Evaluation Model for Teacher Supervision and Feedback in Education
Evaluation model conducted by Hamilton County Department of Education in collaboration with Educator Software Solutions, based on Kim Marshall's work on rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation. The evaluation covers aspects like grade levels served, positions held by educators, goal setting consistency, time frames for goals, feedback delivery, and effectiveness of verbal feedback. The data provides insights into the practices and perceptions related to teacher evaluation within the educational system.
Uploaded on Oct 03, 2024 | 0 Views
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Hamilton County Department of Education Project COACH Evaluation Model 2011-2012 Fall Survey Developed by Hamilton County Department of Education and Educator Software Solutions; based on the work of Kim Marshall - Rethinking Teacher Supervision and Evaluation
Grade Level of Responders 107 total 1317 total 100% 75 7% 6% 7 90% 23 355 80% 21% 27% 70% Other 60% 25 231 23% 17% High 50% Middle 40% Elementary 30% 49% 50% 656 52 20% 10% 0% Administrators Teachers What grade levels does your school serve?
Teacher Response Per Position 1322 total 800 726 700 600 55% Core Subject Teacher 500 400 27% 356 Other Than Core 300 240 200 18% Librarian/Counselor/Other 100 0 Position What is your position?
Goal Setting by Administrators 100% 2% 90% 24% 80% 5% 70% 60% Sometimes 50% 98% No 40% Yes 71% 30% 20% 10% 0% set target? consistent? Have you established a target number of mini- observations? If yes, have you consistently hit your target?
Time Frame Goals 104 total 80 70 70 60 50 Daily 12% 40 67% Weekly Monthly 17% 30 Other 4% 18 20 12 10 4 0 What is the time frame that you use in targeting your mini-observations?
Routine Delivery of Feedback 120% 99% 100% 90% 80% 60% Yes No 40% 20% 10% 1% 0% Teacher Administrator Have you consistently given verbal feedback after each mini-observation that is recorded in T-Eval? Have you consistently received verbal feedback after each mini-observation that is recorded in T-Eval?
Verbal Feedback 100% 90% 80% 70% 62% 61% 60% 50% Teachers 39% 40% Administrators 29% 30% 20% 8% 10% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree The verbal feedback I give is helpful in improving the teacher s classroom instruction. The verbal feedback I received has been helpful in improving my classroom instruction.
Verbal Feedback 100% 90% 80% 70% 58% 55% 60% 45% 50% Teachers 40% 34% Administrators 30% 20% 7% 10% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree The verbal feedback I received was specific and constructive. The verbal feedback I give is specific and constructive.
Verbal Feedback 100% 90% 80% 65% 70% 60% 51% 46% 50% Teachers 40% 34% Administrators 30% 20% 10% 3% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree The verbal feedback I received was in a timely manner. I provide verbal feedback in a timely manner.
Written Feedback 100% 90% 80% 74% 70% 60% 49% 46% 50% Teachers 40% Administrators 26% 30% 20% 10% 4% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree The written documentation recorded through the T-Eval system was consistent with the verbal feedback I received. The written documentation I recorded through the T-Eval system was consistent with the verbal feedback I gave.
Written Feedback 100% 90% 80% 65% 70% 60% 53% 50% 42% Teachers 40% Administrators 25% 30% 20% 10% 5% 10% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree My observations were consistently submitted in T-Eval within 5 days of having my feedback conversation. I consistently submitted my observations in T-Eval within 5 days of having my feedback conversation.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 71% 70% 60% 50% 50% Teachers 40% Administrators 30% 24% 23% 21% 20% 6% 5% 10% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree I feel an increased level of trust and collaboration with my building administrators as a result of the mini- observations that have occurred this school year. I feel an increased level of trust and collaboration with my teachers as a result of the mini- observations that have occurred this school year.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 70% 55% 60% 53% 45% 50% Teachers 40% Administrators 30% 23% 19% 20% 5% 10% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree Project COACH is a positive initiative for my success as a teacher. Project COACH is a positive initiative for the success of my teachers.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 70% 64% 55% 60% 50% Teachers 36% 40% Administrators 30% 21% 20% 20% 4% 10% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree Project COACH is a positive initiative for our district.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 70% 70% 57% 60% 50% Teachers 40% Administrators 24% 30% 23% 15% 20% 7% 10% 4% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree Administrators and teachers share an understanding of the elements of highly effective teaching.
Perception 100% 90% 77% 80% 70% 60% 47% 50% Teachers 38% 40% Administrators 30% 20% 13% 8% 9% 7% 10% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree I believe that Project COACH has had a significant positive impact on district-wide student achievement.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 54% 52% 45% 50% 44% Teachers 40% Administrators 30% 20% 10% 3% 1% 1% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree I am comfortable receiving constructive feedback from administrators at my school. I am comfortable giving constructive feedback to teachers at my school.
Perception 100% 90% 80% 70% 56% 60% 52% 50% Teachers 40% 40% Administrators 29% 30% 20% 14% 5% 10% 4% 0% strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree Instructional conversations have increased at my school due to the design of Project COACH.
