Ocean Observatories Initiative Overview May 2015
undefined
O
O
I
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
M
a
y
2
0
1
5
T
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
O
O
I
l
e
a
d
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
:
•
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
,
f
o
r
d
e
c
a
d
e
s
,
t
h
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
o
f
o
c
e
a
n
d
a
t
a
,
r
e
s
o
l
v
i
n
g
o
c
e
a
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
l
a
n
d
s
p
a
t
i
a
l
s
c
a
l
e
s
;
•
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
O
O
I
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
-
s
e
a
e
x
p
e
r
i
m
e
n
t
s
o
r
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
l
a
n
d
s
p
a
t
i
a
l
r
e
a
c
h
o
f
o
c
e
a
n
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
;
•
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
o
r
y
a
s
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
e
v
o
l
v
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
n
e
w
s
c
i
e
n
c
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
.
O
O
I
O
v
e
r
a
r
c
h
i
n
g
O
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
2
3
S
c
o
p
e
o
f
t
h
e
O
O
I
F
o
u
r
G
l
o
b
a
l
h
i
g
h
l
a
t
i
t
u
d
e
s
i
t
e
s
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
p
a
I
r
m
i
n
g
e
r
S
e
a
A
r
g
e
n
t
i
n
e
B
a
s
i
n
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
O
c
e
a
n
T
w
o
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
A
r
r
a
y
s
E
n
d
u
r
a
n
c
e
A
r
r
a
y
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
A
r
r
a
y
C
a
b
l
e
d
A
r
r
a
y
M
e
s
o
-
s
c
a
l
e
,
P
l
a
t
e
S
c
a
l
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
C
y
b
e
r
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
,
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
,
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
a
t
a
O
O
I
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
4
* CI transitions to full Rutgers
leadership as OOI Net transitions to
O&M
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
O
O
I
5
•
January 2014, PMO took over direct management of CI-UCSD work
effort due to concerns of inadequate progress towards delivery
•
February 2014, contracted with Raytheon to develop a rapid prototype,
based on their Universal Framework (uFrame) service oriented
architecture used by National Weather Service AWIPS II
•
June 2014, successful demonstration of uFrame prototype
•
July 2014, PMO decided to transition away from software being
developed at CI-UCSD due to lack of adequate defect closure rate and
concerns of future maintainability
•
July 2014, Rutgers begins transition to CI Implementing Organization
•
August 2014, Raytheon under contract for full development of uFrame
with PMO acting as Implementing Organization with transition to Rutgers
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
6
M
a
n
a
g
e
t
h
e
c
l
o
s
e
o
u
t
o
f
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
a
s
s
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
f
u
n
d
s
r
e
m
a
i
n
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
t
h
e
l
a
s
t
e
m
e
r
g
i
n
g
r
i
s
k
s
.
M
u
s
t
a
l
i
g
n
b
u
d
g
e
t
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
t
o
o
n
l
y
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
.
E
x
e
c
u
t
e
t
h
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
s
e
c
o
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
s
,
f
i
r
s
t
‘
t
u
r
n
s
’
,
s
h
i
f
t
t
o
O
&
M
$
$
)
f
o
r
a
l
l
a
r
r
a
y
s
7
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
-
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
Challenges
•
Technology
•
Fuel cell
•
AUV w/docking stations
•
Coastal surface piercing profiler
•
Environmental
•
Equipment loss from interaction with other ocean users
8
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
-
E
n
d
u
r
a
n
c
e
Challenges
•
Technology
•
Fuel cell
•
Coastal surface piercing profiler
9
G
l
o
b
a
l
-
P
a
p
a
•
Surface piercing profiler removed at
last maintenance replacement, Plan
B to be developed
•
Open Ocean Glider problems,
working with vendor to resolve
•
Profiler gliders to be installed at
June 2015 maintenance cycle
10
10
G
l
o
b
a
l
-
I
r
m
i
n
g
e
r
•
Operating well with exception of Fleet Broadband on Surface
Mooring which has not been operating since deployment
•
Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve
•
Profiler gliders not ready for deployment
11
11
G
l
o
b
a
l
–
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
O
c
e
a
n
,
5
5
S
•
Operating well with exception of acoustic modem on Hybrid
Profiler mooring
•
Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve
•
Profiler gliders not ready for deployment
12
12
G
l
o
b
a
l
–
A
r
g
e
n
t
i
n
e
B
a
s
i
n
•
Operating well
•
Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve
•
Profiler gliders not ready for deployment
13
13
C
a
b
l
e
d
Challenges
•
Technology
•
Deep profiler
A
s
o
f
5
/
1
/
2
0
1
5
D
e
p
l
o
y
e
d
S
c
o
p
e
o
f
O
O
I
(
o
v
e
r
8
0
0
i
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
s
