Insights on Influence, Networks, and Strategic Leadership

undefined
 
INFLUENCE,  NETWORKS  AND
INFLUENCE,  NETWORKS  AND
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
 
Audrey J. Murrell, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Business Administration, Psychology,
Public and International Affairs and
 Director of the David Berg Center for Ethics and Leadership
University of Pittsburgh, School of Business
amurrell@katz.pitt.edu
 
Our Objectives
 
Understand the role of strategic leadership in
complex and dynamic organizations
Discuss the connection between leadership and
effective organizational change
Examine key concepts such “Tipping Point” and “Level
5” leadership in organizations
Enhance self-awareness of one’s own leadership
strengths and opportunities for improvement
 
Prairie Health Services (PHS)
 
What are some of the key issues described in this
case?
Who are the key people that we need to
understand and discuss?
What aspects of leadership effectiveness or
ineffectiveness are evident in the case?
What other issues should be identified and
discussed?
 
The Myths of Effective Leadership
 
“If I have the authority, I can get things done.”
“It’s important for me to have direct control
over the things that I am responsible for in the
organization.”
“A key factor in my success is being given the
power to direct the work of others.”
“Change does not happen here unless the
person with the title says so.”
 
What Effective Managers Do
 
Effective managers (Kotter):
Develop and utilize both technical and
relational competencies
Devote significant time agenda building within
the organization
Recognize that power and influence are often
gain 
without
 formal title or authority
Spend significant time cultivating diverse
relationships within the organization
 
What It 
Really
 Means to
Effectively Manage & Lead
 
Myth
Authority
Formal Position
Dependency only on
subordinates
Control and
compliance are goals
Use of technical skills
 
Reality
Interdependency
Informal relationships
Peers and others
outside formal lines
Commitment and
empowerment are
goals
Use of technical and
social skills
Leadership Framework
 
Sensemaking
 
Process of coming to understand the context in
which you (and others) are operating within
Must seek many types and sources of data
Involve others in the process
Avoid overuse of personal schema/biases
Learn from small experiments
Use images, metaphors and stories to help
communicate
 
Tipping Point Leadership
 
“In many turnarounds, the hardest
battle is simply getting people to
agree on the causes of current
problems and need for change”
~ Kim and Mauborgne
 
Tipping Point Leadership
 
How do we get the key message or issue to 
stick
?
Overcoming Hurdles
:
Cognitive Hurdle
Put people face-to-face with problems and customers; finding
new ways to communicate
Resource Hurdle
Focus on the hot spots and negotiation with key partners
Motivational Hurdle
Highlight commons interests/identities and frame the
challenge to match organizational goals/mission
Political Hurdle
Address internal and external opponents
 
Tipping Point Leadership
 
Key Action Steps
:
Cognitive Hurdle
Develop and execute an internal communication strategy
Resource Hurdle
Refocus resources – pay attention to organizational 
currency
Motivational Hurdle
Engage key influencers
Political Hurdle
Focus on the “80-20” rule
 
Sensemaking at PHS
 
For group discussion:
What is the key issue at PHS that needs to
become “sticky”
What hurdles should be the focus in order to
help make the key issue “tip”?
What are some specific steps that should be
take here and 
who
 is key to their success?
 
Relating
 
Creating relationships, managing the relationship
aspects of the organization thru building social
capital and trust in leadership
Spend time understanding the perspective of
others
Encourage real participation
Develop connections and important advice
networks
Develop social capital inside and outside the
organization
 
Level 5 Leadership
 
“Level 5 refers to the highest level in a hierarchy
of executive capabilities that we identified
during our research.  Leaders at the other four
levels in the hierarchy can produce high
degrees of success but not enough to elevate
companies from mediocrity to sustained
excellence.  Good-to-great transformation
don’t happen without Level 5 leaders at the
helm.  They just don’t.”
~ Jim Collins
 
“From Good to Great”
 
Collins and research team studied
companies that “made the leap from
good results to great results and
sustained those results for at least 15
years”
Firms studied outperformed the market
over the 15 year period
Key question asked was “
Can a good
company become a great company and if
so, how?”
 
