In Vitro Selection of Enterobacter cloacae Resistance Mechanisms with Antibiotics

 
In Vitro 
Selection of
Enterobacter cloacae
 with Cefepime,
Meropenem, and Ceftazidime-
avibactam Generate Diverse
Resistance Mechanisms
 
Mariana Castanheira, Jill Lindley, Brieanna M. Roth,
Timothy B. Doyle, Andrew P. Davis, Helio S. Sader
 
1
JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa
IDWeek 2020  ⏐  Presentation: 26
 
Achaogen
Allecra
Allergan
Amplyx
Antabio
Arietis Corp.
Arixa Pharmaceuticals
Astellas Pharma
Athelas
Basilea
Bayer
Boston Pharmaceuticals
Cidara
CorMedix
DePuy Synthes
Destiny Pharma
Discuva Ltd.
Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
 
Emery Pharma
Entasis Therapeuticals
Eurofarma Brasil
Fox Chase Chemical
Diversity Center, Inc.
Gateway Pharmaceutical
GenePOC Inc.
Geom Therapeutics, Inc.
GSK
Harvard University
Helperby
HiMedia Laboratories
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Janssen
ICON plc
Idorsia Pharmaceuticals
Iterum Therapeutics
Laboratory Specialists
 
Melinta Therapeutics
Merck
Microchem Laboratory
Micromyx
MicuRx Pharmaceuticals
Mutabilis Co.
Nabriva
Pocared
PTC Therapeutics
Rempex
Novartis
NAEJA-RGM
Paratek
Pfizer
Polyphor
Prokaryotics Inc
Qpex Biopharma
Ra Pharmaceuticals
 
Roivant Sciences
Shionogi
Spero Therapeutics
Summit Pharmaceuticals
Synlogic
Taisho Pharmaceutical
TenNor Therapeutics
Tetraphase
The Medicines Co.
Theravance
VenatoRX
Vyome Therapeutics
Wockhardt
Yukon Pharmaceuticals
Zai Lab
Zavante Therapeutics
 
Disclosure
 
E. cloacae
 
Enterobacter cloacae
 causes a variety of human infections
This organism was included in the ESKAPE pathogen list due to its ability to
cause serious infections and develop resistance during treatment
 
Acquired 
β
-lactamases are not the most common 
β
-lactam resistance
mechanism in 
E. cloacae
 
Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019
 
Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019
Boucher et al., CID, 2009
 
β-
lactam resistance in 
E. cloacae
 
Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019
 
Important contributors to 
β
-lactam
resistance, alone and in combination, are:
Overexpression of the constitutive AmpC
Outer membrane mutations decreasing
β
-lactams permeability
Increased efflux
ESBLs and carbapenemases encoding
resistance have been described in this
species
 
Due to resistance to many 
β
-lactam agents, cefepime and
carbapenems have been used for treatment of 
E. cloacae
 infections
The increased use of carbapenems to treat infections caused by 
E.
cloacae
 could have generated higher resistance levels in this
species
E. cloacae
 is the second most common carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacterales
 (CRE; data from the SENTRY Program)
Most CR-
E. cloacae
 isolates do not produce carbapenemases
 
Treatment of 
E. cloacae
 infections
 
 
Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019
 
Ceftazidime-avibactam
 
Ceftazidime-avibactam is
approved by the United States
Food and Drug Administration (US
FDA) and by the European
Medicine Agency (EMA)
Avibactam restores the activity of
ceftazidime in the presence of
Ambler class A (ESBLs and KPC),
class C (AmpC), and some class
D (OXAs) enzymes
 
Complicated urinary tract
infections, including
pyelonephritis
 
Complicated intrabdominal
infections with
metronidazole
 
Hospital acquired
pneumonia
 
Objective
 
 We subjected 6 
E. cloacae
 isolates to 10-day serial passage with
cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam to evaluate
resistance level and mechanism in the mutant strains
 
Methods
 
Baseline and mutant isolates were susceptibility tested by reference broth
microdilution (CLSI; M07, 2018) against cefepime, meropenem, and
ceftazidime-avibactam (inhibitor at 4 mg/L)
 