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
m
o
o
r
i
n
g
s
,
b
e
n
t
h
i
c
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
s
,
s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r
n
o
d
e
s
,
g
l
i
d
e
r
s
a
n
d
A
U
V
s
)
14
14
G
l
o
b
a
l
A
r
r
a
y
s
C
o
a
s
t
a
l
A
r
r
a
y
s
C
a
b
l
e
d
A
r
r
a
y
s
C
o
m
p
u
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
t
f
o
r
m
s
,
s
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
h
i
g
h
s
p
e
e
d
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
C
y
b
e
r
P
o
i
n
t
s
o
f
P
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
(
C
y
b
e
r
P
o
P
s
)
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
o
i
n
t
s
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
P
o
i
n
t
s
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
o
r
y
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
–
O
O
I
N
e
t
H
a
r
d
w
a
r
e
/
S
o
f
t
w
a
r
e
R
e
d
u
n
d
a
n
t
c
o
m
p
u
t
i
n
g
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
C
y
b
e
r
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
8
8
0
k
m
o
f
s
e
a
f
l
o
o
r
c
a
b
l
e
,
w
i
t
h
1
0
K
W
p
o
w
e
r
,
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
7
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
n
o
d
e
s
,
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
n
o
d
e
s
,
a
n
d
a
l
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
i
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
a
b
o
u
t
e
a
c
h
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
c
a
n
b
e
f
o
u
n
d
o
n
t
h
e
O
O
I
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
(
h
t
t
p
:
/
/
o
c
e
a
n
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
o
r
i
e
s
.
o
r
g
)
15
15
C
y
b
e
r
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Highlights
•
All data from deployed infrastructure is being stored, regardless of
OOINet readiness level
•
OOINet has ingested data from deployed Pioneer moorings and
gliders, Papa and Endurance gliders, as well as initial Build 1B Cabled
instruments
•
Attempted to deliver pre-commissioned data via interim user interface,
but resource drain was impacting ability to deliver production OOI Net
•
Rutgers staff has ramped up and will be ready to assume O&M role
O
v
e
r
a
l
l
C
I
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
16
16
•
Flexible network
architecture
–
Decentralized network
architecture with 5 P2P
connected sites (OMC-
WHOI, OMC-OSU, OMC-
SIO, RSN, CI-RU)
–
Independent
administrative domains
(e.g., IP space)
–
Supports both VPN and
non-VPN configurations
•
Security
–
Short-term: traditional
firewall system (iptables)
–
Long-term: Latest
generation firewall
appliances to consolidate
security layers
•
External connections
–
Leverages institutional
VPN infrastructure
C
I
-
B
u
i
l
d
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
s
•
Build 1
–
Proof of Concept
–
Ingests data, applies algorithms,
provides data products
–
23 sensors integrated
•
Build 2
–
Data Management
–
Capability to record and manage
deployed moorings and platforms
–
User Interface prototype
–
Plotting, charting, SW Management,
landing page
–
Sensors/Algorithms
–
35 New sensors/algorithms integrated
•
Build 3
–
Data Management complete
–
Provenance tracking, life-cycle
management
–
User Interface refinements
–
Manage user accounts, annotate data,
update metadata,
•
Build 3 (cont)
–
User Interface (cont)
–
Prototype health status/monitoring,
trouble ticket integration, operator
turnover
–
Sensors/Algorithms
–
12 New sensors/algorithms integrated
•
Build 4
–
User Interface refinements
–
Command and Control prototype
–
Asset Management prototype
–
QA/QC analysis results, Alarms and
Alerts, ERDDAP integration
–
Help/FAQ/Glossasry/Tool Tips
–
All Algorithms integrated
–
User Interface complete
–
Sensors/Algorithms
–
31 New sensors/algorithms integrated
•
Build 5
–
User Interface Complete
–
Sensors Complete
–
31 New sensors/algorithms integrated
17
17
•
All builds include sensor drivers/parsers and algorithms
•
All builds post Build 1, include incremental UI functionality
18
18
O
O
I
N
e
t
U
s
e
r
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
•
Alpha testing
May 2015
•
Based on OOI Net Build 4
•
User consist of OOI Project Scientist and Operators, member
of UNOLS OOSC, and NSF
•
Defined methodology for user feedback to software build team
•
Beta testing
June 2015
•
Based on OOI Net Build 5
•
Alpha continue use of system
•
OOI work with NSF to define criteria for selection of Beta
users with a linkage to upcoming proposals
•
Commissioned Release –
September 2015
C
I
–
D
a
t
a
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
•
Pioneer mini-workshop held in February
–
Attendance OOI Team, invited external SMEs, UNOLS OOSC
–
Review of initial data and Rutgers proposed Quick Looks
–
Recommendations of proposed deep dives by Data Evaluators
–
Review of Data QA/QC algorithms
–
OOSC provided prioritized list of recommendations
•
Other Array level workshops to follow
–
OOI Team to run mini-workshops for initial data review
–
OOSC will run community workshops
–
