Enhanced Flow Estimates in NHDPlus Version 02 Presentation

undefined
1
Improved  Flow Estimates
in NHD
Plus
 Version 02
Tim Bondelid- NHDPlus Team
Consulting Engineer
2012 ESRI International User Conference
July 23-27, 2012
San Diego, CA
2
NHD
Plus
 V02 Enhanced Runoff
Method (EROM)
Contributors:
The NHD
Plus
 Team
EROM:
Dave Wolock, USGS
Kernell Ries, USGS
Greg Schwarz, USGS
3
Importance of
Stream Flow Estimates
Support the water element goals
expressed in the EPA Strategic Plan
Support the water mission of the USGS
Water-quality modeling (
SPARROW
)
Regional and national stream flow assessments
goal of National Stream Flow Information Program
National Water Census
Watershed planning and management
4
NHD
Plus
 
Version 02
Flow Estimation
Enhanced Runoff Method (EROM)
Mean annual and mean monthly flow
estimates
Current V02 release is mean annual flow
Significantly improved ingredient data
Five-step process
Each step incrementally improves the flow
estimates
Flow QA module; statistics on
performance
5
U.S.: Wolock and McCabe; CN and MX: Canadian Forest Service
6
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff              EET            Ref Reg.      PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.36     2.17   58.8
   2.17   58.8   2.37    32.6   2.37   32.6        23.0
Step 1: Runoff (SR)
7
Method developed by Dave Wolock of USGS.
(graphic courtesy of Dave Wolock)
7
Step 2: 
E
xcess 
E
vapo
t
ranspiration
(EET)
8
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff            EET             Ref Reg.       PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.35    2.46  118.7   2.30   90.6
   2.37    32.6   2.37   32.6        23.0
Step 2: EET (10L)
9
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff              EET            Ref Reg.      PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.36     2.17   58.8
   2.17   58.8   2.37    32.6   2.37   32.6        23.0
Step 1: Runoff (SR)
10
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff            EET             Ref Reg.       PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.36     2.17   58.8
   2.17   58.8   
2.37    32.6
   2.37   32.6        23.0
Step 3: Reference Gage
            Regression (SR)
11
Step 4: Transfer, Withdraw,
Augment Flows (“PlusFlowAR”)
.3
.3
2
2
6
1
9
.5
.5
10
12
Transfer 2 cfs
4
7
2.5
8
12
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff            EET             Ref Reg.       PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.42     2.40   14.9
   2.40   14.9   
2.43   14.7   2.43   11.7
        10.9
Step 4: “PlusFlowAR” (NE)
13
Step 5: Gage Adjustment
.3
.3
2
2
6
1
9
.5
.5
10
12
Gage DA = 12
Gage Q = 13
EROM Flow = 12
QAdj = 13 – 12 = 1
Flowline adjustments closest
to the gage will get higher
weights than Flowlines farther
from the gage
14
G
G
a
a
g
g
e
e
 
 
A
A
d
d
j
j
u
u
s
s
t
t
m
m
e
e
n
n
t
t
:
:
 
 
R
R
e
e
-
-
A
A
c
c
c
c
u
u
m
m
u
u
l
l
a
a
t
t
e
e
d
d
F
F
l
l
o
o
w
w
s
s
.3
.3
2
2
6
.
1
6
1
9
.
4
0
.5
.5
1
0
.
6
7
1
3
 
Gage DA = 12
Gage Q = 13
Flowline Flow = 12
QAdj = 13 – 12 = 1
15
                                     
QA Statistics
Gage       Runoff             EET            Ref Reg.       PlusFlow        Gage Seq.
Mean    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE    Mean   SEE   Mean    SEE         SEE
2.36     2.17   
58.8
   2.17   58.8   2.37    
32.6
   2.37   32.6        
23.0
Gage Adjustment QA:
Randomly remove 20% of the gages
from the gage adjustment
Called “Gage Sequestration”
Provides a ballpark estimate of how
well the final, gage-adjusted flows
match gage flows
16
EROM – Next Steps
We are always looking for ways to
improve EROM
Reference Gage Regression; issue with
cases where it “over-adjusts” at higher
flows
Increase the number of gages; the
more 
valid
 gages the better!
Update to a more recent version of
Reference Gages; “GAGESII”?
Adjust flows further upstream?
Monthly flows
17
Down the Road
PlusFlowAR:
Incorporate more detailed information
from NHD Stewards, WBD, others!
Seasonal values?
EET Step: Model Coefficients, issues
in some areas
Other flows: 7Q10
Use a 1981-2010 time frame
PRISM has released “normals” for this
period
The major issue: international drainage
18
Questions?
Tim Bondelid - Independent Consultant to EPA
timothy@trbondelid.com
NHDPlus V02:
http://www.horizon-systems.com/NHDPlus
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Presentation by Tim Bondelid at the ESRI International User Conference discussing the Enhanced Runoff Method (EROM) in NHDPlus Version 02 for improved stream flow estimates. Highlights the importance of accurate flow estimates for various water-related goals and the methodology used to enhance flow estimation in the current V02 release. Includes step-by-step process and QA module statistics.

