Knowledge Stock of Greek R&D Active Manufacturing Firms

undefined
 
The Knowledge stock of Greek
R&D active manufacturing
firms: Based on published
financial accounts for the
period 2001-2010
 
A. Gkypali
a
, A. Rafailidis
b
, and K. Tsekouras
a
,
a
Department of Economics, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26504,
Patras Greece
b
Department of Business Administration, Technological Educational Institute of
Western Greece, 1st, M. Alexandrou, Koukouli, 26334, Patras, Greece
 
 
Outline
 
Motivation
Sample and Context specificities
Inventory Perpetual Method
Management of the available information
Mapping Greek R&D firms’ knowledge intensity
Some basic descriptive statistics
 
Motivation: Why construct firms
R&D stock?
 
Dierickx and Cool (1989): 
Firms internally “build” their
strategic assets. These type of assets is the cumulative
result of adhering to a set of consistent policies and
practices over a period of time. In other words,
strategic asset stocks are accumulated by choosing
appropriate time paths of flows over a period of time.
 
Hence, in order to study the role of firms’ knowledge
base on aspects of their economic performance,  the
availability of a stock variable would capture a more
holistic aspect of the firms’ knowledge base.
 
The sample
 
300 Greek Manufacturing firms
engaged in R&D activities during the
period 2001-2010
 
Information drawn from their financial
accounts has been employed for the
construction of their knowledge stock
 
Knowledge assets
 
We follow the definition of R&D investments
given by International Accounting Standards
(IAS 38), where particular emphasis is given to
the term ‘intangible assets’. Therefore, we are
interested in measuring the investments in
knowledge creation and/or acquisition, as they
are perceived and reported by Greek firms in
their annual financial statements.
 
R&D stock: Inventory Perpetual
Method (1)
 
Following, Hall et al. (2010) and Kumbhakar et al.
(2012) knowledge stock is approximated as follows:
 
 
where
 
K 
is the knowledge stock of firm 
i 
at time 
t
,
R 
denotes annual investments in the creation and/or
acquisition of knowledge assets at time 
t 
and
    is a suitably chosen (private) depreciation rate.
 
 
 
R&D stock: Inventory Perpetual
Method (2)
 
Assumption: some (or all) of these firms were engaged in
R&D activities before 2001
How to approximate such preexisting knowledge base?
 
 
 
where
    is the depreciation rate of the 
ith
 firm which depends on
the four sectors, namely high-tech, medium-high tech,
medium low tech and low tecg established by OECD and
     is the knowledge investments growth rate at the
industry level 
j 
as it is approximated by OECD ANBERD
database.
 
 
 
 
Management of information
 
2004
: Transition year from National Accounting Standards (NAS) to
International Accounting Standards (IAS). Obligatory for publicly traded
firms.
Main differences:
(i)
IAS dictate that Research should be separated from Development which
in NAS this is not necessarily the case
(ii)
The method for the valuation of (intangible) assets differs between the
two standards in that the IAS dictate that the valuation of assets is done
at their ‘current price’ taken the last day of the financial year, whereas the
NAS dictate that the valuation of assets is done by selecting the lowest
value between their current and purchase price. IAS tend to be less strict
than NAS and that impacted our R&D expenditures measurement.
(iii)
IAS from their philosophy are less detailed than NAS and therefore,
crucial information needed in order to calculate annual R&D investments
and thus,  Greek firms’ knowledge stock had to be approximated
 
Constructing Knowledge stock: how to
approximate annual expenditures
 
Two sources of information: (i) expenditures to
acquire/form assets and (ii) annual expenditures from
profit and loss account (ARD)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In sum the annual expenditures on R&D are calculated
as:
 
 
 
 
 
Greek R&D (GRD) manufacturing firms’
knowledge intensity
 
The mapping of the knowledge intensity is attempted, is
defined as 
the degree of involvement of knowledge in
business activities either through its integration directly into
GRD firms’ outputs or indirectly through their inputs
.
Two indices are constructed for the approximation of GRD
firms knowledge intensity:
the ratio of knowledge capital per employee
 
 
the ratio of knowledge capital to GRD firms’ total assets .
 
 
 
Some basic descriptive statistics (1)
 
Some basic descriptive statistics (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Conclusions
 
In order to investigate the role of firms knowledge base the
construction of their knowledge stock is a precondition
The perpetual method is the most common and acknowledged
approach for such an endeavor.
 In the case of the Greek Manufacturing firms their knowledge
stock for the period 2001-2010 has been constructed. In this
context a structural change has been handled.
Preliminary descriptive statistics indicate that high-tech sectors
indeed both with respect to their inputs and outputs have
accumulated knowledge bases at a greater extent compared to
low tech sectors.
With respect to 
knowledge intensity 
small firms seem to be
more intensive (but not in absolute R&D investments) than large
firms. In other words they face more severe knowledge
indivisibilities and less fixed costs dispersion.
 
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!!!
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Research conducted by Gkypalia, Rafailidis, and Tsekouras from the University of Patras and Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece focuses on the knowledge stock of Greek R&D active manufacturing firms using financial accounts from 2001-2010. The study emphasizes the importance of firms' strategic assets accumulated over time and the measurement of investments in knowledge creation and acquisition based on International Accounting Standards.