Workshop dates are driven by data availability through OOINet
19
19
20
20
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
I
s
s
u
e
s
a
n
d
R
i
s
k
s
f
o
r
O
O
I
Vertical moorings deployed within the cabled array have technical issues
to resolve, specific to the deep and shallower profiler. Remaining
shallow profiler continues successful testing. Deep profiler issues
identified and resolution in progress. Testing in progress. (UW- OL)
R
i
s
k
:
h
o
p
e
d
-
f
o
r
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
s
i
n
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
u
p
p
e
r
-
o
c
e
a
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
(
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
‘
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
v
e
’
a
s
p
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
O
O
I
)
m
u
s
t
a
w
a
i
t
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
w
i
t
h
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
r
e
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
(
l
o
w
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
r
i
s
k
,
m
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
r
i
s
k
)
Surface-piercing profiler technology is not as mature as initially expected.
Global surface-piercing profiler was descoped and is being replaced by
gliders functioning as virtual moorings. Coastal surface-piercing profiler,
long-term performance to be assessed. (WHOI – SIO – OSU - OL)
R
i
s
k
:
h
o
p
e
d
-
f
o
r
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
s
i
n
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
u
p
p
e
r
-
o
c
e
a
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
(
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
‘
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
v
e
’
a
s
p
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
O
O
I
)
m
u
s
t
a
w
a
i
t
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
b
y
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
(
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
)
21
21
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
I
s
s
u
e
s
a
n
d
R
i
s
k
s
f
o
r
O
O
I
The AUV docking system is scheduled for Spring 2015 deployment within
the Pioneer Array. In-water tests demonstrated some success. Docking
system complexity and final design changes could lead to a schedule
problem. (WHOI - OL)
R
i
s
k
:
A
U
V
s
m
a
y
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
d
e
s
c
o
p
e
d
,
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
t
o
b
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
U
V
s
(
h
i
g
h
r
i
s
k
)
.
Fuel cell development continues for the surface moorings, but progress
has been slower than expected. Unit failed to operate on recent
deployment, and was immediately recovered. Failure analysis indicated
root cause, but partial redesign requirement for remediation. (WHOI - OL)
R
i
s
k
:
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
d
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
y
b
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
e
d
b
y
l
a
c
k
o
f
f
u
l
l
p
o
w
e
r
f
r
o
m
w
i
n
d
a
n
d
s
o
l
a
r
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
f
o
r
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
A
U
V
b
a
t
t
e
r
i
e
s
–
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
t
o
b
e
o
b
t
a
i
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
A
U
V
s
(
m
o
d
e
r
a
t
e
t
o
h
i
g
h
r
i
s
k
)
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
&
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
u
s
22
22
•
MREFC fully funded
–
NSF has provided the full MREFC funding to Ocean Leadership
and OL has distributed to each Implementing Organization
•
Control Account Closeouts
–
OL is actively closing out accounts to be prepared for the period of
performance completion
–
Weekly meetings are held to coordinate with all of the finance staff
–
Closed accounts are flagged in the accounting system to prevent
new charges from posting
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
23
23
•
ARRA fully spent and closed
•
MREFC remaining to spend is
$29.39M, of which $7.28M is already
obligated
•
The current contingency balance is
$2.9M. OOI is actively monitoring
risks which, if realized will further
reduce this figure
U
n
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
e
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
b
y
I
O
24
24
U
n
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
e
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
-
P
M
O
25
25
Bulk of remaining PMO budget:
•
Potential resolution of claims currently working
through ratification process with former
CyberInfrastructure Implementing Organization
•
Raytheon work for CI Management Support and
uFrame build
U
n
o
b
l
i
g
a
t
e
d
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
-
W
H
O
I
26
26
•
Remaining Unobligated balance of $9.45m
•
Categories of remaining funding:
•
Main construction cruises are complete
•
C
o
s
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
h
a
v
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
$
1
.
