The Criminal Justice System in Court Proceedings

undefined
 
The 
The 
Criminal
Criminal
 Process
 Process
Criminal Courts
Criminal Courts
Objectives
 
Explain what is meant by an adversarial system
Explain how offences are classified
Describe the criminal court system
Explain mode of trial
Explain sending for trial
Explain plea and case management hearings
Explain disclosure and plea bargaining
Assess whether plea bargaining should be allowed
Explain the trial process/ procedure
Evaluate the system.
The Criminal Process
 
Models of criminal justice systems:
 
Herbert Packer
 
Crime control model
 
Due process model.
The Criminal Process
 
Classification of Offences:
 
Summary Offences
 
Offences triable either way
 
Indictable Offences.
Privy Council
European Court
of Human Rights
Supreme Court
Court of Appeal
High Court
(
Queen’s Bench Division
)
Crown Court
Magistrates’ Court
 
Leapfrog procedure
Appeal by way
of case stated
 
The Criminal Court System
 
Mode of Trial
 
Triable either way offences – 
defendant can insist on jury trial,
otherwise it is up to the Magistrates
 
How do the magistrates make this decision?
 
Seriousness of the case
Their sentencing powers
Since 1996 – they must take into account the defendant’s plea
Criminal Justice Act 2003
, Sched.3
 – magistrates will be told of
defendant’s prior convictions when deciding mode of trial.
 
Sending for Trial
 
 
 
Section 51 Crime & Disorder Act 1998 – ‘sending for trial’ hearing
(old committal procedures abolished by the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
 
 
‘Sending for trial’ – indictable offences :
 
1.
One appearance in Magistrates to determine e.g. funding of case, bail, use of
exhibits and statements.
2.
Magistrates provide statement of evidence, notice of the offence(s) and
place of trial.
3.
Then sent immediately to Crown.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Criminal Procedure Rules 2005
 introduced plea 
and 
case management
hearings (replaced the old plea and directions hearings)
 
Aim
 : to encourage early preparation of cases and reduce ‘cracked trials’
 
H
earings held in open court, defendant present, enter a plea – process
known as the 
‘ arraignment 
 
If guilty plea – proceed to sentence
 
If not guilty, prosecution & defence identify the key issues
Plea and Case Management Hearings
 
Disclosure
 
Criminal Justice Act 2003  
and
 Criminal Procedure and Investigations
Act 1996:
 
Defence obliged to disclose all its evidence to the prosecution – including
defences they intend to rely on and points of law they will raise
 
Defence must provide names and addresses of all witnesses including
experts
 
Prosecution – continuing duty to disclose anything that might reasonably be
capable of undermining the prosecution case or helps the defence case.
 
Plea Bargaining
 
Negotiations between the prosecution and defence e.g. defendant agrees to plead
guilty to a lesser charge:
 
Pleas bargaining very common in US and now in the English system
 
R v Turner (1970)
 – judges not allowed to get involved in plea bargaining – SEE
NOW
 
R v Goodyear (2005)
defendant can request an indication from the judge as to
likely sentence if they plead guilty
 
 
Is plea bargaining in the interests of justice?  What do you think?
 
The Trial
 
Burden of proof – prosecution – beyond all reasonable doubt
Prosecution presents first
Defence then presents their case ( unless submission of no case to answer is
successful)
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 – measures aimed at protecting
vulnerable witnesses giving evidence
Each side makes closing speech
Crown Court -  judge sums up for the jury
ss.101-103 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and  R v Hanson (2005)
 evidence of bad
character and previous convictions.
The Criminal Process
 
1.
Should evidence of bad character and previous
convictions be admitted?
 
2.
What are the arguments for and against the allowing of
such evidence?
 
Criticism of the System
 
Cracked and ineffective trials
 
Problems with disclosure – Criminal Procedure & Investigations Act
1996
 
Confession evidence and miscarriages of justice – the need for a
corroboration rule
 
Role of expert witnesses – 
R v Clark  (2003)
 
Treatment of victims and witnesses
 
Role of the media – contempt of court
.
 
Reforms
 
Community Justice Centres
 
Government paper: 
Delivering simple, speedy, summary
justice(2006)
 – ‘next day justice’.
 
