Good Laboratory Practices Study Protocols for Effective Research Management

 
GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICES
STUDY PROTOCOLS
 (
PART 1I)
 
FEED THE FUTURE INNOVATION LAB FOR LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS
 
Supplemental materials for Good Laboratory Management Training Manual for Trainers
Prepared by Richard Fethiere, University of Florida
 
Background
 
 Protocol: GLP requirements
 Protocol: Approval process
 Amendments
 Study plan
 Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
 
PROTOCOL: GLP REQUIREMENTS
 
Test System
 
Description:
Species, strain, health status
Age, weight, source
Environmental conditions, husbandry
Diet, source, and possible contaminants
Justification of choice
Guidelines, regulations
Background data
 
PROTOCOL: GLP REQUIREMENTS
 
Experimental Design (depending on the study)
Dosing details: levels and frequency
Vehicles
Preparation
Quality Control (QC)
Animal randomization
Pre-test
During study/cages/racks
 
READING:
SECTIONS 8.1 AND 8.2 OF THE
OECD REGULATIONS
 
PROTOCOL: APPROVAL PROCESS
 
Approval/Review
Approved and dated by Study Director before study starts
Allow time for protocol review by Quality Assurance (QA) unit
Allow time for corrections
Allow time for distribution to study staff
Allow time for pre-study meeting
 
AMENDMENTS
 
Main elements
Study/protocol identification and unique issue number
Clear description of change & sections changed
Reason for change
Approval by Study Director
Review process
Circulated to all staff who received the protocol
Amendments are only
used for planned changes
to the study.
 
AMENDMENTS
 
Protocol circulation list
Study Director
Sponsor
Management (research
director)
Main file
Archives
Quality Assurance unit
 
Tech in charge
Animal husbandry
Analy
tical lab
Necropsy
Pathology
Statistician
 
STUDY PLAN
 
Study Time Plan 
(Rules
#115) on Excel with dates
Animals’ reception
Acclimation
Randomization
Formulation and dosing
Analyses of formulations
 
Signs
Feed consumption
Bodyweight
Blood chemistry
Urine analysis
Necropsy
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Written detailed instructions
Cover all lab activities
Provides an in-depth description of who does what, when, where, and
how
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
For successful SOP implementation
Management must develop an SOP culture
Must train on SOP
Must manage SOP system
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
System characteristics
Part of lab master documentation system
Cover all activities
Administration/personnel management
Safety/hygiene
Technical
Readable, clear, precise, practical
Fully understood and followed
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
System characteristics
Responsible person for each SOP
Immediately available
Formal change control
Central organization around SOP (Quality Assurance)
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Centralized organization - roles
Set standard format imposed
Be single point of contact for identification numbers (ID)/
Numbers/Issuance
Manage changes (versions): Traceability
Ensure distribution / destruction
Ensure cross-departmental coherence of SOP
Review by Quality Assurance Unit
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Sections in SOP should be standardized e.g.
Title
Purpose
General
Highlights principal features
Provides background information
Procedure
Instructions in logical/chronological order
References and help
 Whom to contact in case of encountering issues
 
ACTIVITY:
BRAINSTROMING AND SOP DISCUSSION
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Benefits from a good SOP system
Standardized, consistent procedures, reduce test-to-test variability
Means of study reconstruction
Optimize the way of doing things
Record technical and administrative improvements
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Benefits from a good SOP system
Approval by management formalizes their commitment to quality
Ease of documenting complicated techniques
Continuity in case of personnel turnover
Forms training manual
Means of communication (e.g., during audits, visits, technology transfer)
 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
(SOP)
 
Benefits from a good SOP system
Different ways to present an SOP
Important to register the date of adoption of the SOP – necessary for
traceability
In Europe, the Quality Assurance Unit signs the SOP (not necessary
everywhere)
 
Consult the Good Laboratory Management Training Manual for Trainers
https://livestocklab.ifas.ufl.edu/resources/glp/
Direct link to manual in PDF:
 
https://livestocklab.ifas.ufl.edu/media/livestocklabifasufledu/pdf-
/MANUAL-Fethiere_UF_Good-lab-management-practices_2022.pdf
 
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Supplemental materials providing detailed protocols for implementing Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) in research settings. The protocols cover GLP requirements, experimental design, reading regulatory sections, approval processes, amendments, circulation lists, and study plans. These materials aim to ensure adherence to guidelines, regulations, and quality control measures throughout the research process.

