Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP) Process Overview
Falls Risk Assessment and
Management Plan
(FRAMP)
O
u
t
l
i
n
e
o
f
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Revision process for the Falls Risk Management Tool
(FRMT)
Overview of changes
Development of the FRAMP
Trial of the FRAMP
Evaluation of trial
How to use the Falls Risk Assessment and Management
Plan (FRAMP)
Questions
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
F
R
M
T
2010 FRMT introduced
2013 -14 FRMT revision - evaluated what worked
well, what could be improved and made updates in
line with best practice and NSQHS standards
Challenges
Flow not always intuitive
Screening process could be refined
Some interventions could be clearer
No capacity for additional input on form
Requirement to go between FRMT and nursing care
plan
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
F
R
M
T
Thorough review process over 18 months
Started with survey of almost 500 nursing staff :-
What was working?
What wasn’t working?
Revised by a multidisciplinary, multi-site working party
Significant consultation process with clinical staff at all trial
sites during development and feedback incorporated
Integration of NSQHS Standard 10 requirements
Assessment and interventions updated to reflect latest
evidence and best practice
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Screening process now in flow chart format
Interventions more specific and targeted
Referral to the form for shift by shift sign - rather than the
nursing care plan
Designated space for multidisciplinary input
Space to easily record patient and carer:
Education
Involvement in the development of falls management plan
Everything in the one form - name changed to reflect this
Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP)
T
r
i
a
l
o
f
F
R
A
M
P
Trialled for 6 weeks
Bentley, Fremantle, SCGH and RPH
12 wards in total – 3 at each site
Evaluation via staff survey - 149 staff participated
Feedback incorporated
So….. what did staff say?
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
n
i
n
t
u
i
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
?
P
r
o
m
p
t
s
a
r
e
-
s
c
r
e
e
n
?
I
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
F
R
A
M
P
?
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
/
c
a
r
e
r
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
?
D
i
r
e
c
t
c
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
/
F
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
“Need More space to sign on the shift by shift check”
“There is more to read and more pages to fill out,
however, the information on FRAMP is more detailed and
is better for the patient. Is better to use for patient care.”
“Both are simple. FRAMP made me engage more with
falls risk management of my patient”
Overall more positive feedback than negative!!
Note: Acceptability of the form was associated with
education
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
(
P
a
g
e
1
)
S
t
e
p
1
C
h
e
c
k
f
o
r
a
n
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
e
v
e
r
y
s
h
i
f
t
S
t
e
p
2
I
f
N
O
t
o
a
l
l
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
e
n
t
u
r
n
t
o
P
a
g
e
3
w
h
e
r
e
s
h
i
f
t
b
y
s
h
i
f
t
s
i
g
n
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
S
t
e
p
3
I
f
Y
E
S
t
o
a
n
y
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
e
n
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
b
e
l
o
w
t
o
s
c
r
e
e
n
t
h
e
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
(
P
a
g
e
1
c
o
n
t
.
)
S
t
e
p
1
T
i
c
k
t
h
e
b
o
x
t
o
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
s
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
S
t
e
p
2
C
i
r
c
l
e
Y
E
S
o
r
N
O
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
u
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
S
t
e
p
3
F
i
l
l
o
u
t
y
o
u
r
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
S
t
e
p
4
I
f
t
h
e
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
i
s
a
Y
E
S
t
o
A
N
Y
,
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
g
e
s
2
,
3
&
4
N
O
t
o
A
L
L
,
t
u
r
n
t
o
p
a
g
e
3
.
R
i
s
k
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
i
s
e
d
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
a
g
e
2
)
S
t
e
p
1
A
s
s
e
s
s
t
h
e
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
s
r
i
s
k
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
t
h
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
h
a
d
e
d
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
a
p
p
l
y
S
t
e
p
2
S
e
l
e
c
t
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
m
a
n
a
g
e
t
h
e
r
i
s
k
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
&
S
h
i
f
t
B
y
S
h
i
f
t
C
h
e
c
k
(
P
g
3
)
S
t
e
p
1
C
h
e
c
k
a
l
l
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
i
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
s
S
t
e
p
2
D
a
t
e
a
n
d
I
n
i
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
O
n
l
y
o
r
f
o
r
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
A
N
D
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
i
s
e
d
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
e
a
c
h
s
h
i
f
t
O
t
h
e
r
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
i
s
e
d
I
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
P
a
t
i
e
n
t
E
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
(
P
g
4
)
S
t
e
p
2
F
o
r
p
a
t
i
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
a
t
r
i
s
k
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
t
h
e
i
r
r
i
s
k
s
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
c
a
r
e
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
.
