Overview of Professional Code of Ethics for Chartered Accountants

Slide Note
Embed
Share

This content outlines the Code of Ethics for Chartered Accountants, covering compliance, fundamental principles, and the importance of integrity, objectivity, and professional competence. It emphasizes the ethical standards expected from CAs, dealing with conflicts of interest, maintaining honesty, and staying updated in knowledge and skills.


Uploaded on Sep 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CODE OF ETHICS Haroon Tabraze, FCA

  2. STRUCTURE OF THE CODE PART 1 Complying with the Code, Fundamental Principles, Conceptual framework Part 2 Part 3 Chartered Accountant in Business Chartered Accountant in Practice International Independence Standard Independence for Audit & Review Independence for Assurance engagements Glossary

  3. COMPLYING WITH THE CODE Letter R denotes requirement Letter A provides context, explanations, suggestions R. A CA shall comply with the Code. Where laws or regulations preclude compliance, the laws and regulations prevail. R. A CA shall evaluate significance to any breach of Code that is identified, and: Take action to address the breach satisfactorily Determine whether to report the breach to relevant parties (professional or regulatory bodies, or oversight bodies).

  4. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES R. A chartered accountant shall comply with each of the fundamental principles of ethics 1. Fundamental principles establish the standard of behavior expected from the CA. 2. Where CA face conflict in applying a fundamental principle with one or more other fundamental principles the CA may: Consult within the firm Those charged with governance A professional body A regulatory body Legal Counsel

  5. Integrity Integrity - to be straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships. Integrity also implies fair dealing and truthfulness. A CA shall not knowingly be associated with: Materially false or misleading information Information furnished recklessly (willfully dangerous) Omits or obscures information to make it misleading Exception: when a modified opinion is given for such info.

  6. Integrity Objectivity Objectivity - to not allow bias, conflict of interest or undue influence of others to override professional or business judgments. Conflict of Interest is: CA undertaking professional activity for more than one party whose interest conflict with each other Interest of CA and client have a conflict with each other

  7. Professional Competence Integrity Objectivity Professional Competence and Due Care - to maintain professional knowledge and skill at the required level. Competence requires (a) Attainment; and (b) Maintenance of professional competence. To act diligently in accordance with applicable technical and professional standards. Diligence means to be careful, thorough and timely. Ensure staff has appropriate training and supervision.

  8. Professional Competence Integrity Objectivity Confidentiality Confidentiality - to respect the confidentiality of information acquired as a result of professional and business relationships and, therefore, not disclose any such information to third parties without proper and specific authority, unless there is a legal or professional right or duty to disclose. Disclosure is required by law when: Documents are required in the course of legal proceedings; or There is a professional duty or right to disclose, when not prohibited by law, to comply with the QCR program of the Institute

  9. Professional Competence Integrity Objectivity Confidentiality Professional Behavior Professional Behavior - to comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any action that discredits the profession. A CA shall not engage in any business, occupation or activity that might impair the integrity, objectivity or reputation of the profession.

  10. THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK Conceptual framework specifies an approach for a CA to: Identify threats to compliance with fundamental principles Evaluate the threats identified Address the threats by eliminating or reducing them to an acceptable level R. When dealing with ethical issue, the CA shall consider the context in which the issue has arisen.

  11. EXERCISING PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT Understand the known facts and circumstances and consider: Potentially relevant information may be missing Facts are inconsistent with each other CA has sufficient expertise and experience to reach conclusion CA s own preconception or biases may be affecting the judgment There may be more than one conclusions that could be reached by using the same information

  12. THIRD PARTY TEST The CA should reach the same conclusion that a reasonable third party would likely to reach by using the same information. The third party may not be an accountant, but knowledgeable and experienced.

  13. THREATS TO COMPLIANCE R. The CA shall identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles Threats may be created by a broad range of facts and circumstances. It is not possible to define every situation that creates threats A threat is at acceptable level when CA using third party test concludes that CA complies with fundamental principle Threats may have quantitative or qualitative or both factors.

  14. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Self Interest Self-interest threat - the threat that a financial or other interest will inappropriately influence the chartered accountant's judgment or behavior

  15. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Self-review threat - the threat that a chartered accountant will not appropriately evaluate the results of a previous judgment made or activity or service performed by the chartered accountant, or by another individual within the chartered accountant's firm or employing organization, on which the accountant will rely when forming a judgment as part of providing a current service;

  16. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Advocacy threat - the threat that a chartered accountant will promote a client's or employer's position to the point that the objectivity is compromised;

  17. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity Familiarity threat - the threat that due to a long or close relationship with a client or employer, a chartered accountant will be too sympathetic to their interests or too accepting of their work; and

  18. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity Intimidation Intimidation threat - the threat that a chartered accountant will be deterred from acting objectively because of actual or perceived pressures, including attempts to exercise undue influence over the chartered accountant.

  19. A Chartered Accountant shall: (a) Identify threats to compliance with the fundamental principles; (b) Evaluate the significance of the threats identified; and (c) Apply safeguards, when necessary, to eliminate the threats or reduce them to an acceptable level. Safeguards are necessary when the chartered accountant determines that the threats are not at a level at which a reasonable and informed third party would be likely to conclude, weighing all the specific facts and circumstances that compliance with the fundamental principles is not compromised.

