Traditional Approaches in Literary Criticism: An Overview

undefined
 
TRADITIONAL
APPROACHES IN
LITERARY CRITICISM
 
HISTORICAL – BIOGRAPHICAL CRITICISM
MORAL – PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICISM
TEXTUAL 
CRITICISM
 
1
 
Literary studies in the first part of the 20th
century were dominated by what are now
called «traditional approaches».
American New Critics call «extrinsic»
approaches to literature.
They focus on understanding literary
works by bringing external information to
bear on them rather than by close and
careful consideration of what is already
expressed in the work itself.
 
2
 
To certain extent all approaches to literature
are by definition extrinsic  because a reader
must have certain basic information at hand
to read a literary work at all.
At the vey least, a reader must know the
language in which the work is written and
must possess a certain basic amount of
cultural knowledge.
A reader must have at least a minimal
understanding of the conventions of
literature to process the content of a
literary work in a coherent way.
 
3
 
We might compare the use of external
information to aid in the interpretation of
 a
literary text to the activities of a scientist
who interprets a workings of nature. For
instance, the beauty of the stars can be
appreciated without being an expert in
astronomy, but even the most seemingly
naive appreciation of the beauty of nature
involves a complex process of cultural
conditioning.
 
4
 
More scholarly traditional approaches include
a)
biographical studies
, 
in which a work is
illuminated through a discussion of the
experiences and opinions of its author
b)
philosohical
 studies, in which the ideas
expressed in a literary text are compared to
well-known philosophical concepts – and
often judged in relation to the critic’s own
moral or philosophical strance
c)
textual studies, in which the historical record
is carefully sifted in an attempt to determine
the precisely correct rendering of scale
mechanical printing of literary texts.
 
5
 
In traditional approach the work of art
frequently appear
s
 to be a source that
illustrates background.
Such an approach often leads to the study
of literature as essentially biography, history,
or some other branch of learning, rather
than as art.
According to those of the older school,
literature provides primarily an opportunity
for exercising what they perceive to be
really relevant scholarly and cultural
disciplines such as history, linguistics,
biography and philosophy.
 
6
 
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
-
B
i
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
 
A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
 
Its focus is on the life, times, and
environment of the author, 
and this
approach deals with the effects of these
factors on the work of art.
Most of literary works can be analysed in
the light of 
historical-biographical method
.
A reader/a critic studies the work in
accordance with the period in which the
work is produced. Thus
, the values and
perception of the reader’s own age are put
aside.
 
7
 
Historical-Biographical approach
establishes a bridge between the reader
and the world’s of the author.
The life of the author,  the historical events
and the values of his age help us
understand the work, and in a similar way
the literary work gives information of the
author and his own period.
 
8
 
In his book 
History of English Literature
,
French critic Hippolyte A. Taine (1823-
1893) suggests the phrase «race, millue,
et moment»
a)
Race stands for “culture and history”
b)
Millue is “place”
c)
Moment is “time”
 
9
 
This approach sees a literary work
chiefly as a reflection of its author’s life
and times or the characters in the work.
Taine compared the work of literature
to the fossil of a leaf which tells the
world of a previous age.
 
10
 
John Milton's sonnet “On the Late
Massacre in Piedmont” illustrates the
topical quality that great literature may
and often does possess. This poem
commemorates the slaughter in 1655 of
the Waldenses, members of a Protestant
sect living in the valleys of northern Italy.
A knowledge of this background clarifies
at least one rather factual reference and
two allusions in the poem.
 
11
 
However,  novels may lend themselves
somewhat more readily than lyric
poems to this particular interpretive
approach; they usually treat a broader
range of experience than poems do
and thus are affected more by extrinsic
factors.
 
12
 
It is a mistake, however, to think that poets do
not concern
 
themselves with social themes or
that good poetry cannot be
 
written about such
themes. 
 
Actually, poets have from earliest
times been the historians, the interpreters of
contemporary
 
culture,
 
and the prophets
 
of
their people
.
For example, 
Blake's
London
 is an outcry
against
 
the oppression
 
of
 
human
 
beings
 
by
society:
 
he
 
lashes
 
out against
 
child labour
 
in his
day
 
and
 
the
 
church's
 
indifference
 
to it, against
the
 
government's
 
indifference
 
to the indigent
soldier
 
who has
 
served
 
his country
 
faithfully,
and against
 
the
 
horrible and unnatural
consequences
 
of a social
 
code
 
that represses
sexuality
.
 
