Mastering Debate Techniques for Effective Judging and Participation

undefined
 
LET’S DEBATE!
 
Jim Hanson
PREPARING FOR DEBATES!
 
It is important for you to do the left column on
the Climb web page
Before each class.
 
Who is the 1 and who is the 2?
undefined
 
Pro Case Flowsheet
 
Con Case Flowsheet
1. SHOW YOUR FLOWSHEET!
 
Note: No Margins. Try to use Print
Paper (with no lines, no holes).
undefined
2. SHOW YOUR CASES AND REBUTTALS!
 
Not done?
 
Get the Short File—
you are hereby using
the Contentions and
Rebuttals in that file.
undefined
3. SHOW YOUR SCRIPT!
BEFORE WE START THE FOLLOW THE
FLOW DEBATES . . .
 
WE ARE GOING TO LEARN HOW
DEBATES ARE JUDGED
Knowing how judging works helps
your own debating.
WATCHING THE DEBATE
 
Listen and take notes—USE TWO FLOWSHEETS!
Be thinking which specific arguments convince you most
Be thinking which specific responses against arguments convince you
most
Keep your own ideas and arguments to yourself—you aren’t judging
your own thoughts—YOU ARE JUDGING THE DEBATER’S ARGUMENTS
Be thinking what is each debaters doing well
Be thinking what could each debater do to improve.
AFTER THE LAST SPEECH
IN THE DEBATE:
 
Fill out the Peer Judge Comments
Form
Your comments are HIGHLY PRIZED
and really wanted
Please provide specific, detailed but
concise feedback
You can also win an award for Best
Peer Judging.
MAKING A DECISION
 
What topic specific argument convinced you to
vote?
Pro wins better access for people with serious illnesses who need
drugs--by having price caps.
What response convinced you to not vote for the
losing team’s best arguments?
Con tried to say price caps reduce development of new drugs. Pro
showed the caps would just stop high profits-not new drugs-and
even if fewer drugs are developed--at least they are affordable.
EXAMPLES OF NOT SO GOOD/GOOD
DECISIONS
 
NOT SO GOOD: “I voted pro because they had more arguments
that were stronger.”
--which specific arguments? In what way were they stronger? Which
responses convinced you to not vote for the losing team’s best argument?
GOOD JOB: “The pro showed drug prices would drop because of
competition—that means more access for poor people and thus
less disease. The con did have a good point on companies hurt by
the price caps—but as the pro responded—they can handle the
reduced profits and the companies are in some cases abusing the
prices. So I voted pro.”
GIVING FEEDBACK TO DEBATERS
 
Give them Compliments!
You have a great voice!
Your response to the access contention was strong.
Give them Improvement Suggestions!
Practice reading more so you say it more fluently.
You should practice better responses in question and answer.
Improvement Comments show you care about the speaker!
EXAMPLES OF NOT SO GOOD/GOOD
COMMENTS
 
NOT SO GOOD: “You were good but need to speak better.”
--what specifically was good? what aspect of speaking needs to be better? What
should the debater do to speak better?
GOOD IMPROVE: “You have excellent rebuttals—directly answering
each of their contention with evidence.”
GOOD IMPROVE: “You need to speak louder—push your voice to do
that.”
GOOD IMPROVE: “You need a stronger impact to your price caps hurt
companies argument. Show how that will affect employment,
company’s ability to produce new drugs that can help people, etc.”
BEGIN A ONE CONTENTION
PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE
 
2 minute cases and 2 minute rebuttals
1.5 minute crossfires
1.5 minute summaries and final focuses
 
Who is Debating First?
Okay—the other debaters are peer judging
EVERYONE FLOWS!!!
undefined
 
1 PRO AND 1 CON: PRE-FLOW YOUR CONTENTION
YOU’VE GOT 2 MINUTES TO SHOW ME YOUR FLOWSHEET!
2 PRO AND 2 CON—FIND AND BE READY WITH REBUTTALS
1
undefined
 
1 PRO PRESENT YOUR PRO CONTENTION
while 2 CON—FLOW YOUR RESPONSES: 90%!
undefined
 
1 CON PRESENT YOUR CON CONTENTION
While 2 PROP—FLOW YOUR RESPONSES: 90%!
undefined
 
CROSSFIRE!
1 PRO AND 1 CON
“May I have the first question?”
“You can have the first question.”
undefined
 
2 PRO RESPOND TO CON CONTENTION
While 1 CON PREP RESPONSES TO DEFEND CONTENTION: 90%!
undefined
 
2 CON RESPOND TO PRO CONTENTION
1 PRO—PREP RESPONSES TO DEFEND CONTENTION: 90%!
undefined
 
CROSSFIRE!
2 PRO AND 2 CON
“May I have the first question?”
“You can have the first question.”
AFTER THE CROSSFIRE OF THE 2’S
 