CLSI M7Ed10, 2018
 
Serial passaging was performed in broth
microdilution by inoculating the highest growth well
from the broth microdilution panels into new panels
Colonies growing in the highest antimicrobial
concentrations were submitted to short-read whole
genome sequencing (WGS) on a MiSeq (Illumina,
San Diego, California, USA) and analyzed for 
-
lactam resistance mechanisms
 
Methods
 
Final mutants displaying >2-fold changes from the baseline and baseline
isolates were sequenced using a long-read technology in a MinIOn
(Nanopore, Oxford, UK)
FASTQ files generated using short and long reads were combined and
used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis
SNPs determined by MAUVE independently and mapped using BWA
Variant call format (VCF) file had minimum read depth of 4X, >30 map
quality, >50 average base quality, no significant strand bias, and >75% of
mutations within reads to support the presence of any given alteration
Indels and uncovered regions were identified using nucDiff
(
https://omictools.com/nucdiff-tool
)
 
Results
 
SNP analysis
 
Conclusions
 
Meropenem (range 8 to 128-fold; median 24) and cefepime (4 to 128-fold;
median 24) mutants had higher MIC values compared to ceftazidime-
avibactam (range 2 to 32; media 5)
Two isolates had multiple alterations in each of the sequenced mutants
Mutations in the genes encoding AmpC, OmpC, and efflux regulators were
observed in ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem, meropenem and
ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefepime mutants
3 of the 6 isolates had mutations in various genes that have not been
described in relation to antimicrobial resistance and have roles in cell
division, transcription regulation, RNA folding, and efflux
 
Conclusions
 
This study suggests that exposure to cefepime and meropenem could
generate isolates with elevated MIC values for these agents in 6
genetically distinct 
E. cloacae
 clinical isolates
These high MICs were not observed with ceftazidime-avibactam
Therapies that prevent the emergence of resistance could reduce the
burden of antimicrobial resistance and should be part of stewardship
efforts to control this problem
 
Acknowledgements
 
This study was sponsored by Abbvie
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Study by Mariana Castanheira et al. presented at IDWeek 2020 discusses the generation of diverse resistance mechanisms in Enterobacter cloacae with cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam. E. cloacae, a significant pathogen causing human infections, exhibits various resistance mechanisms, including overexpression of AmpC, outer membrane mutations, decreased permeability, and increased efflux. Treatment options for E. cloacae infections are limited due to resistance, leading to the use of cefepime and carbapenems. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential treatment option. Carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae strains are a concern.

  • Enterobacter cloacae
  • Antibiotic resistance
  • In vitro selection
  • Ceftazidime-avibactam
  • IDWeek 2020

Uploaded on Sep 25, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. In Vitro Selection of Enterobacter cloacae with Cefepime, Meropenem, and Ceftazidime- avibactam Generate Diverse Resistance Mechanisms Mariana Castanheira, Jill Lindley, Brieanna M. Roth, Timothy B. Doyle, Andrew P. Davis, Helio S. Sader 1JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa IDWeek 2020 Presentation: 26

  2. Disclosure Roivant Sciences Shionogi Spero Therapeutics Summit Pharmaceuticals Synlogic Taisho Pharmaceutical TenNor Therapeutics Tetraphase The Medicines Co. Theravance VenatoRX Vyome Therapeutics Wockhardt Yukon Pharmaceuticals Zai Lab Zavante Therapeutics Achaogen Allecra Allergan Amplyx Antabio Arietis Corp. Arixa Pharmaceuticals Astellas Pharma Athelas Basilea Bayer Boston Pharmaceuticals Cidara CorMedix DePuy Synthes Destiny Pharma Discuva Ltd. Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH Emery Pharma Entasis Therapeuticals Eurofarma Brasil Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center, Inc. Gateway Pharmaceutical GenePOC Inc. Geom Therapeutics, Inc. GSK Harvard University Helperby HiMedia Laboratories F. Hoffmann-La Roche Janssen ICON plc Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Iterum Therapeutics Laboratory Specialists Melinta Therapeutics Merck Microchem Laboratory Micromyx MicuRx Pharmaceuticals Mutabilis Co. Nabriva Pocared PTC Therapeutics Rempex Novartis NAEJA-RGM Paratek Pfizer Polyphor Prokaryotics Inc Qpex Biopharma Ra Pharmaceuticals