13
 
Moral-Philosophical Approach
or
 Moral/Thematic Criticism
 
The moral-philosophical approach
 
is as old
as classical
 
Greek
 
and Roman critics. Plato,
for
 
example,
 
emphasized
 
moralism
 
and
utilitarianism;
 
Horace stressed
 
that literature
should be
 
delightful and
 
instructive. 
 
Among
its most famous exemplars
 
are
 
the
commentators
 
of the age
 
of neoclassicism
 
in
English
 
literature (1660-1800),
 
particularly
Samuel Johnson.
 
14
 
The basic
 
position of such
 
critics
 
is that
the larger function of literature is
 
to teach
morality and to probe philosophical issues.
They
 
would interpret literature within a
context
 
of the philosophical
 
thought of a
period or group.
This approach focuses on 
what
 is being
taught. 
It asks the question: «What kind of
truth does this work reveal to us?»
 
15
 
Roman critic Horace 
states 
in his 
Ars Poetica
(
The Art of Poetry
) that literature should be
«dulce et utile» or «sweet and useful», it
means literature should be both entertaining
and enlightening.
Sir Philip Sidney adopts the same view in
literary criticism
 in his 
The Defence of Poesy
:
«right poets» «imitate to 
teach and
delight
, and to imitate borrow nothing of
what is, hath been or shall be, but range, only
reined with learned discretion, into the
divine consideration of what may be and
should be».
 
16
 
Matthew Arnold, the Victorian
 
critic,
adopted a
 related attitude
; he
 insisted that a
great literary work must possess
 «
high
seriousness
» 
(Because he felt that Chaucer
lacked it, 
 
Arnold
 
refused to rank him among
the very greatest English poets)
.
 In
 
each
instance critics working from a
 
moral
 
bent
are not unaware
 
of form, figurative language,
and other purely aesthetic considerations,
but they consider
 
them to be secondary.
 
17
 
The important
 
thing is the moral or
philosophical teaching. On its highest
 
plane
this is not superficially didactic, though it
may at first
 
seem so.
In the larger sense,
 
all great literature
teaches.
 
The critic
 
who employs the moral-
philosophical approach insists on
ascertaining
 
and stating 
what is taught
. 
 
If
the work is in any
 
degree significant or
intelligible, this meaning will be there.
 
18
 
TEXTUAL STUDIES or TEXTUAL
SCHOLARSHIP
 
This approach can be considered as
the beginning of New Critisim.
In this criticism the text is analysed in
terms of «the work of the author», in
other words the critic studies what
urges the author to write such a work,
what influences him, and what kind of
historical motives are reflected.
 
19
 
 
Textual criticism has as its ideal the
establishment of an authentic text, or the
«text which the author intended».
There are countless ways in which a literary
text may be corrupted from what the author
intended. The author’s own manuscript may
contain omissions and errors in spelling and
mechanics; these mistakes may be preserved
by the text copyists, be they scribes, or
compositors, or scanners, who may add a few
of their own
.
 
20
 
21
 
Applying  Traditional Approaches on a Text
 
Shakespeare’s 
Hamlet
 is the quintessence of
traditional criticism.
Some of the critics think that Shakespeare
draws attention to the potential problem of
succession after the death of Queen
Elizabeth.
Elizabeth’s advanced age and poor health
may have led the playwright to write such a
work.
 
22
 
Polonius is considered to be related to
Burghley (Lord Treasurer), one of the
important politicians of Elizabethan Time
.
Burghley possessed
 
most of the
shortcomings Shakespeare gave to Polonius;
he was boring, meddling, and given to wise
old adages and
 
truisms. Moreover, he had an
elaborate spy system that kept him
informed about both friend and foe
.  In the
play Polonius assignes Reynaldo to spy his
son Laertes in Paris.
 
