Guidelines for Integrating Gender-Based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Food Security and Agriculture Action

 
MODULE 
5
 - 
Thematic Areas:
Integrating Gender-Based Violence
Interventions in 
FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE
 
Agenda
Links between GBV and Humanitarian Programming
Knowledge Basics for Implementing the Thematic Area
Guidance
A Closer Look: Assessment; Resource Mobilization;
Implementation; Referrals; Coordination; Monitoring
and Evaluation
Discussion of Implementation Strategy
Developing an Action Plan
 
 
 
 
 
Outcomes
FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors are
informed about key relevant elements of the
Guidelines
FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors are
supported to develop an action plan with
indicators for integrating the Guidelines’
recommendations into their areas of operation
FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors
identify accountability measures to track
progress of GBV risk reduction mainstreaming
and response
 
 
FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE (FSA)
 
 
“Protection of all persons affected and at
risk must inform humanitarian decision-
making and response…it must be central
to our preparedness efforts, as part of
immediate and life-saving activities….”
Warm-up Activity: Mapping Risk across
FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE
 
1)
What types of GBV are prevalent in your settings?
2)
What are the risks in this setting that contribute to GBV
Pre-existing - 
exists independent of, or prior to emergency or conflict
(culture, policy, etc.)
Emergency-related - 
specific to/resulting from the disaster or conflict
Humanitarian-related - 
caused directly or indirectly by  humanitarian
environment
3)
What can your cluster/sector do to prevent and 
 
mitigate
GBV risks?
Pre-existing risk mitigation activity
Emergency-related risk mitigation activity
Humanitarian-related risk mitigation activity
 
 
Assessment,
Analysis and
Planning
 
What are our priority areas of
inquiry for FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE?
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG:
Assessment, Analysis & Planning
 
Key point:
Purpose is not for 
FSA 
actors to
undertake standalone GBV
assessments, but rather to 
incorporate
questions related to GBV risks into their
ongoing 
FSA 
assessments
 
 
 
 
A walk through FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG:
Assessment (cont’d)
 
Provides a list of recommended GBV-related
questions to incorporate, as relevant, into 
FSA
assessments and routine monitoring
These questions do not cover the nature and scope
of GBV, but basic issues related to 
FSA
programming, policies and communications
FSA 
specialists are NOT expected to undertake
assessments about the extent of GBV
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD
SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE?
 
From page 41:
f) 
Are there cultural norms that restrict women, girls and
other at-risk groups from accessing agricultural lands,
water points, seed and tool dispersal programmes, or
food/cash/voucher distribution programmes?
 
i) Are women and other at-risk groups involved in
decisions about food/asset baskets and planned
agriculture or livestock activities (e.g. seed or livestock
distribution)?
 
 
 
 
Activity: Conducting Assessments
 
Option 1: Review and Discuss
 
 
 
Review the Areas of Inquiry in the GBV guidelines:
 
1)
Which questions would you prioritize?
 
1)
How will you collect this information?
I.
What surveys / assessment are already being used where you can
integrate questions
II.
When and where will the survey occur to ensure participation of at-risk
groups
 
3)
Who would you need to work with to collect this information?
I.
What is the composition of the assessment team, men / women?
II.
What training will they require?
III.
How will they communicate about the assessment with the community?
 
 
 
 
Activity: Conducting Assessments
 
Option 2: Review and Compare
 
 
 
Review the Areas of Inquiry in the GBV guidelines against your current
assessment tool.
 
1)
Which GBV risks and considerations are already integrated in the
assessment tool currently or previously used?
 
2)
Which GBV risks or considerations would you prioritize for inclusion?
 
3)
How will it be possible to integrate new questions which consider
GBV risks?
I.
With whom will you need to advocate to include these areas of inquiry?
-
 
Cluster coordinators, state actors, GBV specialists
II.
With whom will you need to collaborate in order to safely and effectively
integrate these areas of inquiry?
-
 
Cluster coordinators, state actors, GBV specialists
 
 
 
 
 
 
Activity: Conducting Assessments
 
Option 3: Mapping information on GBV risks to mitigation
Prioritize 3 areas of inquiry that apply to your context and carry out the below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Quiz: Conducting Assessments
 
FSA
 actors should:
Consult GBV specialists throughout the planning,
design, analysis and interpretation of an assessment
Not use local expertise
Strictly adhere to safe and ethical recommendations
for researching GBV
Share data that may be linked back to a group or an
individual, including GBV survivors
Seek out GBV survivors to speak to them specifically
about their experiences of GBV
 
