Insights on Quantum Computing: Bridging Theory and Reality

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Delve into the world of quantum computing through a series of workshops and personal reflections. Explore the intersection of theoretical concepts with practical applications, highlighting the evolving landscape of quantum mechanics. The journey navigates discussions on electron spin, fundamental theorems of quantum computing, and challenges in reconciling theoretical frameworks with physical realities. Witness firsthand accounts from scientific gatherings and ponder the intricacies of quantum information storage within atomic structures. Embrace the quest for understanding amidst a backdrop of innovative discoveries and timeless principles.


Uploaded on Sep 19, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. American Physical Society American Physical Society Racah Institute of Physics Workshop IV Quantum computing: achievable reality or unrealistic dream January 06, Danciger B Seminar room, Afternoon (06.01.15 @ 16.00) 1

  2. American Physical Society American Physical Society Racah Institute of Physics Workshop s IV Dinner Quantum computing and I Restaurant Piccolino , (06.01.15 @ 19.00) 2

  3. Choice of Date Some - Specifics of year 2015 1.2015 : 5 = 403, where 3 + 4 = 7 Holy number 2. 2.2015 2015 in binary 11111011111 (number of digits from each side is 5!) 3. 1+2+4+8+16+64+128+256+512+1024 =20+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28+210 =2015 2015 system is 3

  4. Recollections from the 70th We had a medium-size conference on Atomic structure and processes . In the front row sat an unknown person. After each talk he was the first asking a question. Something like: So, what does all this mean? . Speakers were shocked and dumb. During the brake I asked who is he. An electrician , - was the answer. Perhaps, Perhaps, it it is is not not too too bad irrespectively irrespectively to to the the knowledge knowledge of bad to to ask of the the subject subject. ask questions questions 4

  5. Basic ideas and reality I Electron spin is an ideal yes or no , or up down . Quantum-mechanics A yes + B no diplomat, not virgin Feynman s idea (1981) - a quantum wave function can store a lot of information in an atomic size volume. The idea slept many years, but then it starts to explode. As a conservative, I am afraid of groundless speculations, like new interpretation of quantum mechanics or new theories of everything that I receive 5 times/month. Each author demands to accept his new physics and abandon the old one. But I am comfortable with old ones and ready to accept new only in the case of a deadlock. 5

  6. Basic ideas and reality II In 1996, during my stay at Imperial College it was Sir Peter Knight, who explained me and some others that there is quite a distance between stuffed with information quantum atom and reading this information classical system. In 1998 my friend, mathematician M. Zak, taught me the main QC theorems. At that time I had a cancer surgery so it was an ideal time for abstract thinking. I was very much impressed by Shor s theorem 6

  7. Basic ideas and reality III I started to doubt whether the theorems has something to do with physics reality of the system that is a fundament of the total QC device, with all its inevitable disturbances that make life of a physicist much more complicated than that of a pure mathematician. In spite of my admiration by Shor s theorem, I already long ago accepted Lev Landau s statement: All rigorous theorems on quantum mechanics are either meaningless or incorrect . Soon, I started to consider QC as something similar to manmade global warming , Ponds cold fusion etc. 7

  8. Basic ideas and reality IV By chance in 2012 I run across M. Dyakonov s State of the Art and Prospects for Quantum Computing . I red it like a good detective overnight I learned the main points: 1. Theorems are far from reality, 2. Quantum states are mixed without control, 3. Different disturbances are unacceptable. Remember pure math is not the real world I became not educated but armed and thus dangerous . I gained conclusions to test and as the mentioned above electrician had nasty questions to ask 8

  9. Basic ideas and reality V Conclusions to test: 1. Almost all Quantum Computing promises are a big bluff 2. They cannot be fulfilled due to unescapable existence of the real world in 10 -1000 years 3. Even if one would build real QC device it has no suitable problems All this resonated with my feelings How to test? Ask publicly prominent lecturers at big conferences nasty questions! 9

  10. Basic ideas and reality VI Nasty questions to ask: 1. What QC managed to factorize using the famous Shor s algorithm during last fifteen yeas, except 21=3x7 and 15=3x5 (not yet done)? 2. How, e.g. use anyons , not onions, for QC? 3. What, except modeling of not too big strongly interacting system could be subject of QC? These questions were tested at Euroscience open forum, July 2012 (~4000 attendees) and ICPEAC, July 2013 (~1000). There was no short, clear and/or convincing answer! So, we get together and listened about pro and cons from experts in the field 10

  11. Quantum Computing controversy Quantum Computing controversy 1. Quantum Computation: A Grand Mathematical Challenge for the Twenty-First Century and the Millennium , S. J. Lomonaco, Jr., (2002). 2. I believe that, in spite of appearances, the quantum computing story is nearing its end, not because somebody proves that it is impossible, but rather because 20 years is a typical lifetime of any big bubble in science, M. I. Dyakonov (2012). 3. 3. Who is right? We have experts here! Who is right? We have experts here! Listen, ask question, decide. Listen, ask question, decide. 11

  12. Scientist are responsible for both Scientist are responsible for both informing and misinforming society. informing and misinforming society. Thank you for attention GOODAPPETITE! 12

Related


More Related Content