Mastering Rebuttal Strategies in Debate: A Comprehensive Guide
Discover effective rebuttal techniques in debate such as nitpicking, mitigation, and offensive rebuttals. Learn how to strategically undermine your opponent's arguments by challenging their burdens, reducing the impact of their points, and presenting counter-arguments that strengthen your position. Enhance your debate skills with clear responses, strategic reasoning, and impactful rebuttals.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Novice Bootcamp Fall 2021 DAY 3 Princeton Debate Panel
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
1. Actually Engage Claim: X happens Bad engagement: Yeah but Y happens Good engagement: Y happens and Y is more important than X because X doesn t happen
2. Deal with a charitable version of their case 3. Try not to drop stuff
Type I: Nitpicking Nitpicking Burdens View Claim other side hasn t justified one of these burdens N.B. Don t do this if they actually have justified it 1. Xhappens 2. Xis a good/bad thing 3. Xdoes not happen without the policy
Type II: Mitigation Mitigation has BURDENS Burdens View 1. X doesn t happen that much/at all 2. Xisn t that good/good at all 3. Xalready does happen 1. Xhappens 2. Xis a good/bad thing 3. Xdoes not happen without the policy Notes on usage You only need to prove ONE of these THREE burdens Works well when combined with nitpicking
Type III: Offensive Rebuttal Rebuttal Burdens Burdens View 1. Xis actually bad (if the other team said it was good) 2. Xhappens more without the policy 1. Xhappens 2. Xis a good thing 3. Xdoes not happen without the policy
Summary Type of Rebuttal What you have to show Strategic Use Nitpicking Other team hasn t given sufficient reasons to believe one of the burdens Make other team spend more time on the argument Mitigation One of the burdens is false Reduce the impact of the other team s arguments Offensive rebuttal The opposite of one of the burdens is true Gain impacts for your side
How to do rebuttal Be very clear what you re responding to Say why it s wrong Number responses!
Practice THW Prefer a world where Vladimir Putin steps down in 2024
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
What is weighing Impact weighing THW Impose a Tax on Automation in the West Opp: causes offshoring Argument weighing
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
Arguments you can make a LOT What is the alternative going to be? How is this going to be implemented? Will people be angry? Happy? Does this make other policies more/less likely?
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
What are Points of Information (POIs) You can ask questions/make points during the other team s speeches Not during reply speeches Not in the first minute or last 90 seconds Not from 6:00 onwards for PMC, or from 7:00 for LO, MG, MO Should be under 15 seconds Don taccept more than 1 in your speech But try and accept one
POI Etiquette To ask: In person: stand up/raise hand/say point / say POI Online: can also text point / POI in the Zoom chat To reject: Ignore the question/say no thank you / I ll take you later To accept: Sure / Go for it / I ll take a POI now if opp has one
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
What are Points of Order (POOs) Interject during the opposition s reply speech when you think they re bringing up new material Say Point of order Judge/speaker will pause timer Explain what you think is new Speaker will try to explain why the argument isn t new Don t get into an argument The judge can take it under consideration
Agenda Rebuttal Weighing Replies POIs POOs Debate / Case writing
THR the substitution of digital entertainment (e.g. tv, movies, video games) for written materials (e.g. novels, Kindle, comic books) in the lives of children
SWAT PAIRINGS Afzal Anais Camille Connie Emily Genevieve Jacquelynn Kimberly Mariana Osamede Sheetal Laya Ebun Roma Yuri Jongnam Isaac Pia Aybars Ayanava Ben Ijay