 
 
 
Quiz: Conducting Assessments
 
Assume reported data on GBV/trends represent actual
prevalence/trends in the extent of GBV
Include GBV specialists on inter-agency and inter-sectoral
teams
Not include female assessors and translators when
conducting assessments
Conduct consultations in a secure setting where
individuals feel safe to provide information and
participate in discussions and decision-making
Provide training for assessment team members on ethical
and safety issues
 
 
 
Discussion:
Is it always possible to include GBV in initial assessments?
How can one ensure inclusion of at-risk groups in
assessments?
Who needs to be involved?
Why is it the responsibility of 
FSA
 staff? Where does this
responsibility ends?
Who needs to be convinced?
ALWAYS INVOLVED WOMEN AND OTHER AT-
RISK GROUPS IN THE DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT
OF 
FSA
 PROGRAMS
 
Resource
Mobilization
 
What are FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE commitments to
Resource Mobilization for GBV
risk reduction?
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG:
Resource Mobilization
 
Key point:
Funding for 
FSA
-related GBV prevention and
risk mitigation activities must be included in
project proposals from the outset of
emergency response
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Resource Mobilization
 
In humanitarian settings, GBV resources tend to be linked
to longer-term protection and stability initiatives
Resources to address GBV in emergencies are often
limited
The Guidelines provide recommendations on
incorporating GBV risk mitigation activities into project
proposals
Donors are encouraged to reference this section to
ensure GBV issues are included in 
FSA 
proposals
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Resource Mobilization
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY
AND AGRICULTURE ?
 
GBV-related points to consider for inclusion
 in a proposal
 (Pg. 44):
 
1). Humanitarian Needs Overview/Situation Analysis:
Describe the 
vulnerabilities 
of women, girls and other at-risk groups;
2). Project Rationale/Justification:
Explain 
GBV-related risks
 related to 
FSA
 interventions in your context;
3). Project Description:
Explain which 
activities
 may help in preventing or mitigating GBV
Describe mechanisms that facilitate 
reporting of GBV i
n safe and ethical
manner
 
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE?
 
How to measure GBV-related points to consider for inclusion
 in a
proposal, cont’d
:
 
Monitoring and Evaluation:
 
M&E plan should 
track progress 
and 
adverse effects 
on GBV
mainstreaming activities;
M&E plan should include the 
participation
 of women, girls and other at-
risk groups;
Include 
outcome-level indicators 
to measure program impact on GBV-
related risks;
Disaggregate
 indicators by 
sex, age, disability 
and other vulnerability
factors
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE IASC GENDER MARKER
 
Both Gender marker and GBV
mainstreaming 
address
issues of women and girls’
empowerment and gender
equality and include men
and boys as partners in
prevention.
 
= Tool that codes (0-2
scale) whether or not a
humanitarian project is
designed well enough
to ensure that
women/girls, men/boys
will benefit equally
from it or that it will
advance gender
equality in another way
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD
SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE?
 
 
 
Some examples of GBV mainstreaming activities that can be
included in proposals:
 
Ensuring land access for women and girls
Designing safe distributions with equitable access for at risk
groups (disabled persons, women and girls)
Resettlement options for GBV survivors
Designing culturally relevant livestock programs that consider
ownership, control, care and management
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD
SECURITY AND LIVELIHOODS?
 
 
 
Do you have other examples of mitigation strategies?
 
 
 
 
Activity: Resource Mobilization
 
 
In Small Groups:
Review the assigned proposal 
in light with the
resource mobilization checklist of the Guidelines and
highlight:
 
Good practices
Gaps
Proposed strategies to address these gaps.
Tools needed to better design proposals
 
 
 
 
 
Discussion
:
Is GBV-related activities in FSA programs always
cost-effective? 
Why should it be considered?
Do donors always support GBV-related activities in
FSA programs? What can be some of these
barriers? 
GBV MAINSTREAMING ACTIVITIES ALWAYS
CONTRIBUTE TO GOOD 
FSA 
PROGRAMMING
 
Implementation
 
What are our commitments to
include GBV prevention and
mitigation within ongoing and
new FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE activities?
 
