UE Capability Management Discussion Summary

summary of 604 n.w
1 / 4
Embed
Share

"Explore a detailed discussion on UE capability management, focusing on ensuring feature set ID consistency and addressing potential issues. Companies seek clarity on UE reporting requirements and spec mandates. Join the conversation to understand the nuances and current perspectives."

  • Capability Management
  • Discussion
  • Feature Sets
  • UE
  • Companies

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Summary of [604]

  2. WF Discussion Capture in Chairman Minutes: For the usage of rrc-MaxCapaSegAllowed for EN- DC. In case MR-DC/NR capability is NOT enquired together with LTE capability, there might be issue of FS-ID inconsistency. [OPPO] Red part is added based on offline suggestion [OPPO] Red part is removed based on offline, and this short version seems OK for companies.

  3. WF Discussion Any view regarding: whether the current spec mandate UE to ensure FS-ID consistency in the case above? if so whether some NOTE to the spec is needed? [OPPO] It is observed that some companies want this clarification to relax UE report of FS-ID consistency in the separate enquiry case, while the separate enquiry proponent tends to avoid explicit text in spec which seems to discourage the implementation supporting separate enquiry ..

  4. WF Discussion Current Text: The UE shall ensure that the feature set IDs are consistent across feature sets, feature set combinations and band combinations in all three UE capability containers that the network queries with the same fields with the same values, i.e. UECapabilityRequestFilterNR,UE-CapabilityRequestFilterCommon, rrc- SegAllowed and fields in UECapabilityEnquiry message (i.e. requestedFreqBandsNR-MRDC, requestedCapabilityNR, eutra-nr-only flag, requestedCapabilityCommon, and rrc-SegAllowed) as defined in TS 36.331 [10], where applicable NOTE: For the usage of rrc-MaxCapaSegAllowed, in case MR-DC/NR capability is NOT enquired together with LTE capability, there might be issue of FS-ID inconsistency

Related


More Related Content