Level 5 Leadership
 
Level 5 Leadership
 
Professional Will
Ferocious resolve, stoic determination
Demonstrates an unwavering resolve to do whatever much
be done
Sets the standards of building an enduring company –
inspired standards
Never blames other people or external factors or bad luck
for negative outcome
Yes, leadership is about vision.  But leadership is equally about
creating a climate where the truth is heard and the brutal facts
confronted.  There’s a huge difference between the opportunity to
“have your say” and the opportunity to be heard.  The good-to-
great leaders understood this distinction, creating a culture
wherein people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard and
ultimately, for the truth to be heard.”
 
Level 5 Leadership
 
Personal Humility
Compelling modesty
Acts with calm, quiet determination
Relies on inspired standards rather than inspired charisma
Channels ambition into the company
Focuses on leadership and management succession to surpass
their own success
Leading from good to great does not mean coming up with the
answers and then motivating everyone to follow your messianic
vision.  It means having the humility to grasp the fact that you do
not yet understand enough to have the answers and then to ask the
questions that will lead to the best possible insights
”.
 
Key Findings
 
Larger-than-life, celebrity leaders negatively correlated with
taking a company from good to great
No systematic pattern linking specific forms of executive
compensation to going from good to great
Neither strategy, technology or mergers per se predicted who
was identified as a “good to great” firm
Good to great companies were not in “great” industries, but
terrible industries
“Those who build great companies understand that the ultimate
throttle on growth for any great company is not markets, or
technology or competition, or products.  It is one thing above all
others: the ability to get and keep enough of the right people.”
Level 5 Leadership produces a irony in that personal ambition
that drives people to positions of power conflict with the
qualities of success at this level
Boards of Directors frequently operate under the false belief
that a “larger than life” charismatic leader is what will make the
company successful – this may be why there is a “dearth” of this
type of leader
 
Level 5 Strategies
 
Attend to people first, strategy second
Confront the most brutal facts of the current reality
Focus on executing consistent and sustained
approaches for transformation
Focus people’s attention on 3 keys concerns:
What our company can be the best in the world at
How our economies work best
What best ignites the passion of our people
 
Relating at PHS
 
For group discussion:
 Evaluate the CEO at PHS in terms of the
concepts of Level 5 Leadership
How might “professional will” be a positive or
negative factor in this case?
What role might “personal humility” play in the
overall effectiveness of the CEO as a leader?
What advice might you give to Carl on how to
improve his overall effectiveness as a leader
based on these concepts?
 
Inventing
 
Capability to change the way people work
together and think about their work
Involves key aspects of team design, building
and leading
Focuses on executing, change and
implementation of vision
Captures the ability to create innovative and
creating solutions, processes and outcomes
 
Why Change Fails
 
Not establishing a great enough sense of urgency
Not creating a powerful enough guiding coalition
Lacking a vision
Under-communicating the  vision by a factor of ten
Not removing obstacles to the new vision
Not systemically planning for, and creating short-
term wins
Declaring victory too soon
Not anchoring changes in the corporation’s culture
 
Kotter’s Change Process
 
                     8.  Anchor new approaches in the culture
                  7.  Communicate gains; produce more change
                6.  Generate short-term wins
            5.  Empower broad-based action
         4.  Communicate the change vision
      3.  Develop a vision and strategy
   2.  Create the guiding coalition
1.  Establish a sense of urgency
Change Requires Communication
Peter M. Senge et al., 
The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook
Change Requires Collaboration
 
Customers
 
Networks in Other
Departments
 
Y
O
U
R
 
I
N
N
E
R
C
I
R
C
L
E
 
NGOs
 
Government
Agencies
Senior Executive
Network
 
Suppliers
Change Requires 
Commitments
 
Change Requires “Currency”
 
Task-related
Resources
Assistance
Information
Position-related
Advancement
Visibility
Reputation
Networks
 
Relationship-related
Personal support
Understanding
Validation
Personal-related
Learning
Ownership
Expertise
identity
 
Key Action Steps for Creating Change
 
Establish a sense of urgency
Identify specific threats, “smoldering crises or major
opportunities
Form a powerful guiding coalition
Assemble a group with power and “currency” to lead and
implement change effort
Create and communicate a vision
Understand how to “meet people where they are”
Plan for and create short-term wins
Use evidence and data on outcomes to make a case for
change
 
Can change be too slow?
 