5
m
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
r
e
-
b
u
d
g
e
t
i
n
g
•
Expect additional funding to become available as
weekly financial close out meetings continue
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
-
R
i
s
k
S
n
a
p
s
h
o
t
27
27
•
Intend to close above Risk with the exception of 9000 CI-Execution Risks
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y
R
i
s
k
C
l
o
s
e
o
u
t
28
28
29
29
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
M
i
l
e
s
t
o
n
e
s
t
o
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
S
h
a
l
l
o
w
w
a
t
e
r
t
e
s
t
L
o
n
g
e
v
i
t
y
T
e
s
t
R
e
f
u
r
b
i
s
h
V
&
V
D
e
p
l
o
y
J
u
n
e
J
u
l
y
A
u
g
u
s
t
M
a
y
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
p
a
I
r
m
i
n
g
e
r
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
O
c
e
a
n
A
r
g
e
n
t
i
n
e
B
a
s
i
n
E
n
d
u
r
a
n
c
e
-
I
S
M
/
C
S
P
P
/
G
l
i
d
e
r
s
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
-
C
S
P
P
/
G
l
i
d
e
r
s
-
A
U
V
/
D
o
c
k
-
F
u
e
l
C
e
l
l
C
a
b
l
e
d
-
D
e
e
p
P
r
o
f
i
l
e
r
C
I
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
V
&
V
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
D
e
p
l
o
y
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
P
o
i
n
t
2
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
P
o
i
n
t
3
D
e
p
l
o
y
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
1
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
2
R
e
f
u
r
b
i
s
h
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
P
o
i
n
t
1
D
e
p
l
o
y
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
V
&
V
V
&
V
B
u
i
l
d
3
B
u
i
l
d
4
.
1
B
u
i
l
d
5
B
u
i
l
d
6
F
i
n
a
l
C
a
s
a
n
d
r
a
C
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
31
31
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Currently operating on no cost extension of period of
performance through 6/30/2015
Following presentations will review progress to project
completion and technology risk associated with:
•
CI Design
•
CI Build Status
•
CI Testing
•
CI Completion
•
Marine Technologies Completion
The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) aims to sustain the delivery of ocean data, facilitate at-sea experiments, and expand observatory capabilities. It encompasses various sites and arrays to acquire, store, process, and distribute data. Recent changes include management transitions and development updates with key priorities focused on close out activities.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Overview May 2015
OOI Overarching Objectives The design requirements of the OOI lead to three essential objectives: Sustain, for decades, the delivery of multiple streams of ocean data, resolving ocean processes and properties across a range of temporal and spatial scales; Facilitate the use of the designed capabilities of the OOI for specific at-sea experiments or extension of the temporal and spatial reach of ocean research; Sustain the expansion capabilities of the observatory as technology evolves and in response to new science questions. OOI Review May 2015 2
Scope of the OOI Four Global high latitude sites Station Papa Irminger Sea Argentine Basin Southern Ocean Two Coastal Arrays Endurance Array Pioneer Array Cabled Array Meso-scale, Plate Scale network CyberInfrastructure Acquisition, Storage, Processing, and Distribution of Data OOI Review May 2015 3
OOI Organization Structure OOI Director M. Kelly OOI Integration Lead J. Pesaturo Cabled Array UW B. Ittig CyberInfrastructure PMO D. Sanshu Coastal/Global WHOI P. Matthias Endurance OSU E. Dever * CI transitions to full Rutgers leadership as OOI Net transitions to O&M CI/EPE Rutgers Crowley/Rodero OOI Review May 2015 4
