i-LEAD Results and Recommendations Overview

Slide Note
Embed
Share

This document provides insights into the results and recommendations of the i-LEAD project led by Patrick Padding for the Netherlands Police and Polish Platform for Homeland Security. It discusses the role of ENLETS as an initiator of EU projects, the funding of i-LEAD by the European Union's Horizon 2020 program, and the exploitation of i-LEAD results within ENLETS. The recommendations touch upon the need for continuous debate on technology in law enforcement, enhanced involvement of LEAs in call writing, and the increasing demand for proactive and efficient policing in the face of changing societal dynamics.


Uploaded on Oct 10, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Results and recommendations of i-LEAD On behalf of Patrick Padding ENLETS Core Group Leader|Netherlands Police Rashel Talukder Polish Platform for Homeland Security (PPHS) | ENLETS Secretariat

  2. What is ENLETS?

  3. What is ENLETS? https://enlets.eu

  4. ENLETS as an initiator of EU projects

  5. What is i-LEAD? EU Project Network of practitioners September 2016 February 2023 Budget 3.5 mln Euro i-LEAD is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme, under grant agreement no 740685

  6. What is i-LEAD? i-LEAD is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme, under grant agreement no 740685

  7. Exploitation of i-LEAD results within ENLETS Who else can use i-LEAD outcomes? Everyone, because outcomes and methodology are publicly available. i-LEAD legacy Overall methodology Methodology of organising Industry and Research Days Front Office Internal communication system

  8. Other results, observations and recommendations Difficulties with scanning research and market solutions. Law enforcement is expecting more than we can offer in the project; a continuous debate on technology is needed (all PG's would like to continue and stay in contact). LEA s should be more involved in writing the calls. The need and potential in front-line policing and public protection is increasing: digital community policing is lacking, infrastructures are changing, behaviour of people is changing and social economical and geo political changes are constantly asking for an adequate organised police (pro-active, efficient, close to society).

  9. Other results, observations and recommendations Keep strengthening the existing initiatives and projects from networks and joint ventures to build up a permanent cooperation structure. Although 5 years is long time we need to organise and support beyond successful network projects. Allow projects like i-LEAD to foster the outcome, network, legacy also after the project duration. Ensure that Member States will be invited as much as possible to carry the work. Ensure that new projects in Horizon Europe will examine the baseline capabilities from LEA's before they start to increase the intake from the results delivered by the project. A successful pre-phase study in ENLETS is called Technology Acceptance Model .

  10. http://i-lead.eu project@i-lead.eu https://enlets.eu contact@enlets.eu On behalf of Patrick Padding, ENLETS Core Group Leader and i-LEAD Coordinator Rashel Talukder, Managing Director, Polish Platform for Homeland Security

Related


More Related Content