Karl Weick:
“Emergent changes can be slow to cumulate;
too small to affect outputs or outcomes; less
well suited for responding to threats than for
exploiting opportunities; limited by pre-
existing culture and technology; deficient when
competitors are wedded to transformation;
better suited to implementation in operations,
plants and stores than to strategy, firm-level or
corporate change….”
 
Can Change Be Too Radical?
 
Karl Weick:
“The liabilities of planned change include a
high probability of relapse; uneven diffusion
among units; large short-term losses that are
difficult to recover; less suitability for
opportunity-driven than for threat-driven
alternations; unanticipated consequences due
to limited foresight; temptations toward
hypocrisy (when people talk the talk of
revolution but walk the walk of resistance)….”
 
Inventing at PHS
 
For group discussion:
Among Kotter’s reasons why change fails,
which ones are 
most relevant
 to PHS?
Examine Ann Smith’s role as an “change
agent” within the case – in what ways is she
effective or ineffective in this role?
What advice might you give to Ann on how
to improve her overall effectiveness as an
agent of change within PHS?
 
Visioning
 
Creating and communicating a compelling 
shared
image
 of the future
Focus on framing of visions to reach key
stakeholder groups
Visions must be shared, compelling and sincere
Issues selling strategies are important for
communicating vision
Vision must be followed by action – “walking
the talk” is key
 
Agenda Building
 
Agenda building involves reconciling diverse
and conflicting expectations by developing
one common agenda and course of action
Involves activities and competencies such as:
Managing trade-offs across key currencies
Negotiating across diverse interests
Analyzing the cultural and political
environment
 
Agenda Building
 
Understanding who sets (and the process) the
organization’s agenda
Agenda building involves reconciling diverse and
conflicting expectations by developing one common
agenda and course of action
Involves activities and competencies such as:
Managing trade-offs and conflict
Negotiating across diverse interests
Analyzing the cultural and political environment
 
Issue Selling
 
Critical pathways for managers to raise issues of importance
Reflects key tactics for  effective agenda-building
Illustrates the importance of change “from the middle”
Includes attempts by lower level managers to influence higher
level members of organization
Issue selling important to both organizations and leaders:
Today’s leaders are challenged to cope with complex business
world
Issue selling allows many minds to contribute in organization’s
future
These minds may be closer to problem areas and thus offer
important perspectives
 
 
Issue Selling – Strategic Choices
 
Bundling
 
Linkages of new issue to existing issues
Requires understanding of how issues get on firm’s
agenda
Can tap into resources and support based on current
issue
Can “backfire” or become tainted because of
negative issue and/or perceived failure
 
Framing
 
Framing impacts how choices are evaluated
Issues can be framed as an opportunity or a threat
Framing an issue as an opportunity can induce greater
participation, commitment to taking action versus
framing an issue as a threat
Framing also makes a choice of:
Responsibility vs. obligation
Moral/ethical vs. business case
Internal vs. external
Idea focused vs. data driven
Emotional vs. logical
 
Language
 
Related to issue framing
Relies heavily on understanding of the cultural lens
Language is tailored to the focal target group or
groups
Key issue is focusing on:
Purpose
Audience
Context
Obstacles
 
Involvement
 
Involves issue selling as a process
Must identify critical stakeholders and understand the
role and impact of participation
Factors such as effective use of teams, negotiation,
coalition building and networks are relevant
Focuses on the importance of change
champions/sponsors and change implementers/agents
 
Approach
 
Individual skills and strategies for issue selling
Key choices involve:
Formal vs. informal
Individual vs. team
Public vs. private
Must be able to communicate across function,
interpersonal style and organizational role/position
 
Timing
 
Must understand both the political and cultural context
of the organization
Key factors are momentum, windows of opportunities
and social/organizational climate
Must understand the phases and cycles of change in
organization
 
Issue Selling Challenges
 
Understanding managers’ choice processes in deciding to sell issues
People more willing to sell issues in contexts where they perceive
management will listen and where context is experienced as supportive
Context may enhance or inhibit issue selling
Issue sellers often worry about damaging their reputations
Leaders plays important role in issue selling because they set context for
subordinates
Issue selling is difficult in conflict avoiding organizational cultures
Charged issues are tough, problematic, sensitive issues that sellers may
be reluctant to raise
Examples of charged issues:
Outsourcing
Restructuring
Diversity/Inclusion
Treatment of the natural environment
 
