The New Jersey Oppressed Shareholder Statute

 
Breaking Up Is Hard To Do”
Important Aspects of Business Divorce
 
 
Alan S. Pralgever, Esq
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith and Davis, LLP
75 Livingston Avenue
Roseland, New Jersey 07068
Telephone No:  973-577-1818
 
 
 
 
 
When to Take Action and Split
 
When and How
” to engage in a split-up
 
Making the decision 
early
 enough in the
oppression is critical
 
 
 
The NJ Oppressed Shareholder
Statute
 
N.J.S.A 14A:12-7
It provides the basis for oppression and defines what
the grounds for a buyout are and how a buyout will
occur once oppression has been established.
 
What the Superior Court May Do
Appoint a Custodian,
Appoint a Provisional Director,
Order a Sale of the Stock, or
Enter Judgment Dissolving the Corporation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The NJ Oppressed Shareholder
Statute 
(continued)
 
Shareholder division in voting power /
failure
to elect successors
 to directors, whose terms
have expired
 
The Directors are 
unable to effect action 
on
one or more substantial matters respecting
the management of the corporation’s affairs
 
Corporations with 
25 or less shareholders
 
 
The NJ Oppressed Shareholder
Statute 
(continued)
 
Any Custodian or Provisional Director Shall Be:
Impartial,
Report from time-to-time to the court,
Report recommendations of appropriate actions
(if needed)
 
Reasonable compensation 
will be allowed for
the custodian or provisional director
 
 
 
 
The NJ Oppressed Shareholder
Statute 
(continued
)
 
Purchase Price
Fair Value 
as of the date of commencement of the
action, or a date deemed equitable by the court, plus
or minus adjustments
Five (5) days after the entry 
of an order, the
corporation shall provide each selling shareholder
with the information it is required to provide
Unable to Agree?  
40 Days
Interest Earnings
Purchase price shall be paid within 30 days, after
the court has determined the FV of the shares
Shareholders rights upon entry of an order
 
 
 
 
 
The General Definition of Oppression
in a Close Corporation
 
By definition, you are oppressed when you
can’t get along with your co-shareholders, and
they won’t buy you out or be bought out
Interestingly, there is NO case which
requires one shareholder to buy out another
in New Jersey absent oppression
 
Balsamides v. Protameen Chemical
Company
, 
Inc.,
 160 N.J. 352 (1999)
 
When, Where, and How to Sue
 
Cause
Continued operation of the business in
jeopardy
Shareholder/Partnership Agreement
By Laws
Breach of Contract, Breach of Covenant, Unjust
Enrichment, Breach of Fiduciary Duty,
Conversion, Usurpation of Corporate
Opportunity and Harassment
Application of NJ Statute
Special Fiscal Officer or Receiver appointed
 
 
Charting the Course of Litigation
 
Gathering Information
Corporate Documents, Tax Returns, Key Memos,
Letters, Emails, Financial Statements and
Documents, Bank Statements, Cancelled Checks,
Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable etc.
Who to Depose and When
Selecting the Correct Valuation Date is CRITICAL to
your case
Determining whether you require a Special Fiscal
Officer, Receiver or Discovery Master
 
 
Buy-Out Issues:
 
Oppression of majority and 50% Shareholders
Balsamides v. Perle
, 
160 N.J. 352(1999).
 
Oppression of Minority Shareholders 
Lawson Mardon
Wheaton
,
 160 N.J. (1999)
 
Musto v. Vidas
, 
333 N.J. Super. 71 (App. Div. 2000).
This case establishes that a buy-out is sole remedy and
no “double recovery” from future earnings is allowed
except as contained in valuation and analysis.
 
