Proposed Brunswick County Interbasin Transfer Petition Request

Slide Note
Embed
Share

Brunswick County is seeking approval for an interbasin transfer to address water demand issues. Recommendations by NCDENR include transferring water from the Cape Fear River Basin to Shallotte and Waccamaw River Basins. Various factors such as necessity, detrimental effects, and available alternatives are being considered in the decision-making process.


Uploaded on Sep 14, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PROPOSED BRUNSWICK COUNTY INTERBASIN TRANSFER PETITION REQUEST NOVEMBER 14, 2013

  2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Brunswick County (Tetra Tech) Cape Fear Shallotte, Waccamaw Primary Applicant: Source Basin: Receiving Basins: Existing Allowable IBT (Maximum Daily): 10.5 MGD Average Daily IBT request based on ~2040 demand: Cape Fear to Shallotte: 16.19 MGD 0.81 MGD 17.0 MGD Cape Fear to Waccamaw: Total Requested IBT:

  3. Northeast Regional WWTP (1.65 MGD) 24 MGD West Regional WWTP (6.0 MGD) Carolina Shores WWTP (0.53 MGD) 6 MGD

  4. RECOMMENDATION NCDENR recommends that the EMC grant Brunswick County a transfer amount not to exceed 17 million gallons, calculated as a daily average of a calendar month, from the Cape Fear River Basin to the Shallotte and Waccamaw River Basins.

  5. BASIS FOR DECISION FINDINGS OF FACT OF THE FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED The EMC may grant a Petition in whole or in part, or deny it, and may require mitigation measures to minimize detrimental effects. In making this determination, the EMC is required to specifically consider: The necessity, reasonableness, and beneficial effects of transfer amount Detrimental effects on the source river basin The cumulative effect of uses on the source major river basin Detrimental effects on the receiving basin Reasonable alternatives to the proposed transfer Use of impounded storage Purposes and water storage allocations in a US Army Corps of Engineers multipurpose reservoir Compare the service area of the applicant to the locations of both the source and receiving basins? Any other facts or circumstances

  6. (1) (1) NECESSITY, NECESSITY, REASONABLENESS, AND REASONABLENESS, AND BENEFICIAL EFFECTS BENEFICIAL EFFECTS Brunswick County, through Brunswick County Public Utilities, provides water to more than 34,000 retail customers and 11 wholesale customers through its two water treatment plants (WTP). 30 million gallons per day (MGD) maximum capacity. Peak day demand has exceeded 80 percent capacity at least once annually since 2010. Since 2008, significant programs to encourage reductions in per capita water use. Raw water will be sourced from Lower Cape Fear Water and Sewer Authority (LCFWSA). LCFWSA 106 MGD intake EA received FONSI in August 2010.

  7. (2) (2) DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ON DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ON THE SOURCE RIVER BASIN THE SOURCE RIVER BASIN THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF USES ON THE SOURCE MAJOR RIVER BASIN Three OASIS hydrologic water quantity modeling scenarios: baseline condition (2003), 2030 future projected conditions, 2050 future projected conditions. Conclusion: percent difference from the incremental increased withdrawals at the lowest projected flows (5th percentile) is 5 percent. No significant impacts to downstream flow. Similarly run water quality models demonstrated, no significant changes to existing pH and dissolved oxygen levels. No direct or indirect impacts to aquatic or terrestrial habitats or state and federally protected species are expected to occur. No direct or indirect impacts to hydroelectric power generation, navigation, or recreation are expected to occur.

  8. (3) D (3) DETRIMENTAL ON ETRIMENTAL E EFFECTS ONTHE FFECTS ASINS THE R RECEIVING ECEIVING B BASINS No additional water transfer is anticipated for the Waccamaw Basin; therefore, no indirect or cumulative impacts are expected. Growth in the Shallotte Basin is anticipated to be three to four times that of the existing land use. Mitigation measures to offset any secondary and cumulative impacts have been put into ordinance. Water Shortage Restrictions Pricing Signals Conservation/Efficiency Education Reuse

  9. (4) A (4) ALTERNATIVES P PROPOSED LTERNATIVESTO ROPOSED T TRANSFER TOTHE THE RANSFER New water supply source alternatives: Increase in IBT from Cape Fear River - Northwest WTP Expansion Development of new surface water supply Purchase of water from other suppliers in the basin Development of additional groundwater facilities Seawater desalination Utilizing existing water supply alternatives: Off-line storage reservoir of existing allotment of IBT water from Cape Fear Development of an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) system Further development of water conservation and reuse programs Return of Wastewater to the source basin No Action

  10. (5) I (5) IMPOUNDMENT MPOUNDMENT S STORAGE TORAGE Not applicable. (6) M (6) MULTIPURPOSE THE Not applicable. (7) W (7) WHETHER A APPLICANT B BASIN Brunswick Public Utilities contains significant portions of the service area population within both the source and receiving basins; thereby, avoiding the removal or receipt of water in a basin not contained within the existing service area. (8) A (8) ANY No other considerations at this time. ULTIPURPOSE R RESERVOIR THE U UNITED ESERVOIR C CONSTRUCTED TATES A ARMY ONSTRUCTEDBY ORPSOF BY NITED S STATES RMY C CORPS OF E ENGINEERS NGINEERS HETHERTHE PPLICANTIS ASINAND THE S SERVICE IS L LOCATED ANDTHE ERVICE A AREA OCATED B BOTH THE R RECEIVING REAOF INTHE ASIN OFTHE THE S SOURCE THE OURCE OTHIN ECEIVING B BASIN NY O OTHER THER F FACTS ACTSOR OR C CIRCUMSTANCES IRCUMSTANCES

  11. PROJECT TIMELINE February 2009 Notice of Intent Submitted April 2009 Four Public Meetings Conducted July 2012 Draft Environmental Document Submitted April 2013 Finding of No Significant Impact Issued June 2013 Draft Petition Submitted September 2013 Public Hearing on Draft Petition November 2013 Determination by EMC

  12. RECOMMENDATION NCDENR recommends that the EMC grant Brunswick County an average daily transfer amount not to exceed 17 million gallons, calculated as a daily average of a calendar month, from the Cape Fear River Basin to the Shallotte and Waccamaw River Basins.

  13. CONTACT INFORMATION HAROLD M. BRADY, PWS HAROLD M. BRADY, PWS NCDENR NCDENR - - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES HAROLD.M.BRADY@NCDENR.GOV HAROLD.M.BRADY@NCDENR.GOV

Related


More Related Content