 
 
 
 
Key takeaway:
 
If effectively designed, 
FSA 
programmes can
mitigate risks of GBV:
 
Availability, access and utilization of food for
vulnerable groups
Participation of women and girls in 
FSA 
related
committees and decision making processes
Safe commodity and cash-based interventions
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Implementation
 
 
 
 
A walk through the
 
FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE
 
TAG: Implementation
 
Provides guidance for putting GBV-related risk reduction
responsibilities into practice
Activities to improve the overall quality of GBV-related
prevention and mitigation strategies:
Establish GBV-related responsibilities common to all actors
working 
within 
FSA
Recommend strategies for 
FSA
 actors to reduce risks
Maximize immediate protection of GBV survivors and persons
at risk and foster longer-term interventions to eliminate GBV
3 main types of responsibilities: programming, policies,
and communications & information sharing
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for
 
FOOD
SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE
?
 
From page 45:
Identify appropriate livestock responses that do not
increase the labour burden—or reduce access to key
assets—for women and other at-risk groups.
Ensure that the chosen transfer modality is
substantial enough to meet food requirements so that
women, girls and other at-risk groups are deterred
from having to exchange sex for food and/or
agricultural inputs.
 
 
 
 
Activity- Implementation
Option 1: Review Mitigation Strategies
 
In small groups:
1.
Review recommended mitigation strategies
2.
Add any strategies missing
3.
Prioritize 2-3 key strategies that should be prioritized
4.
Highlight operational challenges
 
Rotate teams: troubleshoot challenges, provide recommendations
 
5. Create operational action plan:
i.
Key actions
ii.
Coordination amongst key actors
iii.
Resources / support required
 
 
 
 
 
 
Activity- Implementation
Option 2: Mitigating GBV risk in Program Strategy
 
Review current programmatic strategy
 
In small groups:
 
1.
Highlight GBV mitigation strategies currently integrated
2.
Review Guideline recommended mitigation strategies
3.
Prioritize 2-3 key strategies that should be prioritized
4.
Create operational action plan:
i.
Information needed
ii.
Key actions
iii.
Coordination amongst key actors
iv.
Resources / support required
 
 
Discussion: Prioritization and Selection Criteria
 
How to prioritize GBV risk reduction in FSA
programs?
What types of investments are required?
What vulnerability criteria would you use for
beneficiaries?
What challenges are associated with these?
How should sensitive information be managed
to protect affected populations, including
survivors of GBV?
33
DON’T SINGLE OUT GBV SURVIVORS OR
VULNERABLE GROUPS
 
Coordination
 
What are our commitments to
include GBV prevention and
mitigation within ongoing and
new FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE activities?
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY
AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination
 
Key takeaways:
 
GBV prevention and risk reduction is most effective
when done in coordination with both GBV specialists
and other sectors
Recommends specific actions for FSA actors to
coordinate with others
 
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination
 
Supports humanitarian actors to define responsibilities and
accountability mechanisms in GBV prevention and response
efforts
Establish responsibilities for humanitarian actors in the prevention
and mitigation of GBV
Maximize immediate protection of GBV survivors and persons at risk
through multi-sectoral coordination on response to GBV incidents
 
Coordination activities can move across the 3 main types of
responsibilities: programming, policies, and communications &
information sharing and may also include advocacy / efforts for
:
Assessment
Resource Mobilization
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination
 
GBV Specialists can assist 
FSA
 actors to (Pg. 51):
 
1.
Design and conduct 
FSA
 assessments that examine the
risks of GBV, and strategize ways to mitigate these risks
2.
Provide trainings for 
FSA
 staff on issues of gender, GBV
and women’s/human rights
3.
Develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) for 
FSA
actors
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE? 
Coordination
 with GBV Specialists cont’d…
 
GBV Specialists can assist 
FSA
 
actors to:
 
4.
Identify where survivors can receive care, and provide
FSA
 staff with skills and information to respond
supportively to survivors
5.
Provide training for the affected community on issues
of gender, GBV and women’s/human rights as they
relate to 
FSA
 rights
6.
Review relevant statutory and customary laws and
policies to strengthen GBV-related legal protections
 
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE: 
Coordination with other sectors 
(p. 52
)
 
FSA
 actors can work with 
(e.g.: SHELTER/WASH actors)
:
 
Where stoves and cooking fuel are the responsibility of
SS&R actors, consult them on the provision of energy-
efficient cooking stoves and safe fuel options
Work with WASH actors to facilitate access to and use of
water for cooking needs, agricultural lands and livestock
 
