Neutron Usage and Innovation Discussion

Jürgen Neuhaus (MLZ) and Philip King (ISIS)
 
Working Group on Neutron usage and
Innovation (WG2)
General Topics under discussion
Education
 (Victoria Garcia-Sakai, Reiner Zorn)
Awards
 (all, later on executing subgroup)
User organisation 
(all)
Industrial users 
(Marc Thiry, Caroline Boudou)
New user communities 
(all)
Assessment
 (all)
Best practice 
(all)
Education
Funding for e-learning
, maintain existing portal and further develop it
(instrument training), highly complementary to schools. Should be promoted
further through LENS (all).  Costs need to be assessed.
Funding of neutron schools
, level compared to previous EU programs; most
schools benefit with either small help or are highly dependant on funding.
LENS school with specific focus
 on gaps: new user communities or mission
related, specific needs (example: data analysis on QENS)
Survey
 the user on schools and training to monitor effectiveness.
WP to create virtual instruments for each facility so that 
training courses can be
done in the shutdowns.
Collection of scientific highlights from all facilities (PowerPoint slides); generic
slides on ‘why neutrons’, ‘how to get neutrons & where’, etc…
Awards
Main objectives: Raising the visibility of LENS, promoting diversity in neutron usage
Existing neutron related international prizes:
Hälg Prize 10.000CHF; 
Levy Berthaut 1500€
; 
Neutron Instrumentation and Innovation
Award
 2072 CHF
LENS Mission Award: 
Addressing Grand Challenges where major achievement is
based on the use of neutron research
Criteria scientific achievement with impact on Science discipline, societal or economic
impact, education, collaboration on international level
Prize: 5000€
Prize ceremony at LENS GA or at a subject-specific meeting. Prize lecture during the meeting, broad communication by
LENS communication group, News on web-pages, Newsletter, press releases, video story of the winner and topic.
Award could be annually on any frequency, starting proposition every two years,
Nominations for a topic as defined by the GA; selection committee defined by EB: submission criteria depends on topic
(publications, patens, etc.).
User Organisation
Not duplication existing initiatives
: existing network / meeting between UO
staff.  
Next will be organised by ELI in Prague in April 2020. Suggestion of
organisation under the Association of European-Level Research Infrastructures
Facilities (ERF-AISBL)
LENS topics
Can we list and possibley coordinate National and European user meetings?
Developing an independent profile against national and international neutron
conferences (ECNS, ICNS)
Link to additional activities like education, schools
Access modes for users to instruments, experiment operation, remote access;
exchange of experience.
Industrial users
Continuation of successful SINE2020 activities
Network of European neutron facilities‘ ILO (coordinated action with LEAPS)
Exchange of feasibility requests from industry
Expand industrial case studies library (LENS homepage)
Further actions
Approaching dedicated industrial sectors (pharma, engineering, batteries) and
focused techniques (imaging, analytics, irradiation). Synergy with „LENS
ambassador programme“
Promotion material dedicated to industry within one year
Future projects
Application of EU project regarding industrial service (together with LEAPS)
Lobbying for new funding schemes like Swedish VINNOVA programme – focus on
industry (companies are funded for the use of large scale facilities in collaboration
with academic partners)
Industrial users
Resources required
1 FTE as 
ILO in each facility
 for the first 3 years with the goal to be self-
sustaining and expanding in future (income by industry projects)
Funding
 for one 
annual meeting of ILO
 (collaboration with LEAPS):
6kEUR/year
Maintainance of 
case study library
: Communication officer 3-4 weeks/year
publishing existing and new case studies
 to LENS corporate identity
(Brightness2 support?)
Staff to attend and present at on-neutron events and roadshows („LENS
ambassador programme“): ILOs + scientists, effort tbd.
New User communities
LENS Ambassador Programme
Encourage lecture series around universities
; 
Commission some experts in topics &
neutrons to deliver seminars at key places / country tour / non-neutron conferences
LENS funds the lecture tours.
Promotion at conferences, performed by a booth of one LENS partner including LENS
promotion material
 
Neutron Pathfinder
Useful for proposal sharing
Value and application needs further evaluation, would require significant resources
Needs analysis on benefits of WayForLight
Other methods of introducing new users may be more effective
Strong link to education activities WG2.2
  
Assessment
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
 
o
f
 
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
 
i
n
 
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
 
o
f
 
K
P
I
 
f
o
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
 
a
n
d
 
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
 
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
.
Added value by harmonisation of some statistics.
Exchange of data between LENS partners for evaluation and reporting
purposes.
I
m
p
a
c
t
 
o
f
 
 
n
e
u
t
r
o
n
 
R
I
How to demonstrate impact more widely to the external community,
including societal impact, return on investment, etc. Exchange and
discussions of EU-programs and initiatives.
Best practice
Best practice in research infrastructure management
Networking of RI managers (LENS and other organisations)
Staff training; webinars
Staff exchange of infrastructure managers, technical staff and
scientists
Engage with RAMIRI / RITRAIN EU projects.
Thank you
Jürgen Neuhaus
Technische Universität München, Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum
85747 Garching, Germany
juergen.neuhaus@frm2.tum.de
Philip King
ISIS Neutron and Muon Source
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory​​​
Didcot, United Kingdom
philip.king@stfc.ac.uk
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This content discusses various topics related to neutron usage and innovation, including education, awards, user organization, and best practices. It emphasizes funding for e-learning, maintaining portals, and developing virtual instruments for training. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of awards in raising visibility and promoting diversity in neutron research. User organization initiatives focus on coordinating national and European user meetings while developing an independent profile within the neutron research community.

