Root Cause Analysis for Campaign Challenges

Root Cause Analysis
 
Identifying critical campaign challenges and
diagnosing bottlenecks
 
Root Cause Analysis
 
Agenda
 
Introduction to Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
Keys steps for conducting root cause analyses
Assessing potential impact and actionability of addressing root causes
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
2
Introduction to
Root Cause Analysis
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
3
 
What is Root Cause Analysis?
 
A problem-solving method to identify underlying causes of key process challenges
A tool for learning from observed bottlenecks and mitigating them in the future & learning from
successes and promoting best practices
A learning process to determine what happened, why it happened, and what should be done to
improve it
An iterative approach – both hypothesis generating and confirming
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
4
 
Why?
 
Why?
 
Why?
 
Learning objectives
 
By the end of this module, users should be able to:
Understand and describe a common approach to identifying challenges or bottlenecks that may
be limiting to the effectiveness of a campaign.
Perform a root cause analysis to determine what’s causing the challenge or bottleneck.
Assess and prioritize root cause(s) that are actionable.
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
5
Root Cause Analysis
Key Steps
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
6
 
Overview of the key RCA steps
 
Step 1: 
Identify issues or bottlenecks
Step 2: 
Define the key problem or challenge (or success)
Step 3: 
Chart the RCA diagram
Step 4: 
Validate the RCA through iterative and participatory processes
Step 5: 
Identify the most impactful and actionable root causes
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
7
 
STEP 01 
| 
Identify campaign issues or bottlenecks
 
Brainstorm observed challenges, issues, or bottlenecks
Draw on multiple sources of data:
»
Routine and non-routine sources
»
Observations from supervision visits
»
Document review
»
Ke
y informant interviews and/or focus groups
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Categorize identified challenges into domains to help
recognize where challenges are concentrated
»
Planning
»
Funding
»
Human resources
»
Disease/epidemiological context
»
Logistics management
»
Data/monitoring and evaluation
»
Leadership, management, and coordination
»
Intervention characteristics/design
»
Population and patient characteristics
»
Advocac
y and social mobilization
»
Contextual factors
»
Social determinants
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
8
 
STEP 02 
| 
Define the key problem or challenge (or success)
Tips and Considerations
Use plain language to ensure clear articulation and
understanding of the challenge (or success) by the
evaluation team and other relevant stakeholders
If multiple challenge statements are identified, some
will likely fall along the causal pathway between root
cause and overall challenge
Where there are multiple challenges, consider which
are most actionable to address
Although challenges are most often the focus of RCA,
examining successes as well can facilitate learning
and sharing of best practices
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
9
 
Examine your list of challenges – which one is most
closely related to the desired outcome or impact?
For example:
If measles outbreaks continue to occur after a
measles campaign...
»
Potential challenge statement: Measles
outbreaks continue to occur
If campaign coverage is lower than expected...
»
Potential challenge statement: Low
coverage
 
STEP 03 
| 
Chart the RCA diagram
Tips and Considerations
Work backwards from the prioritized challenge through
assumed causal factors to arrive at most likely root
cause
RCA often performed as a group exercise; drawing on
diverse perspectives strengthens the RCA
Charting the RCA helps identify evidence gaps and
where additional validation is needed
Put everything down on paper first, then investigate
and iterate further. Messy is okay!
Transfer draft RCA to PowerPoint for sharing digitally;
use for further iteration and development
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
10
 
RCA usually involves a visual schematic to
document assumed causal chains; flow charts
work well
Probes such as ‘Who, What, Where, When, and
How’ questions help in assessing challenges
»
Who
 were the stakeholders involved?
»
What
 information was available to key
stakeholders?
»
Where
 did the challenge or problem
happen?
»
How
 widespread is the challenge or
problem? How well were procedures carried
out?
‘5 Whys’ technique for getting at the root cause
 
 
EXAMPLE RCA: 
Human African Trypanosomiasis Elimination Initiative
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
11
 
