Understanding Criminal Competency in Legal Proceedings
Competency in criminal cases is crucial for ensuring the accuracy and fairness of legal proceedings. Adjudicative competence, based on standards like the Dusky Standard, relates to a defendant's ability to understand and engage in legal processes. Mistaken beliefs, such as equating clinical disorders with incompetence, can lead to errors in assessing competency. Factors like intellectual disability and thought disorders play significant roles, and psychologists must provide informed opinions to aid the legal process.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
UNDERSTANDING COMPETENCY AND UNDERSTANDING COMPETENCY AND THE RESTORATION PROCESS THE RESTORATION PROCESS PETER TOLISANO, PSY.D., ABPP PETER TOLISANO, PSY.D., ABPP BOARD CERTIFIED IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY BOARD CERTIFIED IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY DIRECTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY DIRECTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
Criminal Competency Points Competency is a legal issue, rather than psychological or psychiatric one. Trial competence or fitness to proceed is fundamental for the following reasons: Safeguarding the accuracy of the process Addressing due process rights Giving integrity to the proceedings Increasing the likelihood that the defendant will understand the reasons for punishment.
Criminal Competency Points Adjudicative competence or the competence to stand trial relates to a defendant's ability to understand and participate in legal proceedings. The Dusky Standard is the ability to understand the situation and reasonably assist with one s own defense. Admissibility: Frye Standard regarding scientific evidence; Daubert standard regarding expert testimony. Important distinctions are capacity versus ability and understanding versus appreciation.
Criminal Competency Points Courts often view intellectual competency on a continuum (e.g., concrete associations to abstract metaphors). IQ disability decreases capacity to understand fine distinctions, especially in legal terms (e.g., plea bargain). Creating competency: Is restoration a misnomer in some cases? The more simplistic the charges, the more likely a person is to be found competent. Competency to testify mostly affects children and those with intellectual disability, as courts often look for a developmental level of a six-year-old in terms of adequate memory.
Criminal Competency Points Most common mistake is the misbelief that a clinical disorder, especially psychosis, equals incompetence. A diagnosis is generally irrelevant in the legal context and it is better to look at an individual s functioning. Another key factor is decompensation under distress, especially due to personality-related issues.
Criminal Competency Points Most incompetent defendants have a thought disorder, intellectual disability, or organic brain damage. Disagreeing with or refusing treatment does not mean incompetence. As psychologists, our task is to inform the process. Opinions should not be based solely on testing results.
Five Keys to Competency for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Video Available Module-Based Pre-and Post-Testable 1: Overview 1: Overview Objectives: Objectives: Understand what led to the arrest (i.e., What the police allege that you did?), as well as the Understand what led to the arrest (i.e., What the police allege that you did?), as well as the person s reactions and memories of the event. person s reactions and memories of the event. Determine what the individual needs to know in order to proceed with a court hearing Determine what the individual needs to know in order to proceed with a court hearing Assist the individual to view restoration as an opportunity to learn to help themselves in court Assist the individual to view restoration as an opportunity to learn to help themselves in court Respect the individual s privacy. Respect the individual s privacy. 2. The People 2. The People Objectives: Objectives: Help the individual to distinguish terminology (e.g., defendant, defense attorney, prosecutor, Help the individual to distinguish terminology (e.g., defendant, defense attorney, prosecutor, witness, testify, jury, and judge) and define the associated roles. witness, testify, jury, and judge) and define the associated roles. Visual techniques (e.g., diagrams, television, and movies) Visual techniques (e.g., diagrams, television, and movies) 3. The Truth 3. The Truth Objectives: Objectives: Explaining the events in their own words Explaining the events in their own words Why is the truth important? Why is the truth important?
Courtroom Personnel Courtroom Personnel
Five Keys to Competency for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 4: Definitions 4: Definitions Objectives: Objectives: Learning key words and phrases, such as oath, perjury, charges, evidence, and proof. Learning key words and phrases, such as oath, perjury, charges, evidence, and proof. 5: Definitions Continued 5: Definitions Continued Objectives: Objectives: Comprehend and discuss key terms including contempt, courtroom demeanor, plea Comprehend and discuss key terms including contempt, courtroom demeanor, plea bargain, sentence, jail vs. prison, and probation. bargain, sentence, jail vs. prison, and probation. Demonstrate the difference between guilt and innocence Demonstrate the difference between guilt and innocence 6: You and Your Defense Attorney 6: You and Your Defense Attorney Objectives: Objectives: Learn the five rules to assist with one s defense (e.g., cooperate, truthfulness, Learn the five rules to assist with one s defense (e.g., cooperate, truthfulness, remember, pay attention, and behave). remember, pay attention, and behave).
Restoration Process Most cases will include collateral information about the arrest, as well as a report from the Office of Forensic/Court Evaluations describing the person s competence and the recommendation for restoration. Assessment prior to restoration may include brief intelligence measures, a mental status exam, a clinical interview. Tests of malingering (cognitive and/or psychiatric) may be administered after the process is underway if poor or inconsistent effort is observed. The competency trainer has the discretion to choose the materials used for training. The competency trainer should keep track of training dates, the time spent in each session, the general attitude of the individual, and note any special techniques that were necessary for training. A brief report describing the training process should be provided to the person generating the competency assessment. The report should contain information about the total number of sessions, the dates of each session, the training time spent per session, pre- and post-test scores, as well as the concepts learned adequately versus incorrectly.
Content Areas Content Areas Consult with Counsel Consult with Counsel View of Defense Counsel View of Defense Counsel Expectations for Attorney Expectations for Attorney Agreements and Disagreements Agreements and Disagreements Impaired Communications Impaired Communications Factual Understanding of Factual Understanding of Courtroom Proceedings Courtroom Proceedings Judge s Responsibilities Judge s Responsibilities Criminal charges Criminal charges Talk to Prosecutor Talk to Prosecutor Jury Jury Rational Understanding of Rational Understanding of Courtroom Proceedings Courtroom Proceedings Reasoning Reasoning Testifying Testifying Best and Worst Outcomes Best and Worst Outcomes Courtroom Experience Courtroom Experience Unmanageable Behavior Unmanageable Behavior
