Proposed Approach for Handling Changes in End User Categories

Slide Note
Embed
Share

As per the agreed guidelines, any new End User Categories (EUCs) will only be updated following existing system rules. A potential need for a new Reconciliation Variance code has been identified to track amended EUCs, specifically in scenarios like Back Billing on Greenfield sites. Although frequent, the new Rec Variance will be utilized only under certain conditions. Xoserve is considering not introducing a new code to avoid additional system changes and complexity.


Uploaded on Aug 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. XRN4665 - New End User Categories As agreed at ChMC new EUC s will only change as per current system rules, AQ Calc, Confirmation Start/Change, Gas Year Reassigning etc It was originally assumed that no new Reconciliation Variance code would be needed due to the EUC s only being updated as part of BAU processes (other reason codes would take precedent over any introduced code for EUC) However, following on from detail design the potential need for a new Rec Variance code has been identified to show where an EUC has been amended One particular scenario Back Billing on Greenfield sites brought about this requirement (detailed on next slide)

  2. LDZ: EA Back Billing on Greenfield Scenario AQ CALC 01.10.2019 Gas Year Confirmation Effective Date JOB PP Cyclic Read OPNN E A A Back Billing CAP, COM & REC EUC amendment outside of existing variance codes (except Monthly Variance - UGR) 10.12.2019 05.01.2020 21.08.2019 01.02.2020 08.11.2019 EUC EUC 01 Dom Non-PP EA:E1801B EA:E1901PD EA:E1901ND EA:E1901PD MSC EUC 01 Dom Non-PP Domestic Domestic EUC 01 Dom Non-PP Pre-Payment PP Dev? 25,052 kwh AQ EUC 01 Dom Non-PP 21,000 kwh

  3. Current Reconciliation Variance Codes # Code Description 1 MRR Meter Read Received = ORG Change of organisation 2 BLS Line in sand 3 RBD Rec By Difference 4 AQ AQ change 5 CCH Class change 6 MRF Meter Read Frequency 7 EXZ Exit Zone change 8 MSC Market Sector Code change 9 PRC Price change 10 UGR Monthly variance

  4. Considerations The Back Billing on Greenfield sites occur frequently, however potential new Rec Variance will only be used if the back billing period spans Gas Year 2019 and no AQ Calculation was successful for 01.10.2019 EUC s change each Gas Year (BAU) the Rec Variance used = UGR - Monthly Variance and will be present regardless of introducing a new code EUC values will be present and split within Invoicing Supporting Information Files (e.g AML - K92) showing the EUC values for each variance Trans Inv Type SSC Bill Month Bill Year Invoice # LDZ Market Cat Class Below example is for illustrative purposes only. K43 AMS SIM 08 2019 12345 EA SSP 4 Trans Invoice # MPRN Rec Start Rec End Var Start Var End Var EUC Var Code . . K92 12345 987654321 21092019 08112019 21092019 31082019 EA:E1801B MRR . K92 12345 987654321 21092019 08112019 01092019 30092019 EA:E1801B UGR . K92 12345 987654321 21092019 08112019 01102019 31102019 EA:E1901PD UGR . K92 12345 987654321 21092019 08112019 01112019 08112019 EA:E1901PD MRR .

  5. XRN4665 DSG Actions Xoserve are proposing not to introduce a new Rec Variance Code as part of this change, due to A new variance code would incur Shipper system changes Add additional complexity regarding the production of supporting information files BAU precedent exists for EUC changes as part of Gas Year Additional regression testing would be needed DSG are being asked To consider the Greenfield Back Billing Scenario and advise if a new Rec Variance Code is needed or would the existing Variance Code (UGR Monthly Variance) be enough? If yes, are there any other instances where EUC Rec Variance Code would take priority over any current codes?

Related


More Related Content