Study on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Median Nerve Entrapment in Upper Limb

Slide Note

Investigating the prevalence, factors, and treatment options for work-related musculoskeletal disorders, focusing on median nerve entrapment in the upper limb. The study aims to provide insights into this condition through a thorough literature review and research objectives.

daan Follow

Uploaded on Aug 25, 2024 | 1 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

SYNOPSIS PRESENTATION THESIS DEFENCE PRESENTATION February 28 2023 Title PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Abc MPhil Trainee, MBBS Dow University of Health Sciences SUPERVISOR: Dr.Abc MBBS, FCPS Assistant Professor Dow Dental College CLINICAL SUPERVISOR: Dr. Acc MBBS, FCPS Head of Department Dept. of Abc Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau, Civil Hospital Karachi

Work-related musculoskeletal disorder. Disease (1- 3) Median nerve Entrapment of upper limb. Mono-neuropathy of upper limb.

Factors causing Disease Abc DFg

INTRODUCTION F>>M Middle age female 1.5/1000 male

INTRODUCTION agents Treatment options therapy vdc (5-8) Avc

PREVALENCE (9-10) 5.8% 3.1% NETHERLAND USA 7 % 16% UNITED KINGDOM

PREVALENCE (11) 7% - 19% PAKISTAN

LITERATURE REVIEW(13-17) Talebi GA et.al. , 2015 Ismail. F and colleagues. 2015 Pratelli. E et.al., 2017 Abc Title Abc Title Abc Title Method Method Method Study Design Study Design Study Design 30 Patients 30 Patients 30 Patients Group vcccc Group vcccc Group vcccc Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Outcome Measure VSAS, DSD VSAS, DSD VSAS, DSD Conclusion Conclusion Conclusion asds asds asds

LITERATURE REVIEW Talebi GA et.al. , 2015 Ismail. F and colleagues. 2015 Pratelli. E et.al., 2017 Abc Title Abc Title Abc Title Method Method Method Study Design Study Design Study Design 30 Patients 30 Patients 30 Patients Group vcccc Group vcccc Group vcccc Outcome Measure Outcome Measure Outcome Measure VSAS, DSD VSAS, DSD VSAS, DSD Conclusion Conclusion Conclusion asds asds asds

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE ads

RATIONALE(18) Avc

SIGNIFICANCE Acv

MATERIALS AND METHODS A single- blinded, randomized-controlled trial Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau, CHK (medicine ward) STUDY SETTING STUDY DESIGN STUDY DURATION SAMPLING METHODS Non-probability, purposive sampling technique. 6 Months after synopsis approval SAMPLE SIZE 2 Groups, 30 Patients in each Group. Total Sample Size = 60

MATERIALS AND METHODS INCLUSION CRITERIA EXCLUSION CRITERIA ad ds Age: 18-50 years Both gender patients asd ass sd sd dsd

STUDY GROUPS GROUP A GROUP B ads dds asd asd sad

Group A: Avsc TECHNIQUE Figure:2 aa Figure:3 ff Figure: 4 sad Figure: 5asd

Group B: Avsc TECHNIQUE Figure:2 aa Figure:3 ff Figure: 4 sad Figure: 5asd

OUTCOME MEASURE: (20-22) Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd

OUTCOME MEASURE: (20-22) Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd Visual Analogus Scale (VAS): It is a scale that is typically used to evaluate asds asdsd

CONSORT

DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 2) Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria 1) Screened by a consultant Physiatrist 3) Patient recruited 5) Randomly allocated into Group A and Group B. 4) Informed consent 6) Assessment through VAS at baseline & after six weeks 7) Data recorded and analyzed on SPSS 27

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS IBM-SPSS version 27.0 was used to record and analyse the data. Counts and percentages were recorded for baseline characteristics and results on the dad. Within group comparison was made using paired sample test, between group comparisons was done using independent sample t-test. The statistical normality of the data was evaluated by using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Pearson Chi Square test was used to assessed the association on qualitative outcomes of scales. Statistics were considered significant for P-values less 0.05.