Nuclear Data Covariances Workshop Summary 2020

Slide Note
Embed
Share

This workshop, held at the Elliott School of International Affairs, discussed the impact of unrealistic or missing cross-section covariances in nuclear data activities. The need for complete nuclear data covariances, methods for credibility evaluation, and challenges with missing and questionable covariances were addressed. The importance of experimental data in testing credibility and improving evaluations was highlighted, along with the necessity of determining uncertainties for model and parameter impacts.


Uploaded on Sep 15, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of Unrealistic or Missing Cross Section Covariances Workshop for Applied Nuclear Data Activities 2020 Elliott School of International Affairs at The George Washington University Teresa Bailey Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory March 4, 2020 LLNL-PRES-805976 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

  2. Distribution of data with select covariances Evaluations that include (n,el), (n,n ), (n,2n), and (n, ) covariances: Naturally abundant 2 LLNL-PRES-805976

  3. Missing and questionable covariances Missing (n,n ), (n,2n), or (n,z) covariances: Gamma production, transport, destruction ENDF/B-VIII.0 100% abundant ENDF/B-VIII.0 100% abundant Questionable covariances: Overestimates uncertainty contribution ENDF/B-VIII.0 ENDF/B-VIII.0 ENDF/B-VIII.0 3 LLNL-PRES-805976

  4. Low-Fi evaluations with available experimental data Could experimental data be used to test whether these are credible or improve them? Low-Fi Low-Fi Low-Fi 69% abundant 100% abundant Low-Fi Low-Fi Low-Fi 49% abundant 100% abundant 4 LLNL-PRES-805976

  5. LLNL consensus needs for covariances Complete nuclear data covariances needed for applied UQ studies. Needs can t be established without these. Methods for determining credibility of evaluation needed: Visual validation provides initial approximation. Covariances in (n,n ), (n,2n), and (n,z) needed for many isotopes: (n,n ) and (n,2n) covariances often missing from ENDF/B-VIII.0. Some ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariances are difficult to interpret (e.g. sums like (n,2n)+(n,2np) ). (n,z) covariances frequently missing from ENDF/B-VIII.0 and Low-Fi. Approximate methods for filling in missing and bad covariances needed: Extension of Low-Fi strategy could be a useful starting point for missing reactions. Kyle Wendt will present about a machine learning technique applied to experimental data. Need for proper estimation of model and parameter uncertainties and their impact on pure theory covariances. 5 LLNL-PRES-805976

  6. Some nuclear cross sections of interest with missing, limited, or inconsistent data Isotope Reaction Notes 9Be n-g Two lines are fitted to one point 12C/14N/16O n-n g Very limited data 58Fe n-g Very limited data 183W n-p No data to constrain the threshold 190Pt n-2n No data to constrain the threshold 190Pt n-p No data available 233U n-2n No data available 235U/239Pu n-n Incomplete energy-angle data 239U n-g Only one data point available Peer review from LANL has begun We would like help in assessing, choosing, or performing measurements with a minimum of 10% uncertainty LLNL Presented this slide last year; we will continue to update this as needed and present it 6 LLNL-PRES-805976

  7. Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

Related


More Related Content