The Interplay Between Theoretical Psychology and Empirical Research

 
Philosophy, Theoretical Psychology,
and Empirical Research: Is Mutual
Enrichment Possible and Desirable?
 
Blaine J. Fowers
      
Bradford Cokelet
University of Miami
     
University of Kansas
Philosophers and Psychologists
 
Long history of non-collaboration
Recent revival
Philosophical interest in psychological realism
Experimental philosophy
Deep integration projects
Collaboration domains
Cognitive science
Moral psychology
Evolutionary science
Consciousness studies
Questions of the Day
 
How can philosophers contribute to theoretical
psychology?
How can theoretical psychology contribute to the
growing interest in making philosophical accounts more
psychologically realistic?
How can philosophical accounts contribute to
conceptual improvements in empirical research?
Can empirical research contribute to rendering
philosophical accounts more concrete and
psychologically realistic?
Can theoretical psychologists recognize legitimate and
important empirical questions in our areas of interest?
 
Is There a Place for Empirical
Evidence in Theoretical
Psychology?
 
Blaine J. Fowers, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
University of Miami
Theoretical Psychology and
Empirical Questions
 
Longstanding antagonism
Self-marginalization
All empiricism vs. anti-empiricism
Critique without remedies
Lack of serious engagement
Two avenues for improvement
How can theoretical psychology enhance empirical
psychology?
How can theoretical psychology benefit from empirical
psychology?
Theoretical Psychology’s Contributions
to Empirical Psychology
 
Theoretical enrichments
Empirical virtue research
Single time-point, global measures
Inadequate method
Inadequate theory
Methods remedies
Experience sampling methods
Density distribution models
Meindl et al., 2013
Bleidorn & Denisson, 2015
Enhancing Empirical Research
 
Virtue theory
Cultivated disposition/habit
Behavior
Emotion/motivation
Cognition
Practical wisdom
Multicomponent measurement
Conceptual analysis of constructs and measures
 
Inadequacies of Situationist
Research
 
Enormous experimental social psychology literatures
Doris: “Lack of Character”
Meta-analysis of helping literature
Nascent justice literature
Methods remedy
Theoretical remedy
Cleaner test
Multicomponent measurement
Conceptual analysis of constructs and items
Empirical Contributions to
Theoretical Psychology
 
Checking meta-theoretical complaisance
Concretize abstract concepts into psychologically
realistic constructs
Require nuance in overly pat formulations
Resistance of the empirical world is often instructive
Best evidence can improve confidence in theory and
meta-theory
 
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by a grant from
the Self, Motivation, and Virtue Project at the
University of Oklahoma, which was funded by
the Templeton Religion Trust.
 
Some Benefits of
Interdisciplinary Friendship
 
Bradford Cokelet, Ph.D.
Department of Philosophy
University of Kansas
 
Three Models for Philosophic – Psychological Integration
 
1)
Psychology as Empirical Reality Check
 
2)
Psychology as Middleman (gateway to Policy Impact)
 
3)
Integration of Research
How can we do this?
What are the benefits?
Psychological Realism:
Psychology as Empirical Rail-
guard
From Philosophy to Social Policy:
Psychology as Mediator
 
Acknowledgement
This work was funded by a grant from
the Self, Motivation, and Virtue Project at the
University of Oklahoma, which was funded by
the Templeton Religion Trust.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Exploring the potential for collaboration between philosophy, theoretical psychology, and empirical research, this article delves into the historical divide, recent renaissance, and avenues for mutual enrichment. It raises questions about how each discipline can contribute to and benefit from the others, emphasizing the importance of integrating philosophical accounts with empirical evidence for concrete and psychologically realistic outcomes.

  • Psychology
  • Philosophy
  • Collaboration
  • Empirical Research
  • Integration

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Philosophy, Theoretical Psychology, and Empirical Research: Is Mutual Enrichment Possible and Desirable? Blaine J. Fowers Bradford Cokelet University of Miami University of Kansas

  2. Philosophers and Psychologists Long history of non-collaboration Recent revival Philosophical interest in psychological realism Experimental philosophy Deep integration projects Collaboration domains Cognitive science Moral psychology Evolutionary science Consciousness studies

  3. Questions of the Day How can philosophers contribute to theoretical psychology? How can theoretical psychology contribute to the growing interest in making philosophical accounts more psychologically realistic? How can philosophical accounts contribute to conceptual improvements in empirical research? Can empirical research contribute to rendering philosophical accounts more concrete and psychologically realistic? Can theoretical psychologists recognize legitimate and important empirical questions in our areas of interest?

  4. Is There a Place for Empirical Evidence in Theoretical Psychology? Blaine J. Fowers, Ph.D. Department of Psychology University of Miami

  5. Theoretical Psychology and Empirical Questions Longstanding antagonism Self-marginalization All empiricism vs. anti-empiricism Critique without remedies Lack of serious engagement Two avenues for improvement How can theoretical psychology enhance empirical psychology? How can theoretical psychology benefit from empirical psychology?

  6. Theoretical Psychologys Contributions to Empirical Psychology Theoretical enrichments Empirical virtue research Single time-point, global measures Inadequate method Inadequate theory Methods remedies Experience sampling methods Density distribution models Meindl et al., 2013 Bleidorn & Denisson, 2015

  7. Enhancing Empirical Research Virtue theory Cultivated disposition/habit Behavior Emotion/motivation Cognition Practical wisdom Multicomponent measurement Conceptual analysis of constructs and measures

  8. Inadequacies of Situationist Research Enormous experimental social psychology literatures Doris: Lack of Character Meta-analysis of helping literature Nascent justice literature Methods remedy Theoretical remedy Cleaner test Multicomponent measurement Conceptual analysis of constructs and items

  9. Empirical Contributions to Theoretical Psychology Checking meta-theoretical complaisance Concretize abstract concepts into psychologically realistic constructs Require nuance in overly pat formulations Resistance of the empirical world is often instructive Best evidence can improve confidence in theory and meta-theory

  10. Acknowledgement This work was funded by a grant from the Self, Motivation, and Virtue Project at the University of Oklahoma, which was funded by the Templeton Religion Trust.

  11. Some Benefits of Interdisciplinary Friendship Bradford Cokelet, Ph.D. Department of Philosophy University of Kansas

  12. Three Models for Philosophic Psychological Integration 1) Psychology as Empirical Reality Check 2) Psychology as Middleman (gateway to Policy Impact) 3) Integration of Research How can we do this? What are the benefits?

  13. Psychological Realism: Psychology as Empirical Rail- guard Philosophy What is justice? Why act justly? Why cultivate the trait of justice? Psychology How Just are people? How Just can People be? What social, situational, and individual factors impact Justice?

  14. From Philosophy to Social Policy: Psychology as Mediator Philosophy What is Welfare? What is Happiness? How Ethically Important are Welfare/Happiness? Psychology What add or detracts from Welfare? How can we measure Welfare? How can we evaluate and and improve institutions, etc.

  15. What is justice? Which questions should we ask? How should we interpret narratives? With what can Justice be confused? What are the aspects/compone nts of Justice?

  16. Acknowledgement This work was funded by a grant from the Self, Motivation, and Virtue Project at the University of Oklahoma, which was funded by the Templeton Religion Trust.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#