Visioning at PHS
 
For group discussion:
You have just been informed by CEO Carl Nord that
the board has asked for a presentation from the
team that reviewed the proposals for the new
technology.  You will have 5 minutes to make a “pitch”
to them on your ideas/recommendations.  Carl will be
present during your presentation to the board.  The
board will meet again in 10 days to review/decide.
Taking the role of the evaluation team, outline your
strategy for how you can begin to make change at
PHS.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Explore the role of strategic leadership in complex organizations, delve into the connection between leadership and organizational change, and enhance self-awareness of leadership strengths and areas for improvement. Key issues in Prairie Health Services, leadership myths, effective managerial traits, and the realities of managing and leading are discussed.

  • Leadership
  • Influence
  • Networks
  • Strategic
  • Management

Uploaded on Oct 07, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INFLUENCE, NETWORKS AND STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP Audrey J. Murrell, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Business Administration, Psychology, Public and International Affairs and Director of the David Berg Center for Ethics and Leadership University of Pittsburgh, School of Business amurrell@katz.pitt.edu

  2. Our Objectives Understand the role of strategic leadership in complex and dynamic organizations Discuss the connection between leadership and effective organizational change Examine key concepts such Tipping Point and Level 5 leadership in organizations Enhance self-awareness of one s own leadership strengths and opportunities for improvement

  3. Prairie Health Services (PHS) What are some of the key issues described in this case? Who are the key people that we need to understand and discuss? What aspects of leadership effectiveness or ineffectiveness are evident in the case? What other issues should be identified and discussed?

  4. The Myths of Effective Leadership If I have the authority, I can get things done. It s important for me to have direct control over the things that I am responsible for in the organization. A key factor in my success is being given the power to direct the work of others. Change does not happen here unless the person with the title says so.

  5. What Effective Managers Do Effective managers (Kotter): Develop and utilize both technical and relational competencies Devote significant time agenda building within the organization Recognize that power and influence are often gain without formal title or authority Spend significant time cultivating diverse relationships within the organization

  6. What It Really Means to Effectively Manage & Lead Myth Authority Formal Position Dependency only on subordinates Control and compliance are goals Use of technical skills Reality Interdependency Informal relationships Peers and others outside formal lines Commitment and empowerment are goals Use of technical and social skills

  7. Leadership Framework

  8. Sensemaking Process of coming to understand the context in which you (and others) are operating within Must seek many types and sources of data Involve others in the process Avoid overuse of personal schema/biases Learn from small experiments Use images, metaphors and stories to help communicate

  9. Tipping Point Leadership In many turnarounds, the hardest battle is simply getting people to agree on the causes of current problems and need for change ~ Kim and Mauborgne

  10. Tipping Point Leadership How do we get the key message or issue to stick? Overcoming Hurdles: Cognitive Hurdle Put people face-to-face with problems and customers; finding new ways to communicate Resource Hurdle Focus on the hot spots and negotiation with key partners Motivational Hurdle Highlight commons interests/identities and frame the challenge to match organizational goals/mission Political Hurdle Address internal and external opponents

  11. Tipping Point Leadership Key Action Steps: Cognitive Hurdle Develop and execute an internal communication strategy Resource Hurdle Refocus resources pay attention to organizational currency Motivational Hurdle Engage key influencers Political Hurdle Focus on the 80-20 rule

  12. Sensemaking at PHS For group discussion: What is the key issue at PHS that needs to become sticky What hurdles should be the focus in order to help make the key issue tip ? What are some specific steps that should be take here and who is key to their success?

  13. Relating Creating relationships, managing the relationship aspects of the organization thru building social capital and trust in leadership Spend time understanding the perspective of others Encourage real participation Develop connections and important advice networks Develop social capital inside and outside the organization

  14. Level 5 Leadership Level 5 refers to the highest level in a hierarchy of executive capabilities that we identified during our research. Leaders at the other four levels in the hierarchy can produce high degrees of success but not enough to elevate companies from mediocrity to sustained excellence. Good-to-great transformation don t happen without Level 5 leaders at the helm. They just don t. ~ Jim Collins

  15. From Good to Great Collins and research team studied companies that made the leap from good results to great results and sustained those results for at least 15 years Firms studied outperformed the market over the 15 year period Key question asked was Can a good company become a great company and if so, how?

