Medical Records in Legal Proceedings

MEDICAL RECORDS
Admissabilty:
Hearsay exceptions
Authentication
Who can sponsor the evidence?
What can it be used for?
How to get it in?
What to do with it?
Raising broader issues
 
MEDICAL RECORD EXHIBITS:
Exhibit D: Ambulance “run report”
Exhibit E: Clearwater Hospital Discharge
Summary
Exhibit F: Clearwater Medical Group
progress note
CASE STIPULATIONS
1. All of the exhibits are authentic and the
authenticity of an exhibit is never at issue.
Authentic exhibits are not necessarily admissible
at trial.
5. This case is bifurcated as to liability and
damages. Liability is being tried in this case; if
Smid is successful, damages will be tried on a
later date.
CASE STIPULATIONS
6. While certification pages were not provided,
both sides agree that Exhibit D (ambulance
report), Exhibit E (hospital report), and Exhibit F
(prior medical report) were properly certified.
Additionally, both parties provided proper
pretrial notification regarding the use of Exhibits
D, E, and F under Rule 803(6m).
At its core, hearsay is nothing more than:
A statement
Made out of court
Being offered as the truth
Sammy Smid
“I have been diagnosed with a
seizure disorder.”
Wis. stat. § 908.03
These exceptions are generally utterances
made contemporaneously with some
physical perception or experience (present
sense impression, excited utterance, etc.),
or
Records that document some benign or
non-controversial event, or reputable
publications (marriage records, birth
certificates, learned treatises, etc...)
Rule 803
“The following are not excluded by the
hearsay rule, even though the declarant is
available as a witness…”
803(4)
(
4
)
 
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
 
f
o
r
 
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
 
o
f
 
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
d
i
a
g
n
o
s
i
s
 
o
r
 
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
.
 
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
 
m
a
d
e
f
o
r
 
t
h
e
 
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
 
o
f
 
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
 
d
i
a
g
n
o
s
i
s
 
o
r
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
.
(6m) 
Patient Health Care Records
. 
Authentication witness
unnecessary. 
A custodian or other qualified witness required by sub. (6)
is unnecessary if the party who intends to offer patient health care
records into evidence at a trial or hearing does one of the following at
least 40 days before the trial or hearing:
i. Serves upon all appearing parties an accurate, legible and complete
duplicate of the patient health care records for a stated period certified by
the record custodian.
ii. Notifies all appearing parties that an accurate, legible and complete
duplicate of the patient health care records for a stated period certified by
the record custodian is available for inspection and copying during
reasonable business hours at a specified location within the county in
which the trial or hearing will be held.
Presumption. 
Billing statements or invoices that are patient health care
records are presumed to state the reasonable value of the health care
services provided and the health care services provided are presumed to
be reasonable and necessary to the care of the patient.
CASE STIPULATIONS
6. While certification pages were not provided,
both sides agree that Exhibit D (ambulance
report), Exhibit E (hospital report), and Exhibit F
(prior medical report) were properly certified.
Additionally, both parties provided proper
pretrial notification regarding the use of Exhibits
D, E, and F under Rule 803(6m).
WHY??
Hakenkord v. State
, 100 Wis. 2d 452 (1981)
“In respect to the hearsay rule, a hospital
record clearly falls within the category of
evidence that is so reliable that no only
factual observations recorded in hospital
records but medical opinions and diagnosis
may be admitted into evidence upon
compliance with the procedural rules even
though the declarants, the makers of the
records, are available for cross examination.”
H
e
a
r
s
a
y
 
a
n
d
 
e
x
p
e
r
t
s
703 allows an expert to rely on otherwise
inadmissible evidence to formulate opinions.
HOWEVER…
That evidence must be the kind regularly
relied upon by experts in their field.
Is it??
Common mistakes in offering
exhibits…
Not adequately explaining to the jury what
it is
Ignoring the exhibit after admission
Not using the exhibit with other witnesses
as warranted
Not referencing to the exhibit in closing
Raising Broader Issues…
Support the broader goals of mock trial as
a program:
Better understanding of not only how the legal
system works, but why
Spark discussion of moral and societal issues
How the case relates to real life current
events
Teaching critical thinking skills that translate
to other areas of life
Raising Broader Issues…
The Ferguson case
Frank Jude
Burden of Proof: civil vs. criminal
Simpson trial, not guilty but found civilly
responsible
What is the rationale behind certain rules
Guest speaker?
Solutions?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7jggCcfyjE
 
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Medical records play a crucial role in legal cases as evidence, subject to rules like authentication and exceptions to hearsay. Exhibits such as ambulance reports and discharge summaries are commonly used. Hearsay exceptions like statements for medical diagnosis and treatment are allowed. Proper certification and notification protocols must be followed. The core of hearsay involves out-of-court statements offered as truth. Rules like Wis. stat. 908.03 and Rule 803 govern the admissibility of such evidence.

