Research Scholarship
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
S
c
h
o
l
a
r
s
h
i
p
H
o
n
g
w
e
i
X
i
n
D
e
a
n
,
A
g
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
h
x
i
n
2
@
t
e
n
n
e
s
s
e
e
.
e
d
u
8
6
5
-
9
7
4
-
7
1
0
5
U
T
I
A
P
&
T
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
M
a
y
1
0
,
2
0
2
1
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
I
n
p
u
t
s
&
O
u
t
p
u
t
s
•
Contract and grant funding as PI and collaborator
•
Research expenditure
•
Refereed articles in premier journals or books
•
Patents/commercial licensing
•
Mentoring of graduate students/postdocs/scholars
–
Mentoring of graduate student(s) to completion prior to P&T
–
Timely refereed pubs from graduate research work
•
Attracting top-notch graduate students
–
Successfully competing with peer institutions
–
Post-graduation placement/current employer/position
2
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
•
The
“so-what”
test
–
advancement of basic scientific knowledge
–
influence on or foundation for policy-making or
development of professional practice standards
–
citations (e.g., h-index)
–
technological breakthroughs
–
economic value
–
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
3
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
&
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
m
i
n
e
n
c
e
•
Awards and honors (e.g., fellow, top research awards,
AAAS member, NAS/NAE/NAM member)
•
Scientific advisory boards/committees, national taskforces,
external examiner of PhD defense
•
Member/manager of federal-agency proposal review panels
•
Invited talks at national or international conferences (esp.,
keynote speeches)
4
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
T
r
a
j
e
c
t
o
r
y
&
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
•
Continued growth during probationary period
•
Sustained productivity following P&T
•
Achievements since last promotion
5
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
i
a
l
i
t
y
&
G
o
o
d
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
h
i
p
•
Committees/leadership roles within institution and/or
professional societies or organizations
•
Co-PI or collaborator on research proposals/projects
•
Graduate program committees
•
Courteous/respectful to fellow colleagues & staff
•
Embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion
6
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
•
Peer or aspirational institutions
•
Leading experts in the candidate’s field
–
Peers who are in a position to judge the candidate
•
Full or distinguished professors
•
Follow Faculty Handbook when selecting evaluators
•
Provide the proper documents to the evaluators
7
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
?
H
o
n
g
w
e
i
X
i
n
1
0
3
M
o
r
g
a
n
H
a
l
l
h
x
i
n
2
@
t
e
n
n
e
s
s
e
e
.
e
d
u
8
6
5
-
9
7
4
-
7
1
0
5
8
This workshop focuses on research scholarship excellence, impacts, national/international prominence, trajectory/sustainability, collegiality/good citizenship, and external evaluation in academia.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Research Scholarship UTIA P&T Workshop May 10, 2021 Hongwei Xin Dean, AgResearch hxin2@tennessee.edu 865-974-7105
Research Excellence Inputs & Outputs Contract and grant funding as PI and collaborator Research expenditure Refereed articles in premier journals or books Patents/commercial licensing Mentoring of graduate students/postdocs/scholars Mentoring of graduate student(s) to completion prior to P&T Timely refereed pubs from graduate research work Attracting top-notch graduate students Successfully competing with peer institutions Post-graduation placement/current employer/position 2
Research Excellence Impacts The so-what test advancement of basic scientific knowledge influence on or foundation for policy-making or development of professional practice standards citations (e.g., h-index) technological breakthroughs economic value quality of life 3
Research Excellence National & International Prominence Awards and honors (e.g., fellow, top research awards, AAAS member, NAS/NAE/NAM member) Scientific advisory boards/committees, national taskforces, external examiner of PhD defense Member/manager of federal-agency proposal review panels Invited talks at national or international conferences (esp., keynote speeches) 4
Research Excellence Trajectory & Sustainability Continued growth during probationary period Sustained productivity following P&T Achievements since last promotion 5
Research Excellence Collegiality & Good Citizenship Committees/leadership roles within institution and/or professional societies or organizations Co-PI or collaborator on research proposals/projects Graduate program committees Courteous/respectful to fellow colleagues & staff Embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion 6
Research Excellence External Evaluation Letters Peer or aspirational institutions Leading experts in the candidate s field Peers who are in a position to judge the candidate Full or distinguished professors Follow Faculty Handbook when selecting evaluators Provide the proper documents to the evaluators 7
Questions? Hongwei Xin 103 Morgan Hall hxin2@tennessee.edu 865-974-7105 8
