Incident Management System Workflow for RWCs Using JIRA

 
 
Incident Management System
for RWCs using JIRA ECMF
 
Zulkarnain
 
credit to Daniel Varela Santoalla, ECMWF
 
Workshop for RWC in RA I (SADC)
19-21 October 2020
Workflow of the System
2
All users can
raise new
issue/ticket
RWC will raise a
ticket issue and
evaluate the issue
RWC close the ticket if
the issue disappeared
RWC change status and
wait for proposed solution
In some cases, RWC can
escalate an incident, e.g. no
response from NFP
NFP proposes the
solution
RWC put a ticket to won’t fix if any
incident seems can not be resolved
RWC close the ticket if
incident has been resolved
NFP receive the ticket
and acknowledge that
RWC validates the NFP proposal
and updates the status
NFP provides regular
updates
NFP informs RWC about
the incident rectification
RWC to confirm that
incident has been resolved
RWC decide to raise an
incident
RWC can reopen a closed
ticket
RWC put back a ticket from wo’t fix to
in progress if a resolve action identified
 
Users role
 
RWCs
 
WDQMS NFPs
(Members)
 
Monitoring
Centres
Issue Identification
4
 
Fields for new issue
 
Several information must be filled in to create a new issue
including:
Project*: ‘Incident Management System for RWC’
Issue type*: ‘issue’ (by default)
Summary*: a brief explanation of issues raised using
this format:
ddmmyyyy-country-station/location-issue
 
example: 21102020-Botswana-Ghanzi-no data received
 If more than one station of a country show the same
non-compliance, 
station/location 
could be typed e.g.
three stations 
or
 stations
 
 
 
5
 
*
mandatory fields
OPEN
 
Fields for new issue – cont.
 
Reporter:  by default according to the account
logged in (can be any user)
Assignee (only appear in RWCs’ account): at the
beginning, it will automatically be assigned to
RWC, RWC should assign this ticket to Member
(NFP) if RWC has decided to raise the ticket as
incident
Component: RWC being responsible for this
station
Description: Details concerning the issue
Priority: priority level according  to the Technical
Guidelines for RWC on the WDQMS (Annex 2)
 
6
OPEN
 
Fields for new issue (cont)
 
Linked issues: if the issue is related with any
previous issues
WIGOS ID*: WIGOS Station Identifier (WSI)
registered in OSCAR/surface. If more than one
station is reported in this ticket, use one of their WSI
(details about the other WSIs will go into the
Description field)
WIGOS issue category:
Type of observation: surface or upper air,
Category performance: availability, quality or timeliness
 
7
OPEN
 
One of the two options must be performed by
RWCs when receiving new ticket according to their
evaluation:
1.
Convert the ticket into ‘incident’. If it is decided
to raise an issue into an incident, RWC must
assign
 this incident to specific Member (NFP)
2.
Decide ‘no incident’ for the ticket, 
the issue has
been resolved or has disappeared without
further action taken by the RWC → ‘CLOSED’
 
8
 
Incident Process Initiation
INCIDENT
CLOSED
RWC's response to the new ticket
9
RWC can correct/
edit critical details of
the ticket if needed,
and add more
detailed description
Requesting
additional
information from
reporter as
needed
If decided to
be raised as
incident
If 
decided to raise
an incident, 
ticket
must be assigned
to relevant NFP/
Member
If decided as
no incident
because
issue
disappeared
 
Receipt confirmation and action
proposal from Members
 
To make the RWC aware that the country has taken over the
task of following up the incident, 
NFP/ Member must
acknowledge the incident. RWC will confirm the ticket when
receive acknowledgement from NFP
Potential comments should be added to the ticket
NFP should continuously update the ticket status. On the
other hand, RWC regulary request update to NFP
If there is no confirmation from NFP, RWC should contact
NFP using other media (e.g. email).
RWC escalate the incident to a WMO Secretariat, that will
bring it a higher level (e.g. PR) if necessary →
 
10
UNDER INVESTIGATION
IN PROGRESS
ESCALATED
Confirm the ticket when receive
acknowledgement from NFP
11
RWCs confirms the
ticket into under
investigation
Review and validate action proposal
added by Members
12
RWC receives action
proposal added by
Member
 
Incident Rectification
 
If the incident has been rectified by the country , 
NFP
to inform RWC
The RWC will check whether the incident ticket can
be closed or has to be kept open due to ongoing
non-compliance and underperformance compared to
the WDQMS performance targets →
In the case of ongoing non-compliance, the RWC will
ask the NFP to take further actions
 
13
RESOLVED
 
Won’t fix incident
 
it might be found that an incident cannot be
rectified because no (immediate) action can be
taken
In this case, the RWC should put the incident into
the log of “Won’t fix”
RWC and/or NFP regularly monitor the incident
put in 
“Won’t fix” and whenever it is found that
an action can be taken to rectify the incident,
RWC bring the ticket back to “in progress”.
 
14
WON´T FIX
Incident rectification or
won’t fix incident
15
If the incident has
been rectified
If an incident cannot be rectified
because no (immediate) action
can be taken
Won’t fix incident
16
If it is found that an action can
be taken to rectify a “won’t fix”
incident
Closure of incident ticket
17
If the incident has been
successfully rectified the
incident ticket will be closed
CLOSED
 
Thank you
 
zulkarnain@wmo.int
 https://community.wmo.int/activity-areas/wigos
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This incident management system for Regional Warning Centers (RWCs) using JIRA helps streamline the process of raising, evaluating, and resolving issues. Users can raise new tickets, track status updates, propose solutions, and escalate incidents if necessary. With designated roles and clear workflow steps, the system ensures efficient incident resolution within RWCs.

