Richland County Transportation Improvement Summary

 
 
R
i
c
h
l
a
n
d
 
C
o
u
n
t
y
 
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
 
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
W
o
r
k
 
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
 
#
1
 
 
M
a
r
c
h
 
1
2
,
 
2
0
2
4
 
Work Session #1
 
2
 
2023
Resolution of
County
Council
 
3
 
Transportation Needs
 
Process Review
RFP
Community Meetings
Engagement with Local
Governments and COG
Unfinished Projects
Funded
Unfunded
 
Project List
Summary of community
feedback
Review project highlights
Additional work to be
completed
Time horizon
 
 
4
 
Transportation Needs
 
Project Costs
Cost estimating
Accounting for inflation
 
In excess of $2 Billion
Only includes
transportation projects
Does not account for
COMET needs
 
5
 
Funding
 
Traditional tools to fund Transportation Needs
Pay as you go
County Bonds
Insufficient capacity and will eliminate capacity for other
capital needs of the County
Grants
Will not be enough to serve as a primary source
 
Size of Transportation Needs Requires Additional Source
Other counties are utilizing transportation pennies
Consider continuing the transportation penny
 
 
6
 
How Much Is a Transportation Penny Worth?
 
7
 
Funding
 
How to Divide the 
Transportation Penny?
 
TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS
 
8
 
CMRTA – COMET BUS SYSTEM
 
Project
Principles
 
County Council established
guidelines for how and where
the proceeds of the next
transportation penny will be
used to fund the County’s
transportation needs.
 
9
 
Project Principles
 
The principles would provide specific direction on key questions:
How to prioritize projects remaining from the current
penny project list?
How to divide the penny among project categories that
will appear on the ballot?
What factors, i.e. needs of community, safety, access, etc.
should be prioritized?
What portion of the penny, if any, should be reserved and
set aside to address future projects of strategic or critical
importance to the County?
 
 
10
 
Categories
 
11
Ballot questions for transportation
pennies have taken many forms.
Some 
list projects but others
include larger categories.  Some
allocate dollar amounts to
categories and others use
percentages.
 
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
PROJECTS
 
COUNTY ADVANCEMENT
PROJECTS
 
COMET ENHANCEMENT
PROJECTS
 
12
 
Community
Investment
Projects
 
T
hese projects benefit citizens and businesses in
the County and are focused on improving the
integrity, safety, reliability and sustainability of
the transportation infrastructure in communities
in order to enhance citizens’ regular commutes
to work, play and live. These projects will mostly
encompass road improvement, resurfacing and
paving, intersection improvements, pedestrian-
friendly improvements, including sidewalks, and
multimodal transportations infrastructure.
Additionally, the Community Investment projects
will include transportation projects to address
emerging home developments and population
growth in the County.
 
13
 
T
hese projects address
improvements along major
roadways within the County and
expansion of transportation
infrastructure to achieve, support
and sustain County economic
growth in an equitable manner in
accordance with the strategic goals
of the County.
 
County
Advancement
Projects
 
14
 
COMET
Enhancement
Projects
 
F
unds generated by the
penny and allocated to the
CMRTA will assist in funding
the continued operation of
the COMET mass transit
system.
 
15
 
The Task: Convert Needs to Projects,
and Projects to Categories
 
16
 
Needs
 Inventory
 
1.
Roadways
2.
Intersections
3.
Resurfacing
4.
Sidewalks
5.
Safety
6.
Traffic
alleviation
7.
Future Growth
 
Needs
 inventory must be
reduced to a list of
Projects
 filtered in
accordance with
Principles
 
1.How will the proceeds
be spent?
2. Where will the
proceeds be spent?
3. What factors, i.e.
community needs,
safety, will be
prioritized?
4. How much funds
should be reserved for
future projects?
 
Projects
 must then be grouped
by referendum 
Category
 so
Council can determine how to
divide the penny
 
1.
Community Improvement
2.
County Advancement
3.
COMET Enhancement
 
Input and Advice
 
17
 
 
Transportation Advisory
Committee (TPAC)
Council to charge TPAC to
provide advice on Projects and
Principles
Council to adopt Resolution
March 19
TPAC to report to Transportation
Ad Hoc
 
Transportation Ad Hoc Committee
(TAHC)
TAHC to receive information
from TPAC
Finalize recommendation on
Projects and Principles
Finalize recommendation on
referendum categories
Finalize recommendation on
how to divide the penny among
referendum project categories
 
TPAC Resolution (March 19 Council Item)
 
18
 
Roadmap Review
 
19
 
All specially called
meetings are denoted
with 
purple text.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Richland County's transportation improvement work includes sessions on project principles, funding options, project costs, and guidelines for utilizing the transportation penny. The focus is on addressing transportation needs, project prioritization, funding challenges, and division of funds for various projects. County Council plays a crucial role in establishing guidelines to ensure the effective use of resources for transportation projects.