We’re now going to talk about doing the summary and final
focus speeches in the debate
They are the toughest speeches to give in Public Forum
Debate
Especially to do them right.
SUMMARY—LOOK AT YOUR SCRIPT
 
In our first contention ____________ (name your contention in 2 to 5
words)
We showed 
(concisely list off reasons/experts/studies/stats you
presented in your contention)
: ________________(Use your flowsheet
to write the reasons)____________
They tried to argue ________________. That’s wrong __________.
Then, they tried to argue ______________. That’s not true
___________.
Use your flowsheet, read _short_ evidence from your file.
So, ___________ (sum up this contention/arguments).
FINAL FOCUS—LOOK AT YOUR SCRIPT
 
We win our first contention ________ (name your contention in 2 to 5 words)
We showed 
(concisely list off reasons/experts/studies/stats you presented in
your contention)
: _____________________________(Use your flowsheet to
write the reasons)     As you do this—show you beat their best responses.
Keep it short so you have time to weigh!
We defeated their first contention ___ (name their contention in 2 to 5 words)
We showed 
(concisely list off your best response(s) to the contention
including with reasons/ experts/studies/stats you presented in your
contention)
: ________________________(Use your flowsheet to write the
reasons) As you do this—show you beat their arguments.
Weigh: “Even if they win _______ (their best argument), we still win because
__________ (explain 
why 
your argument has more impact or is stronger).
 
NOW BACK TO THE DEBATE
 
undefined
 
1 PRO DEFEND YOUR PRO CONTENTION
2’S—FLOW  SO YOU CAN RESPOND
Note Everyone should continue to flow
all of the speeches to the very end!
undefined
 
1 CON DEFEND YOUR CON CONTENTION
2’S—FLOW SO YOU CAN RESPOND
undefined
 
2 PRO SHOW YOUR PREVIOUS ARGUMENTS WIN
EACH CONTENTION (avoid new arguments)
2 CON—FLOW SO YOU CAN RESPOND
undefined
 
2 CON SHOW YOUR PREVIOUS ARGUMENTS WIN
EACH CONTENTION (avoid new arguments)
 
TIME FOR FEEDBACK!
 
Instructor/Judge give feedback
Then, During SHORT redos . . . Peer Judges:
https://tinyurl.com/x46w6mze
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Enhance your debate skills by following a structured approach that includes preparation steps, active listening during debates, and providing constructive feedback as a peer judge. Learn how to evaluate arguments, identify strengths, and suggest improvements for debaters. Practice decision-making based on compelling arguments presented during debates.

  • Debate skills
  • Peer judging
  • Argument evaluation
  • Effective listening
  • Decision-making

Uploaded on Oct 05, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LETS DEBATE! Jim Hanson

  2. PREPARING FOR DEBATES! It is important for you to do the left column on the Climb web page Before each class. Who is the 1 and who is the 2?

  3. 1. SHOW YOUR FLOWSHEET! Pro Case Flowsheet Con Case Flowsheet Note: No Margins. Try to use Print Paper (with no lines, no holes).

  4. 2. SHOW YOUR CASES AND REBUTTALS! Not done? Get the Short File you are hereby using the Contentions and Rebuttals in that file.

  5. 3. SHOW YOUR SCRIPT!

  6. BEFORE WE START THE FOLLOW THE FLOW DEBATES . . . WE ARE GOING TO LEARN HOW DEBATES ARE JUDGED Knowing how judging works helps your own debating.

  7. WATCHING THE DEBATE Listen and take notes USE TWO FLOWSHEETS! Be thinking which specific arguments convince you most Be thinking which specific responses against arguments convince you most Keep your own ideas and arguments to yourself you aren t judging your own thoughts YOU ARE JUDGING THE DEBATER S ARGUMENTS Be thinking what is each debaters doing well Be thinking what could each debater do to improve.

  8. AFTER THE LAST SPEECH IN THE DEBATE: Fill out the Peer Judge Comments Form Your comments are HIGHLY PRIZED and really wanted Please provide specific, detailed but concise feedback You can also win an award for Best Peer Judging.

  9. MAKING A DECISION What topic specific argument convinced you to vote? Pro wins better access for people with serious illnesses who need drugs--by having price caps. What response convinced you to not vote for the losing team s best arguments? Con tried to say price caps reduce development of new drugs. Pro showed the caps would just stop high profits-not new drugs-and even if fewer drugs are developed--at least they are affordable.