  16. Level 5 Leadership Level 5: Builds enduring greatness thru personal will and humility Level 4: Catalyzes commitment to clear and compelling vision Level 3: Organizes people and resources toward key objectives Level 2: Contributes to achievement of common goals Level 1: Makes productive contribution thru knowledge, skills & hard work

  17. Level 5 Leadership Professional Will Ferocious resolve, stoic determination Demonstrates an unwavering resolve to do whatever much be done Sets the standards of building an enduring company inspired standards Never blames other people or external factors or bad luck for negative outcome Yes, leadership is about vision. But leadership is equally about creating a climate where the truth is heard and the brutal facts confronted. There s a huge difference between the opportunity to have your say and the opportunity to be heard. The good-to- great leaders understood this distinction, creating a culture wherein people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard and ultimately, for the truth to be heard.

  18. Level 5 Leadership Personal Humility Compelling modesty Acts with calm, quiet determination Relies on inspired standards rather than inspired charisma Channels ambition into the company Focuses on leadership and management succession to surpass their own success Leading from good to great does not mean coming up with the answers and then motivating everyone to follow your messianic vision. It means having the humility to grasp the fact that you do not yet understand enough to have the answers and then to ask the questions that will lead to the best possible insights .

  19. Key Findings Larger-than-life, celebrity leaders negatively correlated with taking a company from good to great No systematic pattern linking specific forms of executive compensation to going from good to great Neither strategy, technology or mergers per se predicted who was identified as a good to great firm Good to great companies were not in great industries, but terrible industries Those who build great companies understand that the ultimate throttle on growth for any great company is not markets, or technology or competition, or products. It is one thing above all others: the ability to get and keep enough of the right people. Level 5 Leadership produces a irony in that personal ambition that drives people to positions of power conflict with the qualities of success at this level Boards of Directors frequently operate under the false belief that a larger than life charismatic leader is what will make the company successful this may be why there is a dearth of this type of leader

  20. Level 5 Strategies Attend to people first, strategy second Confront the most brutal facts of the current reality Focus on executing consistent and sustained approaches for transformation Focus people s attention on 3 keys concerns: What our company can be the best in the world at How our economies work best What best ignites the passion of our people

  21. Relating at PHS For group discussion: Evaluate the CEO at PHS in terms of the concepts of Level 5 Leadership How might professional will be a positive or negative factor in this case? What role might personal humility play in the overall effectiveness of the CEO as a leader? What advice might you give to Carl on how to improve his overall effectiveness as a leader based on these concepts?

  22. Inventing Capability to change the way people work together and think about their work Involves key aspects of team design, building and leading Focuses on executing, change and implementation of vision Captures the ability to create innovative and creating solutions, processes and outcomes

  23. Why Change Fails Not establishing a great enough sense of urgency Not creating a powerful enough guiding coalition Lacking a vision Under-communicating the vision by a factor of ten Not removing obstacles to the new vision Not systemically planning for, and creating short- term wins Declaring victory too soon Not anchoring changes in the corporation s culture

  24. Kotters Change Process 8. Anchor new approaches in the culture 7. Communicate gains; produce more change 6. Generate short-term wins 5. Empower broad-based action 4. Communicate the change vision 3. Develop a vision and strategy 2. Create the guiding coalition 1. Establish a sense of urgency

  25. Change Requires Communication High DIALOGUE Telling Exploring each other s assumptions to generate meaning Asserting Explaining ADVOCACY Asking Observing Clarifying Interviewing Bystanding Sensing Low Low High INQUIRY Peter M. Senge et al., The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook

  26. Change Requires Collaboration Senior Executive Network Government Agencies YOUR INNER CIRCLE Suppliers Customers Networks in Other Departments NGOs

  27. Change Requires Commitments

  28. Change Requires Currency Task-related Resources Assistance Information Position-related Advancement Visibility Reputation Networks Relationship-related Personal support Understanding Validation Personal-related Learning Ownership Expertise identity

  29. Key Action Steps for Creating Change Establish a sense of urgency Identify specific threats, smoldering crises or major opportunities Form a powerful guiding coalition Assemble a group with power and currency to lead and implement change effort Create and communicate a vision Understand how to meet people where they are Plan for and create short-term wins Use evidence and data on outcomes to make a case for change

  30. Can change be too slow? Karl Weick: Emergent changes can be slow to cumulate; too small to affect outputs or outcomes; less well suited for responding to threats than for exploiting opportunities; limited by pre- existing culture and technology; deficient when competitors are wedded to transformation; better suited to implementation in operations, plants and stores than to strategy, firm-level or corporate change .