 
Trial
 
How to prepare your witnesses
They must carefully review their deposition
testimony and work with them
Make sure they know subject matter
Refresh their recollection
 
Thank You
 
 
Alan Pralgever, Esq
Partner
Litigation
 
Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP
75 Livingston Ave
Roseland, NJ 07068
(973) 577-1818
Apralgever@greenbaumlaw.com
Slide Note
Embed
Share

The New Jersey Oppressed Shareholder Statute, N.J.S.A. 14A:12-7, outlines the grounds for oppression in a corporation and the process for a buyout. It allows the Superior Court to appoint a custodian, provisional director, order stock sale, or dissolve the company. Key provisions include shareholder voting division, director succession issues, and compensation for appointed officials. The statute also covers determining fair value for share buyouts and sets timelines for payment.

  • New Jersey
  • Oppressed Shareholder Statute
  • Business Divorce
  • Corporation Management
  • Legal Rights

Uploaded on Sep 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Breaking Up Is Hard To Do Important Aspects of Business Divorce Alan S. Pralgever, Esq Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith and Davis, LLP 75 Livingston Avenue Roseland, New Jersey 07068 Telephone No: 973-577-1818 Email Address: apralgever@greenbaumlaw.com

  2. When to Take Action and Split When and How to engage in a split-up Making the decision early enough in the oppression is critical

  3. The NJ Oppressed Shareholder Statute N.J.S.A 14A:12-7 It provides the basis for oppression and defines what the grounds for a buyout are and how a buyout will occur once oppression has been established. What the Superior Court May Do Appoint a Custodian, Appoint a Provisional Director, Order a Sale of the Stock, or Enter Judgment Dissolving the Corporation

  4. The NJ Oppressed Shareholder Statute (continued) Shareholder division in voting power /failure to elect successors to directors, whose terms have expired The Directors are unable to effect action on one or more substantial matters respecting the management of the corporation s affairs Corporations with 25 or less shareholders

  5. The NJ Oppressed Shareholder Statute (continued) Any Custodian or Provisional Director Shall Be: Impartial, Report from time-to-time to the court, Report recommendations of appropriate actions (if needed) Reasonable compensation will be allowed for the custodian or provisional director

  6. The NJ Oppressed Shareholder Statute (continued) Purchase Price Fair Value as of the date of commencement of the action, or a date deemed equitable by the court, plus or minus adjustments Five (5) days after the entry of an order, the corporation shall provide each selling shareholder with the information it is required to provide Unable to Agree? 40 Days Interest Earnings Purchase price shall be paid within 30 days, after the court has determined the FV of the shares Shareholders rights upon entry of an order

  7. The General Definition of Oppression in a Close Corporation By definition, you are oppressed when you can t get along with your co-shareholders, and they won t buy you out or be bought out Interestingly, there is NO case which requires one shareholder to buy out another in New Jersey absent oppression Balsamides v. Protameen Chemical Company, Inc., 160 N.J. 352 (1999)

  8. When, Where, and How to Sue Cause Continued operation of the business in jeopardy Shareholder/Partnership Agreement By Laws Breach of Contract, Breach of Covenant, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, Usurpation of Corporate Opportunity and Harassment Application of NJ Statute Special Fiscal Officer or Receiver appointed

  9. Charting the Course of Litigation Gathering Information Corporate Documents, Tax Returns, Key Memos, Letters, Emails, Financial Statements and Documents, Bank Statements, Cancelled Checks, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable etc. Who to Depose and When Selecting the Correct Valuation Date is CRITICAL to your case Determining whether you require a Special Fiscal Officer, Receiver or Discovery Master

  10. Buy-Out Issues: Oppression of majority and 50% Shareholders Balsamides v. Perle, 160 N.J. 352(1999). Oppression of Minority Shareholders Lawson Mardon Wheaton, 160 N.J. (1999) Musto v. Vidas, 333 N.J. Super. 71 (App. Div. 2000). This case establishes that a buy-out is sole remedy and no double recovery from future earnings is allowed except as contained in valuation and analysis.

  11. Trial How to prepare your witnesses They must carefully review their deposition testimony and work with them Make sure they know subject matter Refresh their recollection

  12. Thank You Alan Pralgever, Esq Partner Litigation Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis, LLP 75 Livingston Ave Roseland, NJ 07068 (973) 577-1818 Apralgever@greenbaumlaw.com

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#