  10. EXAMPLES OF NOT SO GOOD/GOOD DECISIONS NOT SO GOOD: I voted pro because they had more arguments that were stronger. --which specific arguments? In what way were they stronger? Which responses convinced you to not vote for the losing team s best argument? GOOD JOB: The pro showed drug prices would drop because of competition that means more access for poor people and thus less disease. The con did have a good point on companies hurt by the price caps but as the pro responded they can handle the reduced profits and the companies are in some cases abusing the prices. So I voted pro.

  11. GIVING FEEDBACK TO DEBATERS Give them Compliments! You have a great voice! Your response to the access contention was strong. Give them Improvement Suggestions! Practice reading more so you say it more fluently. You should practice better responses in question and answer. Improvement Comments show you care about the speaker!

  12. EXAMPLES OF NOT SO GOOD/GOOD COMMENTS NOT SO GOOD: You were good but need to speak better. --what specifically was good? what aspect of speaking needs to be better? What should the debater do to speak better? GOOD IMPROVE: You have excellent rebuttals directly answering each of their contention with evidence. GOOD IMPROVE: You need to speak louder push your voice to do that. GOOD IMPROVE: You need a stronger impact to your price caps hurt companies argument. Show how that will affect employment, company s ability to produce new drugs that can help people, etc.

  13. BEGIN A ONE CONTENTION PUBLIC FORUM DEBATE 2 minute cases and 2 minute rebuttals 1.5 minute crossfires 1.5 minute summaries and final focuses Who is Debating First? Okay the other debaters are peer judging EVERYONE FLOWS!!!

  14. 1 PRO AND 1 CON: PRE-FLOW YOUR CONTENTION YOU VE GOT 2 MINUTES TO SHOW ME YOUR FLOWSHEET! 2 PRO AND 2 CON FIND AND BE READY WITH REBUTTALS 1

  15. 1 PRO PRESENT YOUR PRO CONTENTION while 2 CON FLOW YOUR RESPONSES: 90%!

  16. 1 CON PRESENT YOUR CON CONTENTION While 2 PROP FLOW YOUR RESPONSES: 90%!

  17. CROSSFIRE! 1 PRO AND 1 CON May I have the first question? You can have the first question.

  18. 2 PRO RESPOND TO CON CONTENTION While 1 CON PREP RESPONSES TO DEFEND CONTENTION: 90%!

  19. 2 CON RESPOND TO PRO CONTENTION 1 PRO PREP RESPONSES TO DEFEND CONTENTION: 90%!

  20. CROSSFIRE! 2 PRO AND 2 CON May I have the first question? You can have the first question.

  21. AFTER THE CROSSFIRE OF THE 2S We re now going to talk about doing the summary and final focus speeches in the debate They are the toughest speeches to give in Public Forum Debate Especially to do them right.

  22. SUMMARYLOOK AT YOUR SCRIPT In our first contention ____________ (name your contention in 2 to 5 words) We showed (concisely list off reasons/experts/studies/stats you presented in your contention): ________________(Use your flowsheet to write the reasons)____________ They tried to argue ________________. That s wrong __________. Then, they tried to argue ______________. That s not true ___________. Use your flowsheet, read _short_ evidence from your file. So, ___________ (sum up this contention/arguments).

  23. FINAL FOCUSLOOK AT YOUR SCRIPT We win our first contention ________ (name your contention in 2 to 5 words) We showed (concisely list off reasons/experts/studies/stats you presented in your contention): _____________________________(Use your flowsheet to write the reasons) As you do this show you beat their best responses. Keep it short so you have time to weigh! We defeated their first contention ___ (name their contention in 2 to 5 words) We showed (concisely list off your best response(s) to the contention including with reasons/ experts/studies/stats you presented in your contention): ________________________(Use your flowsheet to write the reasons) As you do this show you beat their arguments. Weigh: Even if they win _______ (their best argument), we still win because __________ (explain why your argument has more impact or is stronger).

  24. NOW BACK TO THE DEBATE

  25. 1 PRO DEFEND YOUR PRO CONTENTION 2 S FLOW SO YOU CAN RESPOND Note Everyone should continue to flow all of the speeches to the very end!

  26. 1 CON DEFEND YOUR CON CONTENTION 2 S FLOW SO YOU CAN RESPOND

  27. 2 PRO SHOW YOUR PREVIOUS ARGUMENTS WIN EACH CONTENTION (avoid new arguments) 2 CON FLOW SO YOU CAN RESPOND

  28. 2 CON SHOW YOUR PREVIOUS ARGUMENTS WIN EACH CONTENTION (avoid new arguments)

  29. TIME FOR FEEDBACK! Instructor/Judge give feedback Then, During SHORT redos . . . Peer Judges: https://tinyurl.com/x46w6mze

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#