  3. E. cloacae Enterobacter cloacae causes a variety of human infections This organism was included in the ESKAPE pathogen list due to its ability to cause serious infections and develop resistance during treatment Acquired -lactamases are not the most common -lactam resistance mechanism in E. cloacae Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019 Boucher et al., CID, 2009 Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019

  4. -lactam resistance in E. cloacae Important contributors to -lactam resistance, alone and in combination, are: Overexpression of the constitutive AmpC Outer membrane mutations decreasing -lactams permeability Increased efflux ESBLs and carbapenemases encoding resistance have been described in this species Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019

  5. Treatment of E. cloacae infections Due to resistance to many -lactam agents, cefepime and carbapenems have been used for treatment of E. cloacae infections The increased use of carbapenems to treat infections caused by E. cloacae could have generated higher resistance levels in this species E. cloacae is the second most common carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; data from the SENTRY Program) Most CR-E. cloacae isolates do not produce carbapenemases Davin-Regli et al., CMR, 2019

  6. Ceftazidime-avibactam Ceftazidime-avibactam is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) Avibactam restores the activity of ceftazidime in the presence of Ambler class A (ESBLs and KPC), class C (AmpC), and some class D (OXAs) enzymes Complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis Complicated intrabdominal infections with metronidazole Hospital acquired pneumonia

  7. Objective We subjected 6 E. cloacae isolates to 10-day serial passage with cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam to evaluate resistance level and mechanism in the mutant strains

  8. Methods Baseline and mutant isolates were susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution (CLSI; M07, 2018) against cefepime, meropenem, and ceftazidime-avibactam (inhibitor at 4 mg/L) Serial passaging was performed in broth microdilution by inoculating the highest growth well from the broth microdilution panels into new panels Colonies growing in the highest antimicrobial concentrations were submitted to short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) on a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) and analyzed for - lactam resistance mechanisms -lactam resistance genes AmpC AmpR AmpD OmpC OmpF AcrA AcrB TolC MarA MarB MarR RamA RamR CsrA RobA SoxS CLSI M7Ed10, 2018

  9. Methods Final mutants displaying >2-fold changes from the baseline and baseline isolates were sequenced using a long-read technology in a MinIOn (Nanopore, Oxford, UK) FASTQ files generated using short and long reads were combined and used for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis SNPs determined by MAUVE independently and mapped using BWA Variant call format (VCF) file had minimum read depth of 4X, >30 map quality, >50 average base quality, no significant strand bias, and >75% of mutations within reads to support the presence of any given alteration Indels and uncovered regions were identified using nucDiff (https://omictools.com/nucdiff-tool)

  10. Results MIC (mg/L) ECL Isolate Meropenem #1 0.03 #2 0.03 #3 0.03 #4 0.06 #5 0.06 #6 0.03 Ceftazidime- avibactam 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0.25 Cefepime Resistance genes 0.5 act-18, aph(6)-Ia 0.25 act-17, fosA 0.5 act-41-like, aadA2, sul1 0.5 act-15-like, aph(6)-Ia 0.25 act-12-like, fosA 0.25 cmh-3-like, aph(6)-Ia, aph(6)-Id

  11. ECL#2 Serial Passaging MICs ECL#1 Serial Passaging MICs 64 64 16 16 MIC (mg/L) MIC (mg/L) 4 4 1 1 0.25 0.25 0.0625 0.0625 0.015625 0.015625 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Day Day Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam ECL#3 Serial Passaging MICs 64 16 MIC (mg/L) 4 1 0.25 0.0625 0.015625 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Day Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam

  12. ECL#5 Serial Passaging MICs ECL#4 Serial Passaging MICs 64 32 16 8 MIC (mg/L) MIC (mg/L) 4 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.0625 0.03125 0.015625 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Day Day Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam ECL#6 Serial Passaging MICs 64 16 MIC (mg/L) 4 1 0.25 0.0625 0.015625 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Day Meropenem Cefepime Ceftazidime-avibactam

  13. Fold change for Meropenem MIC results and E. cloacae isolates #1 #2 #3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 2 8 4 4 8 4 16 16 4 16 32 4 16 32 8 16 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 #4 1 4 4 16 32 32 64 128 128 128 #5 1 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 8 8 #6 1 1 2 4 4 8 8 16 32 64 Median 1 1 2 4 4 6 8 16 24 24 Mode 1 1 2 4 4 4 8 16 32 8 Geo Mean 1.0 1.4 2.5 4.0 4.5 7.1 10.1 14.3 20.2 25.4