 
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE: 
Coordination for cross-cutting issues
 
Also coordinate with partners addressing:
 
 
gender
mental health and psychosocial support
(MHPSS)
HIV
age
environment
 
 
 
 
Activity: Coordination
Option 1: Mechanisms to Support Program Implementation
 
Return to small groups from the implementation activity:
 
1.
Reflect on the specific actions recommended
2.
Who needs to be involved to execute this action
GBV specialists
Other clusters
3.
What type of coordination is required – be specific
 
-
 
Roles and responsibilities
 
-
 
Accountability mechanisms
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Activity: Coordination Mapping
 
With what sectors would 
FSA
 
benefit from stronger
coordination?
 
i.
What coordination mechanisms exist to support collaboration
ii.
Key actions
iii.
Who is responsible, accountable, needs to be informed
iv.
How will you monitor progress
 
How could 
FSA
 
and protection actors better
coordinate/work together?
i.
What coordination mechanisms exist to support collaboration
ii.
Key actions
iii.
Who is responsible, accountable, needs to be informed
iv.
How will you monitor progress
 
 
 
 
Suggested recommendations about referrals
in the Guidelines
 
All humanitarian personnel who engage with affected
populations should have up to date written information
about where to refer survivors for care and support.
Ensure training on how to respectfully and supportively
engage with survivors and provide risk reporting and/or
referral information in an ethical, safe and confidential
manner
Any programmes that share information about reports of
GBV must abide by safety and ethical standards (e.g.
shared information does not reveal the identity of or pose
a security risk to individual survivors, their families or the
broader community)
 
 
 
 
Activity: Coordination
Option 3: Coordination and Referrals w/ GBV specialists
In small groups discuss:
 
Map the current referral mechanism where your activities are
ongoing
 
-
 
What services are available
 
-
 
Which actors are involved
 
What are your responsibilities within the referral mechanism?
 
- 
 
Who do you immediately report an incident to?
 
- 
 
Are there cases where you are unable to refer?
 
What happens when there is no referral mechanism in place or
when it is not functioning?
 
- 
 
What are your responsibilities in this situation?
 
Monitoring and
Evaluation
 
What are priority indicators for
GBV prevention and risk
mitigation in FOOD SECURITY
AND AGRICULTURE
programming?
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Monitoring & Evaluation
 
Key Point:
Indicators can be used to measure the
outcomes of activities undertaken across
the programme cycle, with the ultimate
aim of maintaining effective programmes
and improving accountability
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND
AGRICULTURE TAG: Monitoring & Evaluation
 
Why? Limited evidence exists on effective
integration of GBV programming in “other” sectors
Indicators in the Guidelines aim to:
Track outputs resulting from interventions to affected
populations
Chart outcome of cluster activities
Measure progress toward objectives, considering
diversity of affected populations & their perspectives
of the response
 
 
 
 
 
Monitoring & Evaluation: 
Indicators
 
Why? Limited evidence exists on effective
integration of GBV programming in “other”
sectors
Indicators in the Guidelines aim to:
Track outputs resulting from interventions to
affected populations
Chart outcome of cluster activities
Measure progress toward objectives, considering
diversity of affected populations & their
perspectives of the response
 
 
 
 
 
Monitoring & Evaluation: 
Reporting
 
Analyze existing data using a ‘GBV lens’ to improve GBV
prevention and response
Example
: Existence of cultural norms that prevent women
from owning land
What are the implications of the findings?
How may this affect GBV prevention and mitigation?
Failing to meet a target can lead to response and resource
mobilization
Use data for action across the programme cycle
 
 
# of assessments by FSA sector that include GBV-related
questions
# of FSA staff who participated in a training on gender, GBV
and human rights
# of affected persons who report concerns about
experiencing GBV when asked about participating in a
commodity- or cash- based intervention
# of females who report retaining control over agricultural
inputs and/or livestock
 
 
What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY
AND AGRICULTURE (Pg. 53)?
 
 
 
 
 
A walk through the FOOD SECURITY
AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Monitoring &
Evaluation
 
Good to know:
Improvement or success is not
demonstrated by a decrease in reported
GBV cases
Targets and data sources can be
modified to fit the context
 
 
 
Option 1: Prioritizing indicators and data collection methodology
1.
Prioritize 1-2 indicators
i.
Select indicator from assessment, resource mobilization,
implementation or coordination based on current focus within
response
i.
For example, if preparing for an assessment
 
2.
Review the indicator reference sheet used for women’s
participation
 
3.
 
