Meaning-Making in Transactional Analysis

W
h
o
 
a
m
 
I
?
A
n
d
 
w
h
a
t
 
a
r
e
 
w
e
 
d
o
i
n
g
 
h
e
r
e
?
An exploration of our understanding of ‘meaning making’ in
Transactional Analysis
 
 
Rebecca Elston 2022
 
Today we will explore
 
 
A few of the concepts used in our traditional TA approach to
understanding individual meaning making
Our individual connection to place
How we might broaden the frame of our work in TA to account for
more than human influence
Emerging concept ideas, developed in line with the principals of
Eco TA, which support this new frame
How we might apply this to our work with clients
 
Saying Hello
Who are you? Where are you from? What are you hoping for from this time today?
 
Who am I?
A Traditional TA Approach
One of the key concepts we work with in TA is Script (Berne, 1972). It gives us a
common understanding of how a person has come to be who they are based
on their subjective meaning making of intrapersonal experiences with primary
caregivers.
“A script is an ongoing life plan formed in early
childhood under parental pressure"  Berne (1972)
 
Who am I? A Traditional TA Approach
“The Script Beliefs and Feelings are all the Parent and Child contaminations
of the Adult based upon and supporting script decisions” (Erskine &
Zalcman 1979)
 
When working with our clients in TA, to gain an understand
about how they are in the world, we often seek to explore their
beliefs about:
 
Self
 
Others
 
The World
 
Personal Reflection
5 minutes – Note down your own beliefs about self, other and the world as you know them to be.
We will return to this later.
 
What’s missing is the ‘where?’
 
Psychotherapy, has been traditionally an indoor, interpersonal practice. Research is increasingly pointing to the benefits of
being connected to nature, learnings from which could enhance our work.
A study in San Francisco showed an increase in affective benefits and cognitive benefits when a 50 minute walk was
taken in nature, compared to a 50 minute walk in an urban environment (Bratman, Daily, Levy & Gross 2015)
 
A study published in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health reviewing a collection of studies concluded that there
was evidence to support the effectiveness of nature-assisted therapy as a resource for public health, observing
improvements in varied diagnoses, spanning from obesity to schizophrenia (Annerstedt &, Wahrborg 2011)
 
Research conducted on behalf of the RSPB found that only 21% of children in the UK felt connected to nature (Hughes,
Richardson & Lumber 2018)
 
95% of adults stating that the intrinsic value of nature in their daily life has been important to them in some way
(Countryside Charity Research Paper, 2022)
 
Break Out Groups - Introductions
10 minutes - Introduce yourselves and share some of your favourite outdoor spaces from childhood to today.
What do you like about those places?
Exercise – learning from the landscape
 
In your outdoor spaces, take time for the following 30 minute exercise:
 
Questionning the TA Frame of
Reference
 
“It is important to understand how we have positioned ourselves as beings with
interiors who view exteriors, and how these exteriors were positioned as
something extrinsic to the selves who viewed them” (Jordan, 2015)
 
Discussion
How might we enhance the existing ways we have of
working with clients to account for the impact that
place has on script?
Evolving how we think about Script –
The Aggregate Script Helix
 
Aggregate Script Helix: Elston (2022), Adapted From Script Helix: Summers & Tudor (2000 & 2014)
P
A
C
P
A
C
P
A
C
P
A
C
P
A
C
P
A
C
P
A
C
 
Race
 
Gender
 
Sexuality
 
Social Class
 
Religion
 
Ability / Disability
 
Self
 
Ecological Context
 
Self
: Made up of all of the influences from others
and landscapes, a live and changing structure,
responsive to new stimulus
Theme
: A key area of identity for the individual,
made up of all of the ego states of ‘others’ who
the subject has interacted with and made
meaning from and the influence and meaning
made from experience with landscape
Encounter
: The act of self, meeting other in place,
resulting in subjective meaning making (the
absence of other is as significant as the presence
of other)
 
Note
:
Themes are subjective, I have listed a few common themes which may occur,
be curious to the themes of clients individually. The number of themes is also
subjective.
 
