Thickened Fluids in Aged Care Facilities

THICKENED FLUIDS IN
RESIDENTIAL AGED CARE FACILITIES –
Are we getting the recipe right?
Yingying He
1
, 
Dr Renee Clapham
2,3,4
, 
Cara Hill
5
,
Dr Megan Keage
6
, Stephanie Giao
6
, Xinyue Liu
6
, Alesha Sayner
2,3,7
1. West Wimmera Health Service, 2. Ballarat Health Services/Grampians Health,
3. Deakin University/Deakin Rural Health, 4. St Vincent’s Hospital,
5. Barwon Health, 6. The University of Melbourne, 7. University of Canberra
y
ingying.he@wwhs.net.au
Background
Method
Survey
 Staff perceptions
 Current processes
 Confi
dence
Observation
 Staff prepared drink
 Speech Pathologist
   observed
 IDDSI tests
Results
 - 
Survey
Results
 - 
Observations
Conclusion
Staff education
Direct
Indirect
Alternative products
Thickeners
Pre-thickened drinks
Questions
Slide Note

[If there is no introduction provided]

Good morning, I’m Ying.

I’m a Speech Pathologist at West Wimmera Health Service.

[If introduction is provided] -> start as per next slide

Embed
Share

Exploring the adequacy of thickened fluids in residential aged care settings, a study examined staff perceptions, preparation factors, adherence to IDDSI standards, and issues related to dysphagia. Findings revealed barriers, enablers, and the importance of staff education and support in ensuring the proper preparation of thickened drinks for residents with swallowing difficulties.

  • Aged care
  • Dysphagia
  • IDDSI standards
  • Thickened fluids
  • Staff perceptions

Uploaded on Sep 16, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THICKENED FLUIDS IN RESIDENTIAL AGED CARE FACILITIES Are we getting the recipe right? Yingying He1, Dr Renee Clapham2,3,4, Cara Hill5, Dr Megan Keage6, Stephanie Giao6, Xinyue Liu6, Alesha Sayner2,3,7 1. West Wimmera Health Service, 2. Ballarat Health Services/Grampians Health, 3. Deakin University/Deakin Rural Health, 4. St Vincent s Hospital, 5. Barwon Health, 6. The University of Melbourne, 7. University of Canberra yingying.he@wwhs.net.au

  2. Background Questions Management Staff perceptions Factors for preparation Do drinks adhere to IDDSI? Issue Thickened drinks (3 levels) Dysphagia

  3. Method Survey Observation Staff perceptions Current processes Confidence Staff prepared drink Speech Pathologist observed IDDSI tests

  4. Results - Survey Barriers Enablers Other 6% (n=3) Other 15% (n=7) Time to learn about IDDSI framework 6% (n=3) Knowing a resident s current drink thickness 20% (n=9) Education for IDDSI framework & changes 15% (n=7) Using IDDSI terminology 21% (n=10) Education on how to manually thicken drinks 34% (n=16) Knowing what the drink thickness levels mean 23% (n=11) Encouragement from care staff colleagues 26% (n=12) Knowing how to make appropriate thickened drinks 28% (n=13) Encouragement from other staff 30% (n=14) Availability of thickener Encouragement from Dietitian 30% (n=14) 30% (n=14) 53% (n=25) Time to manually thicken drinks Encouragement from Speech Pathologist 40% (n=19) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percentage of participants (n=number of participants) Percentage of participants (n=number of participants)

  5. Results - Observations Drink thickness vs Drink meets IDDSI criteria Prepared drink meets IDDSI criteria 92% (n=12) 100% 90% 65% (n=11) 80% 58% (n=7) 28.6% (12 drinks) 70% Percentage of observations 60% 42% (n=5) 71.4% (30 drinks) 35% (n=6) 50% 40% 30% 8% (n=1) 20% 10% 0% Target drink thickness

  6. Conclusion Alternative products Thickeners Pre-thickened drinks Staff education Direct Indirect

  7. Questions

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#