Fill out the blank indicator reference sheet for the indicator
 
prioritized
i.
Indicator description
ii.
Indicator acquisition
iii.
Data Quality issues
iv.
Data Analysis and Reporting/Dissemination
 
 
Activity: Monitoring & Evaluation
 
 
 
Option 2: Analyzing findings from gender or GBV evaluation
 
1.
How are these findings relevant to your sector programming?
i.
Which sectoral activities may be contributing to GBV risks?
ii.
What cultural, community or policy variables may be contributing
to GBV risks?
a.
Representation of women, girls and at-risk groups
b.
Traditional or cultural gender norms, power dynamics
c.
Policies governing access to services, impunity
 
2.
What activities could you adjust to prevent or mitigate GBV risks?
i.
Activities specific to prevention (focus on gender equality)
ii.
Activities specific to mitigation (focus on reducing exposure to risk)
iii.
Activities specific to response (focus on PFA, referral)
 
 
Activity: Monitoring & Evaluation
 
Monitoring and Evaluation
 
How do you know whether 
FSA
 programs contributed to
reducing GBV risks?
 
-
 
Did select 
FSA
 activities contribute to reducing GBV risks?
 
-
 
What information lets you measure this?
What are the challenges to monitoring GBV risks?
Is it always possible to monitor that at-risk groups needs are
identified and responded to?
Do 
FSA
 SOPs 
include direction for monitoring GBV risks within
FSA
 programming?
54
Do not use number of
reported cases as an indicator
of success.
 
Final Action Plan
 
1.
In teams write down the priority actions
to take forward
2.
Refer to the prevention, mitigation and
response activities of the day
3.
Highlight key actors and responsibilities
4.
Note attention to specific types of actions,
such as training, resources, staffing,
access, etc.
 
 
 
Thank You.
For more information visit: 
www.gbvguidelines.org
Slide Note
Embed
Share

These guidelines focus on integrating gender-based violence interventions into humanitarian action related to food security and agriculture. The document addresses key elements, provides guidance on implementation strategies, and emphasizes the importance of accountability in tracking progress of gender-based violence risk reduction and response in the food security and agriculture sector.

  • Gender-based Violence
  • Humanitarian Action
  • Food Security
  • Agriculture
  • Guidelines

Uploaded on Sep 27, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MODULE 5 - Thematic Areas: Integrating Gender-Based Violence Interventions in FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  2. Agenda Links between GBV and Humanitarian Programming Knowledge Basics for Implementing the Thematic Area Guidance A Closer Look: Assessment; Resource Mobilization; Implementation; Referrals; Coordination; Monitoring and Evaluation Discussion of Implementation Strategy Developing an Action Plan

  3. Outcomes FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors are informed about key relevant elements of the Guidelines FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors are supported to develop an action plan with indicators for integrating the Guidelines recommendations into their areas of operation FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE actors identify accountability measures to track progress of GBV risk reduction mainstreaming and response FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE (FSA)

  4. Protection of all persons affected and at risk must inform humanitarian decision- making and response it must be central to our preparedness efforts, as part of immediate and life-saving activities . Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  5. Warm-up Activity: Mapping Risk across FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE 1) What types of GBV are prevalent in your settings? 2) What are the risks in this setting that contribute to GBV Pre-existing - exists independent of, or prior to emergency or conflict (culture, policy, etc.) Emergency-related - specific to/resulting from the disaster or conflict Humanitarian-related - caused directly or indirectly by humanitarian environment 3) What can your cluster/sector do to prevent and mitigate GBV risks? Pre-existing risk mitigation activity Emergency-related risk mitigation activity Humanitarian-related risk mitigation activity Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  6. Assessment, Analysis and Planning What are our priority areas of inquiry for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE?

