Prevalence and Management of Psychosocial Problems in Primary Care in Flanders

undefined
 
PREVALENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF
PSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS IN
PRIMARY CARE IN FLANDERS
 
Lena Vannieuwenborg, Jan De Lepeleire, Frank Buntinx
Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium
 
Project Description
 
Objective
To assess the prevalence, presentation and handling of
psychosocial problems in primary care in Flanders
Background
Data on prevalence and handling psychosocial problems
are widespread and sparse
Shortcoming of a global picture
Need for a frame that can comprehend the data available
The question is: 
what happens in primary care to intercept the
psychosocial problems that are presented?
 
Methodology (1)
 
Mixed method
‘Fishbone diagram’
visualise the main (problem) areas and challenges
Literature study
various search engines and (official) databases
medicine, psychology and psychiatry journals
(research) data and/or databases available within the
different organizations we approached
 
Methodology (2)
 
Semi-structured interviews
n = 21
health care and welfare professionals in primary care
Focus groups
n = 2 (Nov 2012 and Jan 2013)
Duration approx. 2h
6 and 7 participants respectively
 
Research (sub)questions
 
Main research questions:
how and how frequently psychosocial problems are
presented in primary care?
by who (patients) and with whom (care givers)?
what 
what happens in primary care to intercept the
psychosocial problems that are presented?
what are the results?
Split up into 3 areas:
presentation
handling/approach
course
 
Key Findings
Conceptualisation and inventarisation of psychosocial problems (1)
 
Uniform definition of the concept of ‘psychosocial
problems’?
Great dissension and indistinctness in literature and
within the practice of the different health care
professionals
Construction of our own operational definition
 
Operational definition of psychosocial problems
 
Psychosocial problems 
include the 
broad spectrum of everything that is not strictly medical-somatic
.
They affect the functioning of the patient in daily life, and concern his environment and/or biography.
 
On the one hand, it concerns 
different psychological problems
 such as: feeling
anxious/nervous/tense, (posttraumatic or acute) stress, depression and feeling depressed, burn
out, loneliness, irritability, sleep disorder, sexual problems, tics, alcohol abuse, tobacco abuse, drug
abuse, memory problems, behavior problems, learning difficulties, phase of life problems, fear of
mental illness, psychoses, schizophrenia, anxiety(disorder), somatization disorder,
suicide/suicidality, neurasthenia/surmenage, phobia/obsessive compulsive disorder, personality
disorder or identity problem, hyperkinetic disorder, intellectual disabilities, relation problems (with
friend, family and/or partner), medical unexplained symptoms and eating disorders.
On the other hand, it concerns 
different social problems
 such as: poverty/financial  problems,
housing problems, problems with food/water, social-cultural problems, problems with work or
unemployment, school problems, problems with social security, with health care, legal problems,
adjustment problems, loss/death of family/partner and educational problems.
 
Key Findings
Conceptualisation and inventarisation of psychosocial problems (2)
 
objective and interpretable data very hard to find
Especially when searching for data on non-medical
disciplines
Some possible reasons:
In Belgium, 
specific research or registration concerning
interventions by (primary care) psychologists virtually absent
Nature of the data acquisition
(Still) prevailing (self-)stigma
Emotions are not measurable or objectifiable
 
Key Findings
Presentation of psychosocial problems in primary care (1)
 
Integrated (prevalence) data concerning
psychosocial problems across the different primary
care disciplines are missing
(Research) data are mostly found within the seperate
disciplines
Different presentation of the same problem 
different labeling and/or registration
‘Proto-professionalization’
‘Attributional style’ of patients in regard to their
problems
 
Key Findings
Presentation of psychosocial problems in primary care (2)
 
General practitioner (GP) as a very important
gateway to primary care
Involved in 60-80% of the cases
In most cases, GP is first care giver to be consulted
Of these cases, majority remains with GP for follow-up
Data on consultation within the welfare 
(strong)
regional differences
 
Key Findings
Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (1)
 
Assistance (still) too much ‘supply-driven’
Data on approach of the (primary care) psychologist-
and psychiatrist, social workers and nurses still sparse
compared to data on approach of GP
No (official) recognition of the profession of primary care
psychologist
Data on the approach of psychiatrists mostly concern
secondary care
Data on the approach of social workers are spread and
arise from registrations within the seperate branches of
authorities
Ways of registration and reporting are not standardized
 
Key Findings
Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (2)
 