  • Laboratory Practices
  • Research Protocols
  • GLP Requirements
  • Study Management
  • Regulatory Compliance

Uploaded on Mar 28, 2024 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICES STUDY PROTOCOLS (PART 1I) Supplemental materials for Good Laboratory Management Training Manual for Trainers Prepared by Richard Fethiere, University of Florida FEED THE FUTURE INNOVATION LAB FOR LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS Photo Credit Goes Here

  2. Protocol: GLP requirements Protocol: Approval process Background Amendments Study plan Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)

  3. PROTOCOL: GLP REQUIREMENTS Test System Description: Species, strain, health status Age, weight, source Environmental conditions, husbandry Diet, source, and possible contaminants Justification of choice Guidelines, regulations Background data

  4. PROTOCOL: GLP REQUIREMENTS Experimental Design (depending on the study) Dosing details: levels and frequency Vehicles Preparation Quality Control (QC) Animal randomization Pre-test During study/cages/racks

  5. READING: SECTIONS 8.1 AND 8.2 OF THE OECD REGULATIONS

  6. PROTOCOL: APPROVAL PROCESS Approval/Review Approved and dated by Study Director before study starts Allow time for protocol review by Quality Assurance (QA) unit Allow time for corrections Allow time for distribution to study staff Allow time for pre-study meeting

  7. AMENDMENTS Main elements Study/protocol identification and unique issue number Clear description of change & sections changed Amendments are only used for planned changes to the study. Reason for change Approval by Study Director Review process Circulated to all staff who received the protocol

  8. AMENDMENTS Protocol circulation list Study Director Tech in charge Sponsor Animal husbandry Management (research director) Analytical lab Necropsy Main file Pathology Archives Statistician Quality Assurance unit

  9. STUDY PLAN Study Time Plan (Rules #115) on Excel with dates Signs Animals reception Feed consumption Acclimation Bodyweight Randomization Blood chemistry Formulation and dosing Urine analysis Analyses of formulations Necropsy

  10. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Written detailed instructions Cover all lab activities Provides an in-depth description of who does what, when, where, and how

  11. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) For successful SOP implementation Management must develop an SOP culture Must train on SOP Must manage SOP system

  12. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) System characteristics Part of lab master documentation system Cover all activities Administration/personnel management Safety/hygiene Technical Readable, clear, precise, practical Fully understood and followed

  13. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) System characteristics Responsible person for each SOP Immediately available Formal change control Central organization around SOP (Quality Assurance)

  14. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Centralized organization - roles Set standard format imposed Be single point of contact for identification numbers (ID)/ Numbers/Issuance Manage changes (versions): Traceability Ensure distribution / destruction Ensure cross-departmental coherence of SOP Review by Quality Assurance Unit

  15. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Sections in SOP should be standardized e.g. Title Purpose General Highlights principal features Provides background information Procedure Instructions in logical/chronological order References and help Whom to contact in case of encountering issues

  16. ACTIVITY: BRAINSTROMING AND SOP DISCUSSION

  17. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Benefits from a good SOP system Standardized, consistent procedures, reduce test-to-test variability Means of study reconstruction Optimize the way of doing things Record technical and administrative improvements

  18. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Benefits from a good SOP system Approval by management formalizes their commitment to quality Ease of documenting complicated techniques Continuity in case of personnel turnover Forms training manual Means of communication (e.g., during audits, visits, technology transfer)

  19. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) Benefits from a good SOP system Different ways to present an SOP Important to register the date of adoption of the SOP necessary for traceability In Europe, the Quality Assurance Unit signs the SOP (not necessary everywhere)

  20. Consult the Good Laboratory Management Training Manual for Trainers https://livestocklab.ifas.ufl.edu/resources/glp/ Direct link to manual in PDF: https://livestocklab.ifas.ufl.edu/media/livestocklabifasufledu/pdf- /MANUAL-Fethiere_UF_Good-lab-management-practices_2022.pdf

  21. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems https://livestocklab.ifas.ufl.edu/ (Subscribe to newsletter) livestock-lab@ufl.edu Disclaimer This work was funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau for Food Security under Agreement #AID-OAA-L-15-00003 as part of Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems, and by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP#1175487. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed here are those of the authors alone.

  22. www.feedthefuture.gov

More Related Content

giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#giItT1WQy@!-/#