Challenging the Frame
 
How do we as practitioners ensure that we are constantly
checking for that which we might be discounting?
 
Eco therapy research to date is predominantly from Western
countries (UK, Europe and US)
 
What do we think of when we imagine ‘landscape’?
Romanticised ideas of where we can do this work would
exclude many practitioners and clients
 
66% of the UK population live in predominantly urban
locations, however only 4.25 local greenspaces per 1000
people are found in urban areas, contrasting the 29.39 local
greenspaces per 1000 people in predominantly rural areas
(Countryside Charity Research, 2022)
 
We or our clients may not have a secure relationship with
certain landscapes, each individual’s experience is different -
outdoor work may not be the right type of work for all clients
 
Accessibility, location, disability, safety…
 
What does ’ecopsychology’ mean?
”In Greek, 
oikos
 or “eco” means “home,” 
psyche
 is “soul, ”
and 
logos 
is the “word” or “story.” So a poetic translation
might be “the story of the home of the soul” or “the story of
the soul of home”” (Robinson, 2009 – 
see Buzzell & Chalquist
)
A Simple Frame – The Eco TA Frame of Reference
 
When working to understand meaning making, we can begin to
identify the level of discounting (Stewart & Joines, 1987) in the
client.
 
Eco TA Frame of Reference: Elston (2020)
 
Working outside to inside with the model, we can get a picture in the
levels of grandiosity (Schiff, 1971) of thinking present and use the Eco
TA Frame of Reference pictured to encourage specificity in the client’s
thinking. Working towards understanding the meaning made from a
single encounter.
 
As is true in the concept of the aggregate script helix, we are
always shifting in our perspective, depending on the stimulus in
terms of others and landscape and how safe we feel.
 
M
e
 
T
h
e
m
 
T
h
e
r
e
 
U
s
 
M
e
 
T
h
e
r
e
 
T
h
e
m
 
T
h
e
r
e
 
U
s
 
T
h
e
r
e
 
 
 
Objectives:
1.
Increase specificity – moving towards the centre of the Eco TA Frame
of Reference
2.
Change stimulus – Difference in me, others, where allows space to
uncover more meaning making material to be understood and
processed
 
How:
Bringing the outside in, accounting for the ‘where’ in our indoor work
and bringing awareness to the whole encounter
 
Bringing the outside physically inside, external stimulus in the room
facilitated by the practitioner, representational objects
 
Framing what is natural in an urban setting is still engaging with the
natural (weeds, moss, trees, grass… nature survives)
 
There is emerging evidence on the validity of visualization being effective
in place of ‘doing’, which expands our options even further (Mark
Widdowson, 2021)
 
Frame of Reference in Practice
 
“Postnature is therefore not simply a locking
together of separate entities within a passive
context rather it is a convergence of mutual
interaction and interference involving humans, non-
humans and place.” (Anderson, 2009)
 
Contact
 
Rebecca Elston
 
rebecca@reprana.co.uk
 
www.reprana.co.uk
References
Slide Note
Embed
Share

An exploration of understanding meaning-making in Transactional Analysis by Rebecca Elston in 2022. The discussion revolves around traditional TA concepts, individual connections to place, broadening work frames, and applying Eco TA principles. Key topics include scripts, beliefs about self and others, and the influence of nature-assisted therapy on psychotherapy practice.

  • Transactional Analysis
  • Meaning-making
  • Eco TA
  • Psychotherapy
  • Nature Therapy

Uploaded on Jul 16, 2024 | 1 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Who am I? Who am I? And what are we doing here? And what are we doing here? An exploration of our understanding of meaning making in Transactional Analysis Rebecca Elston 2022

  2. Today we will explore A few of the concepts used in our traditional TA approach to understanding individual meaning making Our individual connection to place How we might broaden the frame of our work in TA to account for more than human influence Emerging concept ideas, developed in line with the principals of Eco TA, which support this new frame How we might apply this to our work with clients

