiplicity 49 Werner et al., PRC 89 (2014) 064903

  50. Model calculations ALICE, arXiv:1505.00664 PYTHIA 8 Soft-QCD tune Colour reconnections Multi-parton interactions Initial and Final state radiation (ISR/FSR) Almost linear increase of D-meson yield with multiplicity Trend depends on pT 50

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#