23
 
Shakespeare creates such a character to
criticise 
Burgley, and he protrays the lord
after his death in 1598.
Apart from the historical events or figures,
Shakespeare’s own thoughts are reflected,  as
well. 
 As a dramatist, he 
criticises
 the
dramatic activity of the period and the
attitudes of the players because
 the private
theatre
 
employ
ed 
children and
 
constitute
d
 a
rival for the adult companies of the public
theater,
 
for which Shakespeare wrote. 
 That’s
why Hamlet attacks the players because of
their repertoire.
 
24
 
Moreover,  Shakespeare portrays some
courtiers as stock characters (Osric,
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern) in the
play to show that they are weak
characters who could not make their
own decisions, instead just puppets in
hand of the authority.
 
25
 
The Danish court of the period could be
studied in terms of traditional criticism, as
well. The question in the play is succession,
so one should focus on how the Danish
court solves such a problem.
And the critic should learn what he needs
to know about Elizabethan England to
understand this play.
 
26
 
The critic should not miss that Hamlet
does not succeed to throne after the death
of his father even though he is the only son
.
I
n Hamlet
s day the Danish throne
 
was an
elective
 
one. The royal council, composed
of the most
 
powerful nobles
 
in the land,
named the next king. The custom
 
of the
throne
s
 
descending
 
to the
 
oldest
 
son
 
of
the
 
late
 
monarch
 
had not yet crystallized
into law.
 
27
 
In the light of traditional criticism, also the
moral and philosophical aspects of the
play should be analysed.
The play emphasises that 
some
 
humans
are
 
so
 
ambitious
 
for a
 
crown that they
are
 
willing to murder for it and
 
that
others are so highly sexed
 
that they will
violate not only
 
the laws of decorum
 
but
also
 
the civil and ecclesiastical
 
laws against
incest
.
 
28
 
Another point is that as an intellectual
,
Hamlet is in search of revenge. It is
obvious that his philosophical knowledge
and Christian religion should hinder him
and he must realise that revenge is wrong.
However,  Hamlet never gives up the idea
of taking revenge because he is a
transitional figure between his “feudal
son” identity and intellectual man.
 
29
 
Conclusion
 
Traditional approaches analyse a work of
art as the mirror of the author and the
society of the period in which it is
written.
Studying the historical events of the
period, getting information about the
author’s life and experiences could help
us
 understand what the text explain
s
 and
what the author intends.
 
30
 
A reader who
 
stays more or less on the
surface of a piece of literature has at
 
least
understood part of what it is about.
Ones who intend to employ the traditional
approaches to a literary work will almost
certainly employ them simultaneously. That
is, they will bring to bear on a poem, for
instance, 
 
all the information and insights
these respective disciplines can give in
seeing just what the poem means and does
.
 
31
 
BIBLIOGRAPHY
 
Booker, Keith M. 
A Practical Introduction to
Literary Theory and Criticism
. London:
Longman Publishers, 1995.
Guerin, Wilfred L., et al. 
A Handbook of
Critical Approaches to Literature
. New York:
Oxford UP, 2005.
 
32
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Literary studies in the early 20th century were influenced by traditional approaches like historical, biographical, moral, philosophical, and textual criticism. These approaches focus on external information to interpret literary works, connecting them to broader contexts in fields such as history, philosophy, and authorial backgrounds.

  • Literary criticism
  • Traditional approaches
  • Historical criticism
  • Biographical criticism
  • Textual studies

Uploaded on Jul 30, 2024 | 2 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TRADITIONAL APPROACHES IN LITERARY CRITICISM HISTORICAL BIOGRAPHICAL CRITICISM MORAL PHILOSOPHICAL CRITICISM TEXTUAL CRITICISM 1

  2. Literary studies in the first part of the 20th century were dominated by what are now called traditional approaches . American New Critics call extrinsic approaches to literature. They focus on understanding literary works by bringing external information to bear on them rather than by close and careful consideration of what is already expressed in the work itself. 2

  3. To certain extent all approaches to literature are by definition extrinsic because a reader must have certain basic information at hand to read a literary work at all. At the vey least, a reader must know the language in which the work is written and must possess a certain basic amount of cultural knowledge. A reader must have at least a minimal understanding of the conventions of literature to process the content of a literary work in a coherent way. 3