  • Neutron Usage
  • Innovation
  • Awards
  • User Organization
  • Best Practices

Uploaded on Mar 04, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Working Group on Neutron usage and Innovation (WG2) J rgen Neuhaus (MLZ) and Philip King (ISIS)

  2. General Topics under discussion Education (Victoria Garcia-Sakai, Reiner Zorn) Awards (all, later on executing subgroup) User organisation (all) Industrial users (Marc Thiry, Caroline Boudou) New user communities (all) Assessment (all) Best practice (all)

  3. Education Funding for e-learning, maintain existing portal and further develop it (instrument training), highly complementary to schools. Should be promoted further through LENS (all). Costs need to be assessed. Funding of neutron schools, level compared to previous EU programs; most schools benefit with either small help or are highly dependant on funding. LENS school with specific focus on gaps: new user communities or mission related, specific needs (example: data analysis on QENS) Survey the user on schools and training to monitor effectiveness. WP to create virtual instruments for each facility so that training courses can be done in the shutdowns. Collection of scientific highlights from all facilities (PowerPoint slides); generic slides on why neutrons , how to get neutrons & where , etc

  4. Awards Main objectives: Raising the visibility of LENS, promoting diversity in neutron usage Existing neutron related international prizes: H lg Prize 10.000CHF; Levy Berthaut 1500 ; Neutron Instrumentation and Innovation Award 2072 CHF LENS Mission Award: Addressing Grand Challenges where major achievement is based on the use of neutron research Criteria scientific achievement with impact on Science discipline, societal or economic impact, education, collaboration on international level Prize: 5000 Prize ceremony at LENS GA or at a subject-specific meeting. Prize lecture during the meeting, broad communication by LENS communication group, News on web-pages, Newsletter, press releases, video story of the winner and topic. Award could be annually on any frequency, starting proposition every two years, Nominations for a topic as defined by the GA; selection committee defined by EB: submission criteria depends on topic (publications, patens, etc.).

  5. User Organisation Not duplication existing initiatives: existing network / meeting between UO staff. Next will be organised by ELI in Prague in April 2020. Suggestion of organisation under the Association of European-Level Research Infrastructures Facilities (ERF-AISBL) LENS topics Can we list and possibley coordinate National and European user meetings? Developing an independent profile against national and international neutron conferences (ECNS, ICNS) Link to additional activities like education, schools Access modes for users to instruments, experiment operation, remote access; exchange of experience.

  6. Industrial users Continuation of successful SINE2020 activities Network of European neutron facilities ILO (coordinated action with LEAPS) Exchange of feasibility requests from industry Expand industrial case studies library (LENS homepage) Further actions Approaching dedicated industrial sectors (pharma, engineering, batteries) and focused techniques (imaging, analytics, irradiation). Synergy with LENS ambassador programme Promotion material dedicated to industry within one year Future projects Application of EU project regarding industrial service (together with LEAPS) Lobbying for new funding schemes like Swedish VINNOVA programme focus on industry (companies are funded for the use of large scale facilities in collaboration with academic partners)

  7. Industrial users Resources required 1 FTE as ILO in each facility for the first 3 years with the goal to be self- sustaining and expanding in future (income by industry projects) Funding for one annual meeting of ILO (collaboration with LEAPS): 6kEUR/year Maintainance of case study library: Communication officer 3-4 weeks/year publishing existing and new case studies to LENS corporate identity (Brightness2 support?) Staff to attend and present at on-neutron events and roadshows ( LENS ambassador programme ): ILOs + scientists, effort tbd.

  8. New User communities LENS Ambassador Programme Encourage lecture series around universities; Commission some experts in topics & neutrons to deliver seminars at key places / country tour / non-neutron conferences LENS funds the lecture tours. Promotion at conferences, performed by a booth of one LENS partner including LENS promotion material Neutron Pathfinder Useful for proposal sharing Value and application needs further evaluation, would require significant resources Needs analysis on benefits of WayForLight Other methods of introducing new users may be more effective Strong link to education activities WG2.2

  9. Assessment Discussion and exchange of experience in establishment of KPI for evaluation and reporting purpose. Added value by harmonisation of some statistics. Exchange of data between LENS partners for evaluation and reporting purposes. Impact of neutron RI How to demonstrate impact more widely to the external community, including societal impact, return on investment, etc. Exchange and discussions of EU-programs and initiatives.

  10. Best practice Best practice in research infrastructure management Networking of RI managers (LENS and other organisations) Staff training; webinars Staff exchange of infrastructure managers, technical staff and scientists Engage with RAMIRI / RITRAIN EU projects.

  11. Thank you J rgen Neuhaus 85747 Garching, Germany juergen.neuhaus@frm2.tum.de Technische Universit t M nchen, Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum Philip King ISIS Neutron and Muon Source Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot, United Kingdom philip.king@stfc.ac.uk

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#