  • Incident Management
  • RWCs
  • JIRA
  • Workflow
  • Ticketing

Uploaded on Aug 23, 2024 | 2 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Incident Management System for RWCs using JIRA ECMF Zulkarnain zulkarnain@wmo.int credit to Daniel Varela Santoalla, ECMWF Workshop for RWC in RA I (SADC) 19-21 October 2020

  2. Workflow of the System RWC will raise a ticket issue and evaluate the issue All users can raise new issue/ticket RWC close the ticket if the issue disappeared RWC decide to raise an incident RWC change status and wait for proposed solution In some cases, RWC can escalate an incident, e.g. no response from NFP NFP receive the ticket and acknowledge that NFP proposes the solution NFP provides regular updates NFP informs RWC about the incident rectification RWC validates the NFP proposal and updates the status RWC put a ticket to won t fix if any incident seems can not be resolved RWC can reopen a closed ticket RWC put back a ticket from wo t fix to in progress if a resolve action identified RWC to confirm that incident has been resolved RWC close the ticket if incident has been resolved 2

  3. Users role WDQMS NFPs (Members) Monitoring Centres RWCs Issue new ticket Issue new ticket Issue new ticket Update the ticket status into incident, under investigation, in progress, resolved, won t fix, or escalated Add comments to the ticket, as necessary Propose resolve actions through comments Add comments to the ticket, as necessary Close ticket Reopen a closed ticket

  4. Issue Identification 4

  5. Fields for new issue OPEN Several information must be filled in to create a new issue including: Project*: Incident Management System for RWC Issue type*: issue (by default) Summary*: a brief explanation of issues raised using this format: ddmmyyyy-country-station/location-issue example: 21102020-Botswana-Ghanzi-no data received If more than one station of a country show the same non-compliance, station/location could be typed e.g. three stations or stations *mandatory fields 5

  6. Fields for new issue cont. Reporter: by default according to the account logged in (can be any user) Assignee (only appear in RWCs account): at the beginning, it will automatically be assigned to RWC, RWC should assign this ticket to Member (NFP) if RWC has decided to raise the ticket as incident Component: RWC being responsible for this station Description: Details concerning the issue Priority: priority level according to the Technical Guidelines for RWC on the WDQMS (Annex 2) OPEN 6

  7. Fields for new issue (cont) OPEN Linked issues: if the issue is related with any previous issues WIGOS ID*: WIGOS Station Identifier (WSI) registered in OSCAR/surface. If more than one station is reported in this ticket, use one of their WSI (details about the other WSIs will go into the Description field) WIGOS issue category: Type of observation: surface or upper air, Category performance: availability, quality or timeliness 7

  8. Incident Process Initiation One of the two options must be performed by RWCs when receiving new ticket according to their evaluation: 1. Convert the ticket into incident . If it is decided to raise an issue into an incident, RWC must assign this incident to specific Member (NFP) 2. Decide no incident for the ticket, the issue has been resolved or has disappeared without further action taken by the RWC CLOSED INCIDENT CLOSED 8

  9. RWC's response to the new ticket If decided to be raised as incident RWC edit critical details of the ticket if needed, and add detailed description can correct/ If decided to raise an incident, ticket must be assigned to relevant NFP/ Member Requesting additional information from reporter as needed If decided as no incident because issue disappeared more 9

  10. Receipt confirmation and action proposal from Members To make the RWC aware that the country has taken over the task of following up the incident, NFP/ Member must acknowledge the incident. RWC will confirm the ticket when receive acknowledgement from NFP Potential comments should be added to the ticket NFP should continuously update the ticket status. On the other hand, RWC regulary request update to NFP If there is no confirmation from NFP, RWC should contact NFP using other media (e.g. email). RWC escalate the incident to a WMO Secretariat, that will bring it a higher level (e.g. PR) if necessary UNDER INVESTIGATION IN PROGRESS ESCALATED 10

  11. Confirm the ticket when receive acknowledgement from NFP RWCs confirms the ticket into under investigation 11

  12. Review and validate action proposal added by Members RWC receives action proposal added by Member 12

  13. Incident Rectification If the incident has been rectified by the country , NFP to inform RWC The RWC will check whether the incident ticket can be closed or has to be kept open due to ongoing non-compliance and underperformance compared to the WDQMS performance targets In the case of ongoing non-compliance, the RWC will ask the NFP to take further actions RESOLVED 13

  14. Wont fix incident WON T FIX it might be found that an incident cannot be rectified because no (immediate) action can be taken In this case, the RWC should put the incident into the log of Won tfix RWC and/or NFP regularly monitor the incident put in Won tfix and whenever it is found that an action can be taken to rectify the incident, RWC bring the ticket back to inprogress . 14

  15. Incident rectification or won t fix incident If an incident cannot be rectified because no (immediate) action can be taken If the incident has been rectified 15

  16. Wont fix incident If it is found that an action can be taken to rectify a won t fix incident 16

  17. Closure of incident ticket CLOSED If the incident has been successfully rectified the incident ticket will be closed 17

  18. Thank you zulkarnain@wmo.int https://community.wmo.int/activity-areas/wigos

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#