  • Knowledge Stock
  • Greek Firms
  • R&D Activities
  • Intangible Assets
  • Financial Accounts

Uploaded on Sep 27, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Knowledge stock of Greek R&D active manufacturing firms: Based on published financial accounts for the period 2001-2010 A. Gkypalia, A. Rafailidisb, and K. Tsekourasa, aDepartment of Economics, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26504, Patras Greece bDepartment of Business Administration, Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, 1st, M. Alexandrou, Koukouli, 26334, Patras, Greece

  2. Outline Motivation Sample and Context specificities Inventory Perpetual Method Management of the available information Mapping Greek R&D firms knowledge intensity Some basic descriptive statistics

  3. Motivation: Why construct firms R&D stock? Dierickx and Cool (1989): Firms internally build their strategic assets. These type of assets is the cumulative result of adhering to a set of consistent policies and practices over a period of time. In other words, strategic asset stocks are accumulated by choosing appropriate time paths of flows over a period of time. Hence, in order to study the role of firms knowledge base on aspects of their economic performance, availability of a stock variable would capture a more holistic aspect of the firms knowledge base. the

  4. The sample 300 engaged in R&D activities during the period 2001-2010 Greek Manufacturing firms Information drawn from their financial accounts has been employed for the construction of their knowledge stock

  5. Knowledge assets We follow the definition of R&D investments given by International Accounting Standards (IAS 38), where particular emphasis is given to the term intangible assets . Therefore, we are interested in measuring the investments in knowledge creation and/or acquisition, as they are perceived and reported by Greek firms in their annual financial statements.

  6. R&D stock: Inventory Perpetual Method (1) Following, Hall et al. (2010) and Kumbhakar et al. (2012) knowledge stock is approximated as follows: ( 1 it K ) = + K R , 1 i t it where K is the knowledge stock of firm i at time t, R denotes annual investments in the creation and/or acquisition of knowledge assets at time t and is a suitably chosen (private) depreciation rate.

  7. R&D stock: Inventory Perpetual Method (2) Assumption: some (or all) of these firms were engaged in R&D activities before 2001 How to approximate such preexisting knowledge base? R it 0= K 0 it + g is ij where is the depreciation rate of the ith firm which depends on the four sectors, namely high-tech, medium-high tech, medium low tech and low tecg established by OECD and is the knowledge investments growth rate at the industry level j as it is approximated by OECD ANBERD database. is ij g

  8. Management of information 2004: Transition year from National Accounting Standards (NAS) to International Accounting Standards (IAS). Obligatory for publicly traded firms. Main differences: (i) IAS dictate that Research should be separated from Development which in NAS this is not necessarily the case (ii) The method for the valuation of (intangible) assets differs between the two standards in that the IAS dictate that the valuation of assets is done at their current price taken the last day of the financial year, whereas the NAS dictate that the valuation of assets is done by selecting the lowest value between their current and purchase price. IAS tend to be less strict than NAS and that impacted our R&D expenditures measurement. (iii) IAS from their philosophy are less detailed than NAS and therefore, crucial information needed in order to calculate annual R&D investments and thus, Greek firms knowledge stock had to be approximated

  9. Constructing Knowledge stock: how to approximate annual expenditures Two sources of information: (i) expenditures to acquire/form assets and (ii) annual expenditures from profit and loss account (ARD) Annual flow of R&D investments following NAS Book values of Cumulative expenditures on R&D following NAS at year t Annual flow of Industrial Property Right investments following NAS Book values of Cumulative expenditures on Industrial Property Rights following NAS at year t RD t = RD CR CR 1 t t t CR t = IPR CIPR CIPR IPR 1 t t t t CIPR t In sum the annual expenditures on R&D are calculated as: it it it R RD IPR = + + , 0 ARD R it it

  10. Greek R&D (GRD) manufacturing firms knowledge intensity The mapping of the knowledge intensity is attempted, is defined as the degree of involvement of knowledge in business activities either through its integration directly into GRD firms outputs or indirectly through their inputs. Two indices are constructed for the approximation of GRD firms knowledge intensity: the ratio of knowledge capital per employee Knowledge Capital Total Number of Employees KNEMPL = the ratio of knowledge capital to GRD firms total assets . Knowledge Capital Total Assets KNASS =

  11. Some basic descriptive statistics (1) KNEMPL and Technological Opportunities KNASS and Technological Opportunities 1,200,000 80% 60% 800,000 KNCAP/TOTASS KNCAP/EMPL 40% 400,000 20% 0% 0 Average 14.11% 5.83% 7.55% 19.33% Min 0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.11% Max 77.50% 68.06% 77.50% 76.98% All LT MT HT All LT MT HT Max Min Average 986,105 15 26,320 134,396 15 10,869 480,964 78 27,816 986,105 392 79,399

  12. Some basic descriptive statistics (2) Kernel Density estimate of KNEMPL index Kernel density estimates of KNASS index .00004 Small Medium Large Small Medium 10 .00003 Large .00002 Density De nsi 5 ty .00001 0 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 0 0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 KNASS KNEMPL

  13. Conclusions In order to investigate the role of firms knowledge base the construction of their knowledge stock is a precondition The perpetual method is the most common and acknowledged approach for such an endeavor. In the case of the Greek Manufacturing firms their knowledge stock for the period 2001-2010 has been constructed. In this context a structural change has been handled. Preliminary descriptive statistics indicate that high-tech sectors indeed both with respect to their inputs and outputs have accumulated knowledge bases at a greater extent compared to low tech sectors. With respect to knowledge intensity small firms seem to be more intensive (but not in absolute R&D investments) than large firms. In other words they face more severe knowledge indivisibilities and less fixed costs dispersion.

  14. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!!!

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#