  14. Fold change for Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC results and E. cloacae isolates #1 #2 #3 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 4 1 4 4 2 8 4 2 8 4 2 32 8 2 32 8 2 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 #4 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 8 16 8 #5 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 #6 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Median 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 Mode 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 Geo Mean 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.2 3.6 5.7 5.0

  15. Fold change for Cefepime MIC results and E. cloacae isolates #1 #2 #3 1 1 1 4 2 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 4 4 8 32 4 32 32 4 64 32 4 32 32 4 Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 #4 1 8 8 32 64 64 128 128 128 128 #5 1 2 2 8 8 16 16 16 16 16 #6 1 2 4 4 8 8 8 16 16 16 Median 1 3 4 6 8 8 12 24 24 24 Mode 1 2 4 4 8 8 8 32 16 32 Geo Mean 1.0 3.2 4.5 7.1 9.0 10.1 16.0 22.6 25.4 22.6

  16. MIC Fold change for E. cloacae isolates Meropenem Geo Mean 1 1 1.4 2 2 2.5 4 4 4.0 4 4 4.5 6 4 7.1 8 8 10.1 16 16 14.3 24 32 20.2 24 8 25.4 Ceftazidime-avibactam Cefepime Geo Mean 2 2 1.6 2 2 1.8 2 2 1.8 2 2 2.2 3 4 2.8 3 2 3.2 3 2 3.6 5 2 5.7 5 2 5.0 Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Median Mode Median Mode Median Mode 3 4 6 8 8 12 24 24 24 Geo Mean 3.2 4.5 7.1 9.0 10.1 16.0 22.6 25.4 22.6 2 4 4 8 8 8 32 16 32

  17. SNP analysis CorC (CNNM family magnesium/cobalt transport protein) EnvZ (two-component system sensor histidine kinase) NlpE (envelope stress response activation lipoprotein) GalU (UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase) multidrug efflux RND transporter permease subunit MioC (cell division inhibition FMN-binding protein) AmpC (chromossomal class C beta-lactamase) UrtB (urea ABC transporter permease subunit) sensor domain-containing phosphodiesterase ABC transporter substrate-binding protein TetR/AcrR-like (transcriptional regulator) RhlE (ATP-dependent RNA helicase) DNA-3-methyladenine glycosylase I glycosyltransferase family 4 protein hypothetical protein M942_13365 OmpC (outer membrane protein) UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase EAL domain-containing protein translation initiation factor IF-2 SlyA (transcriptional regulator) peptide chain release factor 1 hypothetical protein GtrA family protein beta-galactosidase chitoporin Isolate #1 Antimicrobial selection Meropenem (Day 10) Ceftazidime-avibactam (Day 10) Meropenem (Day 10) Ceftazidime-avibactam (Day 10) Cefepime (Day 6) Cefepime (Day 10) Meropenem (Day 10) Cefepime (Day 10) Meropenem (Day 10) Ceftazidime-avibactam (Day 10) Cefepime (Day 3) Cefepime (Day 10) Meropenem (Day 10) Cefepime (Day 10) Meropenem (Day 10) Cefepime (Day 10) missense stop upstream region alteration #2 #3 #4 #5 #6

  18. Conclusions Meropenem (range 8 to 128-fold; median 24) and cefepime (4 to 128-fold; median 24) mutants had higher MIC values compared to ceftazidime- avibactam (range 2 to 32; media 5) Two isolates had multiple alterations in each of the sequenced mutants Mutations in the genes encoding AmpC, OmpC, and efflux regulators were observed in ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem, meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefepime mutants 3 of the 6 isolates had mutations in various genes that have not been described in relation to antimicrobial resistance and have roles in cell division, transcription regulation, RNA folding, and efflux

  19. Conclusions This study suggests that exposure to cefepime and meropenem could generate isolates with elevated MIC values for these agents in 6 genetically distinct E. cloacae clinical isolates These high MICs were not observed with ceftazidime-avibactam Therapies that prevent the emergence of resistance could reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance and should be part of stewardship efforts to control this problem

  20. Acknowledgements This study was sponsored by Abbvie

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#