  7. A walk through FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Assessment, Analysis & Planning Key point: Purpose is not for FSA actors to undertake standalone GBV assessments, but rather to incorporate questions related to GBV risks into their ongoing FSA assessments Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  8. A walk through FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Assessment (cont d) Provides a list of recommended GBV-related questions to incorporate, as relevant, into FSA assessments and routine monitoring These questions do not cover the nature and scope of GBV, but basic issues related to FSA programming, policies and communications FSA specialists are NOT expected to undertake assessments about the extent of GBV Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  9. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE? From page 41: f) Are there cultural norms that restrict women, girls and other at-risk groups from accessing agricultural lands, water points, seed and tool dispersal programmes, or food/cash/voucher distribution programmes? i) Are women and other at-risk groups involved in decisions about food/asset baskets and planned agriculture or livestock activities (e.g. seed or livestock distribution)? Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  10. Activity: Conducting Assessments Option 1: Review and Discuss Review the Areas of Inquiry in the GBV guidelines: 1) Which questions would you prioritize? 1) How will you collect this information? I. What surveys / assessment are already being used where you can integrate questions When and where will the survey occur to ensure participation of at-risk groups II. 3) Who would you need to work with to collect this information? I. II. III. How will they communicate about the assessment with the community? What is the composition of the assessment team, men / women? What training will they require? Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  11. Activity: Conducting Assessments Option 2: Review and Compare Review the Areas of Inquiry in the GBV guidelines against your current assessment tool. 1) Which GBV risks and considerations are already integrated in the assessment tool currently or previously used? 2) Which GBV risks or considerations would you prioritize for inclusion? 3) How will it be possible to integrate new questions which consider GBV risks? I. With whom will you need to advocate to include these areas of inquiry? - Cluster coordinators, state actors, GBV specialists II. With whom will you need to collaborate in order to safely and effectively integrate these areas of inquiry? - Cluster coordinators, state actors, GBV specialists Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  12. Activity: Conducting Assessments Option 3: Mapping information on GBV risks to mitigation Prioritize 3 areas of inquiry that apply to your context and carry out the below: Area of Inquiry Risk of Concern Potential for GBV Mitigation 1. Access to land Women and girls are unable to earn livelihoods and generate basic food needs Sexual exploitation and abuse in order to obtain basic needs Work with local laws and actors to ensure land access for women and food security 2. Distributions Access for at-risk groups is prevented, or exploitation ensues Sexual assault, harassment, deprivation due to insecurity, exploitation Plan distributions with at-risk groups, (timing, physical layout, choice of items (cash versus voucher) to reduce risk Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  13. Quiz: Conducting Assessments FSA actors should: Consult GBV specialists throughout the planning, design, analysis and interpretation of an assessment Not use local expertise Strictly adhere to safe and ethical recommendations for researching GBV Share data that may be linked back to a group or an individual, including GBV survivors Seek out GBV survivors to speak to them specifically about their experiences of GBV Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  14. Quiz: Conducting Assessments Assume reported data on GBV/trends represent actual prevalence/trends in the extent of GBV Include GBV specialists on inter-agency and inter-sectoral teams Not include female assessors and translators when conducting assessments Conduct consultations in a secure setting where individuals feel safe to provide information and participate in discussions and decision-making Provide training for assessment team members on ethical and safety issues Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  15. Discussion: Is it always possible to include GBV in initial assessments? How can one ensure inclusion of at-risk groups in assessments? Who needs to be involved? Why is it the responsibility of FSA staff? Where does this responsibility ends? Who needs to be convinced? ALWAYS INVOLVED WOMEN AND OTHER AT- RISK GROUPS IN THE DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF FSA PROGRAMS Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  16. Resource Mobilization What are FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE commitments to Resource Mobilization for GBV risk reduction?