Test Yourself
 
1.
What is meant by an adversarial system?
 
2.
How are criminal offences classified?
 
3.
What is meant by mode of trial?
 
4.
What are the disclosure rules?
 
5.
What is plea bargaining?
 
6.
What is the burden of proof and who must prove it?
 
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This content explores various aspects of the criminal justice system, including the adversarial system, classification of offenses, criminal court systems, trial procedures, plea bargaining, and more. It covers models of criminal justice systems, classification of offenses, modes of trial, sending for trial procedures, plea and case management hearings, and evaluations of the system dynamics.

  • Criminal justice
  • Court procedures
  • Offenses classification
  • Trial process
  • Legal system

Uploaded on Sep 19, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Criminal Process Criminal Courts

  2. Objectives Explain what is meant by an adversarial system Explain how offences are classified Describe the criminal court system Explain mode of trial Explain sending for trial Explain plea and case management hearings Explain disclosure and plea bargaining Assess whether plea bargaining should be allowed Explain the trial process/ procedure Evaluate the system.

  3. The Criminal Process Models of criminal justice systems: Herbert Packer Crime control model Due process model.

  4. The Criminal Process Classification of Offences: Summary Offences Offences triable either way Indictable Offences.

  5. The Criminal Court System European Court of Human Rights Privy Council Supreme Court Court of Appeal Leapfrog procedure High Court (Queen s Bench Division) Appeal by way of case stated Crown Court Magistrates Court

  6. Mode of Trial Triable either way offences defendant can insist on jury trial, otherwise it is up to the Magistrates How do the magistrates make this decision? Seriousness of the case Their sentencing powers Since 1996 they must take into account the defendant s plea Criminal Justice Act 2003, Sched.3 magistrates will be told of defendant s prior convictions when deciding mode of trial.

  7. Sending for Trial Section 51 Crime & Disorder Act 1998 sending for trial hearing (old committal procedures abolished by the Criminal Justice Act 2003) Sending for trial indictable offences : 1. One appearance in Magistrates to determine e.g. funding of case, bail, use of exhibits and statements. 2. Magistrates provide statement of evidence, notice of the offence(s) and place of trial. 3. Then sent immediately to Crown.

  8. Plea and Case Management Hearings Criminal Procedure Rules 2005 introduced plea and case management hearings (replaced the old plea and directions hearings) Aim: to encourage early preparation of cases and reduce cracked trials Hearings held in open court, defendant present, enter a plea process known as the arraignment If guilty plea proceed to sentence If not guilty, prosecution & defence identify the key issues

  9. Disclosure Criminal Justice Act 2003 and Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996: Defence obliged to disclose all its evidence to the prosecution including defences they intend to rely on and points of law they will raise Defence must provide names and addresses of all witnesses including experts Prosecution continuing duty to disclose anything that might reasonably be capable of undermining the prosecution case or helps the defence case.

  10. Plea Bargaining Negotiations between the prosecution and defence e.g. defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge: Pleas bargaining very common in US and now in the English system R v Turner (1970) judges not allowed to get involved in plea bargaining SEE NOW R v Goodyear (2005) defendant can request an indication from the judge as to likely sentence if they plead guilty Is plea bargaining in the interests of justice? What do you think?

  11. The Trial Burden of proof prosecution beyond all reasonable doubt Prosecution presents first Defence then presents their case ( unless submission of no case to answer is successful) Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 measures aimed at protecting vulnerable witnesses giving evidence Each side makes closing speech Crown Court - judge sums up for the jury ss.101-103 Criminal Justice Act 2003 and R v Hanson (2005) evidence of bad character and previous convictions.

  12. The Criminal Process 1.Should evidence of bad character and previous convictions be admitted? 2.What are the arguments for and against the allowing of such evidence?

  13. Criticism of the System Cracked and ineffective trials Problems with disclosure Criminal Procedure & Investigations Act 1996 Confession evidence and miscarriages of justice the need for a corroboration rule Role of expert witnesses R v Clark (2003) Treatment of victims and witnesses Role of the media contempt of court.

  14. Reforms Community Justice Centres Government paper: Delivering simple, speedy, summary justice(2006) next day justice .

  15. Test Yourself 1.What is meant by an adversarial system? 2.How are criminal offences classified? 3.What is meant by mode of trial? 4.What are the disclosure rules? 5.What is plea bargaining? 6.What is the burden of proof and who must prove it?

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#