Drug treatment remains popular
As only treatment, or in combination with non-
pharmacological treatment
In Belgium, the use of psychotropic drugs is frequent and
seems to increase even further
Use of tranquillizers and sleep medication seems to remain
constant
Increase in prescription of antidepressants ≠ increase in
number of (declared) depressions
 
Key Findings
Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (3)
 
When it comes to referrals...
GP’s help 90% of the patients with psychosocial problems
Referral for psychotherapy is a time asking process, often
spread over time
Financial implications can constitute a barrier
When GP’s refer 
 danger of losing sight of patient
Having a psychologist working in the general practice
facilitates referrals to them
The process of referral to secondary care sometimes gets
stuck
 
Key Findings
Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (4)
 
Multiculturality 
asks for 
different or adapted approaches
Important topic in Belgium
Current care may not be sufficiently and/or appropriately adapted to
the differences
Person of the caregiver important for effectivity of treatment
Rather than discipline-related or bound by theory
Nonspecific elements seem to be of particular importance
consolidation, containement, ‘a place to talk’,...
Demand for a larger and more continuous accessibility of
professionals from psychiatry
Especially in crises
‘Red Phone’
‘Help on the spot’
 
Key Findings
Course of care program / treatment (1)
 
Need and demand for more multidisciplinary
colaboration
Due to evolutions in primary and secondary (mental health)
care
More information exchange between the different
authorities and between primary and secondary care
Experience of limitations and practical considerations in
care program by care givers ≠ by care takers
Care givers sometimes experience more barriers than
patients
Consequences for further course of treatment
Slower progress, late/slow/no referrals, drug treatment when
non-pharmacological help may be more appropriate
 
Key Findings
Course of care program / treatment (2)
 
Great uncertainty among professionals in primary
care about signaling function and -operationalization
Figures virtually untraceable
How professionals can signal psychosocial problems
they notice in patients or families?
Financial and digital gap 
makes position of the
deprived extra weak
Not aware of the (different) ways to help, their rights,
how to obtain their rights,...
 
Conclusion
 
In (primary care in) Flanders:
No tradition of multidisciplinary research
Lack of integrated data
 on psychosocial problems across
different disciplines
Distortion of (prevalence) data
Definition of ‘psychosocial problems’?
Different labeling (of problems)/(nature of) registration
In case of psychosocial problems:
GP
 very important gateway to primary care
Person of caregiver 
important for effective treatment
Great need and demand for 
more and better cooperation,
communication and coordination
 between actors involved
in health care and welfare
 
 
 
 
 
Thank you for your attention!
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This research project aims to assess the prevalence, presentation, and handling of psychosocial problems in primary care in Flanders. The methodology includes a mixed method approach using fishbone diagrams and interviews with health care professionals. Key findings include the conceptualization and operational definition of psychosocial problems.

  • Psychosocial
  • Primary Care
  • Flanders
  • Prevalence
  • Management

Uploaded on Oct 02, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PREVALENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF PSYCHOSOCIAL PROBLEMS IN PRIMARY CARE IN FLANDERS Lena Vannieuwenborg, Jan De Lepeleire, Frank Buntinx Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium

  2. Project Description Objective To assess the prevalence, presentation and handling of psychosocial problems in primary care in Flanders Background Data on prevalence and handling psychosocial problems are widespread and sparse Shortcoming of a global picture Need for a frame that can comprehend the data available The question is: what happens in primary care to intercept the psychosocial problems that are presented?

  3. Methodology (1) Mixed method Fishbone diagram visualise the main (problem) areas and challenges Literature study various search engines and (official) databases medicine, psychology and psychiatry journals (research) data and/or databases available within the different organizations we approached

  4. Methodology (2) Semi-structured interviews n = 21 health care and welfare professionals in primary care Focus groups n = 2 (Nov 2012 and Jan 2013) Duration approx. 2h 6 and 7 participants respectively

  5. Research (sub)questions Main research questions: how and how frequently psychosocial problems are presented in primary care? by who (patients) and with whom (care givers)? what what happens in primary care to intercept the psychosocial problems that are presented? what are the results? Split up into 3 areas: presentation handling/approach course

  6. Key Findings Conceptualisation and inventarisation of psychosocial problems (1) Uniform definition of the concept of psychosocial problems ? Great dissension and indistinctness in literature and within the practice of the different health care professionals Construction of our own operational definition

  7. Operational definition of psychosocial problems Psychosocial problems include the broad spectrum of everything that is not strictly medical-somatic. They affect the functioning of the patient in daily life, and concern his environment and/or biography. On the one hand, it concerns different psychological problems such as: feeling anxious/nervous/tense, (posttraumatic or acute) stress, depression and feeling depressed, burn out, loneliness, irritability, sleep disorder, sexual problems, tics, alcohol abuse, tobacco abuse, drug abuse, memory problems, behavior problems, learning difficulties, phase of life problems, fear of mental illness, psychoses, schizophrenia, anxiety(disorder), somatization disorder, suicide/suicidality, neurasthenia/surmenage, phobia/obsessive compulsive disorder, personality disorder or identity problem, hyperkinetic disorder, intellectual disabilities, relation problems (with friend, family and/or partner), medical unexplained symptoms and eating disorders. On the other hand, it concerns different social problems such as: poverty/financial problems, housing problems, problems with food/water, social-cultural problems, problems with work or unemployment, school problems, problems with social security, with health care, legal problems, adjustment problems, loss/death of family/partner and educational problems.

  8. Key Findings Conceptualisation and inventarisation of psychosocial problems (2) objective and interpretable data very hard to find Especially when searching for data on non-medical disciplines Some possible reasons: In Belgium, specific research or registration concerning interventions by (primary care) psychologists virtually absent Nature of the data acquisition (Still) prevailing (self-)stigma Emotions are not measurable or objectifiable

  9. Key Findings Presentation of psychosocial problems in primary care (1) Integrated (prevalence) data concerning psychosocial problems across the different primary care disciplines are missing (Research) data are mostly found within the seperate disciplines Different presentation of the same problem different labeling and/or registration Proto-professionalization Attributional style of patients in regard to their problems

  10. Key Findings Presentation of psychosocial problems in primary care (2) General practitioner (GP) as a very important gateway to primary care Involved in 60-80% of the cases In most cases, GP is first care giver to be consulted Of these cases, majority remains with GP for follow-up Data on consultation within the welfare (strong) regional differences

  11. Key Findings Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (1) Assistance (still) too much supply-driven Data on approach of the (primary care) psychologist- and psychiatrist, social workers and nurses still sparse compared to data on approach of GP No (official) recognition of the profession of primary care psychologist Data on the approach of psychiatrists mostly concern secondary care Data on the approach of social workers are spread and arise from registrations within the seperate branches of authorities Ways of registration and reporting are not standardized

  12. Key Findings Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (2) Drug treatment remains popular As only treatment, or in combination with non- pharmacological treatment In Belgium, the use of psychotropic drugs is frequent and seems to increase even further Use of tranquillizers and sleep medication seems to remain constant Increase in prescription of antidepressants increase in number of (declared) depressions

  13. Key Findings Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (3) When it comes to referrals... GP s help 90% of the patients with psychosocial problems Referral for psychotherapy is a time asking process, often spread over time Financial implications can constitute a barrier When GP s refer danger of losing sight of patient Having a psychologist working in the general practice facilitates referrals to them The process of referral to secondary care sometimes gets stuck

  14. Key Findings Handling of psychosocial problems in primary care (4) Multiculturality asks for different or adapted approaches Important topic in Belgium Current care may not be sufficiently and/or appropriately adapted to the differences Person of the caregiver important for effectivity of treatment Rather than discipline-related or bound by theory Nonspecific elements seem to be of particular importance consolidation, containement, a place to talk ,... Demand for a larger and more continuous accessibility of professionals from psychiatry Especially in crises Red Phone Help on the spot

  15. Key Findings Course of care program / treatment (1) Need and demand for more multidisciplinary colaboration Due to evolutions in primary and secondary (mental health) care More information exchange between the different authorities and between primary and secondary care Experience of limitations and practical considerations in care program by care givers by care takers Care givers sometimes experience more barriers than patients Consequences for further course of treatment Slower progress, late/slow/no referrals, drug treatment when non-pharmacological help may be more appropriate

  16. Key Findings Course of care program / treatment (2) Great uncertainty among professionals in primary care about signaling function and -operationalization Figures virtually untraceable How professionals can signal psychosocial problems they notice in patients or families? Financial and digital gap makes position of the deprived extra weak Not aware of the (different) ways to help, their rights, how to obtain their rights,...

  17. Conclusion In (primary care in) Flanders: No tradition of multidisciplinary research Lack of integrated data on psychosocial problems across different disciplines Distortion of (prevalence) data Definition of psychosocial problems ? Different labeling (of problems)/(nature of) registration In case of psychosocial problems: GP very important gateway to primary care Person of caregiver important for effective treatment Great need and demand for more and better cooperation, communication and coordination between actors involved in health care and welfare

  18. Thank you for your attention!

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#