  17. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Resource Mobilization Key point: Funding for FSA-related GBV prevention and risk mitigation activities must be included in project proposals from the outset of emergency response Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  18. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Resource Mobilization In humanitarian settings, GBV resources tend to be linked to longer-term protection and stability initiatives Resources to address GBV in emergencies are often limited The Guidelines provide recommendations on incorporating GBV risk mitigation activities into project proposals Donors are encouraged to reference this section to ensure GBV issues are included in FSA proposals Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  19. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Resource Mobilization GBV risk based on gender analysis and safety audit Proposed intervention Risk vs. benefits Adapted intervention Impact? Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  20. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE ? GBV-related points to consider for inclusion in a proposal (Pg. 44): 1). Humanitarian Needs Overview/Situation Analysis: Describe the vulnerabilities of women, girls and other at-risk groups; 2). Project Rationale/Justification: Explain GBV-related risks related to FSA interventions in your context; 3). Project Description: Explain which activities may help in preventing or mitigating GBV Describe mechanisms that facilitate reporting of GBV in safe and ethical manner Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  21. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE? How to measure GBV-related points to consider for inclusion in a proposal, cont d: Monitoring and Evaluation: M&E plan should track progress and adverse effects on GBV mainstreaming activities; M&E plan should include the participation of women, girls and other at- risk groups; Include outcome-level indicators to measure program impact on GBV- related risks; Disaggregate indicators by sex, age, disability and other vulnerability factors Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  22. THE IASC GENDER MARKER Both Gender marker and GBV mainstreaming address issues of women and girls empowerment and gender equality and include men and boys as partners in prevention. = Tool that codes (0-2 scale) whether or not a humanitarian project is designed well enough to ensure that women/girls, men/boys will benefit equally from it or that it will advance gender equality in another way Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  23. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE? Some examples of GBV mainstreaming activities that can be included in proposals: Ensuring land access for women and girls Designing safe distributions with equitable access for at risk groups (disabled persons, women and girls) Resettlement options for GBV survivors Designing culturally relevant livestock programs that consider ownership, control, care and management Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  24. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOODS? Do you have other examples of mitigation strategies? Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  25. Activity: Resource Mobilization In Small Groups: Review the assigned proposal in light with the resource mobilization checklist of the Guidelines and highlight: Good practices Gaps Proposed strategies to address these gaps. Tools needed to better design proposals Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  26. Discussion: Is GBV-related activities in FSA programs always cost-effective? Why should it be considered? Do donors always support GBV-related activities in FSA programs? What can be some of these barriers? GBV MAINSTREAMING ACTIVITIES ALWAYS CONTRIBUTE TO GOOD FSA PROGRAMMING Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  27. Implementation What are our commitments to include GBV prevention and mitigation within ongoing and new FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE activities?

  28. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Implementation Key takeaway: If effectively designed, FSA programmes can mitigate risks of GBV: Availability, access and utilization of food for vulnerable groups Participation of women and girls in FSA related committees and decision making processes Safe commodity and cash-based interventions Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  29. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Implementation Provides guidance for putting GBV-related risk reduction responsibilities into practice Activities to improve the overall quality of GBV-related prevention and mitigation strategies: Establish GBV-related responsibilities common to all actors working within FSA Recommend strategies for FSA actors to reduce risks Maximize immediate protection of GBV survivors and persons at risk and foster longer-term interventions to eliminate GBV 3 main types of responsibilities: programming, policies, and communications & information sharing Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  30. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE? From page 45: Identify appropriate livestock responses that do not increase the labour burden or reduce access to key assets for women and other at-risk groups. Ensure that the chosen transfer modality is substantial enough to meet food requirements so that women, girls and other at-risk groups are deterred from having to exchange sex for food and/or agricultural inputs. Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  31. Activity- Implementation Option 1: Review Mitigation Strategies In small groups: 1. Review recommended mitigation strategies 2. Add any strategies missing 3. Prioritize 2-3 key strategies that should be prioritized 4. Highlight operational challenges Rotate teams: troubleshoot challenges, provide recommendations 5. Create operational action plan: i. Key actions ii. Coordination amongst key actors iii. Resources / support required Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  32. Activity- Implementation Option 2: Mitigating GBV risk in Program Strategy Review current programmatic strategy In small groups: 1. 2. 3. 4. Highlight GBV mitigation strategies currently integrated Review Guideline recommended mitigation strategies Prioritize 2-3 key strategies that should be prioritized Create operational action plan: i. ii. iii. iv. Information needed Key actions Coordination amongst key actors Resources / support required Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  33. Discussion: Prioritization and Selection Criteria How to prioritize GBV risk reduction in FSA programs? What types of investments are required? What vulnerability criteria would you use for beneficiaries? What challenges are associated with these? How should sensitive information be managed to protect affected populations, including survivors of GBV? DON T SINGLE OUT GBV SURVIVORS OR VULNERABLE GROUPS 33

  34. Coordination What are our commitments to include GBV prevention and mitigation within ongoing and new FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE activities?