  4. We might compare the use of external information to aid in the interpretation of a literary text to the activities of a scientist who interprets a workings of nature. For instance, the beauty of the stars can be appreciated without being an expert in astronomy, but even the most seemingly naive appreciation of the beauty of nature involves a complex process of cultural conditioning. 4

  5. More scholarly traditional approaches include a) biographical studies, in which a work is illuminated through a discussion of the experiences and opinions of its author b) philosohical studies, in which the ideas expressed in a literary text are compared to well-known philosophical concepts and often judged in relation to the critic s own moral or philosophical strance c) textual studies, in which the historical record is carefully sifted in an attempt to determine the precisely correct rendering of scale mechanical printing of literary texts. 5

  6. In traditional approach the work of art frequently appears to be a source that illustrates background. Such an approach often leads to the study of literature as essentially biography, history, or some other branch of learning, rather than as art. According to those of the older school, literature provides primarily an opportunity for exercising what they perceive to be really relevant scholarly and cultural disciplines such as history, linguistics, biography and philosophy. 6

  7. Historical-Biographical Approach Its focus is on the life, times, and environment of the author, and this approach deals with the effects of these factors on the work of art. Most of literary works can be analysed in the light of historical-biographical method. A reader/a critic studies the work in accordance with the period in which the work is produced. Thus, the values and perception of the reader s own age are put aside. 7

  8. Historical-Biographical approach establishes a bridge between the reader and the world s of the author. The life of the author, the historical events and the values of his age help us understand the work, and in a similar way the literary work gives information of the author and his own period. 8

  9. In his book History of English Literature, French critic Hippolyte A. Taine (1823- 1893) suggests the phrase race, millue, et moment a) Race stands for culture and history b) Millue is place c) Moment is time 9

  10. This approach sees a literary work chiefly as a reflection of its author s life and times or the characters in the work. Taine compared the work of literature to the fossil of a leaf which tells the world of a previous age. 10

  11. John Milton's sonnet On the Late Massacre in Piedmont illustrates the topical quality that great literature may and often does possess. This poem commemorates the slaughter in 1655 of the Waldenses, members of a Protestant sect living in the valleys of northern Italy. A knowledge of this background clarifies at least one rather factual reference and two allusions in the poem. 11

  12. However, novels may lend themselves somewhat more readily than lyric poems to this particular interpretive approach; they usually treat a broader range of experience than poems do and thus are affected more by extrinsic factors. 12

  13. It is a mistake, however, to think that poets do not concern themselves with social themes or that good poetry cannot be written about such themes. Actually, poets have from earliest times been the historians, the interpreters of contemporary culture, and the prophets of their people. For example, Blake's London is an outcry against the oppression of human beings by society: he lashes out against child labour in his day and the church's indifference to it, against the government's indifference to the indigent soldier who has served his country faithfully, and against the horrible and unnatural consequences of a social code that represses sexuality. 13

  14. Moral-Philosophical Approach or Moral/Thematic Criticism The moral-philosophical approach is as old as classical Greek and Roman critics. Plato, for example, emphasized moralism and utilitarianism; Horace stressed that literature should be delightful and instructive. Among its most famous exemplars are the commentators of the age of neoclassicism in English literature (1660-1800), particularly Samuel Johnson. 14

  15. The basic position of such critics is that the larger function of literature is to teach morality and to probe philosophical issues. They would interpret literature within a context of the philosophical thought of a period or group. This approach focuses on what is being taught. It asks the question: What kind of truth does this work reveal to us? 15

  16. Roman critic Horace states in his Ars Poetica (The Art of Poetry) that literature should be dulce et utile or sweet and useful , it means literature should be both entertaining and enlightening. Sir Philip Sidney adopts the same view in literary criticism in his The Defence of Poesy: right poets imitate to teach and delight, and to imitate borrow nothing of what is, hath been or shall be, but range, only reined with learned discretion, into the divine consideration of what may be and should be . 16

  17. Matthew Arnold, the Victorian critic, adopted a related attitude; he insisted that a great literary work must possess high seriousness (Because he felt that Chaucer lacked it, Arnold refused to rank him among the very greatest English poets).In each instance critics working from a moral bent are not unaware of form, figurative language, and other purely aesthetic considerations, but they consider them to be secondary. 17

