Insights into Gamma-Ray Burst Internal Plateaus

What can GRB internal plateaus
tell us?
Du Shuang (杜双)
Peking University
Outline
What is a gamma-ray burst (GRB)
Observations and models of GRB
GRB afterglows
Correlation between GRB afterglows and magnetars
GRB prompt emission
Fishman G. J., Meegan C. A., 1995, Ann. Rev. of Astron. and Astrophys., 33, 415
  
Kumar P., Zhang B., 2015, Physics Reports, 561, 1
  
Kouveliotou C., et al., 1993, Astrophys. J., 413, L101
GRB model
internal shock
medium
external shock
Isotropic energy of GRBs is 10
51
-10
54
 erg (indicates catastrophes).
Known and unknown
Known:
• Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses  
 ( 
MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262
)
 Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers  
 ( 
Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13
 
)
Unkown:
• Remnant is a BH or an NS?
• Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek 
  mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? 
• Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet?
• How jet energy dissipates?
Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: 
the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs
.
Why NSs/magnetars
(i) Some long GRBs are associated with supernove   
     association. An NS can be born in a supernova.
(ii) The upper limit on rest mass of NSs may be larger  
      than 2.2 M
(
Cromartie H. T., et al.,arXiv:1904.06759
)
,
such       
      that the
 
maximum mass of  a uniform rotating NS can  
      support should be larger than 2.6 
M
.  Total masses 
      of binary NS systems in the Milky Way is 2.5-2.9 
M
.
   
Can we determine the central compact star of a certain GRB?
 
GRB X-ray afterglows may do.
GRB X-ray afterglow
Zhang B., 2006, Astrophys. J., 642, 354
 
Complements
Evans P. A., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177
 
internal plateau
Spin down of stable magnetars due to
magnetic dipole radiation
 
How to explain the internal plateau
under magnetar scenarios?
(i) Spin-down wind dissipates independently of external shock;
(ii) 
the spin-down wind should be highly magnetized;
(iii) 
the magnetic-energy dissipation rate of the spin-down wind
is approximatively the spin-down power
;
(iv) 
electrons/positrons are fast cooling.
How the spin-down wind
dissipates
large amplitude electromagnetic waves (LAEWs)
Can LAMWs be generated while satisfying
the first three conditions?
Yes,  if I haven't miscalculated
 😂.
The story doesn't end here
Spin-down wind catches up the jet
Du S., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 462, 2990
 
To be continued...
GRB 070110
Known and unknown
Known:
• Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses  
 ( 
MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262
)
 Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers  
 ( 
Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13
 
)
Unkown:
• Remnant is a BH or an NS?
• Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek 
  mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? 
• Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet?
• How jet energy dissipates?
Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: 
the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs
.
Liu T, Gu W M, Zhang B., NewAR, 2017, 79: 1
 
Magnetar in GRB 070110
Du S., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2973
 
Similar method can be used to
constrain the equation of state of NSs
through GRB 170714A
through GRB 080607
Du S., Zhou E. P., Xu R. X., 2019, ApJ accepted
Known and unknown
Known:
• Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses  
 ( 
MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262
)
 Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers  
 ( 
Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13
 
)
Unkown:
• Remnant is a BH or an NS?
• Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek 
  mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? 
• Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet?
• How jet energy dissipates?
Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: 
the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs
.
(intermittent) Gravitational waves
induced by  asymmetric jets
Du S., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 480, 420
Summary
The central compact stars of GRBs can be NSs.
X-ray plateau followed by a power-law decay with index 
 -
2 may be powered by
a stable magnetar. 
X-ray plateau followed by a steep decay with index 
< -
3
 can be explained under
the unstable magnetar scenario.
The correlation between GRB X-ray plateaus and the property of corresponding
magnetars can be used to constrain the equation of state of NSs.
                                                                                                                           
  
                                                                               Thanks
 
 
 
 
 
 
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) internal plateaus provide valuable insights into GRB prompt emission, afterglows, magnetars, and launch mechanisms. Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses, while short GRBs are associated with neutron star mergers. Understanding the properties of neutron stars and magnetars is crucial in deciphering the central compact objects of GRBs. X-ray afterglows and spin-down of stable magnetars are also key factors in unraveling the mysteries of GRBs.

