Evaluating Arguments for God's Existence in the 21st Century
Exploring the persuasiveness of inductive arguments for God's existence, assessing the Kalam cosmological argument, and evaluating the effectiveness of cosmological/teleological arguments. Delving into whether scientific explanations surpass philosophical ones, the strengths and weaknesses of these arguments, and how cumulative evidence can support the existence of God.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Evaluation Questions Whether inductive arguments for God s existence are persuasive. The extent to which the Kalam cosmological argument is convincing. The effectiveness of the cosmological/teleological argument for God s existence. Whether cosmological/teleological arguments for God s existence are persuasive in the 21st Century. The effectiveness of the challenges to the cosmological/teleological argument for God s existence. Whether scientific explanations are more persuasive than philosophical explanations for the universe s existence.
AO2 You are expected to present more than one side of an issue, offering arguments for and against and making good use of evidence, examples and reasons, and then conclude with a critical appraisal of both sides and a balanced and reasoned judgement.
What are these questions really asking you? Page 17 of booklet 2 Strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument Strengths and weaknesses of the kalam argument Strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument Does science rule out religion
Can you think of any strengths of the cosmological argument? Use the white boards to jot down ideas.
Strengths of the cosmological argument Use the pictures to identify strengths of the argument
Peter S. Williams The Cumulative Argument Law court analogy Isolated pieces of evidence may be insufficient on their own to warrant convicting someone beyond reasonable doubt , but taken together the evidence does warrant conviction. Likewise with the case for God. The cosmological argument does not prove the existence of God. Nor do individual design arguments. But put all those arguments together, and the court may have to decide that God exists."
Swinburne Ockhams razor God is simpler than anything we can imagine and gives a simple explanation for the system. Richard Swinburne Ockham s razor the simplest explanation is often the best the simplest explanation for the universe is God. the principle (attributed to William of Occam) that in explaining a thing no more assumptions should be made than are necessary
Activity Make notes on the strengths of the cosmological argument using pages 9 and 10 of booklet 2 This can be Bullet points Spider diagram Paragraphs Just don t copy them out!
Odd one out - weaknesses 1. Contradiction in saying the universe can t be infinite but God can 2. Cause not God many causes? 3. An ancient argument that has survived over 2,500 year 4. No sense experience 5. Newton s first law of motion 6. Universe is the result of random chance
Evaluating the CA Counter arguments 1. Don t need it now science. Age doesn t guarantee success 2. Leaky bucket doesn t prove anything about God s characteristics, lots of bad arguments do not make a good one 3. Time is a human made construct. Contradiction in the rejection of infinity. Kalam arguments misunderstand infinity it has to exist even if humans can t imagine it. 4. Big Bang was a random occurrence 5. Kant haven t had experience of start of the universe. Hume and Russell Fallacy of composition 6. Not simple to claim God exists science provides a simpler explanation 7. Russell Mother brute fact Strengths 1. Ancient 2. Cumulative 3. Measure time 4. Big Bang 5. See cause and effect and a posteriori 6. Swinburne Ockham s razor 7. Satisfies need for a cause
Recap You have five minutes Without using your notes write down as many strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument as you can.
Have you included these? Create a memory aid Strengths Weaknesses Ancient Still wrong Cumulative Leaky bucket Time Misinterprets infinity Big Bang Random A posteriori Fallacy of composition Ockham s razor Science simpler Satisfies need for a cause Brute Fact
AO2 Skills To be successful in evaluative questions (15 marks) you need to be familiar with the type of questions that could be asked and what material you could use in each answer. Ensure that you have a detailed essay plan for each of the questions; it should mean that there are no surprises in May! Referring to criticisms of the arguments is not the same as evaluating them! It is important to recognise that evaluations arise from the strengths and weaknesses of each point you make.
AO2 skills Criticisms of any argument can weaken or strengthen depending on the viewpoint that a person holds. What is convincing for a Christian will not persuade an atheist. In AO2 answers there is never any requirement to favour one side of the debate rather than another. The essential quality of a good evaluation is that both sides are carefully represented and then a conclusion, which is based on the evidence presented, can be drawn. Conclusions are an essential feature of all successful AO2 responses.
What is a good AO2 essay? Can you tell me what makes a good AO2 essay? Do you know when you have done a good piece of work? How could you find out if your essay is good ?