  18. The important thing is the moral or philosophical teaching. On its highest plane this is not superficially didactic, though it may at first seem so. In the larger sense, all great literature teaches. The critic who employs the moral- philosophical approach insists on ascertaining and stating what is taught. If the work is in any degree significant or intelligible, this meaning will be there. 18

  19. TEXTUAL STUDIES or TEXTUAL SCHOLARSHIP This approach can be considered as the beginning of New Critisim. In this criticism the text is analysed in terms of the work of the author , in other words the critic studies what urges the author to write such a work, what influences him, and what kind of historical motives are reflected. 19

  20. Textual criticism has as its ideal the establishment of an authentic text, or the text which the author intended . There are countless ways in which a literary text may be corrupted from what the author intended. The author s own manuscript may contain omissions and errors in spelling and mechanics; these mistakes may be preserved by the text copyists, be they scribes, or compositors, or scanners, who may add a few of their own. 20

  21. 21

  22. Applying Traditional Approaches on a Text Shakespeare s Hamlet is the quintessence of traditional criticism. Some of the critics think that Shakespeare draws attention to the potential problem of succession after the death of Queen Elizabeth. Elizabeth s advanced age and poor health may have led the playwright to write such a work. 22

  23. Polonius is considered to be related to Burghley (Lord Treasurer), one of the important politicians of Elizabethan Time. Burghley possessed most of the shortcomings Shakespeare gave to Polonius; he was boring, meddling, and given to wise old adages and truisms. Moreover, he had an elaborate spy system that kept him informed about both friend and foe. In the play Polonius assignes Reynaldo to spy his son Laertes in Paris. 23

  24. Shakespeare creates such a character to criticise Burgley, and he protrays the lord after his death in 1598. Apart from the historical events or figures, Shakespeare s own thoughts are reflected, as well. As a dramatist, he criticises the dramatic activity of the period and the attitudes of the players because the private theatre employed children and constituted a rival for the adult companies of the public theater, for which Shakespeare wrote. That s why Hamlet attacks the players because of their repertoire. 24

  25. Moreover, Shakespeare portrays some courtiers as stock characters (Osric, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern) in the play to show that they are weak characters who could not make their own decisions, instead just puppets in hand of the authority. 25

  26. The Danish court of the period could be studied in terms of traditional criticism, as well. The question in the play is succession, so one should focus on how the Danish court solves such a problem. And the critic should learn what he needs to know about Elizabethan England to understand this play. 26

  27. The critic should not miss that Hamlet does not succeed to throne after the death of his father even though he is the only son. In Hamlet s day the Danish throne was an elective one. The royal council, composed of the most powerful nobles in the land, named the next king. The custom of the throne s descending to the oldest son of the late monarch had not yet crystallized into law. 27

  28. In the light of traditional criticism, also the moral and philosophical aspects of the play should be analysed. The play emphasises that some humans are so ambitious for a crown that they are willing to murder for it and that others are so highly sexed that they will violate not only the laws of decorum but also the civil and ecclesiastical laws against incest. 28

  29. Another point is that as an intellectual, Hamlet is in search of revenge. It is obvious that his philosophical knowledge and Christian religion should hinder him and he must realise that revenge is wrong. However, Hamlet never gives up the idea of taking revenge because he is a transitional figure between his feudal son identity and intellectual man. 29

  30. Conclusion Traditional approaches analyse a work of art as the mirror of the author and the society of the period in which it is written. Studying the historical events of the period, getting information about the author s life and experiences could help us understand what the text explains and what the author intends. 30

  31. A reader who stays more or less on the surface of a piece of literature has at least understood part of what it is about. Ones who intend to employ the traditional approaches to a literary work will almost certainly employ them simultaneously. That is, they will bring to bear on a poem, for instance, all the information and insights these respective disciplines can give in seeing just what the poem means and does. 31

  32. BIBLIOGRAPHY Booker, Keith M. A Practical Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism. London: Longman Publishers, 1995. Guerin, Wilfred L., et al. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Oxford UP, 2005. 32

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#