Grants for Homeless Re-Entry Housing Support

 
Alameda County Fair Chance
Housing Outreach &
Participatory Research
Proposals
 
PURPOSE OF GRANTS:
HOMELESS PREVENTION OF
RE-ENTRY POPULATION AND
RE-INTEGRATION HOUSING
SUPPORT RESEARCH
Ensure that people returning
home know about new
rights to housing access AND
re-entry housing resources
Participatory research to
show how housing access
affects reintegration success
 
Grant Proposal on Re-entry Homelessness Prevention:  Community
Outreach on Fair Chance Housing & Re-entry Housing Resources
 
Partnership:  Just Cities, AUON, BOSS, ASPC, CURYJ
73% of Oakland Homeless Encampment residents
have a criminal record (Just Cities/Goldman School
research survey)
Ensure that 20,000 residents know about new legal
rights AND housing resources
Network power with leading re-entry groups
COVID outreach
Power of cultural arts & inspiration
Networks + Safe Street Outreach + Social Media +
Multimedia + Billboards/Bus Ads
Leverages $532,000/2 years from City of Oakland &
private foundations
AC Request:  $176,000/2 years
 
Grant Proposal on
Housing & Re-entry
Participatory
Impact Evaluation
Study
 
Current research gaps on housing/re-entry
Partnership w/ Prof Veronica Terriquez, UCLA Urban Planning, Just Cities & UC Berkeley Future
Histories Lab & City Planning
Co-led by Re-entry Leaders for transformative justice research model
Evaluates impact of the FCH policies & housing stability to re-entry success
Assesses any unintended consequences of removing discriminatory barrier
Private/Public Funding Committed:  $264,000/2years
AC Request: $154,000/2 years
 
Fair Chance Housing Policy Participatory Impact Evaluation- Purpose & Results
 
1.
First evaluation study of fair chance housing policies in the nation
2.
Provides data that Oakland & Berkeley government officials need to maintain the
ordinances
3.
Provides data that other jurisdictions are looking for in order to pass new fair chance
housing laws
4.
Potential resulting data from the impact evaluation study:
a.
How many people were able to access housing when discrimination was
removed?
b.
What types of housing were people able to access?  (This helps make the case
that formerly incarcerated people are not a monolith)?
c.
What support services and resources were available and needed to find and
maintain housing?
d.
What are ongoing housing barriers?
e.
What are any unintended consequences of removing discrimination?
 
Reentry Housing Research- Purpose & Results
 
Provide data on the relationship between housing stability and anti-
recidivism:
Lack of adequate research on housing and anti-recidivism
Shift funding priorities for dignified housing for formerly incarcerated
people, and other solutions that lead to successful reintegration
 
Distinction from BARHII Work
 
BARHII- Providing leadership training programs on racial equity
 
→ BARHII is not conducting an evaluation of Fair Chance Housing policies enacted in Berkeley
and Oakland.
→ BARHII is not conducting research on reentry housing and the role of housing stability on
anti-recidivism.
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This initiative focuses on preventing re-entry homelessness by ensuring access to fair chance housing and reintegration resources. Through participatory research, the project aims to inform returning individuals about new housing rights and resources, ultimately enhancing reintegration success.

  • Homeless Prevention
  • Re-Entry Housing
  • Fair Chance Housing
  • Housing Support
  • Participatory Research

Uploaded on Feb 17, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PURPOSE OF GRANTS: HOMELESS PREVENTION OF RE-ENTRY POPULATION AND RE-INTEGRATION HOUSING SUPPORT RESEARCH Ensure that people returning home know about new rights to housing access AND re-entry housing resources Participatory research to show how housing access affects reintegration success Alameda County Fair Chance Housing Outreach & Participatory Research Proposals

  2. Grant Proposal on Re-entry Homelessness Prevention: Community Outreach on Fair Chance Housing & Re-entry Housing Resources Partnership: Just Cities, AUON, BOSS, ASPC, CURYJ 73% of Oakland Homeless Encampment residents have a criminal record (Just Cities/Goldman School research survey) Ensure that 20,000 residents know about new legal rights AND housing resources Network power with leading re-entry groups COVID outreach Power of cultural arts & inspiration Networks + Safe Street Outreach + Social Media + Multimedia + Billboards/Bus Ads Leverages $532,000/2 years from City of Oakland & private foundations AC Request: $176,000/2 years

  3. Current research gaps on housing/re-entry Grant Proposal on Housing & Re-entry Participatory Impact Evaluation Study Partnership w/ Prof Veronica Terriquez, UCLA Urban Planning, Just Cities & UC Berkeley Future Histories Lab & City Planning Co-led by Re-entry Leaders for transformative justice research model Evaluates impact of the FCH policies & housing stability to re-entry success Assesses any unintended consequences of removing discriminatory barrier Private/Public Funding Committed: $264,000/2years AC Request: $154,000/2 years

  4. Fair Chance Housing Policy Participatory Impact Evaluation- Purpose & Results 1. First evaluation study of fair chance housing policies in the nation 2. Provides data that Oakland & Berkeley government officials need to maintain the ordinances 3. Provides data that other jurisdictions are looking for in order to pass new fair chance housing laws 4. Potential resulting data from the impact evaluation study: a. How many people were able to access housing when discrimination was removed? b. What types of housing were people able to access? (This helps make the case that formerly incarcerated people are not a monolith)? c. What support services and resources were available and needed to find and maintain housing? d. What are ongoing housing barriers? e. What are any unintended consequences of removing discrimination?

  5. Reentry Housing Research- Purpose & Results Provide data on the relationship between housing stability and anti- recidivism: Lack of adequate research on housing and anti-recidivism Shift funding priorities for dignified housing for formerly incarcerated people, and other solutions that lead to successful reintegration

  6. Distinction from BARHII Work BARHII- Providing leadership training programs on racial equity BARHII is not conducting an evaluation of Fair Chance Housing policies enacted in Berkeley and Oakland. BARHII is not conducting research on reentry housing and the role of housing stability on anti-recidivism.

Related


More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#