  31. Can Change Be Too Radical? Karl Weick: The liabilities of planned change include a high probability of relapse; uneven diffusion among units; large short-term losses that are difficult to recover; less suitability for opportunity-driven than for threat-driven alternations; unanticipated consequences due to limited foresight; temptations toward hypocrisy (when people talk the talk of revolution but walk the walk of resistance) .

  32. Inventing at PHS For group discussion: Among Kotter s reasons why change fails, which ones are most relevant to PHS? Examine Ann Smith s role as an change agent within the case in what ways is she effective or ineffective in this role? What advice might you give to Ann on how to improve her overall effectiveness as an agent of change within PHS?

  33. Visioning Creating and communicating a compelling shared image of the future Focus on framing of visions to reach key stakeholder groups Visions must be shared, compelling and sincere Issues selling strategies are important for communicating vision Vision must be followed by action walking the talk is key

  34. Agenda Building Agenda building involves reconciling diverse and conflicting expectations by developing one common agenda and course of action Involves activities and competencies such as: Managing trade-offs across key currencies Negotiating across diverse interests Analyzing the cultural and political environment

  35. Agenda Building Understanding who sets (and the process) the organization s agenda Agenda building involves reconciling diverse and conflicting expectations by developing one common agenda and course of action Involves activities and competencies such as: Managing trade-offs and conflict Negotiating across diverse interests Analyzing the cultural and political environment

  36. Issue Selling Critical pathways for managers to raise issues of importance Reflects key tactics for effective agenda-building Illustrates the importance of change from the middle Includes attempts by lower level managers to influence higher level members of organization Issue selling important to both organizations and leaders: Today s leaders are challenged to cope with complex business world Issue selling allows many minds to contribute in organization s future These minds may be closer to problem areas and thus offer important perspectives

  37. Issue Selling Strategic Choices

  38. Bundling Linkages of new issue to existing issues Requires understanding of how issues get on firm s agenda Can tap into resources and support based on current issue Can backfire or become tainted because of negative issue and/or perceived failure

  39. Framing Framing impacts how choices are evaluated Issues can be framed as an opportunity or a threat Framing an issue as an opportunity can induce greater participation, commitment to taking action versus framing an issue as a threat Framing also makes a choice of: Responsibility vs. obligation Moral/ethical vs. business case Internal vs. external Idea focused vs. data driven Emotional vs. logical

  40. Language Related to issue framing Relies heavily on understanding of the cultural lens Language is tailored to the focal target group or groups Key issue is focusing on: Purpose Audience Context Obstacles

  41. Involvement Involves issue selling as a process Must identify critical stakeholders and understand the role and impact of participation Factors such as effective use of teams, negotiation, coalition building and networks are relevant Focuses on the importance of change champions/sponsors and change implementers/agents

  42. Approach Individual skills and strategies for issue selling Key choices involve: Formal vs. informal Individual vs. team Public vs. private Must be able to communicate across function, interpersonal style and organizational role/position

  43. Timing Must understand both the political and cultural context of the organization Key factors are momentum, windows of opportunities and social/organizational climate Must understand the phases and cycles of change in organization

  44. Issue Selling Challenges Understanding managers choice processes in deciding to sell issues People more willing to sell issues in contexts where they perceive management will listen and where context is experienced as supportive Context may enhance or inhibit issue selling Issue sellers often worry about damaging their reputations Leaders plays important role in issue selling because they set context for subordinates Issue selling is difficult in conflict avoiding organizational cultures Charged issues are tough, problematic, sensitive issues that sellers may be reluctant to raise Examples of charged issues: Outsourcing Restructuring Diversity/Inclusion Treatment of the natural environment

  45. Visioning at PHS For group discussion: You have just been informed by CEO Carl Nord that the board has asked for a presentation from the team that reviewed the proposals for the new technology. You will have 5 minutes to make a pitch to them on your ideas/recommendations. Carl will be present during your presentation to the board. The board will meet again in 10 days to review/decide. Taking the role of the evaluation team, outline your strategy for how you can begin to make change at PHS.

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#