  • Flow Estimates
  • NHDPlus Version 02
  • Enhanced Runoff Method
  • Water Quality
  • Streamflow

Uploaded on Oct 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Improved Flow Estimates in NHDPlus Version 02 Tim Bondelid- NHDPlus Team Consulting Engineer 2012 ESRI International User Conference July 23-27, 2012 San Diego, CA 1

  2. NHDPlus V02 Enhanced Runoff Method (EROM) Contributors: The NHDPlus Team EROM: Dave Wolock, USGS Kernell Ries, USGS Greg Schwarz, USGS 2

  3. Importance of Stream Flow Estimates Support the water element goals expressed in the EPA Strategic Plan Support the water mission of the USGS Water-quality modeling (SPARROW) Regional and national stream flow assessments goal of National Stream Flow Information Program National Water Census Watershed planning and management 3

  4. NHDPlusVersion 02 Flow Estimation Enhanced Runoff Method (EROM) Mean annual and mean monthly flow estimates Current V02 release is mean annual flow Significantly improved ingredient data Five-step process Each step incrementally improves the flow estimates Flow QA module; statistics on performance 4

  5. 5 U.S.: Wolock and McCabe; CN and MX: Canadian Forest Service

  6. Step 1: Runoff (SR) 100,000 10,000 EROM Flow (cfs) 1,000 100 10 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Gage Flow (cfs) QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.36 2.17 58.8 2.17 58.8 2.37 32.6 2.37 32.6 23.0 6

  7. Step 2: Excess Evapotranspiration (EET) Colorado River (Southwestern U.S.) Non-conservative routing model Conservative routing model Measured flow 30000 25000 Streamflow (cfs) 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 Drainage basin area (km2) Method developed by Dave Wolock of USGS. (graphic courtesy of Dave Wolock) 7 7

  8. Step 2: EET (10L) 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 EROM Flow (cfs) 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 Gage Flow (cfs) QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.35 2.46 118.7 2.30 90.6 2.37 32.6 2.37 32.6 23.0 8

  9. Step 1: Runoff (SR) 100,000 10,000 EROM Flow (cfs) 1,000 100 10 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Gage Flow (cfs) QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.36 2.17 58.8 2.17 58.8 2.37 32.6 2.37 32.6 23.0 9

  10. Step 3: Reference Gage Regression (SR) 100,000 10,000 EROM Flow (cfs) 1,000 100 10 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Gage Flow (cfs) QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.36 2.17 58.8 2.17 58.8 2.37 32.6 2.37 32.6 23.0 10

  11. Step 4: Transfer, Withdraw, Augment Flows ( PlusFlowAR ) 2 .3 .3 2 1 6 4 Transfer 2 cfs 7 .5 9 2.5 .5 10 8 12 11

  12. Step 4: PlusFlowAR (NE) 100,000 10,000 EROM Flow (cfs) 1,000 100 10 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Gage Flow (cfs) QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.42 2.40 14.9 2.40 14.9 2.43 14.7 2.43 11.7 10.9 12

  13. Step 5: Gage Adjustment 2 .3 .3 2 Flowline adjustments closest to the gage will get higher weights than Flowlines farther from the gage 1 6 .5 9 .5 10 Gage DA = 12 Gage Q = 13 EROM Flow = 12 QAdj = 13 12 = 1 12 13

  14. Gage Adjustment: Re-Accumulated Flows 2 .3 .3 2 1 6.16 .5 9.40 .5 10.67 Gage DA = 12 Gage Q = 13 Flowline Flow = 12 QAdj = 13 12 = 1 13 14

  15. Gage Adjustment QA: Randomly remove 20% of the gages from the gage adjustment Called Gage Sequestration Provides a ballpark estimate of how well the final, gage-adjusted flows match gage flows QA Statistics Gage Runoff EET Ref Reg. PlusFlow Gage Seq. Mean Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE Mean SEE SEE 2.36 2.17 58.8 2.17 58.8 2.37 32.6 15 2.37 32.6 23.0

  16. EROM Next Steps We are always looking for ways to improve EROM Reference Gage Regression; issue with cases where it over-adjusts at higher flows Increase the number of gages; the more valid gages the better! Update to a more recent version of Reference Gages; GAGESII ? Adjust flows further upstream? Monthly flows 16

  17. Down the Road PlusFlowAR: Incorporate more detailed information from NHD Stewards, WBD, others! Seasonal values? EET Step: Model Coefficients, issues in some areas Other flows: 7Q10 Use a 1981-2010 time frame PRISM has released normals for this period The major issue: international drainage 17

  18. Questions? Tim Bondelid - Independent Consultant to EPA timothy@trbondelid.com NHDPlus V02: http://www.horizon-systems.com/NHDPlus 18

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#