  20. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity Intimidation Safeguards are actions or other measures that may eliminate threats or reduce them to an acceptable level. They fall into two broad categories: a) Safeguards created by the profession, legislation or regulation; and b) Safeguards in the work environment.

  21. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity Intimidation Apply Safeguards Threats are eliminated / reduced to acceptable level If threats are not reduced Resign / Decline

  22. A chartered accountant may encounter situations in which threats cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, either because the threat is too significant or because appropriate safeguards are not available or cannot be applied. In such situations, the chartered accountant shall decline or discontinue the specific professional activity or service involved or resigns from the engagement (or employment).

  23. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Self Interest Threat CA in Practice Direct Financial Interest fee from one client Close business relationship Possibility of losing client Employment negotiation Contingent fee Discovering an error in previous accounts

  24. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review CA in Practice Reviewing after designing Prepared data Previous director or officer of client Performed service affecting subject matter

  25. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy CA in Practice Promoting client s shares Acting as advocate

  26. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity CA in Practice Family member Director served as engagement partner Accepting gifts Long association

  27. Behavior Integrity Objectivity Competence Confidentiality Threats to Compliance with Fundamental Principles Interest Self Review Advocacy Familiarity Intimidation CA in Practice Possible litigation Reduction of work (fee) Employee more competent to make judgments Partner forcing team members

  28. REVISIONS TO PART-2 CA IN BUSINESS Section 250. Inducements including gifts and hospitality R. CA shall obtain understanding of laws (bribery or corruption) that may prohibit gifts R. CA shall not offer, or encourage others to offer a inducement that may be concluded improper in third party test R. CA shall not accept, or encourage others to accepts a inducement that may be concluded improper in third party test R. CA shall be alert to inducements offered to or made by an immediate or close family member

  29. REVISIONS TO PART-2 CA IN BUSINESS Section 260. Responding to NOCLAR R. CA shall obtain understanding of laws relating to NOCLAR that may be different to provisions of the Code R. A (senior) CA shall discuss the matter with CA s supervisor when there is suspicion of NOCLAR R. CA shall: Communicate with those charged with governance Comply with applicable laws and regulations Rectify the non-compliance and reduce risk of reoccurance

  30. REVISIONS TO PART-2 CA IN BUSINESS Section 270. Pressure to breach the fundamental principles R. CA shall not allow pressure from others to breach the compliance with fundamental principles. Pressures may be: from family member to act as vendor To report misleading F/S to meet investor expectations From elected officials on Public Sector accountants From superiors to approve expenses From superiors to perform a task without having skills Pressure to structure a transaction to evade taxes

  31. REVISIONS TO PART-2 CA IN BUSINESS Other occupations in which CA s can engage without Council Permission dropped from the new code R. CA shall not allow pressure from others to breach the compliance with fundamental principles. Pressures may be: from family member to act as vendor To report misleading F/S to meet investor expectations From elected officials on Public Sector accountants From superiors to approve expenses From superiors to perform a task without having skills Pressure to structure a transaction to evade taxes

  32. REVISIONS TO PART-3 CA IN PRACTICE Section 330.3 (A2 to A4) Fee and other types of remuneration dropped from the new code Replaced with provisions that consider lower fee charged as compared to the previous auditor could be considered as undercutting . Section 330.4 (A1 to A4) relating to contingent fee dropped from the new code Section 370 Public Notices, Announcements and communication Undue publicity to be avoided Advertising for solicitation is to be avoided

  33. REVISIONS TO PART- 4 INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS Cooling off requirements key audit partners for PIE Cooling off requirement is: For engagement partner 5 years For engagement quality control reviewer 3 years For other Key Audit Partner 2 years ASEC recommended to adopt this requirement from periods beginning on or after 1st January 2022

  34. REVISIONS TO PART- 4 INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS Performance of accounting and bookkeeping services in emergency situations has been recommended to retain, as the prohibition has been removed from COCG Regulations 2017.

  35. Conflict of interest The chartered accountant undertakes a professional activity related to a particular matter for two or more parties whose interests with respect to that matter are in conflict; or The interests of the chartered accountant with respect to a particular matter and the interests of a party for whom the chartered accountant undertakes a professional activity related to that matter are in conflict.

  36. Conflict Resolution a) Gather Relevant facts; b) Identify Ethical issues involved; c) Identify Fundamental principles related to the matter in question; d) What are the Established internal procedures (norms or practices); and e) What are the Alternative courses of action. Having considered the relevant factors, a chartered accountant shall determine the appropriate course of action, weighing all possible course of action.

  37. Conflict Resolution (. Continued) A chartered accountant shall determine whether to consult with those charged with governance of the organization, such as the board of directors or the audit committee. It may be in the best interests of the chartered accountant to document the substance of the issue, the details of any discussions held, and the decisions made. If a significant conflict cannot be resolved, a chartered accountant may consider obtaining professional advice from the relevant professional body or from legal advisors.

  38. Conflict Resolution (. Continued 2) If, after exhausting all relevant possibilities, the ethical conflict remains unresolved, a chartered accountant shall, where possible, refuse to remain associated with the matter creating the conflict. The chartered accountant shall determine whether, in the circumstances, it is appropriate to withdraw from the engagement team or specific assignment, or to resign altogether from the engagement, the firm or the employing organization.

  39. Thank you

Related


More Related Content