STEP 04 
|
 
Validate the RCA through iterative and participatory processes
Tips and Considerations
Are there other types of data that need to be collected?
Identify gaps and make plans for additional data
collection
Consider what contextual and/or environmental factors
may be affecting the causal chain
Design choices such as color-coded boxes and solid vs.
dotted lines can help convey relationships
Developing a draft RCA prior to the stakeholder
workshop helps validate the evaluation team’s analyses
with stakeholders and uncover additional supporting
information
See 
Participatory Workshop Design Considerations 
in
RCA Toolkit for guidance on carrying out the workshop
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
12
 
RCA benefits from iteration – update and refine your
RCA as additional data is collected and analyzed
A participatory process helps confirm assumptions and
linkages in the RCA, causal factors, and the key
challenges
A participatory workshop is a low-cost, efficient
approach to RCA validation
»
Engage a variety of stakeholders with diverse
perspectives, such as: Ministry of Health officials,
district health planners, program managers,
implementers, technical partners, and donors
Reaching consensus on root cause(s) is critical before
moving onto designing solutions/interventions
 
STEP 05 
| 
Identify most impactful and actionable root causes
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
13
 
Identifying actionable and impactful root causes is a critical step prior to intervention design
Common considerations for assessing actionability and impact are summarized
Feedback on actionability and impact can also be gathered through a participatory workshop
Use a 2x2 table to organize which root causes are most actionable, and if addressed, likely to drive the most impact
 
Assessing potential impact and actionability of
addressing root causes
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
14
 
Considerations to assess 
potential impact and
actionability 
of addressing root causes
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
15
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
16
 
Determinants of RCA usefulness
 
Strong engagement with stakeholders 
– key actions must be bought into the
RCA causal pathway
RCA 
strikes the right tone 
in framing challenges and successes
A 
policy or program window exists 
within which changes can be enacted and
adopted
RCA is accompanied by 
actionable recommendations 
to help frame further
discussion on intervention design
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS TOOLKIT
 
17
Thank you!
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a problem-solving method used to identify underlying causes of key process challenges in campaigns. It helps in learning from bottlenecks and successes to improve future outcomes. This analysis involves understanding what happened, why it happened, and what actions can be taken to enhance effectiveness. The key steps include identifying issues, defining problems, creating RCA diagrams, validating through iterative processes, and prioritizing actionable root causes.

  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Campaign Challenges
  • Problem Solving
  • Process Improvement
  • RCA Method

Uploaded on Apr 07, 2024 | 8 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Root Cause Analysis Identifying critical campaign challenges and diagnosing bottlenecks

  2. Root Cause Analysis Agenda Introduction to Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Keys steps for conducting root cause analyses Assessing potential impact and actionability of addressing root causes 2

  3. Introduction to Root Cause Analysis 3

  4. What is Root Cause Analysis? A problem-solving method to identify underlying causes of key process challenges A tool for learning from observed bottlenecks and mitigating them in the future & learning from successes and promoting best practices A learning process to determine what happened, why it happened, and what should be done to improve it An iterative approach both hypothesis generating and confirming Why? Why? Why? Root causes Causal factors Causal factors Key Challenge 4

  5. Learning objectives By the end of this module, users should be able to: Understand and describe a common approach to identifying challenges or bottlenecks that may be limiting to the effectiveness of a campaign. Perform a root cause analysis to determine what s causing the challenge or bottleneck. Assess and prioritize root cause(s) that are actionable. 5

  6. Root Cause Analysis Key Steps 6

  7. Overview of the key RCA steps Step 1: Identify issues or bottlenecks Step 2: Define the key problem or challenge (or success) Step 3: Chart the RCA diagram Step 4: Validate the RCA through iterative and participatory processes Step 5: Identify the most impactful and actionable root causes 7