  3. Saying Hello Who are you? Where are you from? What are you hoping for from this time today?

  4. Who am I? A Traditional TA Approach One of the key concepts we work with in TA is Script (Berne, 1972). It gives us a common understanding of how a person has come to be who they are based on their subjective meaning making of intrapersonal experiences with primary caregivers. Mother Father You P P P A A A C C C A script is an ongoing life plan formed in early childhood under parental pressure" Berne (1972) Script Matrix - Stewart and Joines (1987)

  5. Who am I? A Traditional TA Approach When working with our clients in TA, to gain an understand about how they are in the world, we often seek to explore their beliefs about: Self Others The World The Script Beliefs and Feelings are all the Parent and Child contaminations of the Adult based upon and supporting script decisions (Erskine & Zalcman 1979)

  6. Personal Reflection 5 minutes Note down your own beliefs about self, other and the world as you know them to be. We will return to this later.

  7. Whats missing is the where? Psychotherapy, has been traditionally an indoor, interpersonal practice. Research is increasingly pointing to the benefits of being connected to nature, learnings from which could enhance our work. A study in San Francisco showed an increase in affective benefits and cognitive benefits when a 50 minute walk was taken in nature, compared to a 50 minute walk in an urban environment (Bratman, Daily, Levy & Gross 2015) A study published in the Scandinavian Journal of Public Health reviewing a collection of studies concluded that there was evidence to support the effectiveness of nature-assisted therapy as a resource for public health, observing improvements in varied diagnoses, spanning from obesity to schizophrenia (Annerstedt &, Wahrborg 2011) Research conducted on behalf of the RSPB found that only 21% of children in the UK felt connected to nature (Hughes, Richardson & Lumber 2018) 95% of adults stating that the intrinsic value of nature in their daily life has been important to them in some way (Countryside Charity Research Paper, 2022)

  8. Break Out Groups - Introductions 10 minutes - Introduce yourselves and share some of your favourite outdoor spaces from childhood to today. What do you like about those places?

  9. Exercise learning from the landscape In your outdoor spaces, take time for the following 30 minute exercise: However feels natural to you. Maybe connect with the breath, use your senses, move or be still. 5 minutes Grounding / Arriving Be part of the space you are drawn to. What do you like about it here? Why is that important to you? What does that mean to you? 10 minutes Finding Your Space What beliefs about yourself apply here? Who do you feel you are in this space? What feels possible? 10 minutes Who Are you Here? What are the similarities and differences between your earlier beliefs and the sense you had of who you were in your space? What meaning do you make of this? Reflection (indoor vs. outdoor) 5 minutes

  10. Questionning the TA Frame of Reference It is important to understand how we have positioned ourselves as beings with interiors who view exteriors, and how these exteriors were positioned as something extrinsic to the selves who viewed them (Jordan, 2015)

  11. Discussion How might we enhance the existing ways we have of working with clients to account for the impact that place has on script?

  12. Evolving how we think about Script The Aggregate Script Helix Self: Made up of all of the influences from others and landscapes, a live and changing structure, responsive to new stimulus Ecological Context P A C P A C Theme: A key area of identity for the individual, made up of all of the ego states of others who the subject has interacted with and made meaning from and the influence and meaning made from experience with landscape Race Sexuality P A C P A C P A C Encounter: The act of self, meeting other in place, resulting in subjective meaning making (the absence of other is as significant as the presence of other) Social Class Self Religion P A C P A C Note: Themes are subjective, I have listed a few common themes which may occur, be curious to the themes of clients individually. The number of themes is also subjective. Gender Ability / Disability Aggregate Script Helix: Elston (2022), Adapted From Script Helix: Summers & Tudor (2000 & 2014)