  • Medical records
  • Legal proceedings
  • Hearsay exceptions
  • Authentication
  • Exhibits

Uploaded on Sep 14, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MEDICAL RECORDS Admissabilty: Hearsay exceptions Authentication Who can sponsor the evidence? What can it be used for? How to get it in? What to do with it? Raising broader issues

  2. MEDICAL RECORD EXHIBITS: Exhibit D: Ambulance run report Exhibit E: Clearwater Hospital Discharge Summary Exhibit F: Clearwater Medical Group progress note

  3. CASE STIPULATIONS 1. All of the exhibits are authentic and the authenticity of an exhibit is never at issue. Authentic exhibits are not necessarily admissible at trial. 5. This case is bifurcated as to liability and damages. Liability is being tried in this case; if Smid is successful, damages will be tried on a later date.

  4. CASE STIPULATIONS 6. While certification pages were not provided, both sides agree that Exhibit D (ambulance report), Exhibit E (hospital report), and Exhibit F (prior medical report) were properly certified. Additionally, both parties provided proper pretrial notification regarding the use of Exhibits D, E, and F under Rule 803(6m).

  5. At its core, hearsay is nothing more than: A statement Made out of court Being offered as the truth

  6. Sammy Smid I have been diagnosed with a seizure disorder.

  7. Wis. stat. 908.03 These exceptions are generally utterances made contemporaneously with some physical perception or experience (present sense impression, excited utterance, etc.), or Records that document some benign or non-controversial event, or reputable publications (marriage records, birth certificates, learned treatises, etc...)

  8. Rule 803 The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness

  9. 803(4) (4) Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment. Statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.

  10. (6m) Patient Health Care Records. Authentication witness unnecessary. A custodian or other qualified witness required by sub. (6) is unnecessary if the party who intends to offer patient health care records into evidence at a trial or hearing does one of the following at least 40 days before the trial or hearing: i. Serves upon all appearing parties an accurate, legible and complete duplicate of the patient health care records for a stated period certified by the record custodian. ii. Notifies all appearing parties that an accurate, legible and complete duplicate of the patient health care records for a stated period certified by the record custodian is available for inspection and copying during reasonable business hours at a specified location within the county in which the trial or hearing will be held. Presumption. Billing statements or invoices that are patient health care records are presumed to state the reasonable value of the health care services provided and the health care services provided are presumed to be reasonable and necessary to the care of the patient.

  11. CASE STIPULATIONS 6. While certification pages were not provided, both sides agree that Exhibit D (ambulance report), Exhibit E (hospital report), and Exhibit F (prior medical report) were properly certified. Additionally, both parties provided proper pretrial notification regarding the use of Exhibits D, E, and F under Rule 803(6m).

  12. WHY?? Hakenkord v. State, 100 Wis. 2d 452 (1981) In respect to the hearsay rule, a hospital record clearly falls within the category of evidence that is so reliable that no only factual observations recorded in hospital records but medical opinions and diagnosis may be admitted into evidence upon compliance with the procedural rules even though the declarants, the makers of the records, are available for cross examination.

  13. Hearsay and experts 703 allows an expert to rely on otherwise inadmissible evidence to formulate opinions. HOWEVER That evidence must be the kind regularly relied upon by experts in their field. Is it??

  14. Common mistakes in offering exhibits Not adequately explaining to the jury what it is Ignoring the exhibit after admission Not using the exhibit with other witnesses as warranted Not referencing to the exhibit in closing

  15. Raising Broader Issues Support the broader goals of mock trial as a program: Better understanding of not only how the legal system works, but why Spark discussion of moral and societal issues How the case relates to real life current events Teaching critical thinking skills that translate to other areas of life

  16. Raising Broader Issues The Ferguson case Frank Jude Burden of Proof: civil vs. criminal Simpson trial, not guilty but found civilly responsible What is the rationale behind certain rules Guest speaker? Solutions?

  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7jggCcfyjE

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#