Analysis of Top-Level ODM Goals in Joint NASA-FAA Workshop, 2015

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Results from a workshop on On-Demand Mobility highlight key goals like reliability, economic feasibility, certification ease, efficiency, safety, ride quality, ease of use, community noise, emissions, and accessible infrastructure. Participants discussed and voted on various metrics related to these goals, emphasizing safety as a foundational priority. The data reveals the level of support for each goal among workshop participants, shedding light on the priorities in developing On-Demand Mobility systems.


Uploaded on Sep 26, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Straw Poll Results: Top-Level ODM Goals Joint NASA-FAA ODM Workshop, Kansas City October 22, 2015

  2. Goals and Representative Metrics Reliability Economically Feasible Certification Ease & Speed Efficiency Safety Ride Quality Ease of Use Community Noise Emissions Accessible Infrastructure Trip completion rate Total operating cost Time required Specific range Fatal accident rate Equivalent wing loading Training time required Perceived annoyance Life cycle carbon, NOX, SOX, particulates Ground travel time 9/26/2024 2

  3. Raw data and process notes On-Demand Mobility Workshop - October 21 & 22, 2015 - GOALS Each participant received 3 votes Allowed to allocate multiple votes to individual goal if desired Plotted percentages obtained by multiplying percentage of total votes received by 3 Intended to reflect % of participants indicating goal is a top priority Over estimates % of participants supporting if item received multiple votes from individual Significant discussion on Safety as a goal prior to voting Many participants felt that safety was such a foundational requirement that they didn t need to apply votes to it. Safety is always a top priority GOALS RELIABILITY Metric: Trip Completion Rate TOTALS VOTES VOTES FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 0 10 0 10 0% 7% 0% 21% 1 1 5% 14% ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE Metric: Total Operating Cost DECOMPOSTION Acquisition Costs Operating Costs Acquisition & Operating Costs TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 1 13 3 0 0 0 1 5 4 0 0 1 4 11 33 24% 71% 8% 25% 19% 57% CERTIFICATION EASE/SPEED Metric: Time Required ADDED GOAL: Seamless Ops Integration Time alone is not an acceptable metric since it can be driven by forces beyond FAA control. Needs disscusion TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 3 19 3 3 19 14% 41% 3 25% 75% 14% 43% EFFICIENCY (AERO/PROP/STRUCTURAL) Metrics: L/D (AERO) NOT L/D Variable Target Speed Relevant Use energy in vs. kinetic energy out "AEI" PROP STRUCTURE (W/EMPTY & W/GROSS) RANGE TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 1 11 8% 24% 0% 0% 5% 14% SAFETY Metric: Fatal Accident Rate ADDED METRIC: Consider fatal accidents as a metric. Tie to occupant safety and crash survival technology ADDED GOAL: Suggest tweak to safety Have group discuss target safety levels and expectation. Also discuss reliability vs. propability & IOE-X. TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 3 9 1 3 9 1 25% 75% 6% 19% 5% 14% RIDE QUALITY Metric: Equivalent Wing Loading ADDED METRIC: Resulting Accelerations and Rates from a given distrubance TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 1 7 0 1 7 0 8% 25% 5% 15% 0% 0% FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 0 7 3 21 0 0 0 0 3 28 25% 20% 75% 60% EASE OF USE Metric: Training Time Required Initial Training Recurrent Training TOTALS 2 2 0 1 5 24% 71% COMMUNITY NOISE Metric: Perceived Annoyance @ Stand Off Distance TOTALS 1 12 5 1 12 9% 26% 5 8% 25% 24% 71% EMISSIONS Metric: Life Cycle Carbon ADDED METRIC: ZERO "C" arbon Emissions Total Life/Operations Life Cycle NOX, SOX, CO2, Particulants TOTALS FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0% 0% 1% 4% 0% 0% FAA (O'S) INDUSTRY NASA (X's) 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 6 ACCESSIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE Metric: Proximity Distance Metric: Ground Travel/Time Required Added Metric: Flight Density/Capacity Access to Airspace: Scalability has the need for new paradigm for ATC, VFR, IFR if personal aircraft for ODM will provide commute capability (short winter days) Varying level of autonomy enables organized traffic, efficiet point to point travel with deconfliction. TOTALS 0 1 0 0 0 9 1 0% 0% 6% 19% 5% 14% TOTAL VOTES for percentages 12 140 21 9/26/2024 3

  4. Industry Industry Priorities 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Reliability Economic Feasibility Certification Ease Efficiency/range Safety Ride Quality Ease of Use Community Noise Emissions Accesible Infrastructure 9/26/2024 4

  5. FAA FAA Priorities 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Reliability Economic Feasibility Certification Ease Efficiency/range Safety Ride Quality Ease of Use Community Noise Emissions Accesible Infrastructure 9/26/2024 5

  6. NASA NASA Priorities 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Reliability Economic Feasibility Certification Ease Efficiency/range Safety Ride Quality Ease of Use Community Noise Emissions Accesible Infrastructure 9/26/2024 6

Related