  13. Challenging the Frame How do we as practitioners ensure that we are constantly checking for that which we might be discounting? Eco therapy research to date is predominantly from Western countries (UK, Europe and US) What do we think of when we imagine landscape ? Romanticised ideas of where we can do this work would exclude many practitioners and clients 66% of the UK population live in predominantly urban locations, however only 4.25 local greenspaces per 1000 people are found in urban areas, contrasting the 29.39 local greenspaces per 1000 people in predominantly rural areas (Countryside Charity Research, 2022) We or our clients may not have a secure relationship with certain landscapes, each individual s experience is different - outdoor work may not be the right type of work for all clients Accessibility, location, disability, safety

  14. What does ecopsychology mean? In Greek, oikosor eco means home, psycheis soul, and logos is the word or story. So a poetic translation might be the story of the home of the soul or the story of the soul of home (Robinson, 2009 see Buzzell & Chalquist)

  15. A Simple Frame The Eco TA Frame of Reference Me When working to understand meaning making, we can begin to identify the level of discounting (Stewart & Joines, 1987) in the client. Us Me There Working outside to inside with the model, we can get a picture in the levels of grandiosity (Schiff, 1971) of thinking present and use the Eco TA Frame of Reference pictured to encourage specificity in the client s thinking. Working towards understanding the meaning made from a single encounter. Us There Them There As is true in the concept of the aggregate script helix, we are always shifting in our perspective, depending on the stimulus in terms of others and landscape and how safe we feel. Them There Eco TA Frame of Reference: Elston (2020)

  16. Frame of Reference in Practice Objectives: 1. Increase specificity moving towards the centre of the Eco TA Frame of Reference 2. Change stimulus Difference in me, others, where allows space to uncover more meaning making material to be understood and processed How: Bringing the outside in, accounting for the where in our indoor work and bringing awareness to the whole encounter Bringing the outside physically inside, external stimulus in the room facilitated by the practitioner, representational objects Framing what is natural in an urban setting is still engaging with the natural (weeds, moss, trees, grass nature survives) There is emerging evidence on the validity of visualization being effective in place of doing , which expands our options even further (Mark Widdowson, 2021)

  17. Postnature is therefore not simply a locking together of separate entities within a passive context rather it is a convergence of mutual interaction and interference involving humans, non- humans and place. (Anderson, 2009)

  18. Contact Rebecca Elston rebecca@reprana.co.uk www.reprana.co.uk

  19. References Anderson, J. (2009). Transient convergence and relational sensibility: Beyond the modern constitution of nature. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 120-127 Annerstedt, M. & Wahrborg, P. (2011). Nature-assisted therapy: Systematic review of controlled and observational studies, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39, 371-388 Berne, E. (1972). What do you say after you say hello?. New York: Grove Press Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development, New York, Basic Books Bratman, G., Daily, C., Levy, B., Gross, J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition, Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41-50 Countryside Charity, Campaign to Protect Rural England (2020). Local Green Space, A Tool for People and Nature s Wellbeing. Available at: https://www.cpre.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2022/01/Feb-2022_CPRE_Local-Green-Spaces-full-report-1.pdf (Accessed: 26 February 2022) Buzzell, L., Chalquist, C. (2009). Ecotherapy Healing with Nature in Mind, Berkeley: Counterpoint Hughes, J., Richardson, M., Lumber, R. (2018). Evaluating connection to nature and the relationship with conservation behaviour in children, Journal for Nature Conservation, 45, 11-19 Jordan, M. (2015). Nature and Therapy, New York / East Sussex: Routledge Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K., Fuller, R. (2013). What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature?, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 913-935 Steiner, C. (1966). Script and Counterscript, Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 5, 18, 133-135 Schiff, J. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1:1, 71-78 Schiff, J. (1975). Cathexis Reader: Transcational Analysis Treatment of Psychosis. New York: Harper Row Stewart, I. & Joines, V. (1987). TA Today A New Introduction to Transactional Analysis. Melton Mobray & Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Lifespace Publishing Summers, G. & Tudor, K. (2000). Co-Creative Transactional Analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30:1, 23-40. Tudor, K. (2011). Empathy: A Cocreative Perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal. 41:4, 322-335 Widdowson, M. (2021). Ego States and Their Relevance to Working with Trauma. Workshop Material

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#