  8. STEP 01 | Identify campaign issues or bottlenecks Brainstorm observed challenges, issues, or bottlenecks Categorize identified challenges into domains to help recognize where challenges are concentrated Draw on multiple sources of data: Planning Routine and non-routine sources Funding Observations from supervision visits Human resources Document review Disease/epidemiological context Key informant interviews and/or focus groups Logistics management Data/monitoring and evaluation Leadership, management, and coordination Intervention characteristics/design Population and patient characteristics Advocacy and social mobilization Contextual factors Social determinants 8

  9. STEP 02 | Define the key problem or challenge (or success) Tips and Considerations Examine your list of challenges which one is most closely related to the desired outcome or impact? For example: Use plain language to ensure clear articulation and understanding of the challenge (or success) by the evaluation team and other relevant stakeholders If measles outbreaks continue to occur after a measles campaign... If multiple challenge statements are identified, some will likely fall along the causal pathway between root cause and overall challenge Potential challenge statement: Measles outbreaks continue to occur Where there are multiple challenges, consider which are most actionable to address If campaign coverage is lower than expected... Potential challenge statement: Low coverage Although challenges are most often the focus of RCA, examining successes as well can facilitate learning and sharing of best practices 9

  10. STEP 03 | Chart the RCA diagram RCA usually involves a visual schematic to document assumed causal chains; flow charts work well Tips and Considerations Work backwards from the prioritized challenge through assumed causal factors to arrive at most likely root cause Probes such as Who, What, Where, When, and How questions help in assessing challenges RCA often performed as a group exercise; drawing on diverse perspectives strengthens the RCA Who were the stakeholders involved? What information was available to key stakeholders? Charting the RCA helps identify evidence gaps and where additional validation is needed Where did the challenge or problem happen? Put everything down on paper first, then investigate and iterate further. Messy is okay! How widespread is the challenge or problem? How well were procedures carried out? Transfer draft RCA to PowerPoint for sharing digitally; use for further iteration and development 5 Whys technique for getting at the root cause 10

  11. EXAMPLE RCA: Human African Trypanosomiasis Elimination Initiative 11

  12. STEP 04 | Validate the RCA through iterative and participatory processes RCA benefits from iteration update and refine your RCA as additional data is collected and analyzed Tips and Considerations Are there other types of data that need to be collected? Identify gaps and make plans for additional data collection A participatory process helps confirm assumptions and linkages in the RCA, causal factors, and the key challenges Consider what contextual and/or environmental factors may be affecting the causal chain A participatory workshop is a low-cost, efficient approach to RCA validation Design choices such as color-coded boxes and solid vs. dotted lines can help convey relationships Engage a variety of stakeholders with diverse perspectives, such as: Ministry of Health officials, district health planners, program managers, implementers, technical partners, and donors Developing a draft RCA prior to the stakeholder workshop helps validate the evaluation team s analyses with stakeholders and uncover additional supporting information Reaching consensus on root cause(s) is critical before moving onto designing solutions/interventions See Participatory Workshop Design Considerations in RCA Toolkit for guidance on carrying out the workshop 12

  13. STEP 05 | Identify most impactful and actionable root causes Identifying actionable and impactful root causes is a critical step prior to intervention design Common considerations for assessing actionability and impact are summarized Feedback on actionability and impact can also be gathered through a participatory workshop Use a 2x2 table to organize which root causes are most actionable, and if addressed, likely to drive the most impact Root causes Low potential impact High potential impact Low actionability High actionability 13

  14. Assessing potential impact and actionability of addressing root causes 14

  15. Considerations to assess potential impact and actionability of addressing root causes 15

  16. 16

  17. Determinants of RCA usefulness Strong engagement with stakeholders key actions must be bought into the RCA causal pathway RCA strikes the right tone in framing challenges and successes A policy or program window exists within which changes can be enacted and adopted RCA is accompanied by actionable recommendations to help frame further discussion on intervention design 17

  18. Thank you!

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#