S
i
g
n
o
f
f
w
h
e
n
t
h
i
s
i
s
d
o
n
e
.
S
t
e
p
1
A
n
y
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
t
e
a
m
c
a
n
b
e
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
h
e
r
e
o
n
c
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
n
u
r
s
e
S
t
e
p
3
K
n
o
w
t
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
p
o
i
n
t
s
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
The FRAMP is a summary (and ready reference) of
Australian best practice guidelines to reduce falls in
hospital
Clinical staff were consulted prior to revising the FRMT,
during development of FRAMP and after trial of the
FRAMP
In a direct comparison of FRAMP Vs FRMT - FRAMP
came out on top!
Majority of staff found the FRAMP either easier or about
the same as the FRMT
Staff reported making significant positive changes to
practice using the FRAMP
Q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
The presentation outlines the process of revising the Falls Risk Management Tool (FRMT), development and trial of the Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP), and evaluation of the trial. Key improvements include a more intuitive screening process, clearer interventions, and enhanced input capabilities, leading to the all-inclusive FRAMP form. The FRAMP was trialed successfully and feedback was incorporated to ensure staff satisfaction and efficiency in falls risk management.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. Download presentation by click this link. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP)
Outline of presentation Revision process for the Falls Risk Management Tool (FRMT) Overview of changes Development of the FRAMP Trial of the FRAMP Evaluation of trial How to use the Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP) Questions
Revision of FRMT 2010 FRMT introduced 2013 -14 FRMT revision - evaluated what worked well, what could be improved and made updates in line with best practice and NSQHS standards Challenges Flow not always intuitive Screening process could be refined Some interventions could be clearer No capacity for additional input on form Requirement to go between FRMT and nursing care plan
Revision of FRMT Thorough review process over 18 months Started with survey of almost 500 nursing staff :- What was working? What wasn t working? Revised by a multidisciplinary, multi-site working party Significant consultation process with clinical staff at all trial sites during development and feedback incorporated Integration of NSQHS Standard 10 requirements Assessment and interventions updated to reflect latest evidence and best practice
Overview of improvements Screening process now in flow chart format Interventions more specific and targeted Referral to the form for shift by shift sign - rather than the nursing care plan Designated space for multidisciplinary input Space to easily record patient and carer: Education Involvement in the development of falls management plan Everything in the one form - name changed to reflect this Falls Risk Assessment and Management Plan (FRAMP)
Trial of FRAMP Trialled for 6 weeks Bentley, Fremantle, SCGH and RPH 12 wards in total 3 at each site Evaluation via staff survey - 149 staff participated Feedback incorporated So .. what did staff say?
Comments/Feedback Need More space to sign on the shift by shift check There is more to read and more pages to fill out, however, the information on FRAMP is more detailed and is better for the patient. Is better to use for patient care. Both are simple. FRAMP made me engage more with falls risk management of my patient Overall more positive feedback than negative!! Note: Acceptability of the form was associated with education
Screening Process (Page 1) Step 1 Check for any change each and every shift Step 2 If NO to all questions then turn to Page 3 where shift by shift sign is located Step 3 If YES to any questions then proceed below to screen the patient
Screening Process (Page 1 cont.) Step 1 Step 2 Tick the box to indicate the reason for the screen Circle YES or NO for each of the four screening questions Step 4 Step 3 If the patient is a YES to ANY, complete pages 2,3 &4 Fill out your details NO to ALL, turn to page 3.
Risk Assessment and Individualised Interventions (Page 2) Step 1 Step 2 Assess the patients risk against the questions in the shaded area and initial all that apply Select Interventions to help manage the risks identified
Minimum Interventions & Shift By Shift Check (Pg 3) Step 1 Step 2 Check all appropriate minimum interventions are in place for all patients Date and Initial for Minimum Interventions Only or for Minimum AND Individualised Interventions each shift
Other Individualised Interventions and Patient Engagement (Pg4) Step 1 Any additional interventions from the team can be written here once discussed with the nurse Step 2 For patients identified at risk discuss their risks and plan care together. Sign off when this is done. Step 3 Know the important practice points
Conclusion The FRAMP is a summary (and ready reference) of Australian best practice guidelines to reduce falls in hospital Clinical staff were consulted prior to revising the FRMT, during development of FRAMP and after trial of the FRAMP In a direct comparison of FRAMP Vs FRMT - FRAMP came out on top! Majority of staff found the FRAMP either easier or about the same as the FRMT Staff reported making significant positive changes to practice using the FRAMP