  • Gamma-Ray Burst
  • Internal Plateaus
  • Neutron Stars
  • Magnetars
  • X-ray Afterglows

Uploaded on Sep 29, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What can GRB internal plateaus tell us? Du Shuang ( ) Peking University

  2. Outline What is a gamma-ray burst (GRB) Observations and models of GRB GRB afterglows Correlation between GRB afterglows and magnetars

  3. GRB prompt emission Fishman G. J., Meegan C. A., 1995, Ann. Rev. of Astron. and Astrophys., 33, 415 Kumar P., Zhang B., 2015, Physics Reports, 561,

  4. Kouveliotou C., et al., 1993, Astrophys. J., 413, L101

  5. GRB model Isotropic energy of GRBs is 1051-1054erg (indicates catastrophes). external shock medium internal shock

  6. Known and unknown Known: Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses ( MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262) Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers ( Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13 ) Unkown: Remnant is a BH or an NS? Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet? How jet energy dissipates? Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs.

  7. Why NSs/magnetars (i) Some long GRBs are associated with supernove association. An NS can be born in a supernova. (ii) The upper limit on rest mass of NSs may be larger than 2.2 M (Cromartie H. T., et al.,arXiv:1904.06759),such that the maximum mass of a uniform rotating NS can support should be larger than 2.6 M . Total masses of binary NS systems in the Milky Way is 2.5-2.9 M . Can we determine the central compact star of a certain GRB? GRB X-ray afterglows may do.

  8. GRB X-ray afterglow Zhang B., 2006, Astrophys. J., 642, 354

  9. Complements internal plateau Evans P. A., et al., 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1177

  10. Spin down of stable magnetars due to magnetic dipole radiation

  11. How to explain the internal plateau under magnetar scenarios? (i) Spin-down wind dissipates independently of external shock; (ii) the spin-down wind should be highly magnetized; (iii) the magnetic-energy dissipation rate of the spin-down wind is approximatively the spin-down power; (iv) electrons/positrons are fast cooling.

  12. How the spin-down wind dissipates large amplitude electromagnetic waves (LAEWs)

  13. Can LAMWs be generated while satisfying the first three conditions Yes, if I haven't miscalculated .

  14. The story doesn't end here

  15. Spin-down wind catches up the jet GRB 070110 Du S., et al., 2016, MNRAS, 462, 2990 To be continued...

  16. Known and unknown Known: Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses ( MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262) Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers ( Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13 ) Unkown: Remnant is a BH or an NS? Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet? How jet energy dissipates? Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs.

  17. Liu T, Gu W M, Zhang B., NewAR, 2017, 79: 1

  18. Magnetar in GRB 070110 Du S., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2973

  19. Similar method can be used to constrain the equation of state of NSs through GRB 170714A through GRB 080607 Du S., Zhou E. P., Xu R. X., 2019, ApJ accepted

  20. Known and unknown Known: Long GRBs originate from massive star collapses ( MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, Astrophys. J., 524, 262) Short GRBs at least originate from NS-NS mergers ( Abbott B. P., et al., 2017, Astrophys. J., 848, L13 ) Unkown: Remnant is a BH or an NS? Launch mechanism of relativistic jet, Blanford-Znajek mechanism or neutrino annihilation? Something else? Matter-dominated jet or magnetic-energy-dominated jet? How jet energy dissipates? Amphibolously, the answer to the first problem can be: the central compact objects of part GRBs are NSs.

  21. (intermittent) Gravitational waves induced by asymmetric jets Du S., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 480, 420

  22. Summary The central compact stars of GRBs can be NSs. X-ray plateau followed by a power-law decay with index -2 may be powered by a stable magnetar. X-ray plateau followed by a steep decay with index < -3 can be explained under the unstable magnetar scenario. The correlation between GRB X-ray plateaus and the property of corresponding magnetars can be used to constrain the equation of state of NSs. Thanks

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#