  • Transportation
  • Improvement
  • Funding
  • Guidelines
  • Project

Uploaded on May 11, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Richland County Transportation Improvement Work Session #1 March 12, 2024

  2. Work Session #1 2023 Transportation Needs Project Principles Resolution of County Council Funding Input and Advice TPAC Roadmap Review Categories Resolution 2

  3. 2023 Resolution of County Council 3

  4. Transportation Needs Process Review RFP Community Meetings Engagement with Local Governments and COG Unfinished Projects Funded Unfunded Project List Summary of community feedback Review project highlights Additional work to be completed Time horizon 4

  5. Transportation Needs Project Costs Cost estimating Accounting for inflation In excess of $2 Billion Only includes transportation projects Does not account for COMET needs 5

  6. Funding Traditional tools to fund Transportation Needs Pay as you go County Bonds Insufficient capacity and will eliminate capacity for other capital needs of the County Grants Will not be enough to serve as a primary source Size of Transportation Needs Requires Additional Source Other counties are utilizing transportation pennies Consider continuing the transportation penny 6

  7. How Much Is a Transportation Penny Worth? 15-year Transportation Penny $2.2 billion 7

  8. Funding How to Divide the Transportation Penny? TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS CMRTA COMET BUS SYSTEM 8

  9. County Council established guidelines for how and where the proceeds of the next transportation penny will be used to fund the County s transportation needs. Project Principles 9

  10. Project Principles The principles would provide specific direction on key questions: How to prioritize projects remaining from the current penny project list? How to divide the penny among project categories that will appear on the ballot? What factors, i.e. needs of community, safety, access, etc. should be prioritized? What portion of the penny, if any, should be reserved and set aside to address future projects of strategic or critical importance to the County? 10

  11. Categories COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PROJECTS Ballot questions for transportation pennies have taken many forms. Some list projects but others include larger categories. Some allocate dollar amounts to categories and others use percentages. COUNTY ADVANCEMENT PROJECTS COMET ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS 11

  12. 12

  13. These projects benefit citizens and businesses in the County and are focused on improving the integrity, safety, reliability and sustainability of the transportation infrastructure in communities in order to enhance citizens regular commutes to work, play and live. These projects will mostly encompass road improvement, resurfacing and paving, intersection improvements, pedestrian- friendly improvements, including sidewalks, and multimodal transportations infrastructure. Additionally, the Community Investment projects will include transportation projects to address emerging home developments and population growth in the County. Community Investment Projects 13

  14. These projects address improvements along major roadways within the County and expansion of transportation infrastructure to achieve, support and sustain County economic growth in an equitable manner in accordance with the strategic goals of the County. County Advancement Projects 14

  15. Funds generated by the penny and allocated to the CMRTA will assist in funding the continued operation of the COMET mass transit system. COMET Enhancement Projects 15

  16. The Task: Convert Needs to Projects, and Projects to Categories Needs inventory must be reduced to a list of Projects filtered in accordance with Principles Needs Inventory Projects must then be grouped by referendum Category so Council can determine how to divide the penny 1. Roadways 2. Intersections 3. Resurfacing 4. Sidewalks 5. Safety 6. Traffic alleviation 7. Future Growth 1.How will the proceeds be spent? 2. Where will the proceeds be spent? 3. What factors, i.e. community needs, safety, will be prioritized? 4. How much funds should be reserved for future projects? 1. Community Improvement 2. County Advancement 3. COMET Enhancement 16

  17. Input and Advice Transportation Ad Hoc Committee (TAHC) TAHC to receive information from TPAC Finalize recommendation on Projects and Principles Finalize recommendation on referendum categories Finalize recommendation on how to divide the penny among referendum project categories Transportation Advisory Committee (TPAC) Council to charge TPAC to provide advice on Projects and Principles Council to adopt Resolution March 19 TPAC to report to Transportation Ad Hoc 17

  18. TPAC Resolution (March 19 Council Item) 18

  19. Roadmap Review April 9: Council Meeting, 1st Reading Penny Tax Referendum Ordinance March 19: Council Meeting, Approve TPAC Resolution March 26: TAHC Meeting, Projects and Principles April 1: TPAC Meeting, Projects and Principles April 15: TPAC Meeting, Projects and Principles May 6: TPAC Meeting, Allocation of funds to Categories May 7: TAHC Meeting, Allocation of funds to Categories April 16: TAHC Meeting, Projects and Principles April 23: Council Work Session #2, TAHC Report May 7: Council Meeting, 2nd Reading June 17: TPAC Meeting, Deadline for Recommendations June 18: TAHC Meeting, Receive and Review TPAC Recommendations June 3: TPAC Meeting, Finalize Recommendations May 20: TPAC Meeting May 21: TAHC Meeting All specially called meetings are denoted with purple text. June 25: Council Work Session #3, TAHC Report, Finalize Projects and Principles, Finalize Allocations July 16: Council Meeting, Final Reading on Penny Ordinance, Adopt Resolution approving Projects and Principles July 9: Public Hearing on Penny Ordinance July 29: Council Work Session #4 19

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#