  35. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination Key takeaways: GBV prevention and risk reduction is most effective when done in coordination with both GBV specialists and other sectors Recommends specific actions for FSA actors to coordinate with others Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  36. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination Supports humanitarian actors to define responsibilities and accountability mechanisms in GBV prevention and response efforts Establish responsibilities for humanitarian actors in the prevention and mitigation of GBV Maximize immediate protection of GBV survivors and persons at risk through multi-sectoral coordination on response to GBV incidents Coordination activities can move across the 3 main types of responsibilities: programming, policies, and communications & information sharing and may also include advocacy / efforts for: Assessment Resource Mobilization Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  37. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Coordination GBV Specialists can assist FSA actors to (Pg. 51): 1. Design and conduct FSA assessments that examine the risks of GBV, and strategize ways to mitigate these risks Provide trainings for FSA staff on issues of gender, GBV and women s/human rights Develop standard operating procedures (SOPs) for FSA actors 2. 3. Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  38. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE? Coordinationwith GBV Specialists cont d GBV Specialists can assist FSA actors to: 4. Identify where survivors can receive care, and provide FSA staff with skills and information to respond supportively to survivors Provide training for the affected community on issues of gender, GBV and women s/human rights as they relate to FSA rights Review relevant statutory and customary laws and policies to strengthen GBV-related legal protections 5. 6. Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  39. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE: Coordination with other sectors (p. 52) FSA actors can work with (e.g.: SHELTER/WASH actors): Where stoves and cooking fuel are the responsibility of SS&R actors, consult them on the provision of energy- efficient cooking stoves and safe fuel options Work with WASH actors to facilitate access to and use of water for cooking needs, agricultural lands and livestock Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  40. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE: Coordination for cross-cutting issues Also coordinate with partners addressing: gender mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) HIV age environment Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  41. Activity: Coordination Option 1: Mechanisms to Support Program Implementation Return to small groups from the implementation activity: 1. Reflect on the specific actions recommended 2. Who needs to be involved to execute this action GBV specialists Other clusters 3. What type of coordination is required be specific - - Roles and responsibilities Accountability mechanisms Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  42. Activity: Coordination Mapping With what sectors would FSA benefit from stronger coordination? i. ii. iii. iv. What coordination mechanisms exist to support collaboration Key actions Who is responsible, accountable, needs to be informed How will you monitor progress How could FSA and protection actors better coordinate/work together? i. What coordination mechanisms exist to support collaboration ii. Key actions iii. Who is responsible, accountable, needs to be informed iv. How will you monitor progress Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  43. Suggested recommendations about referrals in the Guidelines All humanitarian personnel who engage with affected populations should have up to date written information about where to refer survivors for care and support. Ensure training on how to respectfully and supportively engage with survivors and provide risk reporting and/or referral information in an ethical, safe and confidential manner Any programmes that share information about reports of GBV must abide by safety and ethical standards (e.g. shared information does not reveal the identity of or pose a security risk to individual survivors, their families or the broader community) Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  44. Activity: Coordination Option 3: Coordination and Referrals w/ GBV specialists In small groups discuss: Map the current referral mechanism where your activities are ongoing - What services are available - Which actors are involved What are your responsibilities within the referral mechanism? - Who do you immediately report an incident to? - Are there cases where you are unable to refer? What happens when there is no referral mechanism in place or when it is not functioning? - What are your responsibilities in this situation? Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  45. Monitoring and Evaluation What are priority indicators for GBV prevention and risk mitigation in FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE programming?

  46. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Monitoring & Evaluation Key Point: Indicators can be used to measure the outcomes of activities undertaken across the programme cycle, with the ultimate aim of maintaining effective programmes and improving accountability Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  47. A walk through the FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE TAG: Monitoring & Evaluation Why? Limited evidence exists on effective integration of GBV programming in other sectors Indicators in the Guidelines aim to: Track outputs resulting from interventions to affected populations Chart outcome of cluster activities Measure progress toward objectives, considering diversity of affected populations & their perspectives of the response Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  48. Monitoring & Evaluation: Indicators Why? Limited evidence exists on effective integration of GBV programming in other sectors Indicators in the Guidelines aim to: Track outputs resulting from interventions to affected populations Chart outcome of cluster activities Measure progress toward objectives, considering diversity of affected populations & their perspectives of the response Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  49. Monitoring & Evaluation: Reporting Analyze existing data using a GBV lens to improve GBV prevention and response Example: Existence of cultural norms that prevent women from owning land What are the implications of the findings? How may this affect GBV prevention and mitigation? Failing to meet a target can lead to response and resource mobilization Use data for action across the programme cycle Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

  50. What does this mean for FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE (Pg. 53)? # of assessments by FSA sector that include GBV-related questions # of FSA staff who participated in a training on gender, GBV and human rights # of affected persons who report concerns about experiencing GBV when asked about participating in a commodity- or cash- based intervention # of females who report retaining control over agricultural inputs and/or livestock Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#