Significant Changes within OOI January 2014, PMO took over direct management of CI-UCSD work effort due to concerns of inadequate progress towards delivery February 2014, contracted with Raytheon to develop a rapid prototype, based on their Universal Framework (uFrame) service oriented architecture used by National Weather Service AWIPS II June 2014, successful demonstration of uFrame prototype July 2014, PMO decided to transition away from software being developed at CI-UCSD due to lack of adequate defect closure rate and concerns of future maintainability July 2014, Rutgers begins transition to CI Implementing Organization August 2014, Raytheon under contract for full development of uFrame with PMO acting as Implementing Organization with transition to Rutgers OOI Review May 2015 5
Current priorities Manage the close out of Construction accounts across the project, assuring that sufficient funds remain to address the last emerging risks. Must align budget and staffing to only the most essential remaining work. Execute the transition to operations (second builds, first turns , shift to O&M $$) for all arrays OOI Review May 2015 6
Coastal - Pioneer Pioneer Final 6 3 5 2 2 2 Current 3 3 5 1 0 0 Coastal Gliders Surface Moorings Profiler Moorings Surface Piercing Profiling Mooring AUV AUV Docking Stations Challenges Technology Fuel cell AUV w/docking stations Coastal surface piercing profiler Environmental Equipment loss from interaction with other ocean users OOI Review May 2015 7
Coastal - Endurance Endurance Final 6 2 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 Current 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 Coastal Gliders Inshore Surface Moorings Surface Moorings Profiler Moorings Surface Piercing Profiler Mooring Cabled-Surface Piercing Profiler * Cabled-Benthic Experiment Pkg * Cabled-Deep Profiler * Cabled-Shallow Profiler * * also listed under Cabled Array Challenges Technology Fuel cell Coastal surface piercing profiler OOI Review May 2015 8
Global - Papa Papa Final 3 2 1 2 Current 1 0 1 2 Open Ocean Gliders Profiling Gliders Hybrid Profiler Mooring Flanking Mooring Surface piercing profiler removed at last maintenance replacement, Plan B to be developed Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve Profiler gliders to be installed at June 2015 maintenance cycle OOI Review May 2015 9
Global - Irminger Irminger Final 3 2 1 2 1 Current 1 0 1 2 1 Open Ocean Gliders Profiling Gliders Hybrid Profiler Mooring Flanking Mooring Surface Mooring Operating well with exception of Fleet Broadband on Surface Mooring which has not been operating since deployment Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve Profiler gliders not ready for deployment OOI Review May 2015 10
Global Southern Ocean, 55S Southern Ocean Final Current Open Ocean Gliders Profiling Gliders Hybrid Profiler Mooring Flanking Mooring Surface Mooring 3 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 Operating well with exception of acoustic modem on Hybrid Profiler mooring Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve Profiler gliders not ready for deployment OOI Review May 2015 11
Global Argentine Basin Argentine Basin Final Current Open Ocean Gliders Profiling Gliders Hybrid Profiler Mooring Flanking Mooring Surface Mooring 3 2 3 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 Operating well Open Ocean Glider problems, working with vendor to resolve Profiler gliders not ready for deployment OOI Review May 2015 12
Cabled As of 5/1/2015 Initial 138 2 1 0 0 0 3 4 148 5/1/2015 Status 104 3 4 5 5 23 0 4 148 Operational Partial Functionality Fail Troubleshooting Recovered Offline Not Tested Uncabled Total Challenges Technology Deep profiler OOI Review May 2015 13
Deployed Scope of OOI (over 800 instruments distributed over all moorings, benthic packages, seafloor nodes, gliders and AUVs) Global Arrays Coastal Arrays Subsystems Coastal Arrays Pioneer Components Instruments Service Frequency Subsystems Global Arrays Station Papa Components Instruments Service Frequency 3 Surface Moorings 2 Surface-Piercing Profilers Moorings 5 Profiler Moorings 3 AUVs 6 Gliders 3 Surface Moorings 2 Surface-Piercing Profilers Moorings 1 Hybrid Profiler Mooring 1 Benthic Experiment Package 1 Multi-Function Nodes 60 18 29 18 30 50 18 16 10 8 68 18 5 30 Twice a year 1 Subsurface Hybrid Profiler Mooring 2 Flanking Moorings 3 Gliders 1 Surface Mooring 1 Subsurface Hybrid Profiler Mooring 2 Flanking Moorings 3 Gliders 1 Surface Mooring 1 Subsurface Hybrid Profiler 2 Flanking Moorings 3 Gliders 1 Surface Mooring 1 Subsurface Hybrid Profiler 2 Flanking Moorings 3 Gliders 12 32 9 23 12 32 9 23 12 32 9 23 12 32 9 Yearly Irminger Sea Yearly Endurance (Oregon Line) Twice a year Southern Ocean Yearly Endurance (Washington Line) 3 Surface Moorings Twice a year 2 Surface-Piercing Profilers Moorings 1 Profiler Mooring 6 Gliders Argentine Basin Yearly Cabled Arrays Cyberinfrastructure Subsystems Regional Scale Nodes Hydrate Ridge Components Instruments Service Frequency Computing platforms, software applications, storage, and high speed network equipment Seafloor: Primary and Secondary Profiler Winched Profiler Wire crawler Midwater Platform@ 200m Bottom Instrument Package Seafloor: Primary and Secondary Profiler Winched Profiler Wire crawler Midwater Platform @ 200m Bottom Instrument Package 16 10 5 8 6 26 10 5 8 6 Yearly Cyber Points of Presence (CyberPoPs) Acquisition Points Distribution Points Integrated Observatory Network OOI Net Hardware / Software Axial Seamount Yearly Redundant computing environment Connected by 880km of seafloor cable, with 10KW power, internet connectivity between 7 primary nodes, multiple secondary nodes, and all distributed instrumentation Extensive details about each component can be found on the OOI website (http://oceanobservatories.org) OOI Review May 2015 14
CyberInfrastructure Highlights All data from deployed infrastructure is being stored, regardless of OOINet readiness level OOINet has ingested data from deployed Pioneer moorings and gliders, Papa and Endurance gliders, as well as initial Build 1B Cabled instruments Attempted to deliver pre-commissioned data via interim user interface, but resource drain was impacting ability to deliver production OOI Net Rutgers staff has ramped up and will be ready to assume O&M role OOI Review May 2015 15
Overall CI Architecture Institutional VPN VPN/NGFW VPN/NGFW West Coast CI (Pittock) Flexible network architecture Decentralized network architecture with 5 P2P connected sites (OMC- WHOI, OMC-OSU, OMC- SIO, RSN, CI-RU) Independent administrative domains (e.g., IP space) Supports both VPN and non-VPN configurations PNWGP/MAPGI (Internet2/AL2S) East Coast CI (RU) VPN/NGFW VPN/NGFW PNWGP VPN/NGFW Dedicated circuit Institutional VPN VPN/NGFW RSN Pacific City VPN/NGFW Final users (Portal) VPN/NGFW Cabled Instruments VPN/NGFW Commercial Internet VPN/NGFW Institutional VPN OMC WHOI Security Short-term: traditional firewall system (iptables) Long-term: Latest generation firewall appliances to consolidate security layers OMC OSU Institutional VPN VPN/NGFW Un cabled Instruments VPN/NGFW VPN/NGFW Un cabled Instruments VPN/NGFW Highly available latest generation firewall appliances Un cabled Instruments External connections Leverages institutional VPN infrastructure OMC SIO Institutional VPN Remote dial in users OOI Review May 2015 16
CI - Build Descriptions Build 1 Proof of Concept Ingests data, applies algorithms, provides data products 23 sensors integrated Build 3 (cont) User Interface (cont) Prototype health status/monitoring, trouble ticket integration, operator turnover Sensors/Algorithms 12 New sensors/algorithms integrated Build 2 Data Management Capability to record and manage deployed moorings and platforms User Interface prototype Plotting, charting, SW Management, landing page Sensors/Algorithms 35 New sensors/algorithms integrated Build 4 User Interface refinements Command and Control prototype Asset Management prototype QA/QC analysis results, Alarms and Alerts, ERDDAP integration Help/FAQ/Glossasry/Tool Tips All Algorithms integrated User Interface complete Sensors/Algorithms 31 New sensors/algorithms integrated Build 3 Data Management complete Provenance tracking, life-cycle management User Interface refinements Manage user accounts, annotate data, update metadata, Build 5 User Interface Complete Sensors Complete 31 New sensors/algorithms integrated All builds include sensor drivers/parsers and algorithms All builds post Build 1, include incremental UI functionality OOI Review May 2015 17
OOI Net User Testing and Release Alpha testing Based on OOI Net Build 4 User consist of OOI Project Scientist and Operators, member of UNOLS OOSC, and NSF Defined methodology for user feedback to software build team May 2015 Beta testing Based on OOI Net Build 5 Alpha continue use of system OOI work with NSF to define criteria for selection of Beta users with a linkage to upcoming proposals June 2015 Commissioned Release September 2015 OOI Review May 2015 18
CI Data Management Pioneer mini-workshop held in February Attendance OOI Team, invited external SMEs, UNOLS OOSC Review of initial data and Rutgers proposed Quick Looks Recommendations of proposed deep dives by Data Evaluators Review of Data QA/QC algorithms OOSC provided prioritized list of recommendations Other Array level workshops to follow OOI Team to run mini-workshops for initial data review OOSC will run community workshops Workshop dates are driven by data availability through OOINet OOI Review May 2015 19
Technical Issues and Risks for OOI Surface-piercing profiler technology is not as mature as initially expected. Global surface-piercing profiler was descoped and is being replaced by gliders functioning as virtual moorings. Coastal surface-piercing profiler, long-term performance to be assessed. (WHOI SIO OSU - OL) Risk: hoped-for advances in vertical resolution of upper-ocean processes (supporting the transformative aspect of the OOI) must await further progress by vendors (partially mitigated) Vertical moorings deployed within the cabled array have technical issues to resolve, specific to the deep and shallower profiler. Remaining shallow profiler continues successful testing. Deep profiler issues identified and resolution in progress. Testing in progress. (UW- OL) Risk: hoped-for advances in vertical resolution of upper-ocean processes (supporting the transformative aspect of the OOI) must await further progress with technology reliability. (low technical risk, moderate schedule risk) OOI Review May 2015 20
Technical Issues and Risks for OOI The AUV docking system is scheduled for Spring 2015 deployment within the Pioneer Array. In-water tests demonstrated some success. Docking system complexity and final design changes could lead to a schedule problem. (WHOI - OL) Risk: AUVs may need to be descoped, eliminating the resolution planned to be obtained by the AUVs (high risk). Fuel cell development continues for the surface moorings, but progress has been slower than expected. Unit failed to operate on recent deployment, and was immediately recovered. Failure analysis indicated root cause, but partial redesign requirement for remediation. (WHOI - OL) Risk: Mission duration may be impacted by lack of full power from wind and solar generators for charging AUV batteries eliminating the resolution planned to be obtained by the AUVs (moderate to high risk). OOI Review May 2015 21
Budget & Funding Status MREFC fully funded NSF has provided the full MREFC funding to Ocean Leadership and OL has distributed to each Implementing Organization Control Account Closeouts OL is actively closing out accounts to be prepared for the period of performance completion Weekly meetings are held to coordinate with all of the finance staff Closed accounts are flagged in the accounting system to prevent new charges from posting OOI Review May 2015 22
Summary Program Financials Summary Program Financials (Construction) ($M) as of March 2015 ARRA fully spent and closed MREFC remaining to spend is $29.39M, of which $7.28M is already obligated The current contingency balance is $2.9M. OOI is actively monitoring risks which, if realized will further reduce this figure Funding provided Program Total ARRA 105.93 MREFC 280.23 Total 386.16 $ $ $ Current Baseline Budget PMO UCSD WHOI UW OSU Rutgers Subtotal Contingency Total ARRA 9.46 9.28 19.24 67.96 - - 105.93 - 105.93 MREFC 39.07 24.37 105.21 88.49 12.27 7.91 277.33 2.90 280.23 Total 48.53 33.65 124.45 156.45 12.27 7.91 383.26 2.90 386.16 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Cumulative Expenditures PMO UCSD WHOI UW OSU Rutgers Subtotal ARRA 9.46 9.28 19.24 67.96 - - 105.93 MREFC 32.27 24.31 89.69 87.26 11.49 5.82 250.84 Total 41.73 33.59 108.93 155.21 11.49 5.82 356.77 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Balance Obligations Unobligated Balance $ $ $ - - - $ $ $ 29.39 7.28 22.11 $ $ $ 29.39 7.28 22.11 OOI Review May 2015 23
Unobligated balance by IO Contingency, $2.9 M, 13% Unobligated Balance by IO ($M) as of March 2015 Rutgers, $1.66 M, 8% PMO, $6.23 M, 28% ObligationsUnobligated Balance 0.57 $ - $ 6.07 $ 0.06 $ 0.15 $ 0.43 $ 7.28 $ IO Current Budget Expended OSU, $.63 M, 3% PMO UCSD WHOI UW OSU Rutgers Subtotal Contingency Total $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 39.07 24.37 105.21 88.49 12.27 7.91 277.33 2.90 280.23 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 32.27 24.31 89.69 87.26 11.49 5.82 250.84 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6.23 0.06 9.45 1.17 0.63 1.66 19.21 2.90 22.11 UW, $1.17 M, 5% UCSD, $.06 M, 0% $ 250.84 $ 7.28 WHOI, $9.45 M, 43% OOI Review May 2015 24
Unobligated balance - PMO Bulk of remaining PMO budget: Potential resolution of claims currently working through ratification process with former CyberInfrastructure Implementing Organization Raytheon work for CI Management Support and uFrame build PMO Balance: Former CI IO claims Raytheon IIS, invoiced Raytheon IIS, budget remaining Raytheon IDS, budget remaining PMO TOTAL PMO $1,155,075 $1,971,097 $1,738,000 $1,118,258 $247,637 $6,230,067 OOI Review May 2015 25
Unobligated balance - WHOI Remaining Unobligated balance of $9.45m Categories of remaining funding: Main construction cruises are complete Cost reviews have identified $1.5m available for immediate re-budgeting Expect additional funding to become available as weekly financial close out meetings continue OOI Review May 2015 26
Contingency-Risk Snapshot Current Remaining Contingency ($M) $ 2.90 Remaining Risks: 9000 CI - Execution Risks ($1.5m equipment, $500k labor) $ (2.00) 3130 Open Ocean Gliders $ (0.18) 3525 Coastal Surface Piercing Profiler $ (0.19) 1010 Ship time weather delays and equipment damage $ (0.50) 0000 Misc Risk Items $ (0.03) Subtotal $ (2.90) Balance $ 0.00 Intend to close above Risk with the exception of 9000 CI-Execution Risks OOI Review May 2015 27
Proposed Contingency Risk Closeout PROPOSED OOI CONTINGENCY AND REBUDGET SPEND DOWN Additional Funding - Contingency Additional Funding - Rebudget Completion Date Comments Implement Build 6 to provide the required functionality to complete OOINet CyberInfrastructure $2,430,000 $1,500,000 $300,000 $500,000 $130,000 $0 9/4/2015 Hardware Integration and Management Build System Completion and deployment of 2 AUVs and 2 Docking Stations AUV and AUV Docking Station $0 $462,000 10/31/2015 Completion and deployment of 1 Fuel Cell Surface Mooring Fuel Cell $0 $150,000 10/31/2015 Fully funded, requires no cost extension of Period of Peformance due to changes in UNOLS ship schedules Cabled Deep Profiler Mooring TOTAL COST ALL WORK Extensions Available Contingency/Rebudget Remaining Contingency/Rebudget $0 $0 8/15/2015 $2,430,000 $2,900,000 $470,000 $612,000 $1,500,000 $888,000 OOI Review May 2015 28
Schedule OOI Review May 2015 29
Schedule Milestones to Complete September May August July June Commissioning Conditional Acceptance Station Papa Irminger Conditional Acceptance Southern Ocean Argentine Basin Endurance - ISM/CSPP/Gliders Conditional Acceptance Deploy Pioneer - CSPP/Gliders - AUV / Dock - Fuel Cell Deploy Decision Point 2 Deploy Decision Point 3 Shallow water test Longevity Test Decision Point 1 Refurbish Increment 1 Increment 2 Refurbish Conditional Acceptance Cabled - Deep Profiler Deploy Build 3 Build 4.1 Build 5 Build 6 CI V & V V & V V & V V & V Final Casandra Configuration OOI Review May 2015
Overview Summary Currently operating on no cost extension of period of performance through 6/30/2015 Following presentations will review progress to project completion and technology risk associated with: CI Design CI Build Status CI Testing CI